Maybe. INFJs are hard to explain because Ni is hard to explain, but this should suffice as a comprehensive checklist.
INFP: âFollow your heartâ INFJ: âFollow your intuitionâ
INFP: Inner world of personal values. Introspective with regards to their feelings. INFJ: Inner world of personal hunches. Introspective with regards to their intuition.
INFP: Puts themselves in other peopleâs shoes to empathize. INFJ: Tries to empathize with others based on an objective understanding of human emotion.
INFP: Personal ethics. A subjective moral compass. Doesnât really care if you agree. INFJ: Objective ethics. An external source of morality to follow (religion, interpersonal ethics, law, other people, etc.) Cares if you agree (either to coerce you onto their side, switch to your side, or find some middle ground).
INFP: âThe world is full of possibilities. The world is an inspiration to my imagination.â INFJ: âThe mind contains possibilities. The world is a distraction from my intuitive introspection.â
INFP: Explores new directions and info in an open-minded way to observe new possibilities. INFJ: Sticks only to the info that pertains directly to the hunch thatâs caught in their mindâs eye and that theyâre struggling to bring to fruition.
INFP: How does the world seem to fit in with my sentimental ideals? INFJ: How does the world seem to fit in with my dispassionate ideas, principles, and systematic models?
INFP: âThatâs just the way I feel about it.â INFJ: âThatâs just the way I think about it.â
INFP: Retains past experiences and reliable knowledge to recall and apply later. Reminiscent and nostalgic. INFJ: Retains tentative hunches and intuitions to see how they will evolve inside the psyche into something greater, (though still tentative.) Visionary and prospective.
INFP: Deep wisdom through knowledge and experience. INFJ: Deep perspective through intuitive contemplation.
INFP: Recoils from impartiality (or apathy) and from having their opinion influenced by external coercion, to the point where actually doing so is uncomfortable. So they tend to maintain their own sentimental opinion in the face of unpleasant evidence to the contrary, and react harshly to valid criticism. INFJ: Recoils from face-value details and facts, and from observing new information that doesnât pertain directly to what theyâre focusing on, to the point where actually doing so is uncomfortable. So they tend to be oblivious to important details and real-world responsibilities/occurrences outside their area of focus, even if those occurrences are important. They usually freeze up at times where they need to improvise or adapt to changing circumstances. Sometimes trust their gut over the actual observations, even if their gut is wrong.
INFP: Sometimes snaps and becomes overly callous, passive-aggressive, or even combative, or else retains a non-judgmental, non-assertive demeanor. INFJ: Tends to overindulge in sensory gratification or ascetically neglect it.
Edit for additional basic nuances. Some of these may just be confusing, in which case I suggest just sticking to the above differences.
INFP: More interested in sentimental judgments than in the perception of possibilities. Focusing on whatâs sentimentally important is a priority over reading between the lines and peering behind the scenes. INFJ: More interested in the perception of possibilities than in sentimental judgments. Reading between the lines and peering behind the scenes is a priority over focusing on whatâs sentimentally important.
INFP: More interested in absorbing certain and reliable facts than in forming dispassionate conclusions or dispassionate ideas. Being informed of the certain and obvious facts is more important than being dispassionate in analysis. INFJ: More interested in forming dispassionate conclusions or dispassionate ideas than in absorbing certain and reliable facts. Being dispassionate in analysis is more important than being informed of the certain and obvious facts.
INFP: Uses the outer world as more of a source of raw information to absorb than as a guide, standard, or criteria for decision making. INFJ: Uses the outer world as more of a guide, standard, or criteria for decision making than as a source of raw information to absorb.
INFP: Uses inner impressions as more of a guide for decision making than as a source of raw information. INFJ: Uses inner impressions as more of a source of raw information than as a guide for decision making.
















