藍@考察ブログ

Before we get to the specifics, however, let’s talk about Survive’s idea of harmony. I actually love that Survive isn’t entirely against the ethics of harmony. What Survive keeps rejecting is the shallow version of harmony that most people are taught to admire, which includes values like not burdening others, not being selfish, not creating conflict (at least not visible conflict), and not deviating from the order of the group or society. That kind of harmony might look peaceful on the surface, but the game has no interest in treating it as genuinely good. If anything, it presents it as spiritually hollow, because it leaves no room for difficult feelings or dissent. It also fails to account for the basic fact that other people remain separate from you, and therefore inconvenient.

At the same time, though, the game also rejects the opposite idea that living truthfully just means following your personal feelings, passions, impulses, immediate wants, or whatever else. So its central message isn’t really “society bad, true self good” or “community good, selfishness bad.” It’s more interested in how you find the right balance—how you remain a distinct self within a group, whether that means a specific community or society at large, without either disappearing into it or tearing it apart. To me, that’s much more nuanced than the usual “just be yourself” stance similar stories tend to take, because human beings are social animals and the self is never formed in isolation.

I talked about this at length in a previous writeup, but I think this is also why the symbolism of “becoming one” as false harmony in both Shuuji’s and Aoi’s corruption arcs becomes especially important. In most other Digimon stories, merging with the partner Digimon tends to symbolize trust, integration, and completion (the self made whole through bond). Here in Survive (or at least in arcs involving the themes of corrupt harmony), it’s treated as horror instead, because if harmony becomes indistinguishable from sameness, then the boundary between self and other has to be destroyed. But once there’s no distance between self and other, there’s also no listening, which in turn means there’s no negotiation, and therefore ultimately no true understanding, because difference itself is being erased. In other words, the very separateness that makes conflict painful is also what makes the concept of relationship real. Becoming one is terrifying because it offers peace by abolishing the very conditions that makes peace meaningful in the first place.

Shuuji and Aoi actually show two different ways in which this form of false harmony (becoming one) can take shape. In Shuuji’s case, his whole life is basically built around acceptance through conformity. He’s learned to measure his worth strictly through external approval—essentially, through his ability to become what others expect of him. So of course his corruption arc culminates in a kind of self-erasure through merging with Lopmon in the form of Wendimon (after Wendimon devours him). He and Lopmon only truly become one through shared suffering. Wendimon is basically the image of a boy being eaten alive—both literally and figuratively—by his own desperation to become acceptable.

The fact that Wendimon has dual voices despite the union is interesting too, especially because Lopmon continues to voice the feelings Shuuji tries to suppress (“this hurts,” “I’m scared,” “I don’t like this”). Meanwhile, Shuuji remains trapped in the need to be accepted (“What should I do so you’ll finally accept me? What should I have done?”). It’s as though he has to override what Lopmon is expressing, because if he admits that this is painful—and worse, harmful—then in a sense he loses the only way he knows how to find his place in the world. He can’t yet allow pain to mean that something is wrong, because he still needs it to mean that he must try harder. So his false harmony is basically the annihilation of the self in the name of expectation. In other words, Shuuji loses himself in the need to be loved.

Aoi’s case is a little different from Shuuji’s even though her problem looks similar on the surface. While both of them have a strong social conscience built on self-suppression, Aoi seems to sincerely believe in the responsibility and propriety she feels obligated to enact, rather than being as overtly pressured into conformity as Shuuji is. In a sense she is still pressured, and part of her secretly resents it, but it’s subtler than in Shuuji’s case because she seems to have internalized it as a moral truth more than he has. And that’s what makes her feel more earnest in it.

Aoi’s healthy growth would involve becoming more assertive, more authoritative, and more willing to act and set boundaries. Wrathful does give her all of that, but unfortunately in a corrupted form. She (as Plutomon) finally comes to believe that her own idea of harmony is right and must be enforced. So, like I wrote in that previous writeup before, the fact that Plutomon keeps only Aoi’s voice—despite being a fusion of Aoi and Labramon—feels like a metaphor for Aoi’s care taking on a sort of maternalistic form. She no longer merely privileges her own voice, but begins to regard it as the voice responsible for deciding what is best for everyone else. In that sense, even speaking for Labramon becomes significant, because it shows that Aoi is no longer relating to her partner as a separate perspective to listen to.

I think that’s also why Plutomon feels more morally fraught. She is, in essence, care turned authoritarian. And like I just said, unlike Wendimon, she speaks only with Aoi’s voice because Labramon’s outspoken voice (which used to ground and check Aoi) now survives only inside Aoi’s certainty. So Aoi’s false harmony isn’t really the negation of self so much as its totalization where everyone else must fit into the order she now embodies. Where Shuuji disappears into what others want, Aoi forces others to blur into what she knows is right, so that there will be no more pain arising from “unnecessary” conflict.

