Breaking Headlines First

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/do-not-feed-the-protesters-man-shot-by-national-guard-was-handing-out-bbq/

Do Not Feed The Protesters. Man Shot By National Guard Was Handing Out BBQ.

David McAtee was shot and killed while feeding the “protesters”. According to the Stars and Stripes, a national news organization for and by American soldiers, the national guard of Kentucky has been involved in at least one fatal shooting.

He was killed in reaction to the recent peaceful protest turned riots – that sparked after George Floyd was killed by a corrupt and poorly trained police officer. Now another innocent man has been killed.

IMPORTANT: Now that the “peaceful protest” has turned into a “chaotic riot”. Peaceful protesters need to go home, or they could be caught in the crossfire.

Video of David McAtee Shooting From Bystander

The LMPD & Kentucky National Guard just MURDERED another black man LAST NIGHT‼️‼️‼️ pic.twitter.com/HKJpYZOBzd

— GasmanD 🌬 (@DLH_x1) June 1, 2020

“In Louisville, Ky., a National Guard member and a city police officer were involved in a fatal shooting at about midnight Monday, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear said in a statement.” – Stripes.com

David McAtee, 53, of Louisville, Kentucky was the person who was found dead due to the gunfire. McAtee, who is receiving a lot of public attention due to the shooting, was in a confrontation with rioters during the conflict. McAtee was the owner of YaYa’s BBQ, founded only in February of 2019. His newly successful business, was likely affected by the recent economic crisis. Yet still, McAtee found it necessary to constantly feed the homeless, provide police with free food, and at sometime between Sunday 5/31/2020 and Monday 6/1/2020 around midnight, McAtee found it necessary to give away food to the protesters…This man was obviously a genuinely good hearted person, however this decision cost him his life.

It has been reported though that McAtee was cooking BBQ and passing out food. Other’s say McAtee was even delivering food to the protesters. Regardless, McAtee was not at home, as most all Americans should be if they live in a city where these protests have gone awry and turned into violent riots. Kentucky has experienced several recent shootings by police and has especially large and violent riots occurring.

David McAtee was shot and killed by LMPD officers and the National Guard this morning. Family and witnesses say law enforcement should have never been there. McAtee was serving food at his bbq spot at the time. His family is praying in front of #lmpd officers #louisville pic.twitter.com/tQ4r2ViCUp

— Phylicia Ashley (@pashleywave3) June 1, 2020

Basic Facts of the 5/31/2020 Fatal Shooting by Kentucky National Guard

There was a small faction of police in riot gear – and guardsman in full garb dispatched to disperse a crowd.

While commanding the crowd to disperse, the group of police and guardsman were shot at.

The guardsman returned fire.

At least one person was found dead in the crowd, after it finally dispersed.

Supposedly, there were no body cameras were active during the shooting according to USA Today.

According to Phylicia Ashley of Wave3News, “David McAtee was a bystander. Family says he died shielding his niece from getting shot.”

This was not the first time the national guard shot at rioters. The same night, guardsman in Minnesota shot at an oncoming vehicle, which was the first incident of shots being fired against the “George Floyd” rioters.

"Right now, I can't tell you the feeling I have. All I can say — when a mother loses her child, a piece of you goes along with that child." — Odessa Riley, #DavidMcAtee's mother #Louisville #BreonnaTaylor pic.twitter.com/jdtI4mqcZL

— Philmonger (@phillipmbailey) June 1, 2020

This is obviously not the result anyone wanted. George Floyd would not want this, nor do most Americans. The only help we can all give is our absence, our absence in these riots, until they die down. Protests can potentially continue later.

The first shots fired by the national guard occurred in Minnesota, where Floyd was killed.

There was an incident where a fast moving vehicle continued to accelerate towards 3 armed national guardsman. The three guardsman motioned non-verbally and commanded the vehicle operator verbally to stop. The vehicle continued to accelerate and was fired upon.

The soldier dispersed 3 shots, and according to reports no one was killed.

On May 31st, Trump ordered the national guard to at least 23 States. The national guard published the below press release.

Guard members in 23 states, D.C. called up in response to civil unrest – By Sgt. 1st Class Jon Soucy | National Guard Bureau | May 31, 2020

Originally published on NationalGuard.mil

ARLINGTON, Va. – As of Monday morning, National Guard Soldiers and Airmen were activated in 23 states and the District of Columbia in response to civil disturbances, bringing the total number of Guard members on duty in support of their governors to nearly 66,722.

This number represents 17,015 Guard members activated for civil unrest, 45,000 for COVID-19 response, as well as other Guard members for state-specific disasters such as wildfires, flooding and other natural disasters.

Minnesota Guardsmen took some time while they were on duty today to assist with cleaning up in the community. The Minnesota National Guard is committed to protecting lives, preserving property and restoring order. (Photo by Minnesota National Guard)

The civil unrest response mission is expected to grow as governors assess the fluid situations in their states and call on the National Guard to assist.

“The hardest mission we do is responding in times of civil unrest,” said Air Force Gen. Joseph Lengyel, chief of the National Guard Bureau.

The activation of Guard members in response to civil unrest has unfolded in multiple cities in the wake of the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

Guard personnel assigned to these missions are trained, equipped and prepared to assist law enforcement authorities and first responders, said Lengyel.

“We plan, train and prepare for emergency response missions with our local, state, and federal partners,” he said. “We’re part of the communities we serve. We know the police, fire departments and hospital workers. We know their capabilities because we live with their capabilities.”

Guard members are to perform a variety of mission sets including traffic control, support to law enforcement, transportation and communication support. They’ve also been called upon to assist with extinguishing fires burning as a result of the unrest.

“Aircrews were using forest fire equipment, including helicopter water buckets, to put out building fires at protests last night,” said Lengyel.

The overall mission of Guard members is to assist local authorities and ensure safety.

“We’re here to help and assist local authorities,” said Lengyel. “Our troops are here to protect life and property, and preserve peace, order and public safety.”

Those Guard members called up are in a state active duty status and remain under the command and control of their respective governors, said Lengyel, adding those responding will continue to adhere to COVID-19 prevention measures.

“Governors have used Guard members many times during response efforts to support local and state law enforcement in a wide range of capacities, to include assisting in upholding the rule of law.” said Lengyel. “While conditions may change, the National Guard’s ability to respond is constant.”

Why did these riots break out in the first place?

The media glorified the death of an unarmed black man killed by a police officer (George Floyd). And now, of course they demanded justice, etc.. and pandered to the unruly. Riots began, another black man was killed (David McAtee) by police, riots are now getting bigger, etc… and it goes on and on.

The national guard, military, etc.., the patriotic and civilized Americans who care about our country will protect the businesses and civilians of our country alike.

At least one person has now been killed as a result of these riots. Will it stop there? Unlikely. How does this make you feel? Honestly, it is a little worrisome for me. I do not want to see an America with the military policing the streets, and that is exactly where we are heading.

Trump Encourages Governors To Utilize National Guard Or Military Will Be Activated

If this happens, and the military is ordered to fire on it’s own people, in America, there might be no turning back. There could be a longer term form of authoritarian rule in American streets unlike any coronavirus lock-down or curfew of the past.

There will surely be more deaths as long as these riots continue. The near future only looks grimmer by the day as more and more violence breaks out and more innocent people are caught in the crossfire.

All I can say is, “Do Not Feed The Protestors”.

SOURCES

https://www.stripes.com/news/us/national-guard-involved-in-at-least-two-shootings-one-fatal-in-response-to-protests-throughout-us-1.632057

https://bringmethenews.com/minnesota-news/minnesota-national-guardsman-fired-3-rounds-at-vehicle-that-wouldnt-stop

https://www.facebook.com/david.mcatee.3538

https://youtu.be/Jf5BOMMpnWw

https://www.nationalguard.mil/News/Article/2202946/guard-members-in-23-states-dc-called-up-in-response-to-civil-unrest/

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/trumps-executive-order-targeting-twitter-and-facebook-freespeech/

Trumps Executive Order Targeting Twitter and Facebook. #FreeSpeech

Executive Order On Preventing Online Censorship

Trump has signed into law the most awaited executive order of the 21st century. Finally, a policy from the United States government enabling citizens and private companies recourse for unfair and biased treatment on social media and other platforms! This is an extremely exciting and unforgettable moment of our lifetimes. This day will go down in history as the day the people took back their power from the tech giants who have been playing God over our lives.

Here at Next Up News we are beyond ecstatic of this executive order as all free speech supporters are. Please share this and join the free speech movement.

#Trump just signed perhaps the most awaited executive order of the 21st century. #1A #FreeSpeech is back. #Follow Us Again! No more shadow banning! Let the internet be free. Let people express themselves. Let us Be us! We are all unique and worthy of #publicity and #privacy!

— Next Up News (@NextUpNewsUSA) May 29, 2020

Watch Now: Trump Announces and Signs Executive Order On Preventing Online Censorship

From YouTube – https://youtu.be/KeEVBxwKfgE

From YouTube – https://youtu.be/AT7QusCwIaA

Who ever wanted to surf the internet of Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or Pinterest? We The People. —- want to surf the internet. —-Period. We do not care about their company cultures and or their internal policies, as they do not apply to our purpose, the customer’s purpose. The internet is where we can freely roam as humans to learn, engage and teach. We want information to be free! Not monetarily – but free of censorship and authoritarian control. Social platforms should remain points of access and those who gate keep should be punished for doing so. Not only is this behavior un-American, but it is anti-human and doomed to fail.

Never did the creators of the internet intend for the people’s loss of rights and freedoms to occur due to “Big Tech” giants and technology conglomerates controlling informational access along with. The future of technology has always been only a day away, as fast as things progress in software and hardware, it has always been innovation that has kept our ears ringing and our hearts pumping awaiting the next powerful tool and opportunity to knock at our door.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

Section 230 of The Communications Decency Act, an act that aimed to protect children and encourage online platforms to grow in support of public discourse, has been manipulated by litigious social media giants to allow authoritarian censorship and dogmatic ideological content consumption.

