Untitled

No genuine private relationship has something happen every single day after a major public event like that, only to then shift into actively provoking the audience. That is not privacy. That is strategy.

There are clearly still a few people clinging to the idea that some blissful reveal of a child and happy family unit is coming. At this point, that is completely delusional. A week after the Oscars, Rita posted a photo from over a year earlier. People Magazine did not just do that on their own. That came after the blind had already made a point of saying they were miserable together and that she was desperate. It was on purpose to make the new viewers of this mess get involved. The original photo was sitting right in the girl's tags with the date.

And that divorce document people keep ignoring matters. She was listed as the filer, which means the public narrative was positioned so she would look like the one walking away from something she no longer wanted. That is why the blind saying she was desperate came out. It was basically framing the Oscars appearance as her forcing the public image, clinging to him, and making sure she was all over him even though the marriage was already dead. It was making that night nothing but a business transaction, which it was.

The relationship illusion in the articles that followed looked like one last payout for her side of the arrangement. Then, a month later, she gets an A24 role, and the next day she deletes the appearance. She was placed alone at her premiere, and he was placed alone before that.

This is textbook business cleanup. This is how these things end.

The latest blind reads like a condensed version of all the noise from the fall. It is basically saying, “Remember this? It is coming.”

People on tiktok caught on to this way faster because they aren't up the guy's ass.

Simple as that.

By all means I would LOVE them giving us a “reason” and proof to stop all these “reasons” that it’s fake….

And by your wording saying “reasons”, sounds like you recognize these are indeed valid reasons that it is … fake. 

Never seen during the entire time of “dating” and “living together”.

Both of them making clearly single comments during their supposed “First year so serious together”

Stripping live on IG a month after going public 

Maintaining activity on Web cam sites despite his "squeaky clean" image

Old immature scare videos showing how old they are based on locations of all of them. 

Not a single look of him looking like his “roles” he would have filmed when they supposedly met and lived together. 

Trolling and post, then delete vague cryptic things from extended friends .

Refusing all photos on carpets at all his premieres 

Leaving out a spouse from House sale articles and Mother’s birthday celebrations in 2025 when they were supposedly “expecting.” 

Visible discomfort with any physical contact .

Pre written PDA articles when the photos didn't match.

Not seen ONCE together between January 2025 and Oscars 2026, while supposedly pregnant and welcoming a child.

Never ONCE sharing a birthday or holiday together with evidence despite first xmas’s, first Thanksgivings, new years, valentines. 

Claiming the actress is auditioning when she would have supposedly been six months pregnant. 

Never having a single group photo with the friend groups or families WITH the couple ever. 

Residing mainly in Portugal even supposedly during a pregnancy while the spouse is in the USA.

A friend deleting all social media traces of May-July to erase all “non pregnant” evidence 

A staged Wedding site to show editable RSVP invites to prove the actor is not attending a key family event of hers. 

Not one single visual of her pregnant .

Photoshop dumps that can be pulled apart as fake in five seconds 

Never seen ONCE outside of staged pap walks, or events for over Three years.

Using a photo from Australia and making it “Tennessee” when it’s over 14 months old to make some “proof” the couple is happy. 

Not one DOG walking image in over 3 years 

No “How did they meet” story from either person. 

Showing up separately at separate events to show “wedding rings”, not together. 

Forcing bizarre personal topics like "getting a second dog" and "auditions" into professional movie press tours where they had no relevance.

Not a single family or friend or industry peer congratulating them publicly about marriage or child. 

Total media blackout professionally for the actor for over 6 months despite huge franchise return with Marvel.

Firewall of the franchise from the “personal news” despite the marketing ploy of "fatherhood".

Manufacturing artificial "security crises" and blaming fans to evade live, unscripted microphones is completely unheard of for real parents in the entertainment industry .

Getting tons of solo shots at a prestige carpet event when you have no Hollywood career footprint, and apparently after you “had enough” of fans. 

Fake birth document, fake divorce document, both magically leaked from a so called “So private” NDA, no phones at wedding, couple. 

12 consecutive CDAN blinds painting him as a toxic, miserable, and unfaithful partner who was quietly unraveling behind closed doors right during his major Marvel promotional windows and post birth.

Looking PISSY and uncomfortable and barely speaking during EVERY sighting together. 

Visible discomfort from the actor on camera and his co-star Dakota Johnson openly laughing at the relationship on a public wire. Including mocking her "english."

