“gender is so fun to play around with and be silly with!” okay cool personally i’m not having fun with a construct that has oppressed women & girls for all of its existence

I think the reason why men and women can't agree on what percentage of men are actually "good" men, is because they have two different definitions of what a "good" man is. Men have such low standards for themselves when it comes to considering themselves good guys. They will basically walk around acting like they deserve to be given the key to the city just because they've never murdered anyone before. So when men try to tell women that there are plenty of "good" guys out there, they mean there are plenty of men out there who haven't committed any felonies yet. But women's definition of a "good" guy is a guy who hasn't committed any felonies but also is someone who routinely goes out of his way to be kind, considerate, and caring towards others. Men don't include these qualities in their definition of what a good guy is because they consider these qualities to only be applicable to women. They don't have to actually be empathetic towards anyone because that's women's' job in their minds.

Rest in peace, Rebecca Cheptegei. I have no words for this vile act of femicide.

No other organism is disgusted with how they look. It's a tyranny to condition half of the human population to hate themselves so much that they repeatedly hurt their bodies, making efforts of altering them. Look at the trees aging with no shame in all their glory, all the female animals existing freely and unapologetically but human female people have been subjected to this imposed cruel self-hatred for centuries by m@les and m@le-supremacist world

the terminology centered around love making is morose & concerning. sex is supposed to be a safe, consensual experience. the language used to describe sexual acts are rooted in a violent sect of the heteropatriarchy. “smash”, “ruin”, “destroy”, “break their back”, “rearrange their organs”, “blow”, “bang”, “screw”, “pound”, and more are all used to describe sexual acts. it’s described as something done to someone, rather than as a mutual act. this violent language is so present in our culture, and it assumes that a woman can be sexually satisfied & reach the point of climax merely on the basis of penetration, which has been proven so many times to be blatantly untrue. perhaps it’s just true that men don’t even truly want the woman to feel any sexual pleasure during the act at all, and that they simply see their dicks as something to be worshipped. they truly do want to smash, ruin, destroy, bang, pound, and screw– they want to destruct. they want satisfaction, they want to feel pleasure on the basis of female suffering & female pain. they don’t want the woman to be sexually pleased at all. they don’t see the woman they’re making love with as a person worthy of the status of a person. they don’t think they’re engaging in a mutual activity, they simply take what they want and don’t try to satisfy the person they’re having sex with at all, because they don’t see that person as a person, and because they don’t see the sex act as something they’re doing with someone, but as something they’re doing to someone. that is the essence of rape culture, male egocentrism, and male dominance.

and i think the fact that many people worry about what men would do if prostitution didnt exist - which many fear would be to focus their violent sexual energy on „innocent“ women and other vulnerable groups - tells you everything you need to know about prostitution. some women are forced or groomed into „sacrificing“ themselves so mens insatiable thirst for domination and degradation and their unshakable feeling of entitlement to the female body can be served, and that is the root all prostitution stems from. no matter how much liberals scream and sob about potential empowerment and „choice“.