Social media companies have been forcing their ideas of a perfect world down our throats for too long. It finally is coming to a screeching halt. With threats of fines, lawsuits, etc.. Trump has signed into law the “Executive Order On Preventing Online Censorship”. Those words are music to my ears, as it should be to us all. Not only will there be no more censorship of political views, beliefs and ideologies, but the forceful consumption of uninvited views, opinions and ideas will surely become a thing of the past.

The Internet As We Knew It Will Return

The days of the internet as we currently know it are numbered, 30 to be exact. In the executive order, Trump has created a group to investigate the unfair treatment of users online. This group will report back and policies, legislation and finalization of committees, regulations, etc.. will follow. The internet will be completely reshaped by the end of 2020.

In the 1990’s the internet was as free as it has ever been. Slowly but surely, we have all lost our way, many generations of today’s world haven’t ever had the pleasure to enjoy a truly free internet. Soon, we will all have what we lost, gave up, and let be taken from us, back, in our hands this time, hopefully never to be forgotten again.

The Executive Order That Brought Freedom Back To The Internet

With a stroke of the pen, “The Executive Order On Preventing Online Censorship”, was signed into law. With the support of the United States Attorney General and millions of Americans, Donald J. Trump has taken the power of the internet and given it back to the people. That order is written and transcribed as follows below.

Executive Order On Preventing Online Censorship – Signed by Donald J. Trump on May 28th, 2020 READ FULL TEXT >>>

Copied from https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/ exactly as published.

Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship

 INFRASTRUCTURE & TECHNOLOGY

 Issued on: May 28, 2020

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Policy.Free speech is the bedrock of American democracy.  Our Founding Fathers protected this sacred right with the First Amendment to the Constitution.  The freedom to express and debate ideas is the foundation for all of our rights as a free people.

In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression, we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand pick the speech that Americans may access and convey on the internet.  This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic.  When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power.  They cease functioning as passive bulletin boards, and ought to be viewed and treated as content creators.

The growth of online platforms in recent years raises important questions about applying the ideals of the First Amendment to modern communications technology.  Today, many Americans follow the news, stay in touch with friends and family, and share their views on current events through social media and other online platforms.  As a result, these platforms function in many ways as a 21st century equivalent of the public square.

Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube wield immense, if not unprecedented, power to shape the interpretation of public events; to censor, delete, or disappear information; and to control what people see or do not see.

As President, I have made clear my commitment to free and open debate on the internet. Such debate is just as important online as it is in our universities, our town halls, and our homes.  It is essential to sustaining our democracy.

Online platforms are engaging in selective censorship that is harming our national discourse.  Tens of thousands of Americans have reported, among other troubling behaviors, online platforms “flagging” content as inappropriate, even though it does not violate any stated terms of service; making unannounced and unexplained changes to company policies that have the effect of disfavoring certain viewpoints; and deleting content and entire accounts with no warning, no rationale, and no recourse.

Twitter now selectively decides to place a warning label on certain tweets in a manner that clearly reflects political bias.  As has been reported, Twitter seems never to have placed such a label on another politician’s tweet.  As recently as last week, Representative Adam Schiff was continuing to mislead his followers by peddling the long-disproved Russian Collusion Hoax, and Twitter did not flag those tweets.  Unsurprisingly, its officer in charge of so-called ‘Site Integrity’ has flaunted his political bias in his own tweets.

At the same time online platforms are invoking inconsistent, irrational, and groundless justifications to censor or otherwise restrict Americans’ speech here at home, several online platforms are profiting from and promoting the aggression and disinformation spread by foreign governments like China.  One United States company, for example, created a search engine for the Chinese Communist Party that would have blacklisted searches for “human rights,” hid data unfavorable to the Chinese Communist Party, and tracked users determined appropriate for surveillance.  It also established research partnerships in China that provide direct benefits to the Chinese military.  Other companies have accepted advertisements paid for by the Chinese government that spread false information about China’s mass imprisonment of religious minorities, thereby enabling these abuses of human rights.  They have also amplified China’s propaganda abroad, including by allowing Chinese government officials to use their platforms to spread misinformation regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to undermine pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.

As a Nation, we must foster and protect diverse viewpoints in today’s digital communications environment where all Americans can and should have a voice.  We must seek transparency and accountability from online platforms, and encourage standards and tools to protect and preserve the integrity and openness of American discourse and freedom of expression.

Sec. 2.  Protections Against Online Censorship.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet.  Prominent among the ground rules governing that debate is the immunity from liability created by section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act (section 230(c)).  47 U.S.C. 230(c).  It is the policy of the United States that the scope of that immunity should be clarified: the immunity should not extend beyond its text and purpose to provide protection for those who purport to provide users a forum for free and open speech, but in reality use their power over a vital means of communication to engage in deceptive or pretextual actions stifling free and open debate by censoring certain viewpoints.

Section 230(c) was designed to address early court decisions holding that, if an online platform restricted access to some content posted by others, it would thereby become a “publisher” of all the content posted on its site for purposes of torts such as defamation.  As the title of section 230(c) makes clear, the provision provides limited liability “protection” to a provider of an interactive computer service (such as an online platform) that engages in “‘Good Samaritan’ blocking” of harmful content.  In particular, the Congress sought to provide protections for online platforms that attempted to protect minors from harmful content and intended to ensure that such providers would not be discouraged from taking down harmful material.  The provision was also intended to further the express vision of the Congress that the internet is a “forum for a true diversity of political discourse.”  47 U.S.C. 230(a)(3).  The limited protections provided by the statute should be construed with these purposes in mind.

In particular, subparagraph (c)(2) expressly addresses protections from “civil liability” and specifies that an interactive computer service provider may not be made liable “on account of” its decision in “good faith” to restrict access to content that it considers to be “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing or otherwise objectionable.”  It is the policy of the United States to ensure that, to the maximum extent permissible under the law, this provision is not distorted to provide liability protection for online platforms that — far from acting in “good faith” to remove objectionable content — instead engage in deceptive or pretextual actions (often contrary to their stated terms of service) to stifle viewpoints with which they disagree.  Section 230 was not intended to allow a handful of companies to grow into titans controlling vital avenues for our national discourse under the guise of promoting open forums for debate, and then to provide those behemoths blanket immunity when they use their power to censor content and silence viewpoints that they dislike.  When an interactive computer service provider removes or restricts access to content and its actions do not meet the criteria of subparagraph (c)(2)(A), it is engaged in editorial conduct.  It is the policy of the United States that such a provider should properly lose the limited liability shield of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) and be exposed to liability like any traditional editor and publisher that is not an online provider.

(b)  To advance the policy described in subsection (a) of this section, all executive departments and agencies should ensure that their application of section 230(c) properly reflects the narrow purpose of the section and take all appropriate actions in this regard.  In addition, within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), in consultation with the Attorney General, and acting through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), shall file a petition for rulemaking with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting that the FCC expeditiously propose regulations to clarify:

(i) the interaction between subparagraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of section 230, in particular to clarify and determine the circumstances under which a provider of an interactive computer service that restricts access to content in a manner not specifically protected by subparagraph (c)(2)(A) may also not be able to claim protection under subparagraph (c)(1), which merely states that a provider shall not be treated as a publisher or speaker for making third-party content available and does not address the provider’s responsibility for its own editorial decisions;

(ii)  the conditions under which an action restricting access to or availability of material is not “taken in good faith” within the meaning of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) of section 230, particularly whether actions can be “taken in good faith” if they are:

(A)  deceptive, pretextual, or inconsistent with a provider’s terms of service; or

(B)  taken after failing to provide adequate notice, reasoned explanation, or a meaningful opportunity to be heard; and

(iii)  any other proposed regulations that the NTIA concludes may be appropriate to advance the policy described in subsection (a) of this section.

Sec. 3.  Protecting Federal Taxpayer Dollars from Financing Online Platforms That Restrict Free Speech.  (a)  The head of each executive department and agency (agency) shall review its agency’s Federal spending on advertising and marketing paid to online platforms.  Such review shall include the amount of money spent, the online platforms that receive Federal dollars, and the statutory authorities available to restrict their receipt of advertising dollars.

(b)  Within 30 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency shall report its findings to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

(c)  The Department of Justice shall review the viewpoint-based speech restrictions imposed by each online platform identified in the report described in subsection (b) of this section and assess whether any online platforms are problematic vehicles for government speech due to viewpoint discrimination, deception to consumers, or other bad practices.

Sec. 4.  Federal Review of Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States that large online platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the critical means of promoting the free flow of speech and ideas today, should not restrict protected speech.  The Supreme Court has noted that social media sites, as the modern public square, “can provide perhaps the most powerful mechanisms available to a private citizen to make his or her voice heard.”  Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730, 1737 (2017).  Communication through these channels has become important for meaningful participation in American democracy, including to petition elected leaders.  These sites are providing an important forum to the public for others to engage in free expression and debate.  Cf. PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 85-89 (1980).

(b)  In May of 2019, the White House launched a Tech Bias Reporting tool to allow Americans to report incidents of online censorship.  In just weeks, the White House received over 16,000 complaints of online platforms censoring or otherwise taking action against users based on their political viewpoints.  The White House will submit such complaints received to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

(c)  The FTC shall consider taking action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, pursuant to section 45 of title 15, United States Code.  Such unfair or deceptive acts or practice may include practices by entities covered by section 230 that restrict speech in ways that do not align with those entities’ public representations about those practices.

(d)  For large online platforms that are vast arenas for public debate, including the social media platform Twitter, the FTC shall also, consistent with its legal authority, consider whether complaints allege violations of law that implicate the policies set forth in section 4(a) of this order.  The FTC shall consider developing a report describing such complaints and making the report publicly available, consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 5.  State Review of Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices and Anti-Discrimination Laws.  (a)  The Attorney General shall establish a working group regarding the potential enforcement of State statutes that prohibit online platforms from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices.  The working group shall also develop model legislation for consideration by legislatures in States where existing statutes do not protect Americans from such unfair and deceptive acts and practices. The working group shall invite State Attorneys General for discussion and consultation, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law.