Major A-list peers like Pedro Pascal being systematically left out of every single junket where the "wife" narrative was pushed., No peers ever saying congrats to the actor ONCE .

Launching a major text-only birth announcement through a deleted 10-minute TMZ link and a People column carrying an official "reps didn't respond" disclaimer.

A last-minute "hiking with a baby" leak to DeuxMoi carrying an unprecedented, bolded "This is not a proven sighting" warning from the platform.

Securing a slot-one leading role for an unknown actress who hadn't worked in years via a major A24 trade announcement on Tuesday, May 12th.

Her deleting only their joint Oscars post from her active Instagram feed on Wednesday, May 13th, less than 24 hours after her film package cleared.

DID I leave anything out?

None of this is imaginary or delusional, it's literally the media facing behavior we saw and NOT one bit of it suggests genuine, real or Love, and it is sure as fuck isn't private or protective of a real infant.

That isn’t an argument. That’s deflection.

If people are pointing out clear inconsistencies and the only response is name-calling, then maybe the issue isn’t that people are “delusional.” Maybe the issue is that no one actually has a reasonable counterargument.

So ask yourself these questions:

Why has this couple never been seen organically together, not even once, in over three years? And why was she never seen visibly pregnant?

Why was she shown in Portugal for months in a row through her friend’s posts, and why were those photos suddenly erased in July when pregnancy “rumors” started appearing in entertainment blinds? That has still never been answered.

Why was there complete silence until a random “baby announcement” appeared on the exact same October date this team has used three years in a row?

What protective parent, especially one whose fans are supposedly dangerous or stalking them, would hand over a newborn’s birth document to TMZ instead of simply sharing a hand photo, making a brief statement, or giving a basic verbal confirmation?

Building off that, why has no one verbally confirmed this child in over half a year?

What is the excuse for them showing up at the Oscars only after the live feeds shut off, with an obvious press muzzle in place so they wouldn’t have to speak? She had never attended that event before, and he hadn’t attended in over five years. It is standard practice to speak to press during a first major appearance after a so-called child.

How is she filming off the coast of Africa six months after supposedly having a child? And let’s be clear, she would have had to be there weeks before filming started, since actors are typically expected on set seven to ten days before cameras roll.

Why didn’t she publicly interact with any of her friends on social media all year? And beyond that, why is no one in either of their circles even subtly hinting that a child exists?

What actor who built his life on FAMILY would sit with cheating rumors, speculation, blinds circling him, and still refuse to confirm a literal CHILD and talk about being a parent?

Why was the birth doc marked as born in "Concord" When he sold the Concord home in July 2024?

Those are just TEN valid questions people are asking about this whole charade. There's way more points people are making, including why she put her career on HOLD and then decides to go work when she "has" a baby who's barely sitting up yet? Not to mention the fact the industry does not give someone like that a ET grid interview and Oscar pic solos left and right just to be "A wife" of someone who's last films have all tanked. Give me a break.

So no, calling people “parasocial” is not a counterpoint. Calling people “delusional” is not evidence. Telling people to “get a life” does not answer any of the above.

Why delete or archive your Oscar photos when there were four of you alone and only one with your “husband”?

Have you become such a huge star now that you no longer need to be introduced as “Chris Evans’ wife” for people to remember who you are?

Careful, sweetheart. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. What if a BUA is on the way and the storyline suddenly changes?

And one more thing: stop wasting money buying bots. It’s getting embarrassing. Everyone can see you’re losing “fans” at an impressive speed, not gaining them. Unless, of course, your official role is being Chris Evans’ accessory. In that case, it makes sense. People only follow you to figure out who exactly you are.

Accepting your irrelevance in this industry might be a good start. Maybe then the game will finally change for you.

Honestly, I don’t give it six hours before those bought followers disappear like they always do.

And spare me the nonsense about your three fan clubs spending 24/7 patrolling the internet to defend an actress who works every other year and, when she finally does, appears on screen for exactly fifteen seconds. At this point, it’s still very believable that those pages were created and managed by you.

Seriously what mother leaves her 7 month old baby for work when she has no need to. I get if an actress had already signed a contract to start filming at a certain date before pregnancy, like Margot Robbie with Wuthering Heights, or if a woman has to go back to work because she can’t get enough maternity leave or pay. But none of those scenarios are true with fish.

