NO ON 46

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #46: Prop 46 is a risk Californians can't afford. Remember the risks. http://youtu.be/w73hy-as8Xg It's time to vote NO on Prop 46.

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #45: Every major newspaper up and down the state have urged Californians to vote NO. What is an editorial endorsement and why do they matter? Check out our blog post at http://www.noon46.com/newspapers-endorse-no-on-prop-46/. Read all of the endorsements at http://www.noon46.com/editorial-endorsements/.

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #44: Prop 46 will cost a family of four $1,000 per year in higher health care costs. Learn more about why Prop 46 is a risk California can't afford at http://www.noon46.com/costs/.

Why vote No on Prop 46? Reason #43: Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California notes that Prop 46 "could have dire consequences for health care in California." Read more about why PPAC joins obstetricians, gynecologists and every community clinic in the state to urge Californians to vote NO on Prop 46. http://womenarewatching.org/blog/doctors-nurses-planned-parenthood-affiliates-ca-all-say-no-prop-46

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #42: The California Teachers Association says Prop 46 is "a harmful initiative that our students and schools can't afford." Learn more about the impact of Prop 46 on school funding at http://www.noon46.com/get-the-facts/impacts-on-school-funding/.

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #41: Members of the LA County Democratic Party overwhelming voted to oppose Prop 46. The head of the LACDP noted the group opposes Prop 46 "because it is not what it pretends to be. Rather than a measure that reforms our medical negligence compensation system, it is cluttered with extraneous measures solely because, as the proponents themselves have said, 'They poll well.'" Join Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians and more in voting NO on Prop 46.

Why vote NO on 46? Prop is "a step backward for providing affordable and quality access to health care." Learn more about how Prop 46 jeopardizes access to health care at http://www.noon46.com/access/.

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #39: Prop 46 will cost state and local governments up to "several hundred million dollars annually" according to the independent, nonpartisan Legislative Analyst Office. And who will pay those costs? YOU! Learn more about why Prop 46 is a risk Californians can't afford at http://www.noon46.com/costs/. SHARE with your friends and VOTE NO on Prop 46!

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #38: According to Dr. Ariane Terlet at La Clínica de La Raza, "This flawed measure severely compromises patient privacy by forcing doctors to rely on an online database containing personal prescription medical records, vulnerable to hackers and identity thieves, and adds no money for security." Learn more about the Prop 46's privacy threats at http://www.noon46.com/privacy/.

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #37: In their Editorial strongly encouraging Californians to vote NO, the Santa Cruz Sentinel noted, "proponents of Prop 46 are trying to trick voters." Read the full Editorial here: http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/opinion/ci_26599660/editorial-vote-no-proposition-46

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #36: Prop 46 is sloppily written and will lead to unintended consequences. Get the facts at http://www.noon46.com/get-the-facts/, share with your friends and vote NO on Prop 46.

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #35: Despite the "sweeteners" added to entice voters, Prop 46 is ploy by trial lawyers and, if passed, the business of suing doctors and hospitals would become considerably more lucrative," according to the Orange County Register. Read the full Editorial here: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/malpractice-637702-prop-alcohol.html, SHARE with your friends and VOTE NO on Prop 46.

Why vote No on Prop 46? In addition to their strong opposition to the random, suspicion-less drug testing provision, the American Civil Liberties Union notes that the 3-in-1 initiative "breaks the single-subject rule" that protects voters from the use of popular sweeteners to cover up controversial measures. Read more about ACLU's opposition on their blog: https://www.aclunc.org/article/no-proposition-46-medical-malpractice-lawsuits-cap-and-drug-testing-doctors-initiative.

Why vote NO on Prop 46? Reason #33: In endorsing a NO vote, the LA Democratic Party notes that "Prop 46 is not what it pretends to be." LADP Chairman Eric Bauman went on to say that Prop 46 "misleads voters by gaming this critical issue and throwing in everything but the kitchen sink. Proposition 46 is not what California needs. California needs honest reform, not political gimmicks." Join the LA Democratic Party, the California Republican Party, the Libertarian Party of California, the Freedom Socialist Party, Asian Pacific Democratic Club, Bernal Heights Democratic Club, Beverly Hills/West Hollywood Democratic Club, Butte County Democratic Central Committee, California Federation of Republican Women, Democratic Action Club of Chico, Democratic Women of Santa Barbara County, East Bay Stonewall LGBT Democratic Club, East Bay Young Democrats, John George Democratic Club, New Avenues Democratic Club, Northeast Democratic Club, Pacific Palisades Republican Club, Peace and Freedom Party of Solano County, Raoul Wallenberg Jewish Democratic Club, San Francisco Women’s Political Committee, Santa Barbara County Republican Party, Southern California Republican Women and Men, Westside Chinese Democratic Club and Yuba County Democratic Central Committee in voting NO on Prop 46.

Before you vote, remember the risks about Prop 46.

Dr. Sandra Mendez is voting no on Prop 46 because it is a serious risk to her patients and to California.

Doctora Sandra Mendez dice por qué la Proposición 46 es malo para californianos.