(b) Complaints described in section 4(b) of this order will be shared with the working group, consistent with applicable law. The working group shall also collect publicly available information regarding the following:

(i) increased scrutiny of users based on the other users they choose to follow, or their interactions with other users;

(ii) algorithms to suppress content or users based on indications of political alignment or viewpoint;

(iii) differential policies allowing for otherwise impermissible behavior, when committed by accounts associated with the Chinese Communist Party or other anti-democratic associations or governments;

(iv) reliance on third-party entities, including contractors, media organizations, and individuals, with indicia of bias to review content; and

(v) acts that limit the ability of users with particular viewpoints to earn money on the platform compared with other users similarly situated.

Sec. 6.  Legislation.  The Attorney General shall develop a proposal for Federal legislation that would be useful to promote the policy objectives of this order.

Sec. 7.  Definition.  For purposes of this order, the term “online platform” means any website or application that allows users to create and share content or engage in social networking, or any general search engine.

Sec. 8.  General Provisions. (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)    the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)   the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Will this executive order be enough? I think not. It is a great start. Hardly the beginning though, this executive order is first of it’s kind and as far reaching as any legislation against social media platforms. Below is an interpretation of Trump’s anti-censorship order from Richard Hoeg, who runs the Virtual Law YouTube channel.

We do not endorse this review, nor are we affiliated with Virtual Law or it’s lawyers, we at Next Up News wanted to provide a legal review for better understanding of this executive order. We only hope you all can at minimum gain a little benefit in some way from this news and knowledge.

First Review of Leaked Draft of Executive Order To Prevent Online Censorship From Richard Hoeg

From YouTube – https://youtu.be/tTThb2Y9Fh8

Final Review of Signed Executive Order On Preventing Online Censorship by Richard Hoeg

From YouTube – https://youtu.be/gmBGFVUjCaI

SOURCES

https://youtu.be/KeEVBxwKfgE

https://youtu.be/AT7QusCwIaA

https://youtu.be/gmBGFVUjCaI

https://youtu.be/tTThb2Y9Fh8

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/political-news/

Political News

Judicial Watch

Key Obamagate Doc Uncovered

May 22, 2020

Judicial Watch Sues to Stop California Governor Newsom’s “Vote by Mail” Mandate

May 21, 2020

Judicial Watch and Election Integrity Project California Both Work to Restore Voter Confidence Nationwide

May 21, 2020

UN’s U.S.-Funded Global COVID-19 Response Promotes Abortion, Sexual Health Services

May 21, 2020

Trump on the Front Lines: Big Bet on Virus Drug Gets Personal

May 21, 2020

President Trump

WATCH: Team Trump Online with Lara Trump and Sen. Lindsey Graham!

May 26, 2020

The hardest thing President Trump has to do as President

May 25, 2020

WATCH: War Room Weekly with Tim Murtaugh, Rep. Meuser, and Rep. Brady!

May 25, 2020

Real News Insights with Dean Cain

May 24, 2020

WATCH: Black Voices For Trump Online with Katrina Pierson, Ken Blackwell, and TW Shannon!

May 24, 2020

US Courts

Courts and Classes are Closed, But Judges Make Virtual House Calls During COVID-19 Crisis

May 14, 2020

New Bankruptcy Filings Fall 1.1 Percent

May 6, 2020

Judiciary Seeks Funding, Legislative Changes to Aid COVID-19 Response

May 5, 2020

Courts Begin to Consider Guidelines for Reopening

April 27, 2020

From Suffragist Sashes to Black Armbands, Law Day Distance Learning Focuses on Role of Courts

April 14, 2020

USA.gov

Three Ways to Manage Your Stress

April 27, 2020

Get Help for Homelessness, Hunger, and More

April 3, 2020

Be Sure to Declutter Online This Spring Season

March 20, 2020

USAGov’s Tips for Safely Enjoying America’s National Parks

March 20, 2020

USAGov’s Tips for Safely Enjoying America’s National Parks in 2020

March 20, 2020

Twitter Politics

@GlasgowPam Pam Duncan-Glancy

May 26, 2020

@StephenMcGann Stephen McGann

May 26, 2020

@BBCPolitics BBC Politics

May 26, 2020

@evolvepolitics Evolve Politics

May 26, 2020

@Games_Politics Florian Leon aka Mani2

May 26, 2020

Reddit: Politics

Andrew Yang calls for "serious look" at 4-day workweeks, says "3-day weekends are better than 2-day weekends"

May 26, 2020

Lt. Gov. says Trump is preparing to question Michigan’s 2020 election results if he loses

May 26, 2020

Harvard Researchers Find 'Inequality On Top Of Inequality' In COVID-19 Deaths

May 26, 2020

Opinion from Stanford Law School constitutional scholar: Shelter in place orders are perfectly legal

May 26, 2020

Republican State Lawmaker in Alaska Compares COVID-19 Precautions to the Holocaust, Says Hitler Was No White Supremacist

May 25, 2020

The Gateway Pundit

Roger Stone Files Notice of Appeal After DC Courtroom Lynching — Please Donate to His Defense Fund Linked Here

May 26, 2020

CNBC Reporter: Biden Is Offering Most Expensive Tax Plan Of Any Democratic Candidate In Recent History (VIDEO)

May 26, 2020

“Social Distancing Is Not a Crime – Sheriff’s Office Has No Authority to Enforce” – MO Sheriff Responds After Video from Giant Pool Party at Lake of the Ozarks Goes Viral

May 26, 2020

Video of Biden Looking Very Frail at Veterans Memorial Sparks Concerns Over His Health

May 26, 2020

Newsom Issues New Authoritarian Guidelines For Reopening Churches: Limit Capacity to 25% or 100 People, Eliminate Singing

May 26, 2020

Newsbusters

Politico's 'Playbook' Compares Trump Memorial Day Tweets to Patriotic Newspapers

May 26, 2020

Andrea Mitchell Fawns Over ‘Touching’ Biden Memorial Day Visit, While Bashing Trump, ‘Endangering Troops’

May 25, 2020

MSNBC Analyst Warns: Second Wave of Virus Is Coming, But Just for ‘Red America’ ‘Trump Voters’

May 25, 2020

CNN Averaged 4 Minutes Per Day on Biden's Gaffe, Then Stopped Covering it

May 25, 2020

CNN's Brian Stelter Insists Media Mostly Acts in 'Good Faith,' As He Proves He Doesn't

May 25, 2020

Real Clear Politics

More of Our Daughters Should Serve in the Military

May 26, 2020

The Future of the Pandemic Is Clouded in Chaos

May 26, 2020

There Won't Be a Recovery Unless We Reopen Schools Now

May 26, 2020

Camp Is Canceled. 3 More Months of Family Time. Help.

May 26, 2020

Let's Not Be Naive–China's Dishonesty Is to Blame

May 26, 2020

Jordan Peterson

Peterson Family Update – February 2020

February 7, 2020

Men & Women: Personality Differences | Discovering Personality with Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

December 6, 2019

Rex Murphy (REXTV) interviews Jordan Peterson

November 12, 2019

Auckland Clip 6: On Crippling Guilt

September 14, 2019

Auckland Clip 5: On Starting a Political Career

September 7, 2019

Sam Harris

Making Sense with Sam Harris #196 – The Science of Happiness (with Laurie Santos)

April 10, 2020

Making Sense with Sam Harris #195 – Social Cohesion is Everything (with McChrystal and Fussell)

April 7, 2020

Making Sense with Sam Harris #194 – The New Future Of Work (with Matt Mullenweg)

March 25, 2020

Sam's Mushroom Trip

March 22, 2020

Making Sense with Sam Harris #193 – Meditation In An Emergency

March 20, 2020

Prager University

Memorial Day 2020

May 25, 2020

What Does Separation of Church and State Mean?

May 25, 2020

The Candace Owens Show: Jack Hibbs

May 24, 2020

How Do Lockdowns Impact Mental Health?

May 23, 2020

Reagan: Get Government Out of the Way

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/amazon-warns-associates/

Amazon Warns Associates...

Amazon Warns Associates May Lose Accounts and Earnings Over Coronavirus Coverage

Amazon Threatens To Close Associates Accounts Over Coronavirus Content Opposing CDC Guidelines (Above Image is actual warning.)

After logging into my Amazon associates account today, I was greeted with a stark message from Amazon regarding COVID-19 content. The associate alert or coronavirus warning read as follows below:

“As a reminder, we ask all of our associates to exercise good judgement when covering COVID-19 and refer readers to the CDC website for accurate information. For more information, see the FTC’s guidance around Coronavirus claims. As a reminder advertising with unsubstantiated claims is a violation of law and a violation of the Operating Agreement and may result in account closure, including withholding fees.“

Amazon warns of two potential actions:

Account Closure = The potential loss of all income and livelihood, which could be interpreted as the institution of “Excessive Fines”.

Withholding Fee’s = The withholding of earned income, which could be interpreted as “cruel and unusual punishment” and perhaps even a threat of extortion.

There are at least 900,000 Amazon Associates according to Amazon’s own claims in 2008. There are hundreds of thousands of websites affected by this alert definitively, causing massive censorship on the coronavirus topic. – GeniusLink

Arguably, Amazon has the second largest influence over more content than anyone on the internet, largely due to their economic impact and outright megalithic size.

This move by Amazon is potentially the largest recent act of censorship. Amazon has influence over hundreds of thousands of websites if not millions and potentially millions of associates. Amazon is second only to Google Adsense publishers which range around the 2 million mark. Google and YouTube has also banned coronavirus advertising, but recently rolled both ad platforms restrictions back.

This news from Amazon is one more example of Big Tech’s outlook on free speech. It doesn’t exist. By no means does Amazon have to let associates into their platform if they do not agree with their content, but, they use the term “violation of law” and presumably aim to use these laws as justification for closing accounts and withholding fee’s.

What Are Unsubstantiated Claims?

Unsubstantiated claims in advertising usually refers to things like “puffery” going too far. Unsubstantiated is when a statement becomes deceitful or outright false.

This is a serious legal debacle that Amazon has now put it’s associates in. Also, many if not most of Amazon Associates have zero clue as to what these implications might mean legally, and so they will simply be silenced and they will begin to self-censor. Especially because the coronavirus is a new virus and we are learning more about it everyday, what is true and what is not changes by the day. Using the coronavirus to censor individuals speech is becoming a very common tactic by larger tech firms instituting their vision or ideology on the general public.