The gendered theming works so well for much the same reason. Both of them begin by performing a somewhat exaggerated parody of the role they think they’re supposed to occupy. Aoi starts out as the overburdened feminine ideal: nurturing, excessively compliant, emotionally accommodating, always responsible even while resentful underneath it all. Meanwhile, Shuuji begins as the brittle masculine ideal: stern, forceful, leader-like, stoic, disciplinary—basically the embodiment of authority, though an oppressive one. Neither role fits them comfortably, because each is a performance shaped by pressure rather than genuine selfhood. That’s why both Aoi and Shuuji are so miserable.

Their arcs then move in opposite directions while ultimately serving the same thematic purpose. Aoi has to reclaim authority without turning it into domination, while Shuuji has to reclaim gentleness instead of seeing it as a shameful weakness. I know my friends and I joke about how Aoi becomes the dad and Shuuji becomes the mom of the group by the end of Truthful, but there’s actually some truth in that, I think. They don’t literally become each other’s gender, of course, but they finally stop allowing gendered expectations to amputate the parts of themselves they need in order to become whole.

Related to that, this also brings us to the heavy parental theming in both corruption arcs. Harmony, as a social ideal, is a sort of familial system scaled up. Society gets imagined as a household where leaders become parental in their authority and citizens become children. In this way, conflict equals disobedience and sacrifice equals duty. This metaphor shows up everywhere from nationalism to school culture to workplace organization. This is even expressed in Bowen family systems theory, where Bowen says the same emotional patterns that govern families also appear in non-family groups and whole society.

To further expand on Bowen’s concept, the real opposite of health isn’t actually conflict but fusion under anxiety. A family (or any close group) is an emotional unit, so when tension rises, people start managing anxiety by overaccommodating, overcontrolling, projecting, or distancing rather than by staying grounded as distinct selves in relationship. Bowen explicitly extends this beyond literal families to other forms of social groups as well, through what he calls the societal emotional process.

We can even relate the concept of differentiation of self in Bowen to the themes of Harmony in Survive. Bowen defines low differentiation as being so dependent on others’ acceptance that a person either changes themselves to please others or pressure others to conform to them. On the other hand, high differentiation means remaining connected while still being able to think clearly, act on principle, and tolerate disagreement. This lines up frighteningly well with Shuuji’s and Aoi’s arcs, because they are, essentially, opposite defenses against the same fear of separateness. In Bowen’s own wording, poorly differentiated people either “adjust what they think, say, and do to please others” (Shuuji) or “dogmatically proclaim what others would be like and pressure them to conform” (Aoi).

But anyway, back to the parental theming. The parent-child dynamic is also inherently hierarchical, which connects strongly to Harmony’s broader preoccupation with order. In that structure, the two sides are never truly equal, as the parent occupies a position of authority and control, while the child exists in a state of dependence and vulnerability. That imbalance makes the relationship a useful model for understanding how Harmony imagines order itself as something sustained through power and protection built on unequal roles.

Both Aoi and Shuuji try to step into the group’s parental principle, reproducing its hierarchical structure even when they do so clumsily, at least at first. However, their failure can’t just be reduced to individual weakness. After all, they’re children thrust into a vacuum of authority, trying to become the parental principle of the group in distorted forms precisely because they were never given healthy models of care and authority by the adults around them. Aoi becomes the nightmare mother: the all-containing caregiver who can’t tolerate disorder and wants to abolish selfishness by absorbing difference. Shuuji, on the other hand, becomes the nightmare father: the punitive authority who believes growth only happens by overcoming pain through discipline, before collapsing back into the abused child underneath that role.

Their healthier developments don’t actually destroy those parental energies so much as redeem them. Aoi remains caretaking and group-oriented, but she also grows into a leader who is less self-sacrificing without turning coercive. Shuuji remains serious about responsibility, but becomes more nurturing and guiding, almost teacherly, instead of domineering. Again, by the end, they’re still the “parents” of the group, just no longer trapped inside the false caricature they began with.

Aside from the gendered and parental theming, there’s also a subtler Harmony-related theme here around self-sacrifice. @digisurvive talked about this in one of their writeups, but one of Survive’s critiques of false harmony is the idea of erasing yourself for the greater good. The game keeps showing how morally noble that can feel, because you’re sacrificing yourself for the sake of others. But self-sacrifice in some cases can end up functioning as a distorted shortcut, because it lets you avoid the messier, harder work of staying alive, facing what you did, and learning to share your burden with other people—in other words, working through your relationships instead of just removing yourself from them. It’s a critique of a very particular social logic that if you are inconvenient, flawed, or burdensome, perhaps you can still become meaningful by disappearing usefully.

It’s exactly the logic of “redemption by death.” What makes Survive’s handling of this more complicated than a simple critique is that the game doesn’t only show that logic is failing. It also shows it working, or at least feeling like it works. Kaito’s death in Harmonious can be read as heroic self-sacrifice. But looking at what route it happens in and who’s dying, it’s kind of ironic that the one defined by passion and refusal to be managed actually dies by erasing himself for the group. Simply put, he dies a Harmony death. Conversely, in Wrathful, the Harmony-aligned Aoi dies uncompromising. She holds her conviction to the last and refuses to yield. In a sense, the routes don’t just swap final bosses, they also swap the moral logic of dying. Each alignment contains the shadow of the other when taken to an extreme. However, that structural irony is easier to recognize from the outside, because for the characters caught within it, self-sacrifice registers not as a thematic reversal so much as the only remaining way to matter.

