moonlight sonata

I doubt they’re mad, but I bet they’re kicking themselves like jackasses. Revelations was done by a newly forged, possibly college team who didn’t have licensing to Capcom at the time the first one came out, which is why all the characters look different. Revelations was out on DS in Japan for a very long time until it hit consoles, which Capcom decided to make canonical due to its popularity. Now that they have the licensing and see the public interest in Julia, I’m sure they will use her face. This is what I read off a Japanese news outlet a few years back, at least. It explains why Jill’s RE Revelation’s model was a mix of her and someone else, and why they would really only let you see the characters in cutscenes because I don’t remember being able to turn the POV all the way around like I can in Relevations 2. Even Chris looks a little different, but not by much - unfairly. There’s also a new comic line out on Relevations if you’re interested, not sure about Jill’s arch but they definitely have a Claire one out. 

Never forget “julia voth looks nothing like jill valentine” 

i cant believe you made a whole other blog just to make this post…..

Maybe I’m hard of comprehension skills but what does “touch grass sometime” mean? How is OP displaying “self awareness” (lolwhut) by saying Julia looks like the character she modeled for? Albeit 15 years ago, but what does 15 years ago really merit? Capcom has UNLIMITED licensing to Julia’s face, meaning she would only need to go “do shit” (model) ONE TIME. It’s obvious even Jill on Revelations still displays some of Julia’s facial features. How can you play Resident Evil 5 and say Jill does not look like Julia? I need to go find the original character scan of Jill again. It’s been officially confirmed that Jill’s likeness is based on Julia’s motion capture, so if you don’t think she looks like her - okay?? There’s, like, no argument over that, you’re displaying your opinion. The fact of the matter is, she is officially based on her likeness.