I’m fortunate that I was able to have 10 months paid maternity leave (not all of it full pay but still a generous enough amount to not have to worry and rush back to work) and that my husband earns well enough that I only went back to work when our daughter was 14 months. I was able to spend those precious early moments with her, like seeing her crawl, her first steps, her first words, her first birthday. No way would I have left her at 7 months when I had no reason to.

She’s filming in one country whilst Chris is supposed to be getting ready to film another project, yeah totally sounds like logical steps a couple would take to plan their careers whilst raising an infant. They clearly do not share a child together.

You expect fans to believe he picked an actress who is completely under his age group and is supposedly trying to start a career and we’re expected to believe not only did that actress leave Europe to come over here, but to come over here and be basically his live-in girlfriend and fiancé who didn’t work. Then she supposedly became his wife and still didn’t work, sat at interviews as well as a podcast claiming she didn’t like Hollywood didn’t like the industry over here . Did not promote her work did not attend any of her other projects, or anything, only attended stuff for him, only was inserted into his work and now all of a sudden we are expected to believe that these people have a 6 to 7 month old child that has never been proven has never been confirmed by either of them verbally or photographically and we’re expected to believe that magically now she wants a career and she’s going to film a movie overseas, that is not how that works. We also are expected to believe that he is supposed to go film Marvel, not just Marvel, but another film in August so how does that lineup with raising a supposed baby? Your supposed first baby in fact, in the United States Massachusetts how? it doesn’t work .

let’s not forget that in July 2024 there was a whole media blitz another time about Chris and her and the dog and how they were talking about getting a second dog but oh they had to wait until things slow down before they get a second dog. Then magically we’re supposed to believe that they conceived a child during her filming in Australia, having it barely a year after they claimed they needed to have things slow down before a second dog. You don’t jump to having a baby when you don’t have time for another dog. And add the fact she was seen in Portugal for 80% of this so called pregnancy. And never once with him.

The fact she magically got a project after being paid to get pics at the Oscar’s, a huge press rollout and a ET interview at her premiere , proves a contractual payout is finally being given. I see you Jason. It is not an accident that this was announced the opening day of the Cannes market . And the fact you’re also proving she is far off in Spain already filming proves no “first Mother’s Day” happened.

don’t come at us with people mag listed her with 18 other first Mother’s Day actresses- she is not famous enough to get in an article like that without them being paid! Not to mention she is the only one in the article with zero proof of life of that child

Ah, here we have a true phenomenon of acting: the great star who managed to turn an extra role into… something even smaller. That’s what you call talent, right? Less than 20 seconds of screen time — practically a blink, but with so much artistic intensity, of course. A true example of “outdoing yourself.”

And the phenomenon continues: the diva of 20 seconds of screen time has taken the concept of being “the main character in her own head” to an almost academic level. At the Oscars? A show of its own. Serving blockbuster lead-actress energy (the kind we already know will flop—gracefully), doing solo photoshoots like she just won the award, outfit changes worthy of someone who actually had a reason for it… pure inspiration.

And the best part: guiding her husband like he’s the scene director — while he’s giving off the unmistakable vibe of someone clearly in a completely different script. Consistency is everything, right? After all, she didn’t even need to show up much at the film’s “premiere” — it would’ve been a waste of time, since in 20 seconds she appears, breathes, and disappears.

Now just imagine how proud he must be, being the mentor and advisor of such a… concise talent. Hahaha.

So not only did that "guitar" with purple strap NOT be Chris's like team real insisted of his presence while filming this, but her appearance is not even one minute long and is hardly crucial to the film's storyline or plot.

As far as her attention at the Oscars, as we have said, you do not become famous out of nowhere and grab photographers giving you so many solo shots, please the one where she's with him and they only close up on her that her pathetic fan page posted. That's a PR PAYOUT.

None of those people knew her name, and nothing about her at the Oscars suggested "Star" and yet here she was parading around like one. It was for her PR payout to have solos finally for a portfolio. Notice her solo pic posts? What about the terrible "nude leak" that upsets you and made you "so done"? No? Gonna leave the "baby" because it's all about you at an award show? Gotta shine? Guess the male counterpart didn't get that message or rather wasn't given that requirement for that appearance.

As far as the premiere she was there for one reason only -- to make a quote to make him look good. No one on ET would ever speak to someone in a minor role like that who is unknown. She was arranged to speak bc of her connection to him.

What happened to the scary email hack the Wednesday before? Oh you're fine to go alone to a premiere even be shown papped from a hotel with no risks huh? Funny how all those excuses and blinds were lies to make sure no one unscripted spoke to you.