With Shuuji, this is the clearest case, because his willingness (or should I say “eagerness”) to offer himself as a sacrifice isn’t pure altruism, since it’s entangled with his sense of himself as dead weight. He feels he has to make up for beingh a burden, and if he can’t be useful in life, then maybe he can finally be useful in death. However, that’s not accountability, because you can’t redeem yourself by disposing of yourself. Shuuji’s growth only begins once he stays alive long enough to own what he did and start changing in relation to both himself and others.

With Saki—another Harmony-aligned kid I haven’t really talked about yet—it becomes more complicated. Saki is actually a fascinating addition to this because her struggle is so quiet. If Harmony’s false face is “not being a burden,” then Saki—with her chronic illness—is the living embodiment of a “threat” to that harmony. Her self-sacrifice in Wrathful is her way of trying to balance the scale. And it does contain real courage and care, but it’s still tangled up with the fear of being forgotten and having lived meaninglessly. She wants to do something that will prove her existence mattered. So even here, Survive doesn’t present sacrifice as some clean moral ideal. It becomes tragic precisely because it comes from a girl who hasn’t yet fully learned that her life already has value without needing to end in a “meaningful” death.

Aoi’s case is, once again, slightly different from both Shuuji’s and Saki’s. She almost literally begins from the position of the self-sacrificing caretaker, the one who will carry the burden and do the work for everyone else. Wrathful then shows what happens when that self-sacrificial tendency festers long enough that the martyr ends up becoming a tyrant. Because if she always the one carrying everyone, then eventually she begins to feel that she has the right to decide for everyone too.

Going back for a bit, the self-sacrifice critique is also related to the whole parental theming in the sense that parents are culturally expected to sacrifice for their children. So invoking those themes together can be a way to examine how self-sacrifice is often treated as the highest form of love. The trouble is that this can become problematic very fast, because a caregiver or protector who only lives through sacrifice may start to moralize and even weaponize their suffering because they feel entitled to appreciation. “After all I’ve done for you” is basically the dark side of sacrificial care. Aoi’s corruption arc shows exactly this problem.

Given that the partnermons are meant to reflect their human partner’s true self, I find it somewhat ironic that in two out of the three instances of bio-merging in Survive, the result paradoxically embodies a loss of self. While it makes sense when you consider the Harmony kids’ common thread of seeking conformity, one might expect that merging with one’s true self would lead to the realization of true selfhood. Instead, these unifications become vehicles of self-erasure, where the former self is submerged by a new identity, as they are represented as dark evolutions that occur when the ideals of Harmony are taken to an extreme.

To get what I mean, let’s consider Kaito’s corruption arc. Symbolically, Kaito letting go of Dracumon by fusing Vamdemon (Dracumon) with Piemon can be seen as him discarding his conscience to further his selfish desires without any regard for others. This makes sense to most of us easily, because we’re consistently shown how Dracumon acts as Kaito’s restraint throughout the story — his “moral compass”, if you will. Without Dracumon, there’s no one who can keep Kaito in check anymore. So, the “death” of Dracumon being the metaphor for Kaito going morally bankrupt feels pretty intuitive, at least to me personally.

In contrast, I didn't find the symbolism in Shuuji’s and Aoi’s corruption arcs—particularly their fusion with their partners—as immediately intuitive, for the reasons I’ve outlined earlier. However, after mulling over their arcs a bit more, I’ve come to the realization how both of them becoming one with their respective partner can actually carry multifaceted symbolism that may not be immediately apparent. Also, the different nuances in how the themes of Harmony manifest in their arcs mean that the symbolism works a bit differently in each of their arcs too. Let me explain.

First off, we’ll look at Shuuji and Lopmon. Shuuji’s arc revolves around his struggle with self-acceptance. Through his father’s relentless expectations, he’s always made to feel inadequate, and in turn it drives him to constantly force himself into an imaginary mold that he doesn’t fit into. He does this by repressing his true feelings while trying to live up to (what he believes to be) his father’s idea of a perfect self. His very apparent hatred of Lopmon is mostly meant to represent his self-loathing, among many other things — in a way, Lopmon serves as a reminder for Shuuji that he hasn’t truly changed into the person that his father wants him to be. This is why Shuuji keeps trying to force Lopmon to change as well, even if it means cruelly pushing him beyond his limits.

The outcome of Shuuji’s arc depends on whether he comes to recognize his mistaken beliefs. If he fails to do so, Lopmon evolves into Wendimon and devours him. As this post has already described, this scene serves as a metaphor for Shuuji succumbing to the self-hatred that has been eating away at him from within, leading to a complete loss of self. Because, in both a figurative and literal sense, no trace of Shuuji’s former, “true” self remains, just as there’s nothing left of the Lopmon we once knew in Wendimon.

