wrt the vice-versa with goemon: again, i'm not as certain they were taking it in a transmasculine direction, i'm certain they were referring to the ability for men (or maybe just people in general) to be queer beyond the allotted "time and place" in general, though i donāt think theyād have a problem with me reading transmasculinity into it, and the shoe fits way too well for me not to. i feel like something exactly like oscar but for a trans man (a trans man presenting as a woman), especially a male character who's deign was based on a female character, wouldnāt work due to the difference in transmisogyny and anti-transmasculinity in which trans women are conceived as āa man wearing womenās clothesā and trans men as āa woman crossdressingā. let alone for a gay trans man - there's that trope of masculine women feminizing when they return to their male love interests (cough like goemon before he fought jigen cough), yeah? we can't call characters like that trans men because that's not what being trans is. plus, why do we think she had "freedom" in men's clothes that she can't in women's? that is fr a woman crossdressing. for us to understand "woman crossdressing" as trans men, we need to assume that "woman" and "crossdressing woman" imply certain things.
a male character existing as an otherwise āpassingā feminine guy is the actual equivalent to that imo, considering that gender non conformity is supposed to be a āfailureā of birth gender rather than a genuine form of expression. it works especially well with goemon if we're set on seeing him as attracted to fujiko. can goemon not wear a dress and still be a man? if thatās the case, why does the same not apply to oscar? what makes goemon more adjacent to femininity than her? what are we missing? why are we not considering literally any aspect about him other than his looks/gender? we can't think of goemon as attracted to fujiko throughout all this unless we think that he has zero interior life, or be fine with him "losing" her unless we expect him to, so his fujikofication can't be about his gender, whether it makes him a woman or just stupid, unless we think of him as somehow "inferior". essentially, goemon being fujikofied as a metaphor for him coming into his sexuality (he "figured out who fujiko truly is to him" - his friend who's girl - he came out to her) is goemon being reveled as a "woman crossdressing" - basically a "reverse" of the "oscar" metaphor
i think you can see both sides of this metaphor in that one rose of versailles crossover episode. the premise only works if you know ahead of time that the actual oscar is a female character in disguise as a man. (like how twcfm only works if you know that "women aren't failed men" and "gay men aren't failed women".) otherwise, you actually question lupinās sexuality because that oscar appears to just be an effeminate man. "trap" stuff falls flat when you know that it's transphobic, homophobic, and misogynistic, which they alluded to pretty explicitly in prison of love. are gender nonconformity and homosexuality really that much of threat? can women not fool people and still be women (cough cough)? thereās a difference between ālookingā and ābeingā