Many doctors have made “scientific” claims that go against governments coronavirus guidelines. Many medical organizations have done the same. They have been censored. US law supports protest and promotes democratic argumentation. I mean, our courts are centered around a jury trial for any criminal wrongdoing. Our elections are based upon a multi-party debate and vote. Big Tech however is far from democratic in nature and it’s becoming more and more apparent every day.

This type of threat, from Amazon, is basically a threat to violate your rights under the 8th amendment regarding “excessive fines” or “cruel and unusual punishment” however brought down by a corporation instead of a government.

How U.S. Law Defines “Unsubstantiated”

The United States Federal Trade Commission addresses this in Title 16 Part 255 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and gives several examples. A few examples are taken from the legal text below:

“…bloggers concerning the need to ensure that statements they make are truthful and substantiated.” – Example 5, § 255.1 (d)

“…the advertiser must possess and rely upon adequate substantiation, including, when appropriate, competent and reliable scientific evidence…” – § 255.2 (a)

An Example Of Unsubstantiated Claims

A 2018 settlement with the FTC and The Nobetes Corporation (a dietary supplement company) the FTC simply published their investigations findings with rulings simply banning the company from engaging in future advertising making false medical claims… The FTC as quoted, “FTC’s complaint bans the defendants from advertising or selling Nobetes or any other diabetes product. It prohibits them from making health-related claims….” In other words, there is no real jail time or punishment handed out for violating these laws. Often there aren’t even any fines, like in the case above.

Many Other Countries Have Similar Laws, Like New Zealand.

New Zealand addresses puffery directly in law as, “a representation that a reasonable person would not expect to be substantiated.” The problem is defining what a regular person considers “reasonable”. And so in 2013, the New Zealand parliament has passed law defining what must be substantiated.

Amazon Warns Associates To Stay In Line With CDC and FTC

Amazon stated clearly to all associates to, “exercise good judgement when covering COVID-19“.

What exactly does “when covering COVID-19” mean? It seems as though they are referring to any reporting on the pandemic. News organizations, blogs, commentators and other organizations who “cover” current events.

After considering Amazon’s intent in the alert, I couldn’t possibly imagine how this language from Amazon could be anything close to what the FTC is concerned about. The FTC is concerned with products, that being whether retail companies, “have their products been approved, cleared, or authorized by the FDA“. The FTC doesn’t want people selling snake oil. This would make sense if Amazon warned associates not to advertise their products as possible remedies or cures for COVID-19. But, that’s not what the alert says.

The alert from Amazon referred associates to the FTC’s guidance, and the CDC website (but actually is the CDC’s coronavirus index). These two government agencies are not the only federal agencies giving out coronavirus guidance by far, nearly every federal agency is, due to President Trump’s “whole government” approach to the pandemic.

The FTC warns about companies offering products that are not approved by the FDA, etc.. The FTC is worried about medical and scientific claims made regarding products and services. Most all publishers who review products and retailers are very familiar with these regulations. Again, Amazon does not mention retailers or the sale of any products. Amazon seems to be joining the bandwagon of online platforms banning speech and aiming their alert at reporters and bloggers alike.

Amazon Joins Twitter And Youtube With Policy Chipping Away At Free Speech

We have seen nearly every single social media platform remove content that is not aligned with the World Health Organization or the scientist in chief “Dr. Fouci”, who recently switched sides on the stay-at-home order (now stating that the lock-down can cause “irrepairable damage“. The CDC also has put out several guidelines that it has walked back. This is of course a normal thing, as we learn more about this pandemic, we as a society update our approach, update regulations, guidelines, etc…

Isn’t it possible that a reporter could stumble upon a new truth about COVID-19? Especially, since reporters are the largest source of investigating facts in our society?

Why would amazon be concerned about the content of a blog or news website that is not aligned with government? It is not illegal to disagree with government is it? We as a people are the government of the United States. Our laws are formed through collective political action through voting. The next regulation is only a single vote away. It seems as though these platforms, Amazon alike, are more concerned with setting their own regulations, which are de facto law’s due to the platforms stranglehold on access to information.

If we take to these draconian social policies from Twitter, Youtube and now Amazon, how could government ever adapt, overcome and change for the better? Someone has to disagree with the current state of affairs to present a new idea, right? Or am I missing something here.

It has long been warned through several alternative news outlets, pundits and dissenters alike that the American government was heeding to the Big Tech oligarchies of our time. It seems as though that fear is now a truth that is spreading into our economy, business, social life, etc.. and moving beyond just the self-governing of social media posts.

Amazon Needs To Clarify COVID-19 Alert

Is Amazon worried about snake oil salesmen, or are they aiming at yet another stance on free speech? This alert from Amazon is very unclear and it is extremely worrisome at the least.

We have seen other financial platforms like PayPal ban people from accessing their technology due to ideas they disagree with, Alex Jones for example (Paypal acted against what they called hate promotion)… Banning individuals from access to financial tools and basic economic freedoms to buy and sell is a steep cliff the United States surely was not founded on.

We have also seen Amazon ban books that they disagree with in the past, like Dr. Joseph Nicolosi’s book, “A Parent’s Guide to Preventing Homosexuality.”, which aims to, “help people who have unwanted same-sex sexual attractions deal with those feelings“. A controversial topic, yes, but banned? When Amazon still sells Mein Kampf, Hitlers manifesto (as reported by the New York Times as recent as this March, of 2020.

Youtube CEO Admits Censorship Of Content Opposing World Health Organization

In an interview with Brian Stelter of CNN, Susan Wojcicki, came to the forefront of free speech censorship admitting that she would remove “any content containing medical advice that contradicts World Health Organisation (WHO) coronavirus recommendations“

Amazon’s CEO Jeff Bezos owes its hundreds of thousands of associates a public clarification of this alert and guidance. It is not enough to merely send out an ambiguous alert to the Amazon Associate dashboard. Many Americans and citizens of the world in general, rely heavily on Amazon affiliate sales to support their families and often times run entire businesses focused around the Amazon platform.

Jeopardizing the livelihood of an individual due to a disagreement in perception or ideological framework is not what America stands for and developing nations around the world are still seeking the American Dream, no matter how muddy the waters have become.

If this was about snake oil salesmen, Amazon wouldn’t even have to send out an alert. We all know what it means to lie and be deceitful. This is about changing the ideological framework and shifting the authorities of general public discord.

Forget scholarship and government, Big Tech is your daddy now.

SOURCES

https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/home

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2020/03/ftc-fda-warn-companies-making-coronavirus-claims

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=67d4c0cf-36b3-4534-a830-3e94c4a6260b

https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/FTC%20Guides%20Official.pdf

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2018/12/nobetes-dietary-supplement-marketers-settle-ftc-complaint

https://www.foxnews.com/health/fauci-says-extended-stay-home-orders-could-cause-irreparable-damage

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/09/21/paypal-bans-alex-jones-saying-infowars-promoted-hate-or-discriminatory-intolerance/

https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/15/amazon-bans-books-sex-attraction-not-nazi-propaganda/

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/amazon-hitler-mein-kampf.html

https://youtu.be/4JsnKursVpU

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/amazon-removes-controversial-books-father-conversion-therapy-n1026446

https://geniuslink.com/blog/just-big-amazon-associates-program/

https://marketingland.com/google-celebrates-10-years-of-adsense-48695

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/30/youtube-censorship-of-doctors-bucking-covid-19-cra/

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/trump-taking-hydroxychloroquine-to-prevent-coronavirus/

Trump Taking Hydroxychloroquine To Prevent Coronavirus

Today in a press briefing, President Trump announced that he had been taking hydroxychloroquine for a week and a half now.

Trump claims that he got a letter from a doctor in New York who stated he hadn’t lost a single patient and had been using hydroxychloroquine to treat those patients.

Trump said he asked the White House doctor for the drug and he has been advised by several doctors the hydroxychloroquine dosage can be an effective preventative measure for COVID-19.

Trump was asked over and over if he was infected or if he had been exposed to coronavirus. Trump answered, “Noooo….” over and over.

When asked, “Why?”, “Why are you taking hydroxychloroquine?”, Trump said, “I have been taking it for a week and a half now, and I’m still here.” It seems this is an experiment of some sorts that the drug hydroxychloroquine is safe and that people should not worry about the drug being dangerous.

It all comes down to a psychological battle between the media whom fear monger on a daily basis and those of sound mind who have approached this pandemic with a calm perspective. Many in the media hyped up the death of a man who took a poisonous form of hydroxychloroquine, which was a fish tank cleaner, as a situation where President Trump carelessly recommended hydroxychloroquine and caused a death. Now Trump himself is taking hydroxychloroquine. How about that?

It would seem Trump is making a very bold statement and he is willing to put himself out there completely to back up his claims and beliefs. This is a President unlike any we have seen in the past.

Donald Trump is not the type of person who just says things off of the cuff and doesn’t back them up. This is a perfect example of who Trump is as a person and as a leader. America is slowly moving forward in the coronavirus pandemic to the point where this will soon be a thing of the past.

Undoubtedly, the coronavirus will have scarred many, but moving forward the drugs we need to treat and prevent the spread of this virus are slim and choices are limited. The few we do have, like hydroxychloroquine, should be used and embraced. We do not need a miracle cure to move on and get our people protected and healthy enough to return to daily life as we once knew it.

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/hayabusa2-satellite-rovers-robots-send-back-pictures-and-videos-of-ryugu-asteroid/

Hayabusa2 Satellite, Rovers, Robots, Send Back Pictures and Videos Of Ryugu Asteroid

The Japanese satellite, Hayabusa2, has sent back phenomenal videos and pictures from two “Minerva 2” rovers and at least one robot dispatched to the asteroid 162173 Ryugu, between Earth and Mars.

Quick Facts About 162173 Ryugu Asteroid

Ryugu CGI Rotation GIF

The 162173 Ryugu asteroid is thought to be 8.5 million years old.

The 162173 Ryugu asteroid is about 1 kilometer in diameter and has a radius of 1,427.2 feet.

The 162173 Ryugu asteroid is 450 billion kilograms in weight.

The 162173 Ryugu asteroid was discovered by The Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR) project in 1999, a collaboration of the U.S. Air Force, NASA, and MIT.