Most people believe that this is the moment where Shuuji finally dies, but I think that isn’t the case. In Survive, the lore states that a partnermon dies the moment their human dies. However, Wendimon doesn’t die right after he completely consumes Shuuji, and instead, he gains the ability to speak. Make of this what you will, but in my opinion, this gives a clue that Wendimon being alive after consuming Shuuji isn’t merely a narrative convenience to keep him around for the fight, and that Shuuji has actually been absorbed into Wendimon. In other words, Shuuji and Lopmon are finally unified in their suffering as Wendimon, with Wendimon’s monstrous form serving as a visual manifestation of both Shuuji and Lopmon’s new identity, warped beyond recognition even to themselves.

If you pay close attention to Wendimon’s speech, you’ll notice that he actually speaks with two voices — both Shuuji’s and Lopmon’s. It can be hard to tell since the voices are heavily filtered, but Shuuji’s voice has a slightly deeper pitch than Lopmon. Even if you can’t tell, the story hints at this detail by showing how the other kids and partnermons can distinguish between the voices when Wendimon speaks.

“IT HURRRTS… I’M SCAAARED… I DON’T WANNA DO THIIIS…” “WHAT’S… WRONG WITH ME? WHAT SHOULD I HAVE DONE…?”

I bring this up because it’s intriguing how Wendimon speaks in dual voices despite supposedly being a single entity. It’s as if the story is trying to convey that, even in their merged state, Shuuji and Lopmon aren’t truly reconciled ,  and it’s because Shuuji hasn’t silenced the part of himself that continues to question and doubt. To understand this, notice how Wendimon wails about two entirely different things: in Lopmon’s voice, he cries about how he doesn’t want to do any of this anymore, how he’s scared of this and how it hurts. Meanwhile, in Shuuji’s voice, he rants about not knowing what he should have done to make others happy (but especially to please his father, as I believe his words are primarily directed at his father) and wonders if it’s better for him to disappear if his existence is a nuisance to other people. While Lopmon continuously voices Shuuji’s true feelings that he buries deep inside, Shuuji himself remains fixated on seeking external validation and is concerned about what others think of him even at the expense of his own well-being.

To understand why Wendimon having dual voices is relevant to this discussion in the first place, let’s now turn our attention to Aoi and Labramon. Aoi’s character arc revolves around her desire for authority and proactiveness, which she struggles with because her self-consciousness constantly holds her back from taking actions. This is largely why Aoi and Labramon’s dynamic is vastly different from Shuuji and Lopmon’s relationship, because while Aoi also represses the side of her that Labramon displays — whether subconsciously or not — Labramon’s outspokenness instead embodies the part of Aoi that she wishes she could express more freely but is suppressed by her insecurity.

When Aoi merges with Labramon, the situation is slightly different from Shuuji’s experience, though it carries its own tragic implications: in an effort to save Aoi, Labramon sacrifices her own “self” to become the new force that sustains Aoi’s life. Perhaps because it’s also fueled by Aoi’s overwhelming guilt and frustration over her perceived powerlessness, the act leads them to bio-merge and dark-evolve into Plutomon.

While not entirely analogous, I think it’s fair to make a comparison between Plutomon and Wendimon. The game itself does this as well: upon seeing Aoi becomes Plutomon and kills Piemon, Kaito instantly makes a remark of Aoi becoming like Shuuji. In English, the line is worded as:

“Don’t tell me this is like with Shuuji… When he turned all evil!?”

However, in Japanese, the line is:

“まさか……シュウジのように……暗黒進化か！？” “Don’t tell me… she’s become like Shuuji… is it a dark evolution!?”

It’s interesting to me that Kaito immediately draws a parallel between her and Shuuji. And I have to emphasize that it’s specifically Shuuji, not Lopmon. I’m saying this because they all perceive Plutomon as Aoi instead of Labramon (the game emphasizes this too by having Plutomon’s name initially written as “Aoi?”), whereas we (as the players) tend to perceive Wendimon as Lopmon instead of Shuuji. See where I’m getting at here?

“Aoi, you say? No, I’ve cast off that weak persona.”

Now, unlike Wendimon, who retains both Shuuji’s and Lopmon’s voices, Plutomon speaks only with Aoi’s voice. One interpretation that we can draw is that, unlike Wendimon, the singular voice might represent Aoi and Labramon reaching a true level of mutual understanding and harmony where they don’t have to speak over each other in order to be heard. But I think there’s more to it: given that Labramon is consistently depicted in the story as voicing Aoi’s inner thoughts that she keeps holding back from expressing, I think this is meant to also symbolize her internal resolution where she no longer has the need to externalize her inner thoughts through Labramon, as she now fully embodies those thoughts herself. This might seem empowering at first, seeing how her newfound confidence seems to have conquered her lingering self-doubt that used to haunt her. However, on the other hand, the loss of Labramon’s separate voice means that Aoi has lost an external perspective. The implication is that Aoi is now entirely self-reliant, with no external check on her thoughts or actions. In other words, Aoi has lost the ability to see herself from an outside perspective that used to keep her grounded and connected to the world outside herself.

