any social movement or organization in a settler colony that stops short of decolonization categorically can't be called "revolutionary." a revolution is when you overturn the relations of production. colonialism is fundamentally extractive and enslaving. if "US" settlers remade their colony as a settler workers' state, that would not be revolution, because the primary contradiction in settler colonialism is between the colonizer and colonized. the settler workers' state would face continued (and entirely justified) resistance from the colonized, because the settler "revolution" would not actually resolve the contradiction, it would replicate and re-entrench the same racial regime. these settler "socialists" are self-interested genocidaires, exactly like zionist kibbutzniks
Loading...
