female safety > male feelings
sheepfilms
occasionally subtle

romaâ

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
Misplaced Lens Cap
YOU ARE THE REASON
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

#extradirty
KIROKAZE
Cosimo Galluzzi
Acquired Stardust

Love Begins

Andulka
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
dirt enthusiast

Product Placement
Game of Thrones Daily

titsay
hello vonnie

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Vietnam

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bulgaria

seen from China
@mxadelusion-blog
female safety > male feelings

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Four decades of feminism later I am reading the comedian Angela Barnesâ blog. âI am ugly, and I am proud,â she writes. She goes on to say: âThe fact is I donât see people in magazines who look like me. I donât see people like me playing the romantic lead or having a romantic life.â At the top of the blog is a picture of Barnes. And the thing is, she isnât ugly. Neither is she beautiful. Sheâs normal looking. Sheâs somewhere in the middle of the spectrum, just like lots of women you see every day in real life. It made me think of this yearâs Wimbledon ladiesâ final between Sabine Lisicki and Marion Bartoli. When Bartoli won, the BBC commentator John Inverdale infamously said, âDo you think Bartoliâs dad told her when she was little, âYouâre never going to be a looker, youâre never going to be a Sharapova, so you have to be scrappy and fightâ?â The first thing I thought was: this woman has just won a tennis tournament! And sheâs being judged on her looks! And then I thought: but Bartoli is attractive. Sure, sheâs not at the very highest point on the scale â she doesnât look like a top model. But sheâs pretty. And, in any case, why should it matter? Sheâs a top athlete. Surely thatâs what counts. A sports commentator refers to a pretty woman as ânot a lookerâ. A normal-looking woman thinks sheâs ugly. Why? Because, even though the world is full of normal and pretty women, the world we see â the world of television, films, magazines and websites â is full of women who are top-of-the-scale beauties. And right now, in the second decade of the 21st century, the situation is more extreme than ever. If youâre a woman, a huge proportion of your role models are beautiful. So if youâre normal looking, you feel ugly. And if youâre merely pretty, men feel free to comment on how un-beautiful you are. As a normal-looking man, I find myself in a completely different position. Being normal makes me feel, well, normal. Absolutely fine. As if the way I look is not an issue. Thatâs because itâs not an issue. As a normal-looking man, Iâm in good company. Sure, some male actors and celebrities are very good looking. Brad Pitt. George Clooney. Russell Brand. But many of Hollywoodâs leading men, like me, look like the sort of blokes you see every day, in real life. Russell Crowe, Kevin Spacey, Bruce Willis, Jack Black, Seth Rogen, Martin Freeman, Tom Hanks, Steve Carell, Jim Carrey, Will Ferrell, Vince Vaughn, Brendan Fraser⌠In fact, you might almost say that most leading men are normal-looking blokes. Itâs true of television, too. Bryan Cranston, who plays the lead in Breaking Bad â heâs a normal. James Gandolfini â he was a normal. And chubby too. Kevin Whately â normal. Ben Miller â normal. TV cops all look normal. Ray Winstone looks normal. Tim Roth looks normal. They portray people who are interesting for what they do, not what they look like. Oh, and think of sitcoms. The Big Bang Theory features four normal-looking blokes and a stunningly beautiful woman. New Girl is about two normal blokes, a guy whoâs quite good looking, and two women who are⌠yes, strikingly beautiful. When I watch the news, on whatever channel, itâs presented by the classic partnership of an ordinary-looking guy and a gorgeous woman. After the news, I watch the weather. Male weather presenters look like standard males. Female weather presenters look like models. Footballers look normal. Footballersâ wives and girlfriends look stunning. Daytime television presenters: men look like Phillip Schofield; women look like Holly Willoughby. A typical Saturday-night judgesâ panel consists of two types of people â middle-aged blokes and young, stunning women. Sometimes a normal-looking or ageing woman slips through the net â but then, like Arlene Phillips, her days are soon numbered. Countdown had an attractive woman and an ageing bloke; when the attractive woman began to show signs of ageing, she was axed â replaced by a woman who was, of course, strikingly beautiful. Who presents historical documentaries? Guys like David Starkey. Normals. And what happened when a normal-looking woman, Mary Beard, presented a series about the ancient world? She was mocked for not being attractive enough. In a recent interview Dustin Hoffman, another normal, made a revealing comment. Remember when he dressed up as a woman in Tootsie? âI went home and started crying,â he said. Why? âBecause I think I am an interesting woman when I look at myself on screen. And I know that if I met myself at a party, I would never talk to that character. Because she doesnât fulfil physically the demands that weâre brought up to think women have to have in order to ask them out⌠I have been brainwashed.â
The ugly, unfair truth about looking beautiful (via spiftynifty)
I donât wear makeup to âkill men with my winged eyelinerâ or to âslay misogynists with my red lipstickâ. I wear makeup because Iâve internalized patriarchal concepts of beauty and because I want to survive in a world where 99% of the time a woman is judged solely by her appearance.
