Gun safety being taught in an Indiana school, 1956
Today's Document

Janaina Medeiros

romaâ

Origami Around

Discoholic đŞŠ

blake kathryn

if i look back, i am lost
Not today Justin
todays bird
YOU ARE THE REASON
cherry valley forever
Monterey Bay Aquarium
occasionally subtle

çĽćĽ / Permanent Vacation
trying on a metaphor

PR's Tumblrdome
Keni

ellievsbear
noise dept.
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

seen from Iraq

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from Spain
seen from Chile

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@sehsclsdaddy
Gun safety being taught in an Indiana school, 1956

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
And it has a handle
Finger foods
Dig in
Check out this beauty!Â

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
This is how the sky hotel - which can house 5000 guests - never has to land đŽâď¸
(source)
general relativity for babies
babies? Hell, Iâm an adult this is the clearest and most understandable explaination Iâve ever seen. This book is for anyone
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
âEvery day in communities across the United States, children and adolescents spend the majority of their waking hours in schools that have increasingly come to resemble places of detention more than places of learning.â
 - Investigative journalist Annette Fuentes
This is what it means to go back-to-school in America today.
Instead of making the schools safer, government officials are making them more authoritarian.
Instead of raising up a generation of civic-minded citizens with critical thinking skills, government officials are churning out compliant drones who know little to nothing about their history or their freedoms.
And instead of being taught the three Râs of education (reading, writing and arithmetic), young people are being drilled in the three Iâs of life in the American police state: indoctrination, intimidation and intolerance.
From the moment a child enters one of the nationâs 98,000 public schools to the moment he or she graduates, they will be exposed to a steady diet of:
draconian zero tolerance policies that criminalize childish behavior,
overreaching anti-bullying statutes that criminalize speech,
school resource officers (police) tasked with disciplining and/or arresting so-called âdisorderlyâ students,
standardized testing that emphasizes rote answers over critical thinking,
politically correct mindsets that teach young people to censor themselves and those around them,
and extensive biometric and surveillance systems that, coupled with the rest, acclimate young people to a world in which they have no freedom of thought, speech or movement.
Roped into the governmentâs profit-driven campaign to keep the nation âsafeâ from drugs, disease, and weapons, the schools have transformed themselves into quasi-prisons, complete with surveillance cameras, metal detectors, police patrols, zero tolerance policies, lock downs, drug sniffing dogs, strip searches and active shooter drills.
Young people in America are now first in line to be searched, surveilled, spied on, threatened, tied up, locked down, treated like criminals for non-criminal behavior, tasered and in some cases shot.
Students are not only punished for minor transgressions such as playing cops and robbers on the playground, bringing LEGOs to school, or having a food fight, but the punishments have become far more severe, shifting from detention and visits to the principalâs office into misdemeanor tickets, juvenile court, handcuffs, tasers and even prison terms.
Students have been suspended under school zero tolerance policies for bringing to school âlook alike substancesâ such as oregano, breath mints, birth control pills and powdered sugar.
Look-alike weapons (toy gunsâeven Lego-sized ones, hand-drawn pictures of guns, pencils twirled in a âthreateningâ manner, imaginary bows and arrows, fingers positioned like guns) can also land a student in hot water, in some cases getting them expelled from school or charged with a crime.
Not even good deeds go unpunished.
One 13-year-old was given detention for exposing the school to âliabilityâ by sharing his lunch with a hungry friend. A third grader was suspended for shaving her head in sympathy for a friend who had lost her hair to chemotherapy. And then there was the high school senior who was suspended for saying âbless youâ after a fellow classmate sneezed.
Having police in the schools only adds to the danger.
Thanks to a combination of media hype, political pandering and financial incentives, the use of armed police officers (a.k.a. school resource officers) to patrol school hallways has risen dramatically in the years since the Columbine school shooting.
Indeed, the growing presence of police in the nationâs schools is resulting in greater police âinvolvement in routine discipline matters that principals and parents used to address without involvement from law enforcement officers.â
Funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, these school resource officers have become de facto wardens in elementary, middle and high schools, doling out their own brand of justice to the so-called âcriminalsâ in their midst with the help of tasers, pepper spray, batons and brute force.
In the absence of school-appropriate guidelines, police are more and more âstepping in to deal with minor rulebreaking: sagging pants, disrespectful comments, brief physical skirmishes. What previously might have resulted in a detention or a visit to the principalâs office was replaced with excruciating pain and temporary blindness, often followed by a trip to the courthouse.â
Not even the younger, elementary school-aged kids are being spared these âhardeningâ tactics.
On any given day when school is in session, kids who âact upâ in class are pinned facedown on the floor, locked in dark closets, tied up with straps, bungee cords and duct tape, handcuffed, leg shackled, tasered or otherwise restrained, immobilized or placed in solitary confinement in order to bring them under âcontrol.â
In almost every case, these undeniably harsh methods are used to punish kidsâsome as young as 4 and 5 years oldâfor simply failing to follow directions or throwing tantrums.
Very rarely do the kids pose any credible danger to themselves or others.
Unbelievably, these tactics are all legal, at least when employed by school officials or school resource officers in the nationâs public schools.
This is what happens when you introduce police and police tactics into the schools.
Paradoxically, by the time you add in the lockdowns and active shooter drills, instead of making the schools safer, school officials have succeeded in creating an environment in which children are so traumatized that they suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, nightmares, anxiety, mistrust of adults in authority, as well as feelings of anger, depression, humiliation, despair and delusion.
For example, a middle school in Washington State went on lockdown after a student brought a toy gun to class. A Boston high school went into lockdown for four hours after a bullet was discovered in a classroom. A North Carolina elementary school locked down and called in police after a fifth grader reported seeing an unfamiliar man in the school (it turned out to be a parent).