“Labramon agrees, from deep down inside me.”

(I put the screenshot above because I find it interesting — I think the fact that Aoi speaks on behalf of Labramon, rather than letting Labramon speak for herself, further supports the interpretation of Aoi having absorbed Labramon’s voice into her own, leaving no room for external input anymore.)

This ultimately leads Aoi to form a singular belief system, one that’s entirely shaped by her internal convictions. And it drives her into a dangerously inflexible mindset where any form of disagreement or differing perspective is perceived as a threat to her newly discovered harmony. In her mind now, the only way to ensure peace and unity is to eliminate the possibility of conflict altogether by merging everyone with their partnermon, creating a single, unified consciousness. And Aoi is absolutely resolute in this, because she has now isolated herself in her certainty by silencing other voices, becoming rigid and intolerant of any challenge to her worldview — one rooted in a distorted sense of harmony that results in a situation where disagreement is eradicated instead of resolved.

Some people have pointed out the parallels between Aoi and Shuuji, particularly in how their character arcs explore gendered themes. Both characters initially put on a facade that aligns with societal expectations of their gender roles, and each is paired with a Digimon/Kemonogami partner that jarringly contrasts with their outward persona — which makes sense, since the partnermons reflect the true self they both try to suppress. This post, in particular, also elaborates a bit further on the parallels by discussing about how their character arcs move in opposite directions. To reiterate: Aoi begins as the nurturing and permissive mother figure of the group, almost stereotypically feminine, but as the story progresses, she steps into a leadership role and embraces a more assertive personality, which isn’t necessarily associated with traditional femininity. Conversely, Shuuji starts off trying to fit into the rigid mold of an authoritative leader, believing this is what’s expected of him as the oldest boy in the group. However, he eventually must embrace his gentle and caring side to enable himself to reach his full potential, which challenges the initial idea presented that masculinity must always equate to emotional stoicism. Basically, by the story’s end (at least in the Truthful route), both characters take on roles more commonly associated with the opposite gender.

You might think the gendered themes of their character arcs end just there, but if you look into the evolutions of Labramon and Lopmon, you’ll uncover even more layers of gendered subtext — undertones that, while likely unintended, are intriguing to explore. It’s something that seems to have gone largely unnoticed, so that’s exactly what I’ll write about now. Hopefully this can offer another interesting perspective to their character arcs.

Let’s start with Labramon, as the subtexts in her evolutions feel less subtle to me. From the game mechanics alone, initially, Labramon functions primarily as a support unit, equipped with a healing skill that aligns with stereotypical feminine roles of care and nurturing. However, as she evolves, I’d say this role shifts rather significantly. In her evolution forms (Dobermon, Cerberumon, Anubimon, and even Plutomon), Labramon transitions into a powerful offensive unit, taking on a more aggressive and assertive role that contrasts with her earlier, more traditionally feminine characterization.

What’s also particularly striking is the design and appearance of these evolutions. Dobermon, Cerberumon, and Plutomon all adopt distinctly masculine aesthetics, characterized by strong, fierce, and intimidating designs that align with traditional male archetypes. They also shed the cutesy appearance that Labramon initially has, replacing it with a color palette dominated by black and deep shadowy tones on top of very sharp silhouettes, which starkly contrast with Labramon’s original softer look. It almost feels as though her evolutions discard femininity to embrace more conventionally masculine traits like strength, aggression, and dominance. The game even alludes to this by showing how taken aback Aoi is when she first sees Cerberumon’s intimidating appearance.

Not only that, both Labramon’s two ultimate forms, Anubimon and Plutomon, are based on male deities. Anubis, the god of afterlife in ancient Egyptian religion, is strictly male in his depiction as a man with a jackal head. Even the etymology of his name reinforces this — the name “Anubis” comes from the ancient Egyptian word “Inpw”, which is masculine in grammatical gender. In ancient Egyptian language, words had gender, and the suffix “-w” typically indicated a masculine form (hypothetically speaking, the female form of “Inpw” would have been “Inpwt”). Additionally, Anubis has always been depicted with male attributes and roles in Egyptian mythology, such as being a protector of tombs, which was customarily a male-associated role in ancient Egypt.

Pluto is also consistently depicted as male in the original Greek mythology. The name “Pluto” (Plūtō) itself is the Latinized version of the Greek “Plouton”, which is a euphemism for the underworld god Hades, who is also strictly male. What’s even more interesting to note is that Pluto is the Roman counterpart of Dis Pater (Rex Infernus), whose name is commonly interpreted as “Rich Father” and may be a direct translation of Plouton. Note how the meaning of the name emphasizes the male aspect of the deity, as the title “father” is already inherently masculine.

Despite all of that, though, one thing I want to also note here is that Labramon and her evolutions consistently maintain a feminine speech pattern that’s largely shared by Aoi. An explanation for context: in Japanese, you generally can tell the gender identity of the speaker from their speech pattern (i.e., the way a male individual speaks and a female individual speaks are pretty distinct). I find this especially interesting, because it shows that you’re meant to take Labramon and her evolutions as female despite the traditionally “male” depictions.

