On Heir

Two of George’s Prime Ministers - Asquith and Lloyd George - caused significant issues for the King. Both of them pushed the boundaries of what is acceptable constitutionally for the monarch to do. While we don’t know his exact feelings on either PM, we have written records that he did get on with his final Prime Minister, Ramsay MacDonald.

Edward had a contradictory relationship with his two later prime ministers. While he was a similar character to Arthur Balfour, the two men didn’t get along and the King felt undermined by the politician. On the other hand, the King got on well with the more working class Campbell-Bannerman, with the two men holidaying together!

From her will-they-won’t-they relationship with Lord Melbourne to her hatred of William Gladstone, Victoria had strong opinions on her Prime Ministers. Thanks to her letters and diaries, we have an insight into her preferences and it’s clear she let her heart rule her head.

Hello :) Firstly, thank you for your lovely words. Always nice to know we’re not speaking into the void haha. In terms of tiaras, they’re absolutely not just an aristocratic thing here. The main difference is aristocrats will tend to wear family heirlooms which are very expensive, whereas a normal bride would usually just pick something up in a bridal shop and it might not have real jewels. It also may be a trend thing. I see fewer tiaras on brides now than when my parents married in the 90s, but it still wouldn't be looked at as an odd thing today.

In late July, King Charles met with the UK's new Prime Minister and so this week @duchessofostergotlands and @princesscatherinemiddleton are covering some of the most notable relationships between the monarch and the PM, the two most powerful figures in the UK. Which monarch was so close to their Prime Minister there were rumours of an affair? And did the late Queen really have a bitter feud with Margaret Thatcher? Join us to find out. Listen to Episode 182- “Strange bedfellows" - on Spotify, Apple, and Amazon!ew

Hello! Thank you so much for this really interesting question. We answered it in our most recent episode, Episode 181. Hope you enjoy!

Honestly, the answer is yes but perhaps not in the way you’d think…

It’s the never-ending question with no clear answer but we gave it a good go! What do you think?

Thank you for your perspective💕

There are pros and cons for both arguments here but we agree that the royal men need to improve their fashion sense for it to be worth talking about!

Who is your favourite Queen - Regnant or Consort?

While @duchessofostergotlands and @princesscatherinemiddleton wait for the end of the slow summer season, we're answering more questions from our wonderful listeners. This time we're discussing, amongst other things, whether there should be more of a focus on royal men's fashion, and we'll be debating an age old question : are William and Catherine doing enough work? Listen to Episode 181- “Therapy for opinions" (Q&A) - on Spotify, Apple, and Amazon!

In this category are the partners who entangled their lives with the royals before marriage. This group includes royals such as the now Princess Carina, who became godmother to Countess Athena of Denmark when she was still Carina Axelsson, and Prince Daniel, who moved into an apartment in Drottingholm before he was even engaged!

Most royals - particularly almost all the royals in the British Royal Family - fall into our second category. This is when the public are aware of the partners, and they attend certain private events or events only linked to their partner. This can happen on a scale from only being seen once or twice, to be a known public figure in their own right.

For some royal families, this appears to be a family-wide rule while for others they are more anomalies.

In our most recent episode, we categorised how unmarried partners are treated by their soon-to-be in-laws.