Pumzi - dir. Wanuri Kahiu // Kenya
In a dystopian future 35 years after an ecological WWIII Â has torn the world apart, East African survivors of the devastation remain locked away in contained communities, but a young woman in possession of a germinating seed struggles against the governing council to bring the plant to Earthâs ruined surface.
The main character is a museum curator in the future and also yes I would like see this now please
THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT THIS I DONâT LIKE
The complete short film is on youtube and itâs really good and the end kind of took my breath away.Â
I must see this
Sci fi from KenyaâŚthis looks great.
Support
This is still awesome
Feminism didnât teach me to hate men, but it did teach me to stop prioritising them over women.
And it turns out a lot of men think thatâs the same thing as hatred.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Women In History
I grew up believing that women had contributed nothing to the world until the 1960â˛s. So once I became a feminist I started collecting information on women in history, and hereâs my collection so far, in no particular order.Â
Lepa Svetozara RadiÄ (1925â1943) was a partisan executed at the age of 17 for shooting at German soldiers during WW2. As her captors tied the noose around her neck, they offered her a way out of the gallows by revealing her comrades and leaders identities. She responded that she was not a traitor to her people and they would reveal themselves when they avenged her death. She was the youngest winner of the Order of the Peopleâs Hero of Yugoslavia, awarded in 1951
23 year old Phyllis Latour Doyle was British spy who parachuted into occupied Normandy in 1944 on a reconnaissance mission in preparation for D-day. She relayed 135 secret messages before France was finally liberated.Â
Catherine Leroy, War Photographer starting with the Vietnam war. She was taken a prisoner of war. When released she continued to be a war photographer until her death in 2006.
Lieutenant Pavlichenko was a Russian sniper in WWII, with a total of 309 kills, including 36 enemy snipers. After being wounded, she toured the US to promote friendship between the two countries, and was called âfatâ by one of her interviewers, which she found rather amusing.Â
Johanna Hannie âJannetjeâ Schaft was born in Haarlem. She studied in Amsterdam had many Jewish friends. During WWII she aided many people who were hiding from the Germans and began working in resistance movements. She helped to assassinate two nazis. She was later captured and executed. Her last words were âI shoot better than you.â.Â
Nancy wake was a resistance spy in WWII, and was so hated by the Germans that at one point she was their most wanted person with a price of 5 million francs on her head. During one of her missions, while parachuting into occupied France, her parachute became tangled in a tree. A french agent commented that he wished that all trees would bear such beautiful fruit, to which she replied âDonât give me any of that French shit!â, and later that evening she killed a German sentry with her bare hands.Â
After her husband was killed in WWII, Violette Szabo began working for the resistance. In her work, she helped to sabotage a railroad and passed along secret information. She was captured and executed at a concentration camp at age 23.Â
Grace Hopper was a computer scientist who invented the first ever compiler. Her invention makes every single computer program you use possible.Â
Mona Louise Parsons was a member of an informal resistance group in the Netherlands during WWII. After her resistance network was infiltrated, she was captured and was the first Canadian woman to be imprisoned by the Nazis. She was originally sentenced to death by firing squad, but the sentence was lowered to hard lard labor in a prison camp. She escaped.Â
