let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

tannertan36
$LAYYYTER
occasionally subtle
Doug Jones

@theartofmadeline
KIROKAZE
tumblr dot com

shark vs the universe
Mike Driver

Origami Around

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Color Me Curious
Fai_Ryy
official daine visual archive

Discoholic 🪩

pixel skylines
Cosimo Galluzzi

roma★
seen from Colombia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Japan
seen from Netherlands
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Nepal
seen from Chile

seen from Singapore
seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from South Africa
@northcentralpositronics-blog

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
48, but why is this considered difficult?
Bye i found 21
No, order of operations you guys, you multiply first then add. It’s 41
...it’s 21. In the last equation, there’s only one shoe and one boot. Thus, where x is a horse, y is a single horseshoe, and z is a single boot:
3x = 30 x+2y+2y=x+4y=18 2y-2z=2
z+xy = ???
which gives us x=10, y=2, z=1, and therefore z+xy = 1+20 = 21
but it’s really easy to miss the single-ness of the boot and the horseshoe which I assume is why people get such diverse answers. (also this is all assuming that a pair of boots represents 2(boot), and not like... a totally different symbol)
Last month a study on the human brain showed that we were wrong: brain structure is not gender-specific.
If any of my followers believes that “brain sex” is a rigid and well defined category check this out
I actually did a study on this in my freshman year of university!
I had to give a ten minute presentation on gender and a) how it’s different from sex, and b) whether or not there’s such thing as a “male” and “female” brain.
I found COUNTLESS studies supporting the idea that the brain itself is unisex- there is very little, if any, difference between “male” and “female” brains, with one exception. I’m by no means a neuroscientist but this is what I understood from this particular article: there’s this tiny part of the hypothalamus (a small part of the brain) that has neutrons in it, and the number of neutrons varies. HOWEVER, when the brains of cis men and women and trans men and women (who had not taken hormones for years prior to the time of death) were studied, it was found that the cis men and trans men had almost identical average neutron counts, and the cis women and trans women had almost identical average neutron counts. So if you’re DMAB but realize at some point that you’re a trans woman, as far as your brain is concerned, you ARE a woman! The same goes for DFAB trans men (intersex/nonbinary individuals weren’t studied, unfortunately).
TLDR; Your brain doesn’t care what you were “born as”, only what you really are!
I’m currently reading a fantastic book that goes through and debunks old studies that “find evidence” to support gender roles. SPOILER ALERT: they were all poorly done studies and their evidence is unsupported bullshit.
a pretty good read and a good source
@cutiequeercris
NEUROSCIENCE DEBUNKING GENDER ESSENTIALIST SHIT YESSS
I am really, really hoping the above commenter talking about the hypothalamus meant neurons. Otherwise, woe to the researcher stuck counting subatomic particles in the brain.
I may be doing a project on this for Honour and I’m really interested in it tbh
because the thing is there are minor sex differences in the brain
~division between sex and gender in science~
Mulan. Love your scars by MeryChess
Oh My God, this is so beautiful !
people who don’t experience chronic pain will never understand what it’s like to expect to be in pain for the rest of your life.
you don’t understand what it’s like to have to take your pain and your limitations into account when searching for housing or employment.
you don’t understand what it’s like to quit a job or an activity you love bc it’s exacerbating your pain levels.
you don’t understand what it’s like to send the “sorry, gotta cancel” text to the same friend four days in a row because your pain is just too intolerable.
you don’t understand what it’s like to have to choose between leaving early (again) or suffering through something that will cause you hours or days or weeks of increased pain.
you don’t understand what it’s like to have your accommodations/self-advocacy/self-care viewed as laziness or rudeness or apathy.
i don’t know where i’m going with this exactly but basically living with chronic pain is really hard, shout out to people who deal with chronic pain, and if you don’t then please be understanding toward those of us who do, please assume we are doing our best, because taking care of ourselves often has to come before anything else

