Moonflowero1

Hate of pigeons didn’t start until the 20th Century. Before that was about 9,900 years of loving them. The rock pigeon was domesticated 10,000 years ago and not only that, we took them freaking everywhere. Pigeons were the first domesticated bird and they were an all-around animal even though they were later bred into more specialised varieties. They were small but had a high feed conversion rate, in other words it didn’t cost a whole lot of money or space to keep and they provided a steady and reliable source of protein as eggs or meat. They home, so you could take them with you and then release them from wherever you were and they’d pretty reliably make their way back. Pigeons are actually among the fastest flyers and they can home over some incredible distances (what fantastic navigators!). They were an incredibly important line of communication for multiple civilisations in human history. You know the first ever Olympics? Pigeons were delivering that news around the Known World at the time. Also, their ability to breed any time of year regardless of temperature or photoperiod? That was us, we did that to them, back when people who couldn’t afford fancier animals could keep a pair or two for meat/eggs. 

Rooftop pigeon keeping isn’t new, it’s been around for centuries and is/was important to a whole variety of cultures. Pigeons live with us in cities because we put them there, we made them into city birds. I get that there are problems with bird droppings and there’s implications for too-large flocks. By all means those are things we should look to control, but you don’t need to hate pigeons with every fibre of your being. You don’t need to despise them or brush them off as stupid (they have been intelligence tested extensively as laboratory animals because guess what other setting they’re pretty well-adapted to? LABORATORIES!) because they aren’t stupid. They’re soft intelligent creatures and I don’t have time to list everything I love about pigeons again. You don’t need to aggressively fight them or have a deep desire to kill them at all. It’s so unnecessary, especially if you realise that the majority of reasons pigeons are so ubiquitous is a direct result of human interference.

We haven’t always hated pigeons though, Darwin’s pigeon chapter in The Origin of Species took so much of the spotlight that publishers at the time wanted him to make the book ONLY about pigeons and to hell with the rest because Victorian’s were obsessed with pigeons (as much as I would enjoy a book solely on pigeons, it’s probably best that he didn’t listen).  My point is, for millenia, we loved pigeons. We loved them so much we took them everywhere with us and shaped them into a bird very well adapted for living alongside us.

It’s only been very recently that we decided we hated them, that we decided to blame them for ruining our cities. The language we use to describe pigeons is pretty awful. But it wasn’t always, and I wish we remembered that. I wish we would stop blaming them for being what we made them, what they are, and spent more time actually tackling the problems our cities face.  

And also pigeon poop was a very valuable fertilizer before we had other options, people would hire guards to stop thieves from stealing their flock’s poop.

We never intended to train her for educational programs. It was a job reserved for our raptors. It was our pigeon who decided she would be a part of what we were doing. One day, when we entered her enclosure to change water and food, she decided to fly to my hand and perch like our raptors do. 

No training, no treats, just the reward of being with us. 

What we hadn’t noticed for the couple months prior was her watching us. This brilliant little bird had been watching us every day as we trained and worked with our raptors. Finally she decided she didn’t want to be left out any longer. She made her place on our hands.

This occurred several times before we finally put her on a glove and brought her into the public. Needless to say, she was right at home. She fluffed up and preened the entire evening while people gawked and asked us why we had a pigeon on one glove and a hawk on another. 

Since then, we’ve added 5 more rescued pigeons to our growing flock. And our pigeon (Tybalt) has become a mainstay ambassador for our programs. Each of our pigeons are incredibly fun to watch and interact with. Pigeons simply don’t get enough love. They are marvelous creatures incredibly suited to life alongside people both physically and mentally. 

Photo by .jocelyn.

They have a complex and fascinating social structure, both within a flock and with other individuals:

Photo by Ingrid Taylar

AND THEY ARE JUST SUPER CUTE, HONESTLY:

Most wild animals all look alike within a species, with TINY, RARE individual variations in terms of rare color morphs, unusually big or small animals, different facial markings and other subtleties. But there is no evolutionary benefit to having species where everyone looks slightly different, and in fact, it’s beneficial for species to be similar and consistent, with a distinctive aesthetic. Especially if you’re trying to blend into the environment - a black wolf is all very well, but it looks positively silly in the summer tundra, where its grey/brown/brindley cousins blend in. A white deer has a great aesthetic - and a very short lifespan in the forest. Distinctive Protagonist looks are rare in the wild, simply because natural selection usually comes down heavily on them.

To humans, most wild animals are visually indistinguishable from each other.

As a result, most wild animals are like

“Oh it’s obvious - you can tell the twins apart because Kara has a big nose.”

Wild animals usually have a pretty consistent aesthetic within their species. It’s important to them!

SO WHAT IS GOING ON WITH PIGEONS?

Look, in one small picture you’ve got a red color morph in the center, several melanistic dark morphs, a few solid black birds, a few variations on the wildtype wing pattern, a PIEBALD, a piebald copper color morph…

Like, there are LAYERS UPON LAYERS of pigeon diversity in most flocks you see. Pure white ones with black wingtips. Solid brown ones with pink iridescent patches. Pale pinkish pigeons.

WHY IS THAT? When other wild animals consider “being slightly fluffier than my brother” to be dangerously distinctive in most circumstances? BECAUSE CITY PIGEONS AREN’T TRULY WILD.