Simone Segouin was a Parisian rebel who killed an unknown number of Germans and captured 25 with the aid of her submachine gun. She was present at the liberation of Paris and was later awarded the âcroix de guerreâ.Â
Mary Edwards Walker is the only woman to have ever won an American Medal of Honor. She earned it for her work as a surgeon during the Civil War. It was revoked in 1917, but she wore it until hear death two years later. It was restored posthumously.Â
Rita Levi-Montalcini - Italian neuroscientist who won a Nobel Prize for her discovery of nerve growth factor. She died aged 103.Â
A snapshot of the women of color in the womanâs army corps on Staten Island
This is an ongoing project of mine, and Iâll update this as much as I can (Itâs not all WWII stuff, Iâve got separate folders for separate achievements).Â
File this under: The History I Wish Iâd Been Taught As A Little Girl
Part 2
Annie Jump Cannon was an american astronomer and, in addition to possibly having one of the best names in history, was co-creator of one of the first scientific classification systems of stars, based on temperature.Â
Melba Roy Moutan was a Harvard educated mathematician who led a team of mathematicians at NASA, nicknamed âComputersâ for their number processing prowess.Â
Joyce Jacobson Kaufman was a chemist who developed the concept of conformational topology, and studied at Johns Hopkins University before it officially allowed women entry in 1970.Â
Vera Rubin is an astronomer and has co-authored 114 peer reviewed papers. She specializes in the study of dark matter and galaxy rotation rates.Â
Mary Sherman Morgan was a rocket scientist who invented hydyne, a liquid fuel that powered the USAâs Jupiter C-rocket.Â
Chien-Siung Wu was a physicist who worked on the Manhattan Project, as well as experimental radioactive studies. She was the first woman to become president of the American Physical Society.Â
Mildred Catherine Rebstock was the first person to synthesize the antibiotic chloromycetin.
Ruby Hirose was a chemist who conducted vital research about an infant paralysis vaccine.Â
Hattie Elizabeth Alexander was a pediatrician and microbiologist who developed a remedy for Haemophilus influenzae, and conducted vital research on antibiotic resistance.Â
Marie Tharp was a scientist who mapped the floor of the Atlantic Ocean and provided proof of continental drift.Â
Mae Jamison is an astronaut who holds a degree in chemical engineering from Stanford University and was the first black woman in space.
Ada Lovelace was a mathematician and considered to be the worldâs first computer programmer.Â
Patricia E Bath is ophthalmologist and the inventor of the Laserphaco Probe, which is used to treat cataracts.Â
Barbara McClintock won a Nobel prize for her discovery that genes could move in and between chromosomes.
Thatâs it for now, part three will be on its way. (Josephine Baker was requested in the first installment, just know I did not forget her! Sheâs in a different folder, titled âfamous people you didnât know were complete badasses, and she, along with Hedy Lamar and Audrey Hepburn will be in the next installment :) )
Guy code: helping each other pick up girls
Girl code: protecting each other from creepy guys who wonât stop trying to pick them upÂ
White guys are so proud of their ability to be not offended. When one of them tells a rape joke or uses a racial slur, they wink and pat themselves on the back and give endless attaboys for their superior skills in being not offended. They decry the âpolitically correctâ society they find themselves in and look down on anyone who has the lack of fortitude to be offended by anything.
Of course, what allows them to be not offended at rape jokes and racial slurs is that they are not targeted at them. For white guys, these are fun toys to play with; while for much of the rest of the world, they are tools of violence and oppression. Not just relics of the past, but very much alive and well today. So, then, the magical quality that allows these guys to remain so aloof and above-it-all is, quite simply, privilege.