Along with the Japanese Minerva Rovers, a French-German rover also landed on Ryugu 162173.

Asteroid was officially named “Ryugu” by the Minor Planet Center on 28 September 2015 (M.P.C. 95804) referring to Ryūgū (Dragon Palace) in Japanese folklore. – From Wikipedia

Ryugu Asteroid Orbit

The satellite has also collected samples which are scheduled to be returned to Earth in December of 2020, this year. Hayabusa2 is currently on its way home flying through deep space to Earth and scheduled to land in Australia. The orbit depicted shows Ryugu with a white orbital track, Mars in red, and Earth in Blue.

The videos and pictures have just been released by Japanese Space officials, and published in the “Science” academic journal.

An Up Close Look At Ryugu From Hyabusa2 Leaving Asteroid

Ryugu Asteroid Up Close

Up Close Look At Ryugu From Hyabusa2 Landing On Asteroid

Hyabusa2 Landing On Ryugu

The Surface Structure And Composition Of Asteroid 162173 Ryugu

Hayabusa2 has observed and captured the surface dust and rock – on the pile of rubble and rock known as the 162173 Ryugu “cb-type” asteroid. The surface is primarily a rocky ground full of craters, crevices, cliffs, jagged edges, rubble, dust, boulders and other rocky formations.

The Ryugu asteroid is described as a “top shaped” asteroid. Since the sampling and missions have been completed, it is now known that the surface contains a lot of unexpected red materials. Ryugu 162173 was thought to be a primarily blue asteroid on initial observations.

The colors are now known to be mostly blue and red. The actual materials are yet to be handled and studied by scientists and thus deemed space “stuff”. The materials are mainly fine dusts which are of course extraterrestrial in origin.

Actual Photo Of Asteroid 162173 Ryubu

Ryugu Asteroid Surface – https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/368/6491/654/F2.large.jpg

Some of the current hypothesis include potential reasonings for the red colors observed on Ryubu 162173. It is thought that the red colors are the results of burning. The heat exposed to the asteroid could have been experienced in a single blast of solar flares, rays or similar radiation or they could have been a burning over a period of time where the asteroid was close to the Sun.

The reddish change in color could have been caused by, “space weathering, thermal metamorphism by solar heating, and/or pulverization by small impacts. Redder materials may have been shed from boulder surfaces by impact disruption and/or thermal fatigue.” From Science

The heating hypothesis seems to make sense due to the fact that the areas of blue are primarily located at the north and south poles, other than the cratered areas around the asteroid. This would be because the northern and southern poles are the two most hidden areas of the asteroid from the Sun.

“Science” CGI Image Of Asteroid Ryugu 162173 Composition

Ryugu Asteroid – https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/368/6491/654/F4.large.jpg

Once scientists retrieve the samples from the materials captured on the Hayabusa2 mission, they will know much more. It is expected that the materials are composed of “low abundance of hydrous minerals revealed by global observation”. It is also known that the asteroid has aqueous alterations, which means there is evidence of H20 that existed on the surface at some time in the past. The water could have existed in icy form, vapors or actual liquid, but is obviously unknown.

Hyabusa2 Landing on Ryugu

Hyabusa2’s Second Landing On Ryugu

SOURCES

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6491/616.5

https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Hayabusa2s_touchdown_on_Ryugu_reveals_its_surface_in_stunning_detail_999.html

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/did-the-cia-just-invade-venezuela-to-kidnap-president-maduro/

Did The CIA Just Invade Venezuela To Kidnap President Maduro?

The security firm and paramilitary/mercenary group known as Silvercorp USA led a failed invasion and attempted kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on May 3rd, 2020. Silvercorp USA called this mission “Operation Gideon”.

The CIA has led similar missions in the past like the legendary “Bay of Pigs” operation in Cuba, during President Kennedy’s administration. The CIA often uses paramilitary groups, mercenary groups, ex-military, etc.. for black-ops missions, especially those types that include rebellions and revolution which would bring un-surmountable bad press or even be illegal.

This botched mission started with about 30 armed mercenaries on speedboats dispatched from Columbia, a firefight broke out, several people were killed, the mission essentially ended then, when the surviving invaders were captured. Aside from the Silvercorp USA crew, there were dozens of Venezuelan deserters who accompanied the planning and joined the team in action.

It is rumored that the Moduro government may have been aware of the incoming mercenaries in March…

“One of those Americans, Luke Denman, has since stated the mission sought to capture Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and bring him back to the US, where he is wanted on “narco-terrorism” charges.” From RT News

The Trump administration put a $15 million dollar bounty on President Moduro’s head.

Moduro’s special forces are still searching for additional combatants who may have alluded authorities in the battle or were planted in key positions as part of the coupe.

Jordan Goudreau is now being investigated for arms trafficking according to the AP. Mike Pompeo also announced that the US would be doing everything possible to return any captured U.S. citizens to American soil, but denied “direct” involvement. This appears like a clear and cut “burn” has taken place, which is common when a covert operator fails a mission or is caught by enemies during any black-ops mission.

Silvercorp USA Attempts Kidnapping Of Venezuelan President

Some quick facts about Silvercorp USA

This maritime invasion was called “Operation Gideon”, and was supposed to begin with a seizure of Venezuelan military bases and then kidnapping of President Nicolas Maduro.

SILVERCORP USA INC was founded 2/26/2018 by Jordan Goudreau at 4150 DOW RD STE 104, MELBOURNE, FL, 32934.

Silvercorp USA website can be found at silvercorpusa.com.

Silvercorp USA Facebook page, Twitter profile and Youtube channel have been deleted. Only their Instagram and CEO Jordan Goudreau’s LinkedIn is currently live on social media.

Silvercorp USA was founded by Jordan Goudreau who was designated as the Chief Executive Officer in the filing of SILVERCORP USA INC.

Jordan Goudreau was a Green Beret.

Drew White of Colorado Springs, Colorado was designated as the Corporate Operating Officer during the organizations creation.

Drew White denies any involvement in this operation.

Jordan Goudreau’s whereabouts is currently unknown and he has not responded to any requests for comment or communications in general aside from his video sent taking credit for the invasion.

Jordan Goudreau is currently being investigated for arms trafficking.

Silvercorp USA May Be Shell Corporation For This Single Mission

Silvercorp USA may have been created for this mission alone. A mission of this caliber and style would only be attempted by a few agencies of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

SILVERCORP USA INC was created as Florida Profit Corporation on February 26th, 2018. The corporate filing for Silvercorp USA Inc is currently still active on Florida’s government corporation’s filing website

Silvercorpusa.com, the groups website was only first registered on February 27th, 2018 through GoDaddy. The website was created with plagiarized content from several other websites, including the federal government website for Homeland Security.

“Goudreau, 43, did not return repeated requests for comment. On Wednesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the U.S. had no “direct involvement” in the armed incursion last weekend but will use “every tool” available to secure the return of the captured Americans.” – From NBC

Juan Guaido Implicated As Financier Behind Plot

Juan Guaido is the opposition party leader in Venezuela. His so-called “allies” released a $213 million dollar contract to Guaido showing the detailed mission being contracted and commanded by Juan Guaido himself. The contract is of course being denounced by Juan Guaido as a forgery. A picture of the signed document was released.

“The document contains the signatures of opposition representatives J.J. Rendón, Sergio Vergara, and those of Jordan Goudreau as well as a lawyer named Manuel Retureta as a witness. Guaido’s signature is not on this page (Source: The Washington Post)” – From Bellingcat

Guaido SilverCorp Agreement Signed Invasion Attempted Kidnapping

Contract Between Silvercorp USA and Venezuelan OppositionView or Download

President Moduro Continues Arrests, Worries Of Torture

A total of 31 people have been arrested so far, possibly more depending on which reports you read. It is quite possible Guaido’s allies are in fear of their life due to the fact that President Maduro has tortured members of his opposition in the past.

Read the entire report from the United Nations Human Rights Counsel and Venezuela’s egregious violations and inhumane treatment of its people.

Venezuelan President Moduros Human Rights ViolationsDownload

Confession Videos From Captured Merceneries

The Venezuelan government has released videos of the captured Silvercorp USA combatants. Watch them below.

Luke Alexander Denman Interrogation Video

Airen Berry Interrogation Video

The Grayzone Contacted Drew White, COO of Silvercorp USA

Drew White is listed as the Corporate Operations Officer (COO) on the original organizing of the company and on the updated paperwork in April of 2019. Mr. White claims he was only working with Jordan Goudreau in the creation of the company for purposes of school security. We ask, then why would he be listed as the current COO? His testimony just doesn’t match the legal facts. If he was no longer a part of the company, then he should have been removed as COO of Silvercorp USA Inc.

Video of Grayzone report and phone interview of Drew White

SOURCES

https://www.silvercorpusa.com/

https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/bay-of-pigs-invasion

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/04/venezuela-un-report-nicolas-maduro-violations-against-dissenters

https://twitter.com/Moondog89775605/status/1257728623462641665/photo/1

https://www.trtworld.com/americas/russia-to-help-venezuela-search-for-members-of-failed-incursion-report-36167

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/05/07/ex-green-beret-behind-venezuela-raid-suspected-of-plagiarism

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2020/05/07/the-venezuela-silvercorp-usa-saga-keeps-getting-weirder/

https://www.rt.com/news/488218-guaido-deny-incursion-wapo/

http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=SILVERCORPUSA%20P180000192670&aggregateId=domp-p18000019267-536a2750-30b8-48fa-bce2-c4bbad931cdb&searchTerm=Silvercorp&listNameOrder=SILVERCORPUSA%20P180000192670

https://www.whois.com/whois/silvercorpusa.com

https://thegrayzone.com/2020/05/07/silvercorp-founder-grayzone-state-department-venezuela-invasion/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/mind-blowing-story-ex-green-beret-who-tried-oust-venezuela-n1201981

https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/read-the-attachments-to-the-general-services-agreement-between-the-venezuelan-opposition-and-silvercorp/e67f401f-8730-4f66-af53-6a9549b88f94/?no_nav=true&p9w22b2p=b2p22p9w00098

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/murder-hornet-invasion-is-fake-news/

'Murder Hornet' Invasion Is Fake News

❌ FAKE NEWS

One of the most deadly hornets in the world, the ‘Murder Hornet’ has begun to invade the Northwest, USA. Or has it? Spotted this week in the State of Washington, one “Murder Hornet” was found dead.

