
tannertan36

#extradirty
Sweet Seals For You, Always
sheepfilms
Today's Document
🪼
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

shark vs the universe
Xuebing Du
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Cosmic Funnies

JVL
art blog(derogatory)
RMH

ellievsbear

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

pixel skylines
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
seen from Greece

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Jordan
seen from Colombia
seen from Morocco
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@possumcollege

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
You do a D6 and if you get a 4, nobody's allowed to mention it.
The Altered Pattern 1842 Rifled Musket was a large-bore conversion of the standard .75-caliber smoothbore Pattern 1842 Musket. Manufactured in the 1850s , this stopgap weapon featured a rifled barrel and folding sights. It was primarily issued to the British Royal Navy and Royal Marines during the early Crimean War.
By "large bore conversion" OP means that it's a rifled conversion, and the rifling increased the caliber by 0.005 inches.
That's what she said.
I'm still rotating them in my mind.
I'm still rotating them in my mind.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I have a question about gun culture. When you go to the range, what do the gun people seem to think about about our current tyrant in chief? I mean we had plenty of gun people saying we needed the second amendment to protect from government overreach, now that we have it do they say anything about it?
I do my damnedest never to bring it up and if someone else does, I try to let it wither in the air and go about my business. It sucks but engaging with it eats into range time.
For example, as we were checking in last time, a young black dude came out of the range to get earmuffs because his ear plugs weren't cutting it. The kid was polite and just trying to do what we're supposed to but the second he was gone the guy at the desk turns to us and says, "Bet you anything the stereo in his car is ten times louder than our range! 😉"
I just looked him in the eye and said, "What do you mean?"
He said "Dumb joke" and finished ringing us up. That's about as well as I think that could've gone.
Most of what I encounter is on people's shirts or hats or in a conversation that's only going to make my day worse if I butt in. There's not a lot of utility in bringing up the hypocrisy, because a lot of the people who support this administration don't see it as hypocrisy because they don't see what's happening as a threat. They see it as people they don't like getting punished like they felt they were being punished under administrations they didn't agree with. The sense of proportion is hopelessly skewed because they can't imagine a situation where this State would treat them like an enemy.
It also bears saying that I see a lot of "gun people" going along to get along because:
1) no matter how many guns or friends you have, you can't outgun the state in 2026.
2) The majority of gun owners are more afraid of losing their toys and treats than they are of the state deciding to come get them. They believe those liberties will only ever flow from one party. Both major parties are perfectly happy for people to keep thinking that because the state doesn't see armed civilians as a meaningful threat and it's a useful football to bicker over.
For example, people flipped out over the bump-stock ban. A bumpstock is a stock that lets you pull the action forward against your finger so the recoil bounces it back and forth, allowing you to RATATATAT the whole magazine away in about 3 seconds like a machine gun. It gave people the simulation of full-auto without having to get the expensive permits you need for a real full-auto weapon.
It's fun and noisy but it's just an easy way to burn ammo or commit a mass casualty event. It's a range toy that lets people get around what they see as a pointless regulation and closing that loophole made some people act like King George just ate their lunch. There are tons of loophole guns and accessories like this that are technically illegal but can't be restricted without an act of congress because the language of the law doesn't explicitly forbid them.
Lots of shooters and collectors own a gun or two that would absolutely be illegal again if we went back to the laws we used to have in the 80s and 90s. So liberties become a carrot one wing dangles while using any attempt to actually regulate as proof that the other wing is itching to ban every gun, knife, and big stick. What'll they ban next? Dogs?!
The politicians love it, the gun companies love it, and the loss of that tension is more threatening than the potential for violence to land at their well-protected doors.
Even if they're not pleased with the policies and abuse, people who don't think it'll land on them don't want to rock the boat that keeps them afloat. They don't want to raise that specter because it might not look so kindly on the loopholes and privileges they enjoy.
Most gun-owners like the idea of self defense a lot more than the reality of it because their actual lives have never been meaningfully threatened. They believe they'll know the threat when they see it, but they've been trained to think it looks like home invasions, foreign terrorists, drug addicts, Anarchists, and Feds with pronouns on their windbreakers. They may never fire a shot in anger but they feel better if it feels like an option.
Toxic gun culture conditions you to understand a "threat" as a thing trying to end your life right now, not the gradual erosion of one group's rights and protections as a back door to consolidate power. We're taught that's what laws and the constitution are there to prevent, so don't worry about it.
The kind of people you're asking about believe they're safer with ten guns in their house than they would be in country that actively addressed the causes of crime or poverty at the expense of limiting potential individual firepower. That's very convenient and profitable for politicians, lobbyists, gun manufacturers, and cops. All it costs them is bodies.
I have a question about gun culture. When you go to the range, what do the gun people seem to think about about our current tyrant in chief? I mean we had plenty of gun people saying we needed the second amendment to protect from government overreach, now that we have it do they say anything about it?
I do my damnedest never to bring politics up and if someone else does, I try to let it wither in the air and go about my business. It sucks but engaging with it eats into range time.
For example, as we were checking in last time, a young black dude came out of the range to get earmuffs because his ear plugs weren't cutting it. The kid was polite and just trying to do what we're supposed to but the second he was gone the guy at the desk turns to us and says, "Bet you anything the stereo in his car is ten times louder than our range! 😉"
I just looked him in the eye and said, "What do you mean?"
He said "Dumb joke" and finished ringing us up. That's about as well as I think that could've gone.
Most of what I encounter is on people's shirts or hats or in a conversation that's only going to make my day worse if I butt in. There's not a lot of utility in bringing up the hypocrisy, because a lot of the people who support this administration don't see it as hypocrisy because they don't see what's happening as a threat. They see it as people they don't like getting punished like they felt they were being punished under administrations they didn't agree with. The sense of proportion is hopelessly skewed because they can't imagine a situation where this State would treat them like an enemy.
I love following an artist for their great works (such as a lovely queer web comic about goats, perhaps) and then being delightfully flashbanged by niche knowledge on their blogs. Very cool to see all the interesting information about firearms recently. One can only gleam so much from weapons history youtube channels. (Forgotten Weapons & Type 56 my beloved) Is the history behind guns a particular hobby of yours?
I started shooting in second grade. The first time, we took a single shot .22 rifle to the creek and shot at cardboard on roll bales, cans, boxes. We shot at fruit in the creek, at cans and plastic bottles on twigs, and paper plates on logs. Once vaporized a Moon Pie with a 12ga slug. I learned to shot clays with my grandfather's 410 and my dad's 12ga. I got a little compound bow for my birthday in 4th grade, and a Crossman BB/pellet gun in 5th. I got a paintball gun in 6th grade and splattered the hell out of our back yard. I got my first .22 rifle in 7th grade and put over 1,000 rounds through it over the next spring break. I like shooting.
My dad tried to take us hunting for rabbits once, my brother carrying a 12ga 870, me with the 410 single and my dad with a Beretta 92 in his belt. It was pretty ridiculous and we shot nothing. I was maybe 9?
Guns were around and by 4th-5th grade, I was better at shooting than I was at math, video games, sports, or whatever else kids were doing in the 90s. Skateboarding? Yo-yos? Pushing a hoop with a stick?
I think a lot of boys get fascinated with guns and tanks and planes and all kind of military things at some age. Our society sure does pour a bunch of propaganda down our throats about the army or the police from a young age, so it happens to the best of us. Between my bother and I, I was the more outdoorsy of the two, so that's the route I went while my brother picked up basketball and baseball and later the guitar.
We rarely wore hearing protection, aside from dad standing behind us with his hands over our ears early on. Between guns and guitars, I think we both lost a bit of hearing to our hobbies.
Some things happened when I was 12-13 and I became absolutely obsessed with learning how guns worked. I took all of ours apart, learned to clean them, tune them, replace parts. I read manuals for every historic firearm I could find. I got very into the nuts and bolts of military history, firearm development, action types, mechanisms, applications, tactics, ballistics, etc. There's something about memorizing all the specs and numbers that makes you feel like you know something intimate and secret about them.
There was a while where I considered joining the military because shooting, walking around, and carrying things felt like my most marketable skills. But by God, war or not, I would not have survived among such a high concentration of men long enough to get out again. And war is stupid. Glad I stayed at art school.
I'm much less into the lore and legend of guns now because there is a lot of bullshit baked into it. Seriously, I've had veterans tell me an M2 Browning is so effective because you only need to get the round within 6in of a person to do damage. My retired-cop CCW instructor told all of us that he believes that some rounds are basically useless against an attacker high on meth. People claim a 7.62x39 from an AK is actually one of the least lethal modern rounds. Weird little anecdotal nonsense abounds that ultimately doesnt mean much. It's bonkers, and the ambient aggression of it wears on me.
I own a nice range of different guns. Certainly more than I need. I've carried in Ky where I felt like it was warranted. I have the training but don't carry where I live. It's a pain in the ass literally and figuratively and I don't need the pressure. I'm much more nervous around other shooters at the range than I am on the street. Not because I think they mean me harm, but because they're fucking around with guns. I think way too many people carry, and that includes the police. I train regularly on advanced first aid and stop the bleed, and I've done the extra wacky training where someone screams in your ear while you pack gauze into a big bleeding Vienna sausage. It was goofy but I see what people get out of it. It's beyond distressing how many people train to inflict wounds without ever learning to treat them.
I shoot whatever I can get my hands on though, air guns, rifles, pistols, shotguns, old, new, military, civilian, bows, slingshots, full-auto, black powder. I want to fire a t-shirt cannon at something. It's just a ton of fun to send a thing flying through the air at a target and see how well you can hit it and many times before you have to go home.
I used to shoot groundhogs for money in high school and college but that started to feel pretty bad and groundhog meat is not easy to work with. I used to hunt pheasant and chukars with my father in law, but again they don't taste that great, I'm divorced now, and shooting clays is more fun.
I try to get out to the range regularly. It helps me feel regulated. An hour of only having one thing to focus on that really engages the mind and body in something I'm good at is refreshing. I've struggled with body dysmorphia for as long as I can remember, and having something that my body does well gave me something to feel proud of. I think it was doing a lot of heavy lifting in the 35 years before I got my diagnosis. I didn't really notice how much until I'd been away from it for a few years.
That's a lot of words to say, "yes and no." Feels a little embarrassing to say but it's almost more of a relationship for me than a hobby. It's a complicated relationship but on the balance, it's given me more than it takes and those can be rare for a young queer kid who had trouble connecting.
The larger gun community is not a great place for me but meeting other queer folks online feels great. I love seeing more of us on the range. I love introducing new people to shooting and I'd love to find more opportunities to be a friendly resource for LGBTQIA folks who are are curious. It doesn't have to be such an angry old boys club. You can teach people to respect the dangers of it without having to come off as a hardened killer of men, an elite operator, or a sheepdog watching over the weak, resentful sheep. That shit sucks. Helpful as a cat fart for someone looking to learn more about history, design, or use of guns. 🐈⬛💨
America's gun culture has never been what I'd call reasonable but we've really lost something in the decline of those that see them more as a utilitarian tool to put food on the table or a sport to be practiced responsibly. Too much tactical warfighting, stand-your-grounding, race-baiting, offensive paranoiac homesteading, fragile masculinity trash on this fire.
So if anyone's curious feel free to hit me up. I'm no expert but I've certainly got more trigger time on a wider variety of guns than your average middle-aged queer cartoonist. Never seen combat but my father's almost shot me by accident at least twice. I've been shot at by strangers at least 3 times in Ky but I can't say how hard they were really trying. I know enough about gunfighting not to mess with it as they say.
🏳️🌈🦮💨
I'm finally playing Lovely Lady RPG.
Get Silo and the Sinner together on the wrong night, in the wrong mood, they could achieve a sort of Critical Top Mass that kills them both.
A hookup that rapidly devolves into biting eachother's teeth.
Like the scene in a zombie movie where you think the couple's making out until someone's head falls off but more heavy breathing and growling. Lot more hand stuff, likely.
Crittertongue no. 69: Ex Libris
New Crittertongue strip is up!
🍹🐐🧛♂️🍺
If you'd like to read previous strips or follow the series, all of them are up on the Crittertumblr and webtoon.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'm finally playing Lovely Lady RPG.
Get Silo and the Sinner together on the wrong night, in the wrong mood, they could achieve a sort of Critical Top Mass that kills them both.
I'm not like disabled but as a regular person with other stuff to do I am wishing that there were difficulty options for delta rune.... I don't really enjoy boss fights in games I feel like I'm banging my head against a wall if I can't get them in the first couple of tries especially for a game that's so heavy on narrative
I feel that. I just want to play a story. I really loved Hollow Knight and Silksong but I hit a wall pretty early in both games. I'm 41, I don't have an abundance of time and energy to devote to learning the precise patterns and placement of things to get me past this apparently low-level boss. Like 40% of the time I'm playing a game while eating dinner. I don't feel discriminated against but it sucks that it's either watch someone else play it or burn several hours grinding away on the same tooth-grinding fight. Both of those suck ass. It's why I never played more NES games as a kid. Mega Man was sick as hell but that shit was a chore.
I just want to run around, collect stuff, explore, and fight freaky monsters as a cute bug.
Ex Libris by Dinosaur Sheriff on Patreon. Join Dinosaur Sheriff's community for exclusive content and updates.
A new Crittertongue strip is up for $2 patrons on Patreon!
Make a Terrible Comic Day!
Seasons Greetings to You and Yrs this Make a Terrible Comic Day!
Wishing you all a Terrible Comic!
Crittertongue Q&A: Bluesky edition

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Shotgun Pistol
A Browning BSS with the barrel sawn off drawn by @qsycomplainsalot for the firearm section of the Eureka: Investigative Urban Fantasy rulebook, providing a visual example of a Shotgun Pistol.
A “Shotgun Pistol” isn’t really any sort of real-world firearm terminology, we just needed something to call a gun like this to fit it into the way Eureka categorizes guns mechanically.
This is, like, the iconic “crime” gun.
In the Bonnie and Clyde days they called em "whippet" guns. Lossibly cos one could whip it out real quick. The A5 and model 11 were popular choices since the Browning action worked well even with most of the barrel chopped off.
Some folks would saw the stock down and tack a shoulder strap onto what was left so they could wear it under a top coat and swing it out at brandishing time. Or maybe they just thought it was cool in the movies...
Fwiw only, since it doesn't feel like it'd work in place of the sawn-off (both in terms of era and a bit in function), there are pistols, like the Taurus Judge, that can fire small caliber shotgun shells.
The problem with .410/45 pistols is that they fall down on the big selling points for shotguns and pistols by using the lightest shotgun round available and handling neither round well. The Judge is especially impractical, since its barrel had to be rifled not to be considered a short-barreled shotgun by the BATF. It scatters shot like a party favor but also isn't rifled deeply enough to make it as reliable as a dedicated 45LC. Unless you're up against small, fragile targets at rock-throwing distance, they're even less effective than a sawn-off .410. Could be useful against fairies.
Also have a question about Wizard marks and other magical curses. Is only the original caster able to lift them? Or can they be destroy by an individual with enough know-how and ability to do so?
Technically it should be easy for the cursed person to remove the mark by fulfilling the conditions of the curse. If it were as simple as returning a shovel or painting a shed, you'd do it and the marks would disappear. But marking someone's body remotely, with a spell that carries additional, ongoing effects is not a simple task. It's not the kind of thing you do to a neighbor as a reminder. You wouldn't do it if the debt at hand could be enforced by something as crude and pedestrian as the law. The point isn't just shaming the target into compliance. The point is satisfaction and that doesn't come cheap.
Depending on the proficiency and spite of the original caster, and if the conditions of the original curse weren't very well defined, a novice wizard, a legal clerk, or anyone particularly skilled at language could find an exploitable loophole to dispel them. A skilled mage could also cover marks that aren't warded against disguise. Or a tailor. It might not alleviate accessory conditions, but the marks themselves could be hidden.
It helps to think of the marks as a contract. The more byzantine and specific the conditions, the harder it is to break. A caster could protect the curse by adding a sort of non-disclosure clause that prevents the target from sharing the conditions of the curse, making it harder for others to dispel it. Or the marks could be imbued with magic that makes them visible even through clothes and armor. However, as spells become more complex and specific, they require more skill, energy, and effort to cast. You'd have to be an exceptionally petty sonofabitch with a lot of free time and literal tons of resources to cast something totally bombproof.
That said, dispelling services also come with a cost. If you can't afford to take a wizard to court you likely can't afford a wizard to dispel the first one's work. Even then, the institution of wizardry is so hierarchical, academic, and so tightly knit that meddling in another wizard's personal affairs could risk not only your status but your continued access to vital magical resources.