And if you want to watch hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance in action, simply bring up privilege to these not offended white guys and see how fast and hard they become offended. Privilege is a concept so simple and obvious that most social scientists take it as axiomatic, but the mere mention of it gets these guys worked up into a rage. Theyâre so proud of their ability to be not offended by oppressive language and stereotypes, but theyâll be damned if you point out why. Funny. Itâs almost as if they are the beneficiaries of systems of oppression and want to subtly encourage those systems so as to continue benefiting, while simultaneously stifling all mention of those systems, so as to mollify their fragile egos and underused consciences.Â
But by all means; continue to congratulate yourself on your superior ability to be not offended by oppression and cruelty.Â
I think what bothers me so much about the âfeminists are uglyâ or âfeminists are hairyâ or âfeminists are lesbianâ stereotypes isâ So fucking what? Some of us ARE ugly. Some of us ARE hairy. Some of us ARE lesbians. And it shouldnât fucking invalidate anything weâre fucking saying to you. But you know, if you believed that, if you actually believed that our sexual usefulness to men is irrelevant to the conversation about our basic human rights, you wouldnât be a fucking misogynist, would you?
If youâre reblogging this and adding conventionally beautiful heterosexual feminists, youâre missing my point entirely.
Our attractiveness and/or availability to men should not determine the validity of our movement.
Stop fighting the âFeminists are ugly lesbiansâ stereotype by shouting, âNo, weâre not!â Fight it by acknowledging that thatâs a shitty critique of a movement for people who want our human rights. The fact that this is even a problem - that our cause is so often critiqued not by discussions about our ideas but about whether or not we are sexually attractive/available to men - is proof that weâre being viewed not as human beings who deserve rights but as sexual objects.
When someone dismisses your cause because they canât/donât want to fuck the people in it, your response should not be, âLOOK, SOME OF US ARE FUCKABLE!â It should be, âWhat a shitty person you are for believing thatâs a requirement for us to be worth listening to.â
I LOVE NOT WEARING MAKEUP BC I CAN JUST RUB MY EYES AND NOTHING HAPPENS

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
okay jesus fuck this conversation has gone far enough so:
hey, so you like bernie sanders! i like bernie sanders too! i agree with his politics! he is doing better than people expected in the democratic primaries, which is cool!
what are you going to do if he loses?
because given the tone of the conversations i hear on this website right nowâ given the sheer hatred of hillary thatâs emerging, given the overwhelming feeling that bernie sanders is amazing and the messiah and the only candidate thatâs worth voting for in americaâ hereâs what i see happening in mid-2016:
bernie sanders, who despite his better-than-expected performance still has an unbelievably low chance of winning the primaries, loses the primaries to hillary clinton
the leftist wing of the democratic party (thatâs usâ tumblr, yeah, but also the whole occupy-black lives matter-third wave feminist-young educated millennials crowd), having spent the past 10 months campaigning against hillary clinton, is overwhelmingly disappointed
while a few people are willing to bite the bullet and campaign for hillary, energy is low, disillusionment is high, and many leftist americans donât campaign, donât donate, and donât vote (or vote for third-party candidates, like the green party or the peace and freedom party)
the republican party wins the presidential election.
(i literally shivered as i typed that last bullet point, btwâ i know there are people voting in 2016 who were ten years old when obama was elected, and yâall may not remember much of the bush years. i was only 13 when bush left, but jesus christâ remember when hurricane katrina was overwhelmingly badly handled? remember when the patriot act passed? remember when the housing bubble collapsed? remember when the president said god told him to invade iraq? yâall wanna do that again?)
so what are you going to do if bernie sanders loses?
i need you to think about that now. i need you to not be surprised when it happens. i need you to not put all your hopes in one basket.
you think the gop wonât be pouring all their resources into this election? you think the superpacs and the koch brothers and the oil lobbyists wonât be throwing their money at ballot boxes until they spit out the result they want? you think the rich and powerful and conservative wonât be bringing their best game?Â
they will, and if we donât work twice as hard as they doâ no matter who the democratic nominee isâ we are fucked.
i need you to be okay with the idea of hillary clinton being president of the united states, and i need you to make peace with that before she wins the primaries, so that youâre prepared and ready to campaign for her with all your might if sheâs the democratic nominee.
because i honest-to-god believe this country will not survive another four, eight, twelve years of a republican administration.