There is a real worry by beekeepers that murder hornets will develop colonies, that could affect their beekeeping populations. According to epidemiologists in Washington, it is more likely that any murder hornets that are here, will be controlled and wiped out before that happens.

Continue on to understand how scary the hornet actually is. These hornets are literally able to take down mice and other rodents or competing insects. Yes, they can kill people, but only after several stings or through allergic reactions. Of course, a swarm of these “Murder Hornets” could kill someone, but the same goes for any swarm of hornets.

As if 2020 didn’t need another fear mongering scare, it looks like there just might be another one on the the way. The ‘Murder Hornet’ is a delicacy in Asia. Yes, you heard it right, another epidemic, that came from Asia…Another fear mongering campaign for the mainstream media to ensue views and clicks from. Watch the video below to learn the truth about the “Murder Hornet” and it’s so-called invasion in the USA.

The Murder Hornet Did Not Naturally Migrate To USA

It is simply a physical impossibility that the Murder Hornet naturally migrated across the Pacific Ocean. These hornets were most likely let loose by some local beekeeper accidentally or they just flew aboard a boat and traveled here with other imports.

The Murder Hornet Hurts And Can Literally Murder You

The sting of the Murder Hornet is the second strongest in the bee family, second to the ‘Executioner Hornet’. The venom is six times stronger than a regular honey bee and enough to kill a person after a series of stings. This is unlikely however, because Murder Hornets do not attack humans unless they are attacked or provoked.

If you happen to come across a murder hornet, do not approach the murder hornet. Do not spray it with any kind of insecticide or other repellent because that will most likely just trigger an attack. If you do attempt to kill the murder hornet, it will most likely attack you, and it will hurt. You probably won’t die though.

Watch This Murder Hornet Take Down A Mouse

How Can Murder Hornets Cause An Epidemic?

Murder Hornets actually are very territorial when it comes to other bees. Farmers in the US and around the world have long been worried about the health of their bee colonies. A swarm of Murder Hornets can easily wipe out an entire worker bee colony, decapitating the worker bee’s one at a time.

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/christopher-kemmett/

Christopher Kemmett

Christopher Patrick Kemmett

Born December 18th in 1989 in Winchester, Massachusetts.

Currently lives in Lake City, Florida.

Family please connect on 23andMe

Friends can connect on Facebook

Businesses can review on Linkedin

Readers please reach out via our Contact Form

Early Life

I was born in Winchester, Massachusetts and spent my childhood in several cities throughout Volusia County, Florida. I spent grade school in gifted, advanced placement and international baccalaureate programs. I finished grade school at age 16.

Education

I have thoroughly studied Finance, Business, Taxes, Investing and Entrepreneurship. I am an education lifer. I’ll never quit learning.

Hobbies

I enjoy Inventing, Writing, Learning, and Exploring. I have invented several small widgets, written unique computer programs and started several new businesses. I enjoy the meditation and mind clearing experience while writing lyrics, and have written over 100 songs. I enjoy the rush of researching and publishing news, creating visual and contextual content, and sharing it with the world. Ultimately, I am just a problem solver at heart.

Business

Next Up News is a product of Business Developer App®, my business development company. I also operate several other online websites and applications.

Additionally, I own and operate a local and long distance moving company, Moving America®.

Family

I am married to Michaelyn Kemmett, my beautiful and one and only. Father of three beautiful boys, Evan (born 2014), Christopher (born 2016) and Michael (born 2018). My parents and grandparents are passed away (may they all rest in peace). We had a very close family between my mother and maternal grandparents. My brother and best friend Robert Kemmett also passed away at age 18 (may we meet again).

Legacy

I am working to build, create and innovate as much as possible for future generations to gain from and build on. I hope to leave behind advanced technologies and creations for my family, community and the world at large. I feel like making a difference in the world for the better matters most and continue working towards a better future for us all every day.

Favorite Quotes

Figure it out! – Christopher Kemmett

Learn from yesterday, live for today, and hope for tomorrow…The important thing is not to stop questioning. – Albert Einstein

Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country. – John F. Kennedy

History in News

The Beginning of The Real Strategy and An Overview

The Real Strategy – Also Known As – TheRealStrategy.com was a news website I started with my good friend Cody King. We operated this website for about 3-4 years. We started with 0 followers and 0 visitors and grew the news organization to roughly 200 million aggregate followers and over 2-3 million visitors per month. The website was eventually abandoned due to financial strain on my part and my partners. We only made about $300 per day in early 2017 when we shut down the website. We started the project as an outlet to fight against fake news and biased media like CNN and MSNBC. We absolutely accomplished what we aimed to do.

The Real Strategy ended up being pinned against the wall by The Washington Post, the BBC, and others as the “main” site pushing fake news…how ironic. Democratic echo chambers still reverberate the idea that somehow we ran a “botnet” either funded by Russians or Trump to push fake news. The Washington Post is still writing articles about us as recent as October 2018. They wrote an entire article about us supporting Trump with fake news and named only one website…The Real Strategy. All of that animosity years later and still not a single example of fake news, great reporting Washington Post! Their most recent hit piece on us was regurgitated by the AP News of all people and they made claims that they reached out to us and got no response in their article. This is an absolute falsehood, I spoke to them on the phone. I was asked all kinds of questions regarding Russia for about 5 minutes and the conversation ended when they realized their narrative wasn’t going to fly.

The Alternative Media Ecosystem – The Kate Starbird Article

Kate Starbird, a professor at Stanford University, did some small study outlining how we were the largest voice pushing “alternative narratives” on Twitter in 2016. She claims we were so influential, she had to remove us from her graph, because we skewed her data so much. Or maybe her data just didn’t make sense without her removing some truth…once again. I still want to see the graph with us in it Kate.

Hilariously enough, the article she wrote pinning us as public enemy #1 was her most viewed article still to date, no other even comes close. I’m glad we could help you get some attention Kate! Hope you are doing well. Her article was echoed by the BBC, the Washington Post and others.

The only examples ever given by her or any other critics were that we published anti-hillary and pro-Trump content. Also, it is apparantly a crime to question official narratives now. I guess that made us fake news. Remember my favorite quote by Einstein, “…the important thing is not to stop questioning”, and I won’t. Kate Starbird still made sure she got that academic paper published by the University of Washington, without ever reaching out to me personally. It’s unfortunate that her and other so-called journalists call themselves academics and professionals, but can’t even pick up a phone to verify a fact. Others who do, lie about the facts when they don’t go their way.

We were also cited in alternative news studies by Cornell University and a partisinship, propaganda and disinformation study done by Harvard University. Harvard’s graphic put us right next to Real Clear Politics in content volume and political view, based on whatever scale they used.

The Real Strategy Made Worldwide Headlines For Speaking Truth

We were propped up by some outlets, but we were banned for the truth, both of these are true. Youtube took away our monetization rights in 2016 for showing the “Clown Mask” video where an inflamed citizen of Canada threatened jihadists in a video he uploaded, I guess ISIS can have a youtube account, but those that report on others who speak out against ISIS cannot. That one put The Real Strategy’s youtube channel on to the front of RT News.

RT News also shared our interest in the Podesta brothers similarity in the suspects of a child kidnapping and their involvement in the #pizzagate scandal. This story is still developing for those who think it is a complete conspiracy theory, the pizza shop has nothing to do with it, pizza is just a slang word used by pedophiles.

Snopes even tried to debunk one of my articles and it came out as “Mixture”. The only mistake in my article was that my featured image for the article was taken from the movie Splice, other than that the entire article was factual and accurate…crossbreeding animals and humans is and was approved for embryonic research as I outlined in my article.

We were constantly having back and forths with larger companies. Monsanto didn’t like the studies that tied their products to the Zika Virus, which we reported on, they wrote articles about us in return.

Other companies like Nestle Water, had problems of their own to deal with like rioting and petitioning locals who wanted to keep their local water rights. We were on the sides of the locals, which they also didn’t like…

Still, other companies like WeAreChange.org also cited us in activism articles. Infowars.com and Paul Joseph Watson also spread some of our stories against police corruption; this article was completely re-posted under creative commons (another financial mistake).

I admit I made several mistakes with that site because we were new to the industry and learning as we went. But as far as facts go, we focused on what we could prove with video, audio, document or similar evidence. This is unlike most of the media conglomerates out there who have so many “anonymous sources” or “sources close to the White House”, etc… We fought for the rights and freedoms of the American people and when you do that, you make enemies. We expected it. Most of the mistakes we made were just part of a learning curve, and financial in nature, which was not at the top of our priority list.

The truth is we just exposed corruption on a constant basis and with Hillary Clinton there was a lot to talk about. I mean the first article I published about Trump was titled, “Trump Thinks Miss America Looks Good On Her Knees”, which is hardly a pro-Trump article. I did eventually vote for Trump and am proud to have him as my president. I do not however endorse him as a person or even claim to know who he is as a person, nor do I know any politicians and couldn’t vouch for any of their character traits. I believe politics should remain focused on community issues and we should all vote independent of party lines.

It wasn’t uncommon to see an article on The Real Strategy that outlined Hillary’s clear medical issues and we held the top Google search results for several keyword searches like “Hillary Twitching” etc… She had no business running for president, which we clearly understood as did many Americans. Of course we had our own opinions mixed into our actions as every journalist does when they choose what to report on and what not to. We always aimed to provide more facts than every other outlet and include the entire story not just small parts piece by piece. We always had to go further with our research on single pieces due to the fact that we didn’t have millions of dollars in ad revenue to pay teams of reporters. This meant that the articles we did publish were stronger and generally more interesting than the competitions version.

The Botnet That Took Over Twitter in 2016

Our website grew very fast and our following got extremely large due to some technical innovations I came up with along with my partner. We learned a lot on the marketing side of things because we ran every aspect of our business together, without outsourcing a single process or project. Eventually, we had over 5,000 people sharing our articles automatically on several different platforms through public automation tools we made available to our users.

Every website generally has a CTA or “Call to Action”, ours was focused on building a networking army. In other words, our so-called “botnet” was actually a huge network of real people who wanted to share our news and signed up to do so.

