Akira - Not My Thing
Although Akira getâs super high ratings from critics and fans alike, itâs just not my cup of tea. The visuals were bold and detailed and the animation was phenomenal, but the aesthetic of the dirty, steam punky 1980âs dystopia wasnât appealing to me. There was lots of blood and gore, so much so that it seemed like the animators were trying to add it to as many frames as possible. Watching the scenes where the Espers were making Tetsuo hallucinate that they were giant toys, and the one where Tetsuo mutates into the giant fleshy monster with fingers coming out of fingers was like a waking nightmare.
That being said, Iâll try to comment on some social ideas that the film tackles. There is definitely some commentary on the ineffectively of government. In the film, social order is hanging on by a thread, with gangs running rampant, high instances of violent crime and mass protesting in the streets. The scene that shows the New Tokyo parliament arguing when Colonel Shikishima requests more funding for Doctor Onishiâs work with the Espers shows how deep the social disorder goes. The politicians cannot seem to agree on their priorities, one pushing to route the funding to social programs, another to the upcoming olympics. Name calling ensues while another politician casts doubt on whether Akira even caused World War III. The Colonel attempts to convince the parliament that the threats are real and quick action is required. Other members accuse the Colonel of corruption. As the disorder goes on one of the politicians is shown dozing off and another quietly sips tea. Frustrated, the Colonel finally storms off. Akira paints a picture of the challenges when there's rule by committee. For someone like the Colonel who values decisive action over deliberation, the slow moving and bickering bureaucracy is a source of frustration. In the context of the film, the scene reads as critique of weak corrupt leadership. Without someone like the Colonel to step in, powerful forces like those being developed in the Espers will get out of control. Instead of bickering over pet ideas, representatives like those in the parliament need to understand and appreciate the threat and support their counterparts, rather than nit-pick. Thus, Akira suggests that in the face of a crisis, those with authority need to unite, otherwise society risks crumbling into anarchy with the worst of the powerful filling in the gaps left over.
Hey Ben! This is a really well-balanced and thoughtful take! Even though Akira wasnât to your personal taste, you still engaged with its deeper themes in a meaningful way. Your analysis of the political dysfunction and the Colonelâs frustration with bureaucracy is sharp, it really highlights how the film critiques leadership failures in the face of chaos.





