#remember ralph nader? #I FUCKING WELL REMEMBER RALPH NADER #WEâRE NOT DOING THAT AGAIN. (via swanjolras)
my hand to god i have seen so many posts on my dash that have been both heartbreakingly optimistic and absolutely mind-bogglingly uninformed (and naive, but that comes with time; information comes with googling the way the government of your own country works. fun fact: not all primaries are open primaries! i know! this is inconsistent! it is also the world that we live in and i donât think weâre going to get around to redesigning the electoral system before november 2016. just saying) and, like every election year, i have sat down and thought, albeit briefly, about this possibility:
the republican party wins the presidential election.
that is not a possibility that i can or will accept. i know we like to mythologize our figures here and put them on can-do-no-wrong pedestals, but, for godâs sake, to paraphrase: can we live in the real fucking world here, please? by all means, know that we can do better. by all means, know that we should. but here are some facts:
the us electoral system is not going to change by november 2016.
the notes on your tumblr post about bernie sandersâ ideology are not going to translate to votes.
those votes are not as big a percentage of the voting population as you think they are.
even if they were, bernie sanders is not going to be able to wave a magic wand and:
turn those ideas into policies
get those policies signed into law
get those laws implemented
they arenât going to be perfect anyway.
can you imagine the reactionary voting in the election immediately following that anyway.
this is not how politics works. you donât vote a politician into office and then stand back and watch the world fix itself! you donât get to do that. it takes work and it takes time and it takes, sometimes, the willingness to accept and keep pushing through lowered expectations. iâm happy for your optimism and iâm happy for your energy. we need those! donât lose them. do, however, remember that there is context to this, because we live, again, in the real fucking world.
#i have read posts calling hillary clinton problematic.#i fully expect an edit of bernie sanders in a flower crown to cross my dash sooner or later.#real. world. (via endquestionmark)
THIS.
FUCKING THIS.
FUCKING EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS.
And this has an embarrassingly low number of notes.
I know how a lot of people here feel about Hilary. If I had my druthers, I would MUCH rather have Bernie Sanders as president because his politics so closely align with my own. Like, stunningly close. A-breath-of-fresh-air close.
But consider these words from an ancient, jaded, 34 year old fuck who voted for Ralph Nader in 2000âŚ
NONE OF US agreed with Gore. I mean, not really, at least. He was Republican-lite. First off, his wife Tipper was a frigginâ censorship Nazi, Gore was a Southern Baptist who was mum on gay rights, and while he gave lip service to climate change, please note that An Inconvenient Truth had not been produced or filmed, and there wasnât much in the way of supporting the Kyoto protocols in his platform. He supported the limited military action in Iraq, supported NAFTA, and supported driving our production overseas. There wasnât much to his platform other than âless scary alternative to Bushâ. In other words, he was problematic as hell.
Then there was Ralph Nader, a consumer rights advocate, a proponent of gay marriage before it became a mainstream cause to champion, against NAFTA, spoke out against the military industrial complex, was pro-union, and anti-corporate.
And I voted for him. Proudly. In the general election. My reasoning was that nearly everyone I knew was voting for him (and everyone I knew were fellow college age leftists) so if enough of us got together and enough of us wanted that change to happen, then it would, right?
âWell, weâre talking about the primaries,â I can already hear you say. And yes, we are. But consider this: if Bernie ends up not winning the primaries, and no one turns out to the polls to vote for Hilary so they can âmake a statementâ or because sheâs âproblematicâ, or turns out and votes Green or some other third Party for those same reasons, then history will repeat itself with disastrous consequences.