How Did The Real Strategy End?

We used IFTTT for the bulk of our public automation, which suddenly became a paid feature costing over $2,000 per month. IFTTT deactivated our public recipes for the free service we used, removing our ability to reach millions. At the same time they made a deal with the New York Times, allowing them to publish their new recipes into their public library! Laughably, the NYT’s still doesn’t even have half of the user base signed up to share their content as we had, and its been 4 years! A couple weeks after the IFTTT shutdown a NYT reporter came at me with a lawsuit for using one of his images in an article on a riot. I paid him off and removed the image, which was clearly fair-use, and newsworthy, but nevertheless, I didn’t have the money to fight back. I was clearly being targeted by a million dollar corporation and had zero interest in fighting them.

After the followers of our site began to dwindle, the money we made followed, which was not much to begin with. So, the decision was made to abandon ship and move forward. I personally, had my first baby on the way and had just purchased my first home making money extremely vital in the short term. All of this, along with the unfortunate event of my grandfather and mother passing away, I inherited some financially burdening assets, etc.. and needed money fast. So I started a moving company, this is an industry where I have had a lot of experience in since I was about 14 years old, and it has become a very successful brand here in North, FL.

Looking Forward With Next Up News

Overall, we conquered our enemies in 2016 and we accomplished our goals with The Real Strategy. We have since moved on to bigger and better things in life. I will bring all of my experiences from those times with me to Next Up News and build something much more concrete and unshakable. I learned a lot from those 4 years of growing from nothing to public enemy #1 in the far left’s eyes online.

Next Up News will aim to develop a closer relationship to its viewers and provide as much value as possible. I will be starting a youtube channel as soon as possible and will be creating as many free tools and free downloadable applications as possible for our readers. There will be ads, affiliate links, etc.. worked into our site, but only those that actually are quality products. Of course anyone with adblocker will be able to disable the ads and we won’t be charging for access to news ever. Information deserves to be free for everyone. This remains a core belief of mine. I hope all who read this have a better understanding of my past and where I am heading with this project. Wish me luck and have a great day.

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/70-bodies-found-on-ice-in-uhaul-truck-coronavirus-overflow/

70 Bodies Found On Ice In Uhaul Truck - Coronavirus Overflow

50 Dead Bodies Found In Uhaul Truck in Brooklyn – Overflow of Coronavirus Corpses

50 Dead Bodies Found In Uhaul Trucks At Andrew T. Cleckley Funeral Home

Some of the bodies were thawing out and leaking body fluids onto the streets. The local residents have been dealing with the smell for days and after repots came in the police began their investigation.

The funeral home also had several leased reefer trailers (refrigerated trailers) in the parking lot. It seems that the refrigerated areas filled up and the owner was left with no options, or made a very bad decision.

Several local residents were interviewed and they all seem to be overwhelmed at the level of disrespect for the dead.

The funeral home has refused to comment on the investigation.

The funeral home has since lost its license to operate after the Department of Health was made aware of the situation.

“Following an investigation by the State Department of Health, I issued an immediate suspension order to the Andrew T. Cleckley Funeral Home in Brooklyn – whose actions were appalling, disrespectful to the families of the deceased, and completely unacceptable,” said state Department of Health Commissioner Dr. Howard Zucker.

CBS – https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2020/05/01/brooklyn-funeral-home-has-license-suspended-after-storing-bodies-in-unrefrigerated-trucks/

and has been banned from renting trucks from Uhaul ever again.

Uhaul issued a statement to TMZ saying, “This is a wrongful, egregious and inhumane use of our equipment.”

TMZ – https://www.tmz.com/2020/04/30/u-haul-rips-funeral-home-trucks-store-dead-bodies-rent-inhumane-covid-19-coronavirus/

Coronavirus Deaths Are Clearly Overwhelming Our Medical System

Regardless of the conspiracy theories regarding “empty hospitals” etc.. It is clear that the current medical system has overwhelmed the capacity for at least one local funeral home.

We are told the pandemic has passed the peak and the amount of infected are declining. We should see the amount of dead decline as well. It seems that although the hospitals may be staffed to handle the incoming patients that perhaps the funeral homes were overlooked in this crisis response.

SOURCES

https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2020/05/01/brooklyn-funeral-home-has-license-suspended-after-storing-bodies-in-unrefrigerated-trucks/

https://nypost.com/2020/05/01/u-haul-cuts-ties-with-brooklyn-funeral-home-that-stored-bodies-in-truck/

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/suicide-reports-skyrocket-in-april-2020-statistics/

Suicide Reports Skyrocket in April 2020: Statistics

All of the data is clearly not in. However, with some rudimentary searching you can already see the amount of suicide reports skyrocketing in publications online. We cannot give you an exact percentage or number of increased suicides, but we can conclude the number of suicide reports have significantly increased in April of 2020 to a number much higher than any month ever seen before.

Since the data for the true recorded deaths by suicide is a far way from being gathered, analyzed and released to the public, I decided to innovate and find what I could. I figured if the amount of suicides were changing, then the amount of news publications reporting these suicides would correlate with that change.

The results I found were astonishing.

As of April 27th, 2020 there have already been 347,000 news reports published on “suicide”. Is this normal? No. I checked the past few years and saw every year there has been an increase.

Last year, for the entire month of April, 2019 there were only about 180,000 reports on suicide published.

In April of 2018, there were only about 96,500 reports on suicide published online.

Going back another year to April, 2017, you can see only 22,600 news publications in the results.

Where Did This Suicide Data Come From?

This data was found on the Google News publication syndicate.

If you perform a custom date range search on Google News you will see that the recorded amount of results disappears and the date range takes its place as depicted below.

However, if you simply right click and “view the source code” you can reveal once again the amount of search results for your search. For example, you can view the search data for “Suicide” in April, 2020 in the source code of the result page below.

Without A Doubt, The Number Of News Reports On “Suicide” Is Rising Fast.

We should all understand this is only one source of news publications, and there are far more reports being published worldwide.

This however is a strong indicator and cohort of data, based on the most prevalent news publications on the internet (those published in Google News). Google News has also been a growing platform and that in and of itself is going to skew the data because Google is constantly recruiting new publications. There is no doubt however, that all of these increases are not due to new publications.

How do I know this isn’t a reflection of Google News growing in size? If you look at the amount of news publications for March (98,000 results), February (126,000 results), and January (277,000 results) of 2020 you see a huge increase leading into April. All of the preceding months are under well under 347,000 reports and April isn’t over yet.

After doing several searches, I have yet to find another month as high as April 2020. Search for yourself and see. December 2019 (229,000 results), November 2019 (237,000 results), October 2019 (80,300 results).

What Has Caused Suicide Reports To Rise Significantly in April of 2020?

I firmly believe the spike in suicide reports is a reflection of actual suicides being committed by depressed and confused people around the world. Our global society has been under an immense amount of emotional pressure and psychological warfare during this coronavirus pandemic.

Suicide has been on the rise at a constant rate for the past 13 years according to a recent report by the Economist.

“This makes suicide the tenth-biggest cause of death in the United States—deadlier than traffic accidents and homicide.“

The Economist – https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/01/30/americas-suicide-rate-has-increased-for-13-years-in-a-row

News agencies worldwide are reporting non-stop on the chaos and potential harm, foul, pain, death, etc… caused from this illness. There are definitely newsworthy events related to the coronavirus to report on, but the amount of fear-mongering from CNN, CBS, MSNBC and others partake in, has become factually harmful to society.

Today or in the near future, there may even be a legal ramification to prevent the harm caused from fear mongering news agencies. If we get enough data together, we could potentially prompt a change through the justice system.

I wouldn’t doubt that in a comparison of countries where negative crisis reports are higher, the suicide rates are higher.

The governments around the world have all responded to this pandemic with tighter regulations and more strict guidelines than ever before. No doubt, our own governments are also at fault here. There are millions of people on complete lock down, unable to live their lives, unable to leave their homes and this is the direct cause of this increase. It is unknowable exactly how many suicides have been caused by the global lock-downs or “shelter-in-place” orders.

Could We Have Seen This Rise In Suicides Coming?

One thing is for sure, our President Donald Trump warned us of this in the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic. His exact words were, “We can’t have the cure be worse than the problem.” It seems the numbers are rolling in and we will soon find out if that is the case. With millions still in isolation and the unemployment rate surging past 20% the amount of depressed individuals is only rising. Let’s hope this all ends as soon as possible.

Trump Warned Of “Massive Suicides”

As you can see, Mr. Trump was not afraid to point out that the decision to shut down the American economy was going to cause “tremendous suicides”, and “massive depression” and “drug addiction”.

May God be with you all. And may you all maintain a healthy and clear mind. Remember the societal changes we are going through are only a reaction to the current crisis and we all will adapt as things ebb and flow back to normalcy.

SOURCES

Google.com/news

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/01/30/americas-suicide-rate-has-increased-for-13-years-in-a-row

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/03/24/trump_we_cant_have_the_cure_be_worse_than_the_problem_142750.html

https://fortune.com/2020/04/23/us-unemployment-rate-numbers-claims-this-week-total-job-losses-april-23-2020-benefits-claims/

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/tom-hanks-blood-coronavirus-vaccine/

Tom Hanks Blood Used For The Coronavirus Vaccine

Tom Hanks blood is being used for the coronavirus vaccine. Tom Hanks blood is especially useful due to the fact that it contains coronavirus antibodies.

Tom Hanks and his wife Rita Wilson both have been infected with the coronavirus and both have since recovered. The two both now carry the coronavirus antibodies. This is what is used in the creation of vaccines or according to Tom the “Hank-cine”.

The two, Tom Hanks and Rita have been donating blood since their arrival back in the USA. They spent their infection and recovery time in Australia, where they caught the virus. Now, it looks like they have been recruited by a research team for a larger role in the fight against the coronavirus.