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I think in terms of the Discourse we maybe run into a wall when it comes to. Like. Reasonable expectations. I notice it in most social interactions anyway - you should stop taking on other people’s problems BUT WHY DON’T YOU CARE ABOUT MY PROBLEMS. You need to practice self care but IF YOU DON’T PUT YOURSELF THROUGH HELL TO HELP ME YOU’RE A CRAP FRIEND. And we all do that, like, cognitive dissonance is at the centre of human thought processing, i think, and anyway however cognitively aware we are of other people’s needs we will always be MORE aware of our own feelings, because those are the realest things to us. Like, there’s nothing WRONG with that, and it’s really important that we can prioritise our wellbeing where necessary, but as far as I’m concerned the difference lies between ASKING for help and DEMANDING help. You are not entitled to someone’s time/energy/care. And yes, sometimes their refusal to give it is shitty and unfair and bigoted, but it’s still their right not to. And sometimes it IS a matter of self care. People aren’t owed friendship, or love. I don’t know, it’s hard to express, because as anyone who knows me knows, I instinctively revolt against the idea of not helping everyone I can, but it’s IMPORTANT. I see so often people extolling the virtue of self care with one hand and with the other saying how ableist it is for people to leave them because of how difficult their disorders/neuroatypicality/other can be to deal with. And it often IS and it SUCKS but also? Self care sometimes has to mean prioritising your own wellbeing. If a relationship is taking so much out of you you have to withdraw, often it’s the only healthy option. I don’t know. It’s frustrating as fuck when you lose people because of things outside your control, and it’s upsetting and hurtful and you DO get angry that they couldn’t or wouldn’t do more. I know, I’ve been there a whole bunch. But I also know that however hard I try, I can’t be there for everyone who needs me, and trying harder only means burning out sooner in many cases. We all know that but I think it’s easy to forget and in my opinion that’s honestly really dangerous, because when you’re the sort of person who aims to take on everyone’s pain, and you eee a constant flood of posts about how real, good, actual friends will always stay and never have to nope out or tell you that your behaviour is unacceptable even though it comes from an understandable source…you can see how that can be an issue, right?
this may be the most real thing i’ve seen all week tbh
the two most disgusting pieces of news i have heard this week that i need people outside the uk to hear:
uk armed forces will be exempt from human rights laws. you read that right. the tories want to “protect” soldiers from investigations into non-conflict-related violence abroad
it’s been proposed that corporations will now have to list all their foreign workers. companies with “abnormal” numbers of non-british employees will be penalised
this is so fucked. this is so fucked. this is so fucked.
Smokers and obese people will be denied surgery on the NHS by cash-strapped hospitals trying to save money, senior health officials have warned. Vale of York Care Commissioning Group has announced it will make people wait up to a year for non-essential surgery if they are overweight, until their body mass index (BMI) drops to 30. The group said the decision has been made as “the best way of achieving maximum value from the limited resources available”.
We cannot condemn enough this disgusting move from the already well known senseless British government supported by every of their voters.
This is the fatphobia in the health system that many people refuse to acknowledge. This is the fatphobia that gets fat people killed. THIS IS IT.
-G
“We’ll treat you if you lose the weight” they say, knowing that studies show that 10% weight loss is all that can really be managed at most by the most capable. Its code for “We won’t treat you. Your life has less value.”
Already a victim of this for a while, now its gone mainstream outside of trans stuff. For me to reach their BMI goals I need to lose 20% of my body mass. The only effective method I found of this was a starvation diet of 400cal/day. I posted about it on facebook and in came the droves to defend it saying “well, why should we pay for treating people who don’t look after themselves” It’s fucking BMI you numbnuts, it has so little to do with individual health and more about cost cutting in a way that they can get away with because of the disgusting fatphobia we face in society. I should also point out the dramatic cuts to weight management clinics in the NHS specifically designed to help people with weight issues. Its hardly encouraging when on one hand you refuse to treat the overweight and on the other refuse to help them lose it. And once again, the governments violent cuts to nhs funding have turned our healthcare service into some grim discriminatory rationing body.
fucking wankbiscuits
I am really passionate about healthcare and medicine.
and now I am really passionately angry
FUCK THIS FUCKING COUNTRY I STG
#wearescotland currently No1 trending on Twitter. These are some of my favourites and if you’ve got anymore please feel free to add them on!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
jormy stop engaging in The Discourse and answer your fucking lab practical questions
you have two practicals to get through and you have to be in bed in three hours
having also read up on electronic wound healing for that meeting tomorrow
stop typing this and go write about sheep brains
You don’t need gender dysphoria to be trans.
You don’t need to be a woman who’s only attracted to other women to be a lesbian.
You don’t need to be allergic to gluten to suffer from coeliac disease.
You don’t need impaired vision to be visually impaired.
Oh, wait, yes you do, because that’s what those things mean.
Well, yes and no, because things mean what we define, or agree, that they mean. So, you can define the word (or concept) ‘trans’ in such a way that someone does need gender dysphoria to be trans, but only according to your definition. Other people aren’t necessarily going to use the same definition. That might just be a linguistic thing or they might, for example, think that requiring gender dysphoria to be trans is a shitty and transphobic definition of ‘trans’.