Hereâs what happened on election night, November 7, 2000:
We waited. Â We watched Gore lose in battleground state after battleground state by just about the same number of votes that went to Ralph fucking Nader. Bush took all the dip shits who thought heâd be a swell feller to have a beer with. And then Florida and the recount and the Republican Party-led coup that stormed the voting recount, triggered the Supreme Court ruling and handed George W. Bush control of the country.
The first thing Bush did was reverse each and every executive order Clinton had put in place over the protestations of a crybaby Republican Congress, and most of those executive orders were designed to protect the middle class from corporate America and protect our budget surplus from the military industrial complex. Then Bush instituted legalized class warfare: the tax cuts that benefited the wealthy and still do to this day.
Then 9/11 happened.
If youâre 22 right now, then in 2001 you were 8 years old. In 2001, I was 20. I watched friends of mine who had joined the military because there were few other opportunities for them after high school get shipped to Iraq and Afghanistan and get their limbs blown off by IUDs. There are people I knew, people I ate lunch with every day, who are FUCKING DEAD right now.
This country was an unchecked fascist dictatorship for six years. Donât believe me? Hereâs the dictionary definition of fascism. And hereâs what happened during the Bush regime.
Torture. Suppression of the press. Siphoning the nationâs wealth to the upper 1%, creating our current aristocracy. Investments made by principle members of the Bush regime in for-profit military-industrial corporations that were tasked with murdering hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Sunsetting the assault weapons ban. The Defense of Marriage Act. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security. The loss of an entire city and fucking nothing done about it as people were drowning and starving to death in New Orleans. No Child Left UnTested Behind. A color coded number system on every day of the news telling Americans how frightened they needed to be that day that hilariously enough coincided with how far Bush dipped in the polls that week. He dipped, we went up to terror threat: orange. His poll numbers went back up. Like clockwork.
Between 2001 and 2005 us leftists who thought that there was no different than center-left Democrats and right wing Republicans got hit by a giant clue by four and watched the fucking Republicans dismantle our safety, economic security, and our entire way of life. No, the centrists are not the same. THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS ARE NOT THE SAME. One faction sort of listens to us. The other doesnât give a shit about us and actively promotes policies designed to kill and silence us.
âŚ
So for all the âproblematicâ that you imagine a Hilary Clinton presidency could be, I want you to imagine a Republican presidency (pick one) in which they want people like us fucking dead as pawns in their war games or fucking dying because theyâve stripped away the Affordable Healthcare Act.
So please Support Bernie Sanders. Support him because if enough leftists make their voices known through his candidacy, then NO MATTER WHAT it will influence the DNC platform next summer. Support him because weâre all passionate about returning America to a thriving, working democracy and flushing out the corporate lobbyist corruption that has held our entire government hostage for a decade.
But if he doesnât win the primaries then you need to support Hilary Clinton. And Iâm not kidding, Iâm not being hyperbolic.  If the Republicans win, then you need to start preparing yourself for life under a fascist state.
Hint: it will help if youâre fundamentalist Christian, wealthy, white, straight, male, and cisgender.Â
Otherwise, youâre fucked.
All of this. Read it. I also lived through the Nader debacle. Vote for Bernie in the primaries if you agree with him. I like a lot of his politics too. But then you MUST SHOW UP FOR HILLARY IN THE GENERAL ELECTION OR WE WILL END UP WITH A THIRD PRESIDENT BUSH.
Three Supreme Court Justices are very old and may die in the next Presidential term.
www.rockthevote.com
This. So much this. We cannot survive a Republican-led regime.
And the bit about ending up with a 3rd Bush is about right - Jeb Bush is probably the âbestâ of the Republican candidates right now. Itâs a TERRIFYING thought.
Vote. VOTE.
USA politics is, unfortunately, everyones business - how you vote over there will impact the ENTIRE WORLD. Think ahead everyone!
Books, Corsets and Lace
An outfit from when I was in Stockholm to see Othello at Kungliga Operan earlier this year. Looking through a bunch of pictures and realising there's a lot I've never posted (I might try to do that!)