“Upon arriving back in the US, Tom, 63, and Rita, 63, enrolled in a medical study to determine if their antibodies would be useful for scientists working on developing a vaccine…”

MSN – https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/entertainment-celebrity/tom-hanks-blood-will-be-used-to-develop-coronavirus-vaccine/ar-BB12Z5Lk?ocid=st&fbclid=IwAR18ZDAJ7qhpgalugBKQlI975ah1UChfl2MEpO4ZMLaPcrR2FnIQSpTeZTQ

Can Tom Hanks Blood Really Help Create A Coronavirus Vaccine

Vaccines have been used for ending the spread of viral pandemics and epidemics around the world for decades. There is perhaps no better alternative.

We have all heard the cries of our leaders in recent months for a vaccine and now it looks like Hollywood celebrities are taking a leadership role in this as well. At least for now, Tom Hanks is giving his blood and plasma with the hope that his antibodies will help scientists engineer a cure.

The creation of a vaccine is inevitable, and all recovered COVID-19 patients can contribute to the antibody studies. These studies will be used in the creation of a vaccine, undoubtedly.

Interview With Tom Hanks Wife Regarding Coronavirus Experience

Tom Hanks Gives Coronavirus Monologue On Saturday Night Live

When Will The Coronavirus Antibody Vaccine Be Ready?

The first coronavirus vaccine made with human antibodies was announced at the beginning of April by the University of Pittsburgh. They are following a model of vaccines produced for previous SARS and MERS viruses.

The studies are being performed on mice, for now, and are so far showing the same recovery trends as their sister vaccines. This means antibody protection for at least a year and what looks like a two week period of inoculation, where the antibodies are spread throughout your body.

Could this mean we have an additional yearly shot, similar to the flu shot? Perhaps. It is all going to be up to the individual, regardless of the “forced vaccination conspiracy theories” you might hear about. Eventually, there could be hundreds of known flu-like diseases, all with their own vaccines, etc.. and they will probably create a vaccine combination of some sorts.

A closer look at the coronavirus vaccine made from human antibodies.

“…viruses, which are closely related to SARS-CoV-2, teach us that a particular protein, called a spike protein, is important for inducing immunity against the virus. We knew exactly where to fight this new virus..” – Andrea Gambotto, M.D.

University of Pittsburgh – https://www.upmc.com/media/news/040220-falo-gambotto-sars-cov2-vaccine

The scientists and doctors involved in this study are now awaiting approval for human trials by the FDA. They are confident they will be able to begin human testing in the next few months. This is on par with the original estimates of 12-18 months, before a vaccine will be publicly available.

SOURCES

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/entertainment-celebrity/tom-hanks-blood-will-be-used-to-develop-coronavirus-vaccine/ar-BB12Z5Lk?ocid=st&fbclid=IwAR18ZDAJ7qhpgalugBKQlI975ah1UChfl2MEpO4ZMLaPcrR2FnIQSpTeZTQ

https://www.upmc.com/media/news/040220-falo-gambotto-sars-cov2-vaccine

Image – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Hanks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1-HcFVG1tA

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/taylor-swift-mocks-soros-family/

Taylor Swift Mocks Soros Family For Predatory Investing

The Soros family along with other investors purchased the entire catalog of Taylor Swift’s music, without her knowing or agreement in 2019. The $330 million dollar sale of Taylor Swift’s music catalog, which she was denied opportunity to purchase, is where the Soros vs. Swift beef began.

Taylor Swift mocked Alex Soros, The Soros Family and other investors on Instagram. She claimed that today’s the release of an album, containing live performances

$330,000,000, according to Taylor Swift, “wasn’t a wise choice” by Scooter Braun and his financial backers which Alex Soros and George Soros is heavily invested in with the Carlyle Group.

Newswars – https://www.newswars.com/taylor-swift-blasts-soros-family-for-shameless-greed-in-the-time-of-coronavirus/

Swift Mocks Soros Says, “Shameless Greed” is “Transparant”

Taylor Swift is starting to sound more and more like she has been red pilled. She is absolutely correct in saying Soros is being transparent in their greedy and corrupt investing tactics.

“In my opinion … Just another case of shameless greed in the time of coronavirus. So tasteless, but very transparent.”

The Guardian – https://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/apr/24/taylor-swift-disowns-new-live-album-scooter-braun-big-machine

The Soros family has gotten more and more public with their shady dealings. George Soros has been interviewed laughing about his involvement in the Nazi rounding up of the Jewish community during the Holocaust.

The corruption in today’s world is no longer being hidden in the shadows. It is moments like this when someone speaks out and points to the corruption that we the people need to pay attention and pick a side. The openness of greed and corruption is becoming more and more prevalent, and soon should become a thing of the past.

As long as the American people and citizens of the world reject the evil nature of such evil deeds the transparency technology has provided to the world will become the death hammer for evil doers of the past, such as George Soros. Alex Soros will eventually need to find a new line of work. Although that may be the long term vision I see coming to light, the story of Taylor Swift vs. Soros is far from over. It is actually just heating up.

Taylor Swift Attacked Soros Family At Her Award Speech In December, 2019

Taylor Swift has taken a strong stance against the Soros family, and now it looks like the grudge will not end.

The first major attack Taylor Swift aimed at Soros was during her speech after accepting the “Woman of the Decade” award.

Watch this video and pay attention to how brave Taylor Swift is. She clearly is not afraid of the Soros family. She breaks down the details of how Alex and George Soros are preying on her musical legacy. The section of her speech addressing Soros begins around the 10:00 minute mark.

Taylor Swift Claims Soros Has “Toxic Male Privilege”

Well, Taylor Swift is correct in the privilege description, however this has nothing to do with men. The Soros Foundation, George Soros and hes son and predecessor Alex Soros have long been privileged to the types of financial opportunities only seen by the worlds most elite.

The real question here is “What does Soros want with Taylor Swift?”.

George Soros has a legacy of corrupt investing and political action.

George Soros is known to manipulate global currency markets, cause and create public riots, encourage mass illigal migration, interrupt elections, and some of these majorly corrupt investments have led to the complete destruction of governments.

The types of investments the Soros family makes usually ends in chaos.

What is the future of Taylor Swift and Soros?

Why has the Soros family chosen to make such a life changing investment into her? Knowing how Soros investments usually are used to destroy or end the current status quo, it looks like Taylor Swift is on the defense for good reason.

SOURCES

https://www.dailywire.com/news/taylor-swift-blasts-george-soros-for-exploiting-her-music-without-her-consent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGWizajL7tA

https://www.newswars.com/taylor-swift-blasts-soros-family-for-shameless-greed-in-the-time-of-coronavirus/

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/business/dont-mess-with-renminbi-china-warns-george-soros/articleshow/50735059.cms?from=mdr

https://www.infowars.com/judicial-watch-docs-prove-migrant-caravan-funded-by-soros-other-international-organizations/

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/08/wave-of-new-laws-aim-to-stifle-anti-pipeline-protests-activists-say

https://theintercept.com/2018/04/07/foreign-spies-meddled-hungarys-election-smear-non-candidate-george-soros/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Revolution

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/apr/24/taylor-swift-disowns-new-live-album-scooter-braun-big-machine

Image – https://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/GettyImages-499012168.jpg

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/meme-list/

New Post has been published on https://nextupnews.com/hacked-wuhan-lab-bill-gates-cdc-who-and-others-hacked-by-anonymous/

HACKED: Wuhan Lab, Bill Gates, CDC, WHO And Others Hacked By Anonymous

The hacks have been going on for at least the past 4 days, or since April 19th. This is based on the dates on the pages where the hackers dumped the data. These hackers hacked the Wuhan Lab, WHO and several other major organizations.

It seems these hackers are driven by the desire to know the truth about the coronavirus. Hackers have taken aim at the most important entities involved in this global pandemic.

It is not clear as to how many different networks were hacked but it seems like this was a coordinated attack against several large key players in the world health business. Below I have listed some of the organizations and people who were allegedly hacked.

WHO (The World Health Organization)

CDC (Center For Disease Control)

Bill Gates (Vaccines)

Gates Foundation

World Bank

Wuhan Institue of Virology

National Institute of Health

What Data Was Hacked?

Emails, Passwords, Documents, Login Information, Personal Data, Files, and pretty much anything you can store on a computer.

We were able to find some of the links to the dumped data, which is listed below. The links were listed on Archive.is and also pasted into their own url’s.

World Health Organization – Archive.is

Gates Foundation – Archive.is

CDC – Archive.is

NIH – Archive.is

World Bank

Wuhan Institute of Virology

China GOB Leak

A report from SITE did somewhat of an organized analysis of the hacked login data. We are unsure what the “China GOB Leak” is referring to.

Amount of Credentials Dumped Per Organization

National Institute of Health – 9,938 sets

Center for Disease Control – 6,857 sets

World Bank – 5,120 sets

World Health Organization – 2,732

Bill Gates – UNKNOWN

Gates Foundation – UNKNOWN

Wuhan Institute of Virology – UNKNOWN

The data has all been confirmed real through an analysis from a cyber security expert out of Australia.

“An Australian cybersecurity expert, Robert Potter, said he was able to verify that the WHO email addresses and passwords were real.”

Seattle Times – https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/email-addresses-and-passwords-allegedly-from-nih-who-and-gates-foundation-are-dumped-online/

The story is developing fast as people are digging through the data.

How Are All These Organizations Connected?

They are all taking part in the response to the coronavirus in some kind of way.

Why Are These Organizations Being Hacked?

It has been rumored for weeks now that the coronavirus may have been man-made and also that there have been cover-ups regarding the true impact of the coronavirus in China.

It would appear that the hackers have gone into these networks in search of exposing or at least investigating the truth behind these rumors.

How Is The WHO, GATES, etc.. Being Hacked?

Bloomberg reached out to some top officials at the WHO and found out that the hacking appears to be hyper targeted to the top officials personal and work email accounts. The hackers are using phishing methods.

“Many of the attacks have been phishing or spearphishing attempts to lure WHO staff into clicking on a malicious link in an email…”

Bloomberg – https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-21/top-officials-at-world-health-organization-targeted-for-hacks

SOURCES

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/email-addresses-and-passwords-allegedly-from-nih-who-and-gates-foundation-are-dumped-online/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/21/nearly-25000-email-addresses-passwords-allegedly-nih-who-gates-foundation-are-dumped-online/

https://counterglobalist.com/bill-gates-foundation-hacked-also-w-h-o-wuhan-lab/