(Sure, you might argue that this is just another instance of Digimon taking liberties with gender depiction, as they did with Garudamon in Adventure. However, I still find it intriguing to note that among the female cast, Aoi is the only character whose partner’s evolutions are consistently gendered as “male” within the Digimon franchise.)

Let’s move on to Lopmon and his evolutions. While Lopmon doesn’t undergo the same dramatic shifts in appearance the way Labramon does, he does give off a somewhat feminine vibe with how cute and very “pink” (for the lack of a better word) he looks. This has led to some mistaking Lopmon as female, even though his speech pattern closely resembles Shuuji’s distinctly male speech pattern (this is a similar case to Aoi and Labramon anyway, where they share similar speech patterns with each other). Aside from that, there is also still a gendered theming present in his evolutions. In particular, two of his evolutions, Turuiemon and Andiramon, feature genderqueer elements in their origins.

As I mentioned in my previous writeup, Turuiemon is based on Tu’er Ye (Tù’eryé/兔兒爺), the rabbit deity entrusted with saving the people from a plague. According to the legend, Tu’er Ye needed to borrow clothes to wear in order to gain the trust of the people. What I didn’t mention, however, is that Tu’er Ye also had a female counterpart called Tu’er Nainai (Tù’ernǎinai/兔兒奶奶). While these two figures might seem distinct, they could actually be one and the same deity. In some versions of the legend, Tu’er Ye changed appearance depending on the clothing donated to him by the people he helped, implying that Tu’er Nainai could simply be a cross-dressing Tu’er Ye. In short, Tu’er Ye can be interpreted as genderqueer due to the fluidity of his gender presentation in these legends.

The genderqueer theme becomes even more prominent in Antila, the figure upon which Andiramon is based. Antila (Āndǐluò/安底羅) is one of the Twelve Heavenly Generals serving Bhaisajyaguru (the Medicine Buddha). Although Antila is strictly depicted as male and isn’t necessarily genderqueer in the original legend, he takes on a genderqueer interpretation through his depiction in Japanese religious syncretism of Buddhism and Shinto (shinbutsu/kamihotoke/神仏): Through a concept known as honji-suijaku (本地垂迹), where Buddhas and bodhisattvas serve as the true forms (honji/本地) that have worldly manifestations (suijaku/垂迹) as Shinto kami (神), it is said that Antila was the worldly manifestation of the bodhisattva Guanyin (i.e., Guanyin is the honji of Antila, and Antila is the suijaku of Guanyin). Guanyin as a figure is primarily depicted as female-presenting. However, I should note that the nuances of Guanyin’s gender are complex, so I’ll address them in the next paragraph.

For starters: Guanyin (Guānyīn/Kannon/觀音) is the bodhisattva of compassion. As a bodhisattva, she’s a Buddhist figure, but in East Asian and Southeast Asian folk religions, she’s also sometimes known as the Goddess of Mercy. While some Buddhist schools in East and Southeast Asia recognize Guanyin as a genderless or androgynous entity, she’s consistently depicted to be female-presenting, so as a result, East and Southeast Asians commonly refer to her as “Mother Guanyin” or “Goddess Guanyin”. However, this hasn’t always been the case throughout history, as there was a time long ago when Guanyin was depicted as a male. You see, Guanyin is essentially the same figure as Avalokitasvara (also written as Avalokiteśvara), originally depicted as male in India. He was initially depicted as male in China as well, where East Asian Buddhism first originates. However, seeing that the traits the bodhisattva had (e.g., compassionate, merciful, and nurturing) were seen as conventionally feminine by Chinese people, eventually the depiction of Guanyin as female took over. This change was so profound that by the time Buddhism spread further into East and Southeast Asia, the female depiction of Guanyin became the dominant one, and this solidifies her status as a “female” divinity instead of a “male” one. So, it’s safe to say that in the case of Guanyin as the true form of Antila, the intention is for her to be female, despite Antila being a male himself.

(Kind of a tangent: I don’t necessarily disagree with trans readings of Guanyin, whether in relation to her being Antila’s true form or the historical nuances of her gender depictions. I believe it’s a completely valid interpretation, to say the least. However, I must note that this perspective isn’t universally accepted — at least not among the Buddhists I know personally — so it’s important to approach this argument carefully. But anyway, I digress.)

I don’t have much to say about Cherubimon, as he is based on cherubim, who aren’t strictly defined as male or female, as far as I know. However, I personally find that Cherubimon’s appearance carries a distinctly feminine vibe, primarily through the character design and symbolic elements. I mean, Cherubimon features a softer, more rounded form, with large, expressive eyes that convey a sense of gentleness and add some cute factors. The pastel color palette, often dominated by shades of pink, further enhances this somewhat feminine quality. Additionally, his demeanor and role as a guardian figure align with traits typically associated with femininity, such as nurturing and protective instincts. I think it’s fair to say that the combination of these visual and thematic elements gives Cherubimon a feminine presence that contrasts with the more aggressive or imposing designs of most other ultimate level Digimon (including Labramon’s ultimate forms).

