Comparison
The book Saving Fish from Drowning takes a group of tourists from China to Burma, present day Myanmar. However, one of these “tourists”, Wendy, is actually a journalist. Her goal on this trip is to talk with the natives to see if their human rights; life, liberty, and property, are being deprived from them. As she took notes and journaled about her days. Throughout this book, you see the real government treatment of the people of Myanmar. They worked from dawn til dusk, or around twelve hours, and received two hundred or three hundred of their currency in return. Ninety percent of this country is Buddhist, the other ten percent are majority Muslim. The Muslim families in this region have been attacked with impunity, stripped of the vote, and driven from their homes, according to the Economist on June thirteenth, 2015. The Muslims in this country are cruelly mistreated.
The book 1984 by George Orwell talks about society in which too much power is given to the government. “ Orwell indirectly proposes that power given to the government will ultimately become corrupt and they will attempt to force all to conform to their one set standard. He also sets forth the idea that the corrupted government will attempt to destroy any and all mental and physical opposition to their beliefs, thus eliminating any opportunity for achieving a utopian society” (Government Oppression). This power that Orwell mentions can be seen in Myanmar today. The government has too much power, so much, in fact, they can take away the basic human rights of their citizens, without an uprising. The main reason these Muslims are being mistreated is because the government is Buddhist, the two religions are rivals in this country. Getting rid of the Muslims means that more of the population will be Buddhist, therefore, agree with the government. According to Orwell’s definition of an oppressive government, Myanmar fits the bill.
Amy Tan saw this and decided she would describe this in her book as well. She took a different approach than Orwell. Orwell fought the ideologies of corrupt governments head on in his writings whereas Tan speaks of this injustice on a more personal level. She has her characters interact with people of oppressive governments. The citizens of these countries do not complain in her book to make the reader pay attention to this, but instead, Tan had her American characters express their standard of living to that of the natives. Orwell had his characters live under an oppressive regime. Here, his characters revolt against their oppressor. These authors get their message across efficiently. Tan’s approach is a more common occurrence. In today’s world, the reasons those under these governments are not revolting include a lack of willingness or ability. The people of these regimes are happy with their lives. We can observe this in Tan’s characters’ interactions with the natives. This event leads to other governments and international organizations having to get involved to fight for those who can not.