Police officers at a Florida middle school carried out an active shooter drill in an effort to educate students about how to respond in the event of an actual shooting crisis. Two armed officers, guns loaded and drawn, burst into classrooms, terrorizing the students and placing the school into lockdown mode.
These police state tactics have not made the schools any safer.
The fallout has been what youâd expect, with the nationâs young people treated like hardened criminals: handcuffed, arrested, tasered, tackled and taught the painful lesson that the Constitution (especially the Fourth Amendment) doesnât mean much in the American police state.
So whatâs the answer, not only for the here-and-nowâthe children growing up in these quasi-prisonsâbut for the future of this country?
How do you convince a child who has been routinely handcuffed, shackled, tied down, locked up, and immobilized by government officialsâall before he reaches the age of adulthoodâthat he has any rights at all, let alone the right to challenge wrongdoing, resist oppression and defend himself against injustice?
Most of all, how do you persuade a fellow American that the government works for him when, for most of his young life, he has been incarcerated in an institution that teaches young people to be obedient and compliant citizens who donât talk back, donât question and donât challenge authority?
As weâve seen with other issues, any significant reforms will have to start locally and trickle upwards.
For starters, parents need to be vocal, visible and organized and demand that school officials 1) adopt a policy of positive reinforcement in dealing with behavior issues; 2) minimize the presence in the schools of police officers and cease involving them in student discipline; and 3) insist that all behavioral issues be addressed first and foremost with a childâs parents, before any other disciplinary tactics are attempted.
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
One of the long-standing complaints of media critics has been the double standard applied to liberal and conservative figures voicing controversial viewpoints.
For example, columnists celebrated the firing of former Sen. Rick Santorum at CNN for making insensitive or false comments about the influence of Native American culture on the United States. When racist statements, however, are made by those on the left, there is no such hue and cry.
The latest example is MSNBC regular Elie Mystal, who launched into a racist diatribe against Republican Georgia Senate candidate Herschel Walker who is African American.
During a segment on âThe Cross Connection,â Mystal suggested Walker was supported because he does what Republicans âwant from their Negroes.â
âYou ask why are Republicans backing this man whoâs so clearly unintelligent, who so clearly doesnât have independent thoughts, but thatâs actually the reason. Walker is going to do what heâs told, and that is what Republicans like. Thatâs what Republicans want from their Negroes: to do what they were told. And Walker presents exactly as a person who lacks independent thoughts, lacks an independent agenda, lacks an independent ability to grasp policies, and heâs just going to go in there and vote like Mitch McConnell tells them to vote.â
Mystal has previously caused uproars for controversial claims from accusing a senator of wanting to murder Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to his continued attacks on a high school student even after he was cleared of a false race-based story. He has called the Constitution âtrashâ and previously stated that white, non-college-educated voters supported Republicans because they care about âusing their guns on Black people and getting away with it.â He has also lashed out at âwhite societyâ and explained how he strived to maintain a âwhiteness freeâ life in the pandemic.
Many clearly relish Mystalâs race-baiting takes on issues on MSNBC. The issue, in my view, is not why Mystal is allowed to continue to make such comments on a network but the clear double standard applied to such commentators.
We have seen the same double standard at universities. For example, Womenâs Studies Professor Donna Hughes was publicly condemned by the University of Rhode Island for writing an op-ed that criticized what she called the LGBTQ ideology. Yet, the university has largely remain silent on the writings of Director of Graduate Studies of History Erik Loomis, who has defended the murder of a conservative protester and said that he saw ânothing wrongâ with such acts of violence. Loomis also declared that âScience, statistics, and technology are all inherently racist because they are developed by racists who live in a racist society, whether they identify as racists or not.â
I have defended faculty who have made an array of disturbing comments about âdetonating white people,â denouncing police, calling for Republicans to suffer,  strangling police officers, celebrating the death of conservatives, calling for the killing of Trump supporters, supporting the murder of conservative protesters and other outrageous statements.
Yet, liberal professors continue to enjoy the full protection of academic freedom and free speech. Indeed, at the University of California campus, professors actually rallied around a professor who physically assaulted pro-life advocates and tore down their display.
The fact is that most faculty hold liberal views and do not feel threatened by such biased, content-based approaches to free speech and academic freedom. Others remain silent to avoid being the next tagged in the next campaign.
The support enjoyed by faculty on the far left is in sharp contrast to the treatment given faculty with moderate, conservative or libertarian views. Anyone who raises such dissenting views is immediately set upon by a mob demanding their investigation or termination. This includes blocking academics from speaking on campuses like a recent Classics professor due to their political views. Conservatives and libertarians understand that they have no cushion or protection in any controversy, even if it involves a single, later deleted tweet. At the University of North Carolina (Wilmington) one such campaign led to a professor killing himself a few days before his final day as a professor.
Mystal knows that he has a license to speak that is denied to those on the right on platforms like MSNBC. He wrote an April column calling Walkerâs campaign a âpolitical minstrel show.â He later attacked New York mayor Eric Adams bizarrely as a âconservativeâ and then added âthese tokens who are out here right now shucking and jiving for their White handlers.â
Obviously, such attacks on liberal black figures would not be tolerated by the media and a commentator would be barred by many platforms as persona non grata. Again, I believe that we all benefit from having an array of different views, including controversial views like those of Mystal and Santorum. The worst approach is to maintain a double standard where racist or controversial commentary is celebrated from the left while condemned on the right.
1971 Plymouth 'Cuda

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
1972 Dodge Challenger
'71 Dodge Swinger ... 440ci bored 30 over
1956 Imperial Two-Door Southampton
1959 Dodge Custom Royal Lancer

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming