youtube commenters will say things like "just because a character changed gender doesn't make them trans"
Cosimo Galluzzi
Mike Driver

JBB: An Artblog!
Misplaced Lens Cap

if i look back, i am lost

Kiana Khansmith
$LAYYYTER
Today's Document
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Not today Justin

titsay

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

macklin celebrini has autism

@theartofmadeline
ojovivo
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Andulka
occasionally subtle

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Sweden
seen from Bulgaria
seen from T1
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@pinetreesreblogs
youtube commenters will say things like "just because a character changed gender doesn't make them trans"

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
if you want to actually materially address child abuse, the single most important thing you can do to start is give children the legally enforceable right to leave any situation they no longer want to be in.
church, extracurriculars, summer camps, school classes, their biological family's houses. notably, these are the places that child abuse is enabled by the child's inability to just fucking leave if they need to. they can't walk out of church if their youth pastor touches them inappropriately; they'll get punished for leaving. if they walk out of their house because their dad hits them, the cops pick them up and give them right back to their dad.
children need the legal autonomy to leave abusive situations in order to even begin to usefully materially address child abuse.
original post by qweerhet because it's unrebloggable but very important
& that should include foster care, psychiatric care, facilities for homeless youth, etc. Going from one abusive situation to the next is a known pattern. If the 'rescue' you're being offered isn't actually safe, you should be able to leave and you should have other options.
i sympathize with the message but the second part confuses me, what does it mean to have a "legal right" to leave homeless shelters, foster care and psychiatric institutions? Like where do they go then? The streets?
Like, ok, police wont force them to go back to abusive situations, im with you there, what is step two?
Surely a more actionable course of action is "fix institutional failures that allow abuse in foster care, shelters, and medical institutions"
You still need the right to leave those places as a stopgap against abuse; we can fix a lot of the causes of abusive relationships but cannot prevent all them, and so we have as a final stopgap the ability to leave your partner at any time.
Similarly, if someone is leaving behind 3 hots and a cot for the street, it's probably because something is gone wrong enough that sleeping on the street looks like a better deal.
"children should have the right to choose homelessnes"?
Im not being sarcastic or trying to gotcha, if this is the genuine position i can respect that
Yes, that is the bullet I'm biting here; I really do think there are situations where a child is better off running away from home, and they should not be brought back by police.
Theoretically, it would be nicer if we had e.g. a children's shelter in every city where any minor could go and have a very small private room they could stay in and not have to go home and eat shitty oatmeal, all no-questions-asked, until and unless they were willing to go home or get put into foster care or whatever.
But even without that, yeah, I think the alternative is de facto locking up people with their abusers with no escape.
this is often where my sorta anarchisty/libertarian intuitions come from. a lot of the time when you point out that some practice or institution is horrible or abusive and propose literally the most obvious measure- making it optional- people will go "oh but then [thing institution ostensibly prevents]! shouldn't we focus on fixing it?". and every time it's like sure! but im not gonna hold my breath! why should the people subjected to this thing have to? if people willingly choose to brave the thing you're trying to prevent in order to avoid your "help" then that's that. revealed preference. if you do actually manage to fix anything then people will choose to avail themselves of your services. not everything is 10d decision theory chess, it's actually pretty rare that more choice can make a person worse off
Related:
Children are not so stupid they're incapable of experiencing something bad and then evaluating the situation they're in. If they're so privileged and just angry, they're not so stupid they can't go to the cops or even just return home if they've run away. If they genuinely believe that being on the streets - and, you know, presumably experiencing the horrors you're going on about - is better than going back to their parents or the foster system . . . well, I'm inclined to think there's a good reason for that. It might be because sometimes the streets are the better option.
Denying people exit rights because "What if they voluntarily choose something even worse?" doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.
Omission bias really tends to be strong in people when it comes to trans people and trans healthcare. Because the focus in those discussions tends to be: "What if they do it and regret it?" To which I always ask: "Okay, what if they don't do it and regret it?" A question that gets answered with: "That is completely different and you know it."
Only that... it is not completely different.
If you argue that a teenager starting puberty cannot know what their gender is, then you argue that a cis teenager starting puberty cannot know what their gender is either. If you assume one can know and the other cannot, then your problem is clearly just that you are transphobic and have internalized this idea of "social contagion" which has been put out in the world by people actively faking science. Social contagion is not a thing.
If you talk about how taking hormones during puberty to have the right puberty is "irreversible", you have to acknowledge that not taking HRT during puberty is also irreversible. Why is it that you consider one of those irreversible things bad and the other not?
Also, what do you think about intersex children having things done? Which might also include them taking hormones during puberty. You know, spoken as a former intersex child who was forced to take HRT during puberty to force me to develop a physical gender presentation that I did not actually want.
But let's even keep out the entire problem of intersex kids being forced or coerced into therapy. Let's focus on an intersex kid who actually is certain about their gender, this gender also aligns with what was (forcefully) put into their data, but now they hit puberty and their body does not produce enough of the sex hormone they need and possibly too much of the sex hormone they do not want. Do you think they should be allowed to access HRT during puberty?
And yes, I am speaking in all cases about HRT, not just puberty blockers. Because the science is pretty darn clear that the outcomes are better for teens who can access HRT over puberty blockers if they wish to do so.
Omission bias really tends to be strong in people when it comes to trans people and trans healthcare. Because the focus in those discussions tends to be: "What if they do it and regret it?" To which I always ask: "Okay, what if they don't do it and regret it?" A question that gets answered with: "That is completely different and you know it."
Only that... it is not completely different.
If you argue that a teenager starting puberty cannot know what their gender is, then you argue that a cis teenager starting puberty cannot know what their gender is either. If you assume one can know and the other cannot, then your problem is clearly just that you are transphobic and have internalized this idea of "social contagion" which has been put out in the world by people actively faking science. Social contagion is not a thing.
If you talk about how taking hormones during puberty to have the right puberty is "irreversible", you have to acknowledge that not taking HRT during puberty is also irreversible. Why is it that you consider one of those irreversible things bad and the other not?
Also, what do you think about intersex children having things done? Which might also include them taking hormones during puberty. You know, spoken as a former intersex child who was forced to take HRT during puberty to force me to develop a physical gender presentation that I did not actually want.
But let's even keep out the entire problem of intersex kids being forced or coerced into therapy. Let's focus on an intersex kid who actually is certain about their gender, this gender also aligns with what was (forcefully) put into their data, but now they hit puberty and their body does not produce enough of the sex hormone they need and possibly too much of the sex hormone they do not want. Do you think they should be allowed to access HRT during puberty?
And yes, I am speaking in all cases about HRT, not just puberty blockers. Because the science is pretty darn clear that the outcomes are better for teens who can access HRT over puberty blockers if they wish to do so.
Omission bias really tends to be strong in people when it comes to trans people and trans healthcare. Because the focus in those discussions tends to be: "What if they do it and regret it?" To which I always ask: "Okay, what if they don't do it and regret it?" A question that gets answered with: "That is completely different and you know it."
Only that... it is not completely different.
If you argue that a teenager starting puberty cannot know what their gender is, then you argue that a cis teenager starting puberty cannot know what their gender is either. If you assume one can know and the other cannot, then your problem is clearly just that you are transphobic and have internalized this idea of "social contagion" which has been put out in the world by people actively faking science. Social contagion is not a thing.
If you talk about how taking hormones during puberty to have the right puberty is "irreversible", you have to acknowledge that not taking HRT during puberty is also irreversible. Why is it that you consider one of those irreversible things bad and the other not?
Also, what do you think about intersex children having things done? Which might also include them taking hormones during puberty. You know, spoken as a former intersex child who was forced to take HRT during puberty to force me to develop a physical gender presentation that I did not actually want.
But let's even keep out the entire problem of intersex kids being forced or coerced into therapy. Let's focus on an intersex kid who actually is certain about their gender, this gender also aligns with what was (forcefully) put into their data, but now they hit puberty and their body does not produce enough of the sex hormone they need and possibly too much of the sex hormone they do not want. Do you think they should be allowed to access HRT during puberty?
And yes, I am speaking in all cases about HRT, not just puberty blockers. Because the science is pretty darn clear that the outcomes are better for teens who can access HRT over puberty blockers if they wish to do so.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I really like the observation that some disabled people with a certain toxic mindset see themselves as temporarily embarrassed abled people.
It might also explain why some people will refuse medical interventions but then try literally everything else.
Taking meds is an admission that you have an illness/disability. Most wellness & self-optimization products/treatments, however, are marketed with vague promises that make it easier to avoid having to do that.
It's not chronic fatigue, you're just tired and need to take a revitalizing supplement, something that boosts your energy levels and read 15 books on productivity & motivation!
the removal of physical media is not the inevitable progression of improving tech, its like the removal of the 3.5mm jack: purely a result of profit physical games still account for about 1/5th of all sales of video games
but by only selling digital games sony can be the ultimate arbiter of their price. they can stop you lending games and force another sale instead. they can stop the sale of second hand games and keep prices artificially high. they can set any price they want and that will be your only option.
“what jax did is a pretty normal defense mechanism for—” no it’s not. stop it. it shouldn’t be normal and please don’t think it’s normal dude.
yes pushing people away and being rude is like, a very normal defense mechanism but actively abusing and sexually harassing them is not. not normal. like she consistently took it a step further every day. who told you that.
like yes jax deserved to have a real deal chance to change. like she was also a victim etc…. but why are we not realizing the actual scope of her actions. she ultimately did it all to herself. fictional character or not please dont let people treat you Like that. lawwwd.
Nasty and sophisticated scam: BEWARE of this!
If an email recently landed in your inbox with a subject line like "Pending charge of USD 987.90 for account activation. Questions? Call 855
Don’t get caught off guard by this. It’s quite a slick one.
voter suppression against black people is reaching Jim Crow era levels in the US so please get registered to vote now, learn who's going to be on your ballot in advance, try to talk some sense into your conservative relatives or coworkers (diplomatically), and, when November rolls around, vote to make Republicans lose as many seats as possible. there are many other things to do, of course, but the midterms will have a massive impact on the future of civil rights.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
let’s be real the pressure to use AI as an adult is exactly what they said the pressure the do drugs as a teenager would be like but the people that told us that caved immediately for the AI and definitely did not just say no
AND nobody is offering me drugs, smdh
If the only thing that has kept you going was outliving Mitch McConnell, imma need yall to pick a new person to outlive and fast. Your mission is not over.
I can acknowledge cgi is a helpful tool BUT when it comes to characters / creatures the human brain is so much kinder to puppets and practical effects. bc sure we know they’re not real but we can suspend our disbelief bc they’re tangible
There's an awful trend in reading that's this CinemaSins kind of rejection of abstract concepts and suspension of disbelief, that makes people say it's bad writing when authors use descriptions that aren't immediately one to one with physical reality.
Like it's bad when a "tattoo is undulating" (as opposed to... "drawn in a wave like pattern on the skin"?), or when hair is "wet wheat from a late Summer field" (as opposed to "sort of brownish light yellow that dries lighter, but is not actual wheat stalks growing on someone's head but kind of reminiscent of the color and texture"?), or when when ice cream tastes like midnight at the fair" (as opposed to "ice cream flavour bringing back memories of undefined ice cream flavours that are individually popular but always tied to a memory of late evening at the fair ground and probably smelling vaguely like popcorn and sugar"?).
Please. We have to get back to understanding abstract descriptions that evoke feelings and memories and mental images or things we haven't experienced yet. This hyper utilitarian way of reading and judging text is killing fiction. it's robbing you of experiencing things you haven't actually personally experienced.
If you haven’t heard, today PolyCystic Ovarian Syndrome has been renamed to Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome. This change reflects that this is not a reproductive “problem” but a whole body disease.
Edit: this syndrome affects women, nonbinary folks and trans men. Please excuse the language in the informatic.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hot take, but even if you ARE punching up (instead of punching sideways at a group that is in the same boat as you), there's a limit to what you can say without sounding like a violent facist but woke this time.
Making fun of a group of people that are privileged over you is one thing, but wishing non-cartoonish violence and death on them ("they should fall off a cliff" vs. "they should be wiped out"), wishing sexual violence on them, dehumanising them, claiming that they're less capable of creating art or living meaningful lives, saying that their relationships are inherently shallow and fake - these things are fucked up. I understand venting and saying extreme things when in pain, but when you find yourself regularly posting about wanting certain people tortured and killed, you need to examine that.
When the only thing stopping you from completely dehumanising someone is your own judgement regarding their privilege level relative to yours, you are not a safe person to be around.