I recently published a calendar for sale featuring various floating island pieces that people have commissioned from me over on Redbubble. Iâve gotten more than one inquiry about the ethics of doing this, including more than a few accusations of âsketchyâ behavior. I recently responded to one of these inquiries in private, which became rather lengthy but which I think is useful to post publicly. I know this information is floating out there in other posts, but because of the frequency of misunderstandings, I thought it useful to put it out here again!
Iâd first like to open this with a brief explanation of copyright and trademark law, because usually this question comes from a place of not understanding how those laws work. When an artist makes a piece of work, that individual piece of work is protected by copyright. No need to register the piece with the copyright office, though doing so can help in cases where your artwork is used illegally without your consent for profit. This applies to commissioned artwork as well. Unless it is specified in a written agreement (an exchange of emails can count), the copyright to a commissioned piece by default remains with the artist. The client is paying for the time used to create the piece. Itâs a service, not a product (though itâs a bit of a combination especially in regards to traditional commissions where the original painting is shipped to the client). Even with traditional paintings, the rights to use the image remain with the artist by default. Because this isnât widely known, I have it outlined in my term of service, a link to which is available on my front page of every gallery I have, and provided in email exchanges with clients before payment is made.
Now you might ask, what about the copyrights of the characters? Donât the clients own the character design? In an absolutely strict legal sense, the answer is no. Character design, unlike individual works of art, is not protected by copyright. However, a character creator can TRADEMARK their character, the process for which is a bit more rigorous than copyright. While trademark isnât protected immediately upon creation like copyrighted individual works are, you need to actually file for a trademark according to certain specifications to have your character design protected legally. Examples of trademarked characters are Mickey Mouse and Superman.
Ethically, however, the characters absolutely do belong to the clients! Despite there being no legal precedent, that is something I respect. Which is why I often alter commissioned works before selling prints, stickers, or other products of the piece. Some people prefer this. Some people find it insulting, and desire me to represent their character exactly as designed in my products. Most people donât care, as theyâve read and agreed to be terms of service before paying for and receiving commissioned artwork. I do my best to respect the wishes of every client in this regard on an individual basis, within reason.
A side note I want to bring up, because this is often a point of confusion, is the term âWork for hireâ, which you will see nowhere on my terms of service. This is a specific legal term that applies to artists doing work for clients who will retain all the rights to the resulting work. Many people think âwork for hireâ means âany work which you are hired for.â This is incorrect, and the source of a lot of grief for artists. Itâs important to know that it refers to a very specific legal term, and not ALL art which you are hired to create.
Now onto my terms of service. If you take a look at the link here - tinyurl.com/katiehofgardtos You will see I have more than one clause covering this exact issue. Clause 14 outlines basic copyright law as it pertains to commissioned works. While not necessary, helps to avoid confusion. Most people arenât aware of the law, and I believe clients should be informed. Clause 15 states that I do not claim ownership of the character, another concern that potential clients may have. By commissioning me, you donât give over the rights to your character in any fashion whatsoever. They still belong to you, just as the artwork belongs to me. Clause 16 is an extension of clause 14, to further clarify that ârightsâ include the distribution of the digital file and sale of the image in any way. Again, many people donât understand what rights are, so this is to keep them informed. Clause 17 outlines the limited rights that I transfer to a client, because some people want to make a print for their wall, or a t-shirt of their character just for personal use. That doesnât harm me financially in any way, and I think itâs only right they get to do that.
Every single client is given the opportunity to read this terms of service often in several stages; once before emailing me when I open for commissions, once in email exchanges before sending payment, and any time they wish to refresh their memory as itâs linked on all of my gallery pages. This is not hidden information, since itâs important to make the transaction go smoothly, and to protect both myself and the client. Commissioning me is a choice, and preferences for the use of the commissioned art absolutely do get taken into consideration within reason.
I want to end this by emphasizing that without the use of commissioned works for creation of prints and other products, I and many other artists who work almost exclusively on a commission basis are reduced to being laborers alone. We are paid for the labor of making brand new art, but would be denied the opportunity to make passive income from our own artwork through products and licensing. Iâm someone whose business is mostly labor. It will eventually catch up to me physically, I will not be able to make brand new art for pay later in life. It doesnât seem like it, but art is a physically laborious task which can (and has) resulted in repetitive motion injury which threatens my livelihood in the long term. But with passive income (making and selling merchandise, or licensing artwork for companies to do so), I can create a secondary income for myself which frees me to do BETTER work, hurts me less, and provides a needed source of income for my family, for which I am the sole provider.
If you have questions, I recommend checking out from your local library this book - graphicartistsguild.org/handbo⌠Along with the courses I took in art school about copyright law, contract law, and common art business practices, this is one of my main up to date resources for building and maintaining the way I do business. My business practices are based off a combination of what I learned in copyright law/contract law/business practice classes in college, what Iâve read on my own, & common practices in the furry art commission arena. Iâve tried to create a balance thatâs fair for me and clients!
prguitarman
romaincrisis
yousharknotpass
kianamaiart
vaporwave
titsay