These are rules of the industry, so keep your whining bullshit thinking "he's making her a star" out of my face, that isn't how Hollywood works and that's USING Him.

(delulu defenders will say otherwise but its literally here and soo detailed) im assuming the tweets below who exposed her, are the mentioned ones in the blind. Funny how people even brought up a petition to cancel warrior nun back then.. and see it got cancelled back then. but really what the fkk are those quotes?!

1- No matter how much you try to change a person's personality, they will never change.

In the reality of the industry, a "Privacy Shield" for a new parent is the easiest, most socially accepted pass a celebrity can use. If there were a real child, and especially if there were a real security crisis (Nude leak shit) or issues in their relationship, they had every "right" and professional justification to stay home.

In Hollywood, the first 6 months postpartum is considered a "blackout period."  If an actor like Chris Evans told the Academy or his studios, "I’m staying home to protect my newborn and manage a security threat," he would receive 100% support and glowing "Protective Father" press.

What they did : They chose to appear at the Oscars and Vanity Fair, but then used the "Security Crisis" as a Selective Muzzle to avoid granting interviews. This proves the appearance was a Contractual Requirement (The Payout) rather than a personal choice. And her behavior was not some "I'm tired of this, and done" security crisis bullshit.

"Safety" logic collapses when you look at the last week:

Chris-  Claimed he wasn't safe enough to speak at the Oscars, but was safe enough to stand on a massive stage in Las Vegas at CinemaCon yesterday with RDJ.

Her- Claimed she was in a security crisis, twice , yet stood solo and vulnerable on a public NYC carpet on Monday.

Security threats don't have "office hours." If they were real, she wouldn't be doing solo premieres and he wouldn't be going to any of these events either. On top of that you wouldn't be pushing the repetitive press coverage on your "relationship" and putting your "child's" name and bday in all of them.

If the child were real, they would be using Humanizing info (mentions of nursery colors, sleep schedules, or "mom's night out" at the premiere).

Having a baby is intense. It’s an emotional rollercoaster, your body goes through a lot, and as a couple it’s one of the most stressful times you’ll ever go through. Hormones are all over the place, your body is changing, you’re exhausted. It’s not light or casual.

You’re not out here baiting fans with “blinds” that conveniently drop around birthdays or family events to grab attention. You’re not posing in ways to make people think you’re pregnant while clearly getting work done on your face for months straight before. That’s not how any of this works.

And then living mostly in Portugal while your supposed husband, the father, is nowhere to be seen with you, while he’s publicly in the U.S.? That doesn’t line up either.

After a baby, you’re drained. Your entire focus is on that child. I get that some people say, “that’s why they ignored everything,” and sure, to a point. But constant outside drama actually makes things worse, not easier. It adds stress, it doesn’t disappear.

You literally had blinds saying she was fed up with people picking everything apart. So why turn around and keep feeding the machine? Why push out more content that people are obviously going to analyze, like using a 2025 Australia photo and calling it Tennessee 2026? That didn’t just magically happen. That was given to the media.

And why show up at the Oscars after claiming you’re over it and want privacy, just to put yourselves in the most public situation possible?

No celebrity who actually just had a baby would sit back and let this level of scrutiny happen, especially people questioning if the child even exists or calling him a cheating husband during that time. That’s when you shut it down. One call, one clear statement. Especially after confirming the child, which he never even did.

And physically, nothing about her lines up either. Not one sign of having had a baby. Not saying bodies don’t change differently, but you don’t go through that and bounce back completely untouched in a few months, especially when you’re already small. Her body hasn’t shifted at all, and that’s just reality. On top of that, she’s clearly been getting work done, multiple times, even between major appearances. When exactly does that fit in with a newborn? It doesn’t.

Same goes for him. Men around pregnancies change too, it’s normal. This idea that they’re somehow immune to every basic reality just doesn’t make sense.

When people have their first child, they usually pull back. They go quiet, focus on their family. Not whatever this is, where they disappear except for events, while all this drama builds around them with zero real response.

You don’t ignore everything and then keep adding fuel to it by pushing out the same recycled articles, using old photos to bait reactions, and then flipping it into “we’re the victims” when people call it out.

A baby is a happy, grounding thing. If there was one, they’d handle it like that. A simple announcement, ask for privacy, move on. Not this constant loop of the same timeline being pushed over and over like people won’t notice.

At this point, people aren’t just confused, they’re exhausted. And honestly, none of this lines up with reality.