Which is a roundabout way of saying you don’t need dysphoria to be trans.
That’s not what ‘trans’ means.
Transgenderism is a neurological disorder. Being Trans is having said disorder. The main symptom is dysphoria. If you are trans you have dysphoria. Easy as that.
Okay, let’s say I accept your definition–which, as I’ve already mentioned, no one is obliged to—that transgenderism is a disorder, and that dysphoria is a symptom of it. People can have disorders without having all symptoms; they may be sufficient but they are not necessary.
If you have measles you may or may not have a rash.
If you are trans you may or may not have dysphoria.
Easy.
Dysphoria is the main symptom. Kind of like insulin deficiency is the main symptom of diabetes. It’s what defines Gender Identity Disorder.
Trans is a medical term. You don’t get to have second opinions on medical terms. This is not how that works.
Funny. I always thought the main symptom of being trans was being a gender other than that assigned to you be society/at birth. It’s not defined by medicine. It’s not for the medicine to define.
Being male or female or neither is not a medical condition.
…sorry, I’m stuck on “You don’t get to have second opinions on medical terms.”
um
yes
yes you do
that is one of the KEY PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY
(signed: a medical scientist)
oh and I forgot
Insulin deficiency ISN’T the main symptom of diabetes! Depending on your diabetes type, it may not even be anything to do with diabetes (type 2 diabetes, i.e. the type gained later in life, is not about insulin concentration but receptor specificity, and type 2 patients actually often have a physiological excess of insulin)
Insulin deficiency is a pathology of diabetes. It’s not a symptom. Symptoms of diabetes are things like fatigue, energy spikes and troughs, thirst and diuresis, hypo- or hyperglycaemia...
To be clear, in the “transness is a disease” model (which I’m not saying I subscribe to):
Transness is the disease
A gender not matching your assigned sex is the pathology (i.e. the discernable characteristic of the disease, used both to define and definitively diagnose)
Dysphoria is a symptom - often present, an indicator of the pathology, but not the underlying pathology itself.
Look, in that model, it would be fair to say that non-dysphoric trans people are asymptomatic and thus less in need of treatment, in the same way that someone can have... idk, cancer, and if it’s non-metastatic and non-malign (and thus relatively asymptomatic) they’re not going to be triaged on an equal footing with someone whose cancer is metastatic, malign, or both. But both patients have cancer.
Or to take another example: you can have a cold virus that is entirely asymptomatic, or only slightly symptomatic. This doesn’t mean you need to go to the doctor, but you still have a cold. The underlying pathology is still present. And it can still be relevant to medical treatment - for instance, if you take immunosuppressants, the cold will be A Problem, or you can still pass it on to other people, or it may exacerbate other problems.
...again, I’m not saying transness is pathological. I don’t believe it is. But what I am saying is that even in your own model, non-dysphoric trans people are still trans.
You don’t need gender dysphoria to be trans.
You don’t need to be a woman who’s only attracted to other women to be a lesbian.
You don’t need to be allergic to gluten to suffer from coeliac disease.
You don’t need impaired vision to be visually impaired.
Oh, wait, yes you do, because that’s what those things mean.
Well, yes and no, because things mean what we define, or agree, that they mean. So, you can define the word (or concept) ‘trans’ in such a way that someone does need gender dysphoria to be trans, but only according to your definition. Other people aren’t necessarily going to use the same definition. That might just be a linguistic thing or they might, for example, think that requiring gender dysphoria to be trans is a shitty and transphobic definition of ‘trans’.
Which is a roundabout way of saying you don’t need dysphoria to be trans.
That’s not what ‘trans’ means.
Transgenderism is a neurological disorder. Being Trans is having said disorder. The main symptom is dysphoria. If you are trans you have dysphoria. Easy as that.
Okay, let’s say I accept your definition–which, as I’ve already mentioned, no one is obliged to—that transgenderism is a disorder, and that dysphoria is a symptom of it. People can have disorders without having all symptoms; they may be sufficient but they are not necessary.
If you have measles you may or may not have a rash.
If you are trans you may or may not have dysphoria.
Easy.
Dysphoria is the main symptom. Kind of like insulin deficiency is the main symptom of diabetes. It’s what defines Gender Identity Disorder.
Trans is a medical term. You don’t get to have second opinions on medical terms. This is not how that works.
Funny. I always thought the main symptom of being trans was being a gender other than that assigned to you be society/at birth. It’s not defined by medicine. It’s not for the medicine to define.
Being male or female or neither is not a medical condition.
...sorry, I’m stuck on “You don’t get to have second opinions on medical terms.”
um
yes
yes you do
that is one of the KEY PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY
(signed: a medical scientist)
This represents my increasingly futile attempts at optimism
Creepy or adorable? Researchers at Harvard University have demonstrated the first autonomous, untethered, entirely soft robot: the octobot.
Instead of being controlled by electronics, the robot’s logic board is powered by chemical reactions and fluid passing along tiny channels. Scientist have struggled to create completely soft robots because rigid components like circuit boards, power sources and electronic controls are difficult to replace.
Learn more about the octobot and soft robotics here and see the full study published in Nature here.
Videos Credit: Harvard SEAS/Image Credit Lori Sanders
I’d say this octobot is creepily adorable or adorably creepy. -Emily
...i want it

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i am tired and cold and not working on any of my essays
please send help and/or cuddles
Cowboy jousting
I am glad this happens.
This is the American west 24/7
#jormy look do you think they did this in gilead
um yes
or at least bert did and he made everyone else do it too