radfems go kill yourselves challenge
d e v o n

izzy's playlists!
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

tumblr dot com
Game of Thrones Daily
Cosimo Galluzzi
sheepfilms
🪼
wallacepolsom
i don't do bad sauce passes
Peter Solarz
Mike Driver

Kaledo Art

pixel skylines

titsay
dirt enthusiast
$LAYYYTER
RMH
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
seen from Philippines

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Colombia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from Portugal
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Philippines
seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Czechia
@ratsetflummi
radfems go kill yourselves challenge

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
We never really talked about it but The Ugly Ducking that grew up to be a beautiful swan was still probably pretty fugly from a duck’s perspective
Like that story isn’t about an ugly duckling that grew up sexy, it’s a fucking swan was judged as a duck and hated itself as a duck until it found out it wasn’t a duck and stopped trying to be a duck.
The actual ducks in the neighborhood were probably still looking around at perfectly normal swans like “damn, look at those busted ass ducks”
This is pretty important, actually. The good ending is finding the other swans, not tearing yourself to pieces trying to impress the ducks.
although a lot of adaptations skip over this and sanitise it to the point where the message is apparently meant to read "you'll be forgiven for being born wrong, if you turn out thin and white and pretty!" - there's a lot going on in the original. For one thing, most adaptations present him as a wild animal, but the Ugly Duckling is born into captivity, into a society that mimics upper-class pretensions, which is why he's declared 'ugly'. His mother is loving and very generous at first - hatching him despite the inconvenient incubation period, and defending him firmly - but after the other domestic animals (including a higher-class dominant one) point out what a burden he is, she turns on her child. Previously, she genuinely appeared to like him.
And a thing that's missed, while kid's abridged adaptations miss out on the rest of the point, is that the Ugly Duckling decides he can't live like this and leaves the farmyard; he goes into the wild himself. In the various passages in which people try to keep him as a pet, or a duck, it's hammered home again and again that this does not make a good pet. there is nothing in him that suits being a domestic animal.
one of the particular parts that makes you go "sweet jesus, hans christian andersen" is where the wild geese rock up and are nice to the young swan, not quite recognising him as a swan but saying they're pretty into whatever weird vibe he has (is this a sort of queer recognition thing? we are told, explicitly, that the wild geese are both male, and they definitely say "you're so ugly it's hot - come with us" - given HCA, it might be) and then they're, you know, instantly shot dead. Because that's what happens to wild geese. They like your vibe and try to take you with them, and even offer to teach you how to flirt - and then you see exactly what happens to them. And then every encounter from there, from the old woman who attempts to keep him - a very satirical and funny passage - to the young family who genuinely attempt to save his life (but he's too fundamentally panicked and awkward to reciprocate their kindness, and explodes out of their house in a social catastrophe) the story hammers in: not only are you a terrible duck, but you just aren't MEANT to live with people. You're closer to the things they kill than the things they keep.
but yeah, adaptations miss this often: you have to go out into the wild to save your own life. you may die in the wild, and you WILL die where you are. nobody comes to save you - and nobody really could have, when you were younger - but ultimately, mate, you just aren't a very good pet. Of the list of "attributes of a domestic animal" you really suck, in detail, at all of them.
so it's very telling to me that the good ending is the one where he is a wild animal - but more importantly, a WILD SWAN.
Not killed. (like a wild goose).
Not kept. (like a duck).
but a secret third thing, that swans - of few creatures - get. they get admired and they get paid and they get LEFT ALONE. they have a position in relation to humanity, and it is BEING A LOVELY SWAN OVER THERE.
what a thing for a lonely heart to yearn for!
I saw some notes saying "oh wow I need to look up the original." It's very easy! It's here: The Ugly Duckling, by Hans Christian Andersen on Project Gutenberg. It is 3500 words or so and free.
The Ugly Duckling isn't a "fairy tale" or a fable. It didn't emerge from the collective unconscious - it didn't come from nowhere. It's an original work. Andersen wrote it in 1843. It didn't exist before he came up with it. the translation I linked above was translated in 1930.
like many HCA stories (The Little Mermaid, The Snow Queen) it's out of copyright and has pretty images, so it gets mined frequently as a free text - you can always republish a cheap Ugly Duckling, and don't have to pay an author. So people tend to just read and remember the various abridged versions. as a result, they think about it like a fairy tale - a sort of ambiguous, detached, floating thing that belongs to everyone and can mean everything. fairy tales - loose cultural fragments - can be hammered to suit any moral, or handwaved to be about anything, and then when you get bored of them, you can "twist" them a different way. Maybe it's about this. maybe it's about that. I read it as being about beauty. I read it as being about me. I don't like the politics. Today King Arthur is going to be Roman. Tomorrow Sleeping Beauty will wake up by herself. it doesn't really matter. And that's grand! that's what fairy tales have become - they are the people's mental property - they're to be played with.
But The Ugly Duckling isn't a fairy tale. it's a single sad, weird queer guy from a while ago, trying to tell you something personal about himself. maybe he isn't communicating clearly, maybe he's too weird, maybe you don't like it, maybe it annoys you - but <TheUglyDuckling> DOES have meaning and intention.
"I think the moral is this / I think the moral is that" - do try reading it first though! do try reading the whole thing first.
perhaps a hot take but even at its most generous i think "if men could get pregnant abortions would be free" is a pretty shallow observation in that it treats the ability to get pregnant as something superfluous to patriarchy. i do take a very socialist view of patriarchy and reproductive autonomy is very much a labor issue. "if (cis perisex) men could get pregnant" is a "what if the moon was made of pudding" issue to me because if cis perisex men could get pregnant, our entire model of society and the production of new workers and also our entire species would be fundamentally different. its not like random happenstance that the people who can get pregnant are treated like property to be controlled, that is literally The Whole Point. you simply cannot separate misogyny and patriarchy from how people's actual bodies function and how they are treated and used by systems of power.
its not a super deep phrase overall. its an attempt to make visible the degree to which (cis)androcentrism shapes what things are viewed as important or normal and at the end of the day "human" in a general sense. which isn't entirely useless on its own, but in that attempt trans and intersex men are harmfully excluded. we can do so much better i promise! this phrase is cathartic for cis women to say and i feel that is largely why it has stuck around for so long and why people who are supposedly pro-trans get so defensive about people criticizing it, or will agree with criticisms and then keep using it.
#I'd reblog this a thousand times if I could#patriarchy's fundamental existence is as a tool of control of (re)production#the means of production of new working force or heirs (depending on class)#trans issues are also inextricable from this dynamic. how we are viewed and treated socially is highly influenced#by our ability to reproduce or lack of it. transphobes even explicitly point this out a lot of the time
^^ THIS is what actual transfeminist materialism can look like btw.
this is also why i believe the patriarchy is binarist in ideology but never truly binary on a system-level. because queer people ("queer" used as expansively as possible") have always existed and will always exist, and as a system of culture and thought it has to account for queer existence in order to properly suppress it and maintain power. which is why any feminist analysis that doesn't take a fundamentally non-binary view of gender, which overlooks queerphobia(s) and focuses entirely on "m > f," is incomplete.
I do think people who hate A.I. need to be a little more self-critical about when their own backlash hurts other people.
Such as when people attack an actual artist due to a claim that the art was Gen A.I., and then when the fact they’re getting unwarranted hate & did not even use A.I. is brought to light, someone says “ugh I hate that we have to worry about this now due to A.I.”
Like, no, A.I. didn’t make you do that. You should’ve been verifying facts before taking action against others to begin with, and the issue of dogpiling people online over unverified rumors has been a big problem for a long time before these Gen A.I. models even existed. The existence of A.I. means verifying facts is more difficult, but the way to prevent attacking people over false positives is stuff you probably should’ve been doing anyways. Don’t act like A.I. made you do it.
for as long as this A.I. boom/bubble lasts, A.I. is going to be used—by the companies running the models, and by the users—to obfuscate and deflect from responsibility. you need to not also do that.
slow down. verify. if you can’t verify with absolute certainty, don’t act in a way where getting it wrong would make you the asshole. maybe don’t do anything.
this might mean you get a lot less invested in being angry about a lot fewer things online. but this is almost definitely good for your mental health. you should probably be doing it anyways.
Before AI it was endless unsubstantiated accusations of tracing or theft due to vague resemblances, AI's just changed the acussations but not the patterns.
(Source: Sen the donkey)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
basically everyone on this website.
No transphobes allowed, only transborbs.
Check out my stuff!
✧Read Namesake✧ ✧Read Crow Time✧ ✧Store✧ ✧Patreon✧
oh, damn
i mean i knew that buildings look worse nowadays, but i didn't realize there was such a concrete reason for it
oh, damn
i mean i knew that buildings look worse nowadays, but i didn't realize there was such a concrete reason for it
dump your partner who wants you to diet