MANY OF THEM (POSSIBLY MOST OR ALL) ARE FERAL MIXES.

THEY WERE ONCE BELOVED PETS, SPECIAL MESSENGERS, EXQUISITE SHOW-WINNERS, AND PRIZED LIVESTOCK.

THEIR PRETTY COLORS WERE DELIBERATELY INTRODUCED BY HUMANS.

AND NOW THEIR HUMANS DON’T LOVE THEM ANY MORE.

See, pigeon fanciers bred (and still breed!) a huge array of pigeons. And the resulting swarms of released/discarded/escaped/phased out “fancy” pigeons stayed around humans. What else were they going to do? They interbred with wildtype pigeons.

Lots of the pigeons you see in public are feral. They’re not wild animals. They’re citizen animals. They’re genetically engineered. And now that’s what “city” pigeons are.

These “wild” horses are all different colors because they’re actually feral. Mustangs in the American West are the descendants of imported European horses - they’re an invasive domestic species that colonized an ecological niche, but they are domestic animals. Their distinctive patterns were deliberately bred by humans. A few generations of running around on the prairie isn’t going to erase that and turn them back into wildtypes. If you catch an adult mustang and train it for a short period, you can ride it and have it do tricks and make it love you. It’s a domestic animal. You can’t really do that with an adult zebra.

No matter how many generations these dogs stay on the street and interbreed with one another, they won’t turn back into wolves. They can’t. They’re deliberately genetically engineered. If you catch one (even after generations of rough living, even as an adult) you can make it stare at your face, care about your body language, and love you.

City pigeons? Well, you don’t have to like them, but they’re in the same boat. They’re tamed animals, bred on purpose, living in a human community. Their very bodies are marked with their former ownership and allegiance; they cannot really return to what they once were; if you caught one, you could make it love you (in a limited pigeon-y way.) They have gone to “the wild,” but not very far from us, and they’d be happy to come back.

So next time you see a flock of city pigeons, spare a moment to note their diversity. The wing patterns. The pied, mottled and brindled. The color types.

All of it was once meant to please you.

Still needs fine-tuning, but I couldn’t resist pulling a print of this design tonight!

Taking into account that this is probably in the same timeline as SFAWTDE, (he says he solves mysteries) i see this insistance as a coping mechanism after all of the real things he's seen. Meaby he's using denial and a "if I don't acknowledge it it cannot hurt me" as a way to push himself to continue looking into mysteries that he now know could be dangerous. Or meaby he's in denial after the KIY situation.

It's interesting how, the instant things get real at the end, he does not even have an instant of "this is impossible", he immediately accept what is happening to him and start being afraid this entity might be able to tell he's recording outside the game.

hooo first fanart of his new vid, its cool

- An eldritch god (?)

- A place with a large amount of yellow

- At least one ominous yellow eye

- Searching for someone/something

- Themes of wanting to be found/seen

- Gay vibes

4/4 potentially being the implication of another entity present that's taken the reins (or potentially the fourth experiment by mds, but i still think it's the former)

the fact that no one acknowledges hummer is even present; why doubt what you can see with your own eyes?

(WHICH I WANNA POINT OUT. NEVER SEEN JOINING WORLDS. NEVER SEEN WITH A DEATH MESSAGE. NEVER SEEN IN THE MEMBER LISTS OF SERVERS. We're watching a being that doesn't exist try existing, to no avail, until the end)

the fact that hummer always has wifies go first when doing anything (parkouring, the nether portal, the minecarts, having him go out further in the ocean to find the chest, to name a few)

hummer either being the leviathan, an aspect of levi, a lingering will (smiles) of levi; he wants to be seen, overall. be seen as something that exists, that is more than legend and rumors and creepypastas

THE FUCKING OTHER REALM. THAT GOT HINTED AT IN THE VERY FUCKIGN BEGINNING IN THE REDDIT POSTS DO YOU FUCKERS UNDERSTAND MY INSANITY REALIZING IT THE SECOND WIFIES APPEARED THERE (i would also like to point out; i think there's a church. sf/dawtde trauma setting in)

the heart of the ocean in the singular chest. wifies passing out d3rlord3 style. oh my god.

the potential that if hummer was the latest vessel of madness for the leviathan (who could very much be cthulu; remember, wifies in the bts video said he wanted to add cthulu in to help derek, but couldn't find a good way to do it without undermining the story), that it's wifies' turn now; searching for a madness that exists, or some shit OH MY GOD

also shoutout to all my recent watchings of defunctland videos because 20,000 being the coordinates for the deep ocean kept ringing bells; 20,000 leagues under the sea. where they take a submarine to find a sea monster. and the captain of the submarine is a lil crazy.

Taking into account that this is probably in the same timeline as SFAWTDE, (he says he solves mysteries) i see this insistance as a coping mechanism after all of the real things he's seen. Meaby he's using denial and a "if I don't acknowledge it it cannot hurt me" as a way to push himself to continue looking into mysteries that he now know could be dangerous. Or meaby he's in denial after the KIY situation.

It's interesting how, the instant things get real at the end, he does not even have an instant of "this is impossible", he immediately accept what is happening to him and start being afraid this entity might be able to tell he's recording outside the game.