Iâve never heard a man say: âNot all women are like that.â âBut my mother is not like that!â, not even âMy girlfriend is not like that.â âMy wife is not like that.â âMy sister is not like that.â âPlease stop generalising women.â
Haha. Wonât happen.
Reblogging as a point on the superficiality of feminine beauty standards.
ok I am certified face-blind but⌠the ones on the right do not look real. they look like CGI or animated versions of people or something. like⌠human skin doesnât look like that. wtf.
Facial contouring, lighting techniques, and photo editing software can remove all blemishes, pimples, moles, scars, wrinkles, uneven skin coloring, and the appearance of pores. Beauty standards (which are feminine for female people) are about removing the markers of womenâs humanity. Itâs woman-hating because we canât be who we naturally are. Women looking the way we naturally do makes misogynists uncomfortable. (Donât misread or misinterpret that, Iâm not saying you are a misogynist. I agree with your statement that they appear inhuman in the right column because looking naturally like that is not humanly possible. Which is one of the purposes of femininity, it gives us an impossible, unrealistic standard to aim for and measure ourselves against). Women and girls are socially and culturally pushed to look made-up. It robs us of money, time, energy, and confidence in what we naturally look like.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
going to the doctor when youâre chronically ill is weird.Â
Itâs like imagine everything in your house is on fire, and youâre standing there and the fire department come in like, describe the fire to me and maybe we can find what caused it and put it out.Â
and you canât just say everything so youâre like⌠well the fire in the curtain is the biggest but the fire in the photo albums might be doing the most damage also the fire in the couch is really inconvenientÂ
occasionally the fire guy is like, well your tv is on fire so it might be electronic-fireitus but that would cause other things like fire in the dvd playerÂ
and youâre like, oh yes. thatâs been on fire for years. I forgot to mention it because itâs always been a relatively small fire. Itâs right next to the bookshelf which has much more fire.Â
and then the fire guy is like, oh. I wouldnât worry about that. book shelf fire just happens sometimes.
I think one of the reasons the Harry Potter Epilogue was so poorly received was because the audience was primarily made up of the Millennial generation.
Weâve walked with Harry, Ron and Hermione, through a world that we thought was great but slowly revealed itself to be the opposite. We unpeeled the layers of corruption within the government, we saw cruelty against minorities grow in the past decades, and had media attack us and had teachers tell us that we âmust not tell liesâ. We got angry and frustrated and, like Harry, Ron and Hermione, had to think of a way to fight back. And them winning? That would have been enough to give us hope and leave us satisfied.
But instead. There was skip scene. And suddenly they were all over 30 and happy with their 2.5 children.
And the Millennials were left flailing in the dust.
Because while we recognised and empathised with everything up to that point. But seeing the Golden Trio financially stable and content and married? That was not something our generation could recognise. Because we have no idea if weâre ever going to be able to reach that stage. Not with the world weâre living in right now.
Having Harry, Ron and Hermione stare off into the distance after the battle and wonder about what the future might be would have stuck with us. Hell, have them move into a shitty flat together and try and sort out their lives would have. Have them with screaming nightmares and failed relationships and trying to get jobs in a society thatâs falling apart would have. Have them still trying to fix things in that society would have. Because we known Voldemort was just a symptom of the disease of prejudice the Wizarding World.
But donât push us off with an âall was wellâ. In a world about magic, JK Rowling finally broke our suspension of disbelief by having them all hit middle-class and middle-age contentment and expecting a fanbase of teenagers to accept it.
Also. Since when was âdonât worry kids, youâre going to turn out just like your parentsâ ever a happy ending? Does our generation even recognise marriage and money and jobs as the fulfillment of life anymore? Does our generation even recognise the Epilogueâs Golden Trio anymore?
#i think this one of the reasons why the james/lily/albus naming theme bothered me #because thereâs a sense of going in a circle rather than pressing forward #the only way the wizarding world will survive if it changes dramatically from this point #having the station seem exactly the same #right down to the names being thrown around #makes it seem stagnant #so iâm guessing another dark lord should turn up in a couple of decades (x)
YOU PUT IT IN WORDS