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
functionally suicidal character saying “I would die for you” to their significant other and its like. I get the sentiment, honey, but if a hot dog vendor told me he’d sell hot dogs for me, I wouldn’t feel very moved now would I
Now a functionally suicidal character saying “I will live for you”. Now that’s a dynamic I can sink my teeth into.
now how about a functionally suicidal character saying "I will sell hot dogs for you"
Hotdog vender lays down their life to protect their suicidal partner, who then takes over the hotdog stand to carry on their memory...
office bugs.... been wanting to practice drawing bugs and officespaces so i did both smile
its cool that sometimes people try to have one kid and accidentally have two kids. flavorful. more things should work like that. get married and suddenly there's a second wife. pass the interview and end up with two jobs. etc. keep em guessing
I have started following the journey of a German soccer fan in the US for the world cup
@laeffy the euros have found buc-ee's
OP: My chickens refuse to roost on their perches, so I’m trying to find their leader among them.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
OP: "Grandpa made this for Dad when he was a child, and now it's been passed down to my son."
As pointed out in the comments on Douyin, a lot of thought went into the engineering: oval wheels slow it down, the frame is close to the ground and the handle is angled to prevent it from tipping over, the wood pieces on the back wheels lock it from moving in reverse, and the knocking sounds serve more than one purpose, both attracting the attention of the child as well as allowing the adults to easily hear the speed and location of the child.
funniest yet most enlightening conversation on this whole social media ban topic, by two girls sat across from me on the bus the other day:
"what do they mean by social media? does Roblox count? what about all the stuff I've built?"
"you'll be fine, doesn't your icloud say you're 34?"
"oh my god they're even banning Facebook. who the fuck is on Facebook"