Interestingly, unlike Labramon’s evolutions, Lopmon’s evolutions don’t always retain Lopmon’s masculine speech pattern. Specifically, Andiramon and Cherubimon adopt more neutral speech patterns that aren’t distinctly masculine or feminine. I believe this is intended to represent both Andiramon and Cherubimon as more mature forms of Lopmon, with speech patterns that convey a sense of regality and dignity. Given the lore in Survive, where Digimon/Kemonogami are seen as the true selves of their human partners, it’s reasonable to still interpret both Andiramon and Cherubimon as male within the context of the game.

In addition to the individual subtexts, it’s also noteworthy to see how Labramon’s and Lopmon’s evolution lines as a whole reflect contrasting archetypes that align with traditional gender roles. As Labramon evolves into forms like Anubimon and Plutomon, she embodies a theme of judgment and authority, taking on the traditionally masculine role of one who wields power, dispenses justice, and determines the fates of others. On the other hand, Lopmon’s true evolution line (Turuiemon, Andiramon, and Cherubimon) centers around the theme of a guardian deity, which carries more feminine connotations such as care, compassion, and protection. I just think the whole contrast is worth pointing out, considering it aligns very well with the overall gendered undertones present in Aoi and Shuuji’s respective character arcs.

To end this writeup, I just want to reiterate once again: While these gendered subtexts might not be immediately apparent or universally acknowledged, I still think they provide additional depth to the narrative. They also offer a fascinating lens through which you can further explore both Aoi and Shuuji, beyond the much more obvious aspects of their arcs.

At first glance, it might seem that Wendimon and Turuiemon have no connection at all, given that they originate from two vastly different cultures with no geographical ties. Wendimon is based on Wendigo from Algonquian folklore (primarily among Indigenous tribes in North America), while Turuiemon is based on Tu’er Ye (Tù’eryé/兔兒爺, literally “Lord Leveret”) from a Chinese folk religion in Beijing. On top of that, Digimon as a franchise itself rarely makes their connection clear beyond Wendimon and Turuiemon being the default adult forms of Lopmon. Despite all of that, there’s actually one theme that they do have in common: they both make their appearance during times of crisis. And yet, they both have starkly contrasting roles in their respective mythology.

Let’s start with Wendigo. Wendigo is told to be an evil spirit that emerges during the harshest of cold winters, when resources are scarce and survival becomes increasingly difficult. It preys on those who succumb to desperation and greed by possessing them and turning them into cannibals. Once possessed by Wendigo, the individual is cursed with an insatiable hunger — no matter how much they consume, they will forever remain emaciated and never feel full.

We can already see several references that Survive makes to the actual Wendigo mythology, the most obvious being Wendimon’s act of devouring Shuuji when he finally succumbs to insanity and desperation, which references Wendigo’s association with cannibalism. Many interpret this scene as a representation of Shuuji’s final surrender to his self-harm tendencies (in short, suicide) — and they aren’t wrong at all, but we can go a bit further by drawing more symbolism from the Wendigo myth: Shuuji is trapped in a self-destructive spiral driven by his constant need for external validation and his unfulfilled craving for approval, particularly from his father. This craving can be seen as a form of greed — not for material wealth perhaps, but for affirmation from others. In the same way that Wendigo’s victims are possessed for their greed and cursed with an insatiable hunger that leads to their ruin, Shuuji’s relentless yet fruitless pursuit of recognition forces him to repress his true feelings, and you can say this leads to his loss of self and eventually his demise, where he is metaphorically — and then quite literally — consumed by his own desperation. It’s also fitting that Lopmon evolves into Wendimon when Shuuji is at his lowest and very much cornered with no choice but to resort to desperate measures, which mirrors how Wendigo only appears during the coldest winters, when both despair and survival instincts are at their peak.

Let’s contrast that with Tu’er Ye, Turuiemon’s namesake. According to Chinese mythology, Tu’er Ye is also known as Yutu (Yùtù/玉兔, literally “Jade Rabbit”), the rabbit on the moon who pounds the elixir of life. Legend says that, once upon a time, he was sent by the Moon Goddess Chang’e (Cháng’é/嫦娥) to eradicate a plague on the land. The people of the land were initially distrustful of Tu’er Ye, seeing that his fur was white and white symbolized death in Chinese culture. However, this didn’t stop Tu’er Ye from saving them — he visited a nearby temple to borrow some clothes that he could wear to cover his white fur. After that, the people welcomed him, and Tu’er Ye successfully saved them from the plague. Ever since then, the people have been revering him as a symbol of protection. He is viewed as a guardian figure, especially for children, and is celebrated during festivals for his role in ensuring health and safety.

