shocked by how bright even our pain is
running wildly beside us like an underground river.
And whatever language is good for
The 'Fleet' text has become the focus & key to providing viewer entry into the work. In other words it offers the potential for the work to open out & become more than something that signifies personally to me alone.
My initial use of the ambigram was to incorporate 'Fleet' into the work in a visible but not immediately apparent way, in the same way the river affects the visible landscape of Kings Cross. It also appeals that ambigrams are thought of in terms of compelling the 'viewer to shift their perspective and engage with language on an intellectual and intuitive level simultaneously, turning text into art.' (Wikipedia)
Interestingly 'Douglas Hofstadter coined the word "homogram" to define an ambigram with identical letters.[11][38] In this case, the first half of the word turns into the last half.[39]'. See my quote from him below about generality in the specific' when I was looking at abstraction.
Also around the same time/place in my blog see Etel Adnan, Key Signs in Tate Modern & the Antoni Tàpies work 'Z':"This piece exemplifies Tàpies’s exploration of materiality and his interest in combining symbolic letters with complex textures to evoke meaning beyond the literal, inviting contemplation on language, form, and presence." Antoni Tapies | Z | https://share.google/RFspIYqGVf7Q91He2
All links noticed retrospectively!
The underlying concept: displacement. Or in a different way: lost from view. The Fleet - a river lost from view - displaces the placement of the railway & hotels.
The railway lost from view displaced the people who lived in the area prior to its arrival in the form of the stations & station hotels.
The construction of the building which has 'displaced' my view & (will have) displaced me - in part due to my lost view.
I prioritised concept over aesthetics in driving decisions about the placement of the elements & the colours. By that I mean aesthetic in a specific - limited - sense of 'beauty' see Kirchner's work (e.g. "[t]he recurring scorched yellow tones, later referred to as Kirchner Yellow, evoke heat, decay, and disturbance. Color functions here as an atmosphere rather than a surface." Kirchner’s Expressionism and Urban Anxiety | Art Learnings https://share.google/trvtCmCVTsDVwUZqa)
It was decided for aesthetic reasons that too many 'industrial' elements in dark grey might make for a very cluttered background to the 'Fleet' text.
The text works visually: although it has representative meaning it reads backwards & forwards as well as from below & above, and in front & from behind without proving an immediately accessible 'meaning', which is - perhaps paradoxically - lost from view.
The inclusion of the textual aspect means the work becomes the (different) combination(s) of the five letters that make the ambigram of 'Fleet'.
An important aspect was recognising a. four of the characters were comprised of two rotated pairs; and b. the central element of the ambigram of 'Fleet' could be used (in combination with stencil) to make all of the four outer characters.
This allowed for a relatively quick printing process.
In printing it meant the orientation of the image in relation to each individual letter was crucial. The individual 'industrial' images in left top quarter were to be combined with the elements of the ambigram & to facilitate printing each set (of the various respective elements) was organised in advance.
Ultimately there was some comment (DH) that the strongest (most 'punch') prints were a. those without the map & bark layers; b. the more solid 'industrial' images (photogrammetric images of my work in the interim show) worked best under the text (best contrast).
In preparing the images for presentation the misalignment of layers in registration proved problematic. Two options were explored: cutting down to the St Pancras layer (cutting of parts of gestural mark); and secondly cutting around the gestural marks (see above).
The use of two layers - each slightly offset - for the gestural marks added greatly to the impact & depth of the letters.
I am in two minds about the red/pink (fluro inks) blend used. On the one hand it sets up a strong jarring effect with the softer underlying blues/greens (but would a red have been as or even more effective); on the other a fluro yellow in combo with the black might have worked better (in terms of colour tones) but not done the conceptual work of the jarring effect generated in me by the construction that led my view to being lost.
Ultimately as it will be shown the work is a first effort - and provisional - piece.
I tend to agree the works with St Pancras alone seem to work best with the 'industrial elements. At the same time the 'bark' & 'map' layers are effective together & I think the addition of one central visual or textual element (perhaps one or more historical photos) to those layers would allow it to become one stand alone piece that could work as a diptych with the more 'industrial' elements. However I suspect the work(s) present differently when seen from a distance (i.e. when hung).
Either way - as with before - the effort is to pare back the work & not try to do too much all at once in one piece.