Even beyond Survive, the broader Digimon lore references Tu’er Ye through Turuiemon’s profile: Turuiemon is described as a Digimon that hunts down viruses that exploit e-mail, much like how Tu’er Ye’s mission is to eradicate the plague. Survive, however, takes this a step further by contrasting Turuiemon’s role in the story with Wendimon’s: While their evolution scenes take place during the exact same point in the story (that is, the peak of Shuuji’s mental breakdown), unlike Wendimon, Turuiemon appears to save him from a devastating situation, akin to how Tu’er Ye arrived to heal the people from the plague. Additionally, just as Tu’er Ye was initially distrusted by the people and could only rescue them after he gained their trust, Lopmon’s evolution into Turuiemon is only triggered when Shuuji finally places his trust in Lopmon (which in turn also symbolizes his willingness to accept himself for who he is). In contrast to Wendimon, whose appearance causes Shuuji’s death, Turuiemon sustains his life — which is very apt considering that Tu’er Ye is known for pounding the elixir of life, like mentioned earlier.

Aside from their mythological references, you can still draw more interesting parallels between Wendimon and Turuiemon from the story alone to see how they’re opposite of each other. Wendimon has an intimidating appearance and strength which gives Shuuji the impression that he has finally gained the upper hand after feeling weak for so long. However, this strength is deceptive — it isn’t born out of genuine growth, but instead out of Shuuji pushing Lopmon (and himself) beyond his limits. His obstinacy in this is fueled by the belief that the pain will help Lopmon grow stronger, just as his father’s harsh upbringing has forged him into the person he is today. It isn’t wrong to say that Lopmon does grow stronger from it by turning into Wendimon, but Wendimon’s strength is so destructive that it literally destroys Shuuji.

Part of why I think this behavior remains in Shuuji is because of the way he was raised by his father. While it’s true that Shuuji — very much like Aoi — has a strong sense of responsibility, I believe this sense duty also comes from his need to meet the expectations others have of him. His urge to fulfill these expectations seems to be driven by a desire to be accepted, as his father has made him believe that living up to these expectations is the only way to gain approval. In short, he constantly seeks external validation by repressing how he truly feels and following through what other wants.

Cherubimon’s evolution scenario seems to address this persistent trait of his and attempts to make him grow out of it even if just a little. Due to the simplistic scenario presented in it (much like any other affinity-based evolution scene in Survive), perhaps not many notice it’s meant for that. However, ever since the first time I watched it play out, I’ve been intrigued by how this line by Cherubimon is worded:

“シュウジが責任感だけじゃなく、自分の中に見つけた『正しさ』を信じたから、ボクにも力が湧いたんだ”

This line (very literally) translates to “I was able to find strength because you (Shuuji) didn’t just rely on your sense of responsibility; you also believed in the ‘rightness’ you found within yourself.” Something to note is that I couldn’t quite come up with an appropriate word to translate “正しさ”, but we’ll get back to this later. English localization has it translated to “Believing not only in your duty, but in your own righteousness, you filled me with strength,” which isn’t wrong per se (it’s correct and it flows more naturally than the very literal translation I’ve come up with, in fact), but translating “正しさ” as “righteousness” in this context doesn’t really click in my opinion. Let me finally explain why.

While translating “正しさ” as “righteousness” isn’t necessarily wrong, “righteousness” often has a stronger moral or ethical connotation, implying a judgment of moral superiority or adherence to a strict set of principles. For me, this feels too heavy or “formal” in the context where Shuuji is simply discovering and trusting his own sense of what is right rather than claiming a broader moral high ground, which I believe is the case here. It’s probably why it’s written in quotes (『正しさ』), perhaps implying subjectivity since it comes internally from Shuuji’s own judgment.

Now, to connect my interpretation of what “正しさ” means with what I said earlier before about the line intriguing me: the line makes it seem like Shuuji’s sense of responsibility/duty (責任感) isn’t necessarily the same thing with what Shuuji believes to be right. The way Cherubimon puts it implies that duty is external, and this new thing that Shuuji discovers comes from within and it’s what has triggered the evolution. In other words, Shuuji finally finds it in himself to just follow what his heart believes without getting too concerned about what others think of it, instead of constantly focusing on fulfilling duties and obligations in response to external expectations, which is represented by his strong sense of responsibility.

The dialogue that comes after that line drives home the point even further too — Shuuji wonders if what Cherubimon calls his “rightness” is just his ego talking (the Japanese word used for this is literally also “ego”/“エゴ”). Instead of saying he’s wrong for thinking about it like that, Cherubimon reassures him that he doesn’t care whether his “rightness” is driven by his ego or his selfish desires (身勝手), because to him, it still holds value if it can be shared with and understood by others. Essentially, Cherubimon is saying that Shuuji’s own personal beliefs or actions are valid as long as they resonate with someone else, making them his form of justice or righteousness (as a note: “正義” usually translates to “justice” in English, but I think this is where the word “righteousness” would be appropriate to use). He wants Shuuji to realize that personal motivations can still lead to something meaningful and just when they connect with others. I personally find how this is incorporated in Cherubimon’s evolution beautiful — it’s in the way  Shuuji finally allows himself to embrace his personal beliefs after struggling with trusting his own heart (since it’s been long overshadowed with his need to meet the expectations imposed on him), and by doing so, he doesn’t just empower himself, but also enables Lopmon to reach his final stage of evolution.