- the poem ends soft as it began-

#extradirty
Three Goblin Art
dirt enthusiast
occasionally subtle
almost home
AnasAbdin
we're not kids anymore.
NASA
Stranger Things
taylor price
sheepfilms
art blog(derogatory)
DEAR READER

izzy's playlists!

ellievsbear

Love Begins

PR's Tumblrdome
RMH
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Slovakia
seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
@merryhaze
- the poem ends soft as it began-

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
James Fenton, Ten Little Bullets, and the lost Les Mis
(First off: Marianne, please let me know if you have any problem with me copy-pasting one of your Abaissé posts from ‘06 and I’ll take this down. I was trying to rephrase the stuff you covered re: Fenton and lyrics, but you said it all better than I could restate it.)
Many Les Mis fans know Herbert Kretzmer as the musical’s English-language (and therefore arguably most important) lyricist, but fewer are aware that he wasn’t the first man to attempt the job. The first guy was one James Fenton, who was fired for being unable to keep to the show’s schedule. Not much of his work survives but his song “Ten Little Bullets” was returned to Gavroche’s death scene for the Broadway revival. As Marianne reported at the time (link goes to Abaissé):
So, for those who haven’t been following news of the revival as obsessively as I have, one of the changes has been to cut “Little People” entirely and have Gavroche sing a song called “Ten Little Bullets” in his death scene. Ten little bullets in my hand ten little snipers neat and clean– one for the king of this great land two for the aristocracy three for the bishops and the clergymen four for the prefects of police– give me a chance, I’ll take the lot of them– ten little chances to be free Close your eyes, I’ll say when, count to ten. It was written back in the early 80s by James Fenton, the original lyricist for Les Mis, who was fired in 1984 for taking forever to finish and replaced by Herbert Kretzmer. As far as I know, none of Fenton’s lyrics are in the present incarnation of the show, except of course “Ten Little Bullets” in the revival. It’s sung to the same tune as Gavroche’s part in “Look Down.” The only other surviving example of Fenton’s lyrics is another Gavroche song, entitled “You” and presumably set to the tune of “La faute à…” You thought you would notice we had nothing to eat You thought we wouldn’t mind we had to sleep on the streets You thought you wouldn’t bother if we drank from a ditch You thought we wouldn’t wonder what had made you so rich You made up all the rules You must have thought us fools… You kicked us in the gutter and you laughed in our face You dragged us through the courtroom and you taught us our place You preached at us on Sunday looking solemn and sleek You cheated us on Monday and the rest of the week We saw the coaches passing on the way to the ball I wonder if you noticed we had nothing at all We smelt you coming out again with brandy for breath I wonder if you noticed we were starving to death Be careful as you go You don’t know what we know You drove us to despair You thought we didn’t care Based on these two samples, which are much more clever and socially relevant than Kretzmer’s sentimental dreck, I would give my right arm to see the rest of Fenton’s lyrics for Act I. (He never made it to Act II, apparently, though he sketched bits of it out.) Behr’s “Les Misérables: History in the Making” goes on to say that Fenton’s lyrics were more poetic than singable, and thought to be too allusive and esoteric for general audiences. Which really only makes me want to see them more.
I heartily agree (but such are the wages of being an incurable fandom hipster). Fenton, if Wikipedia is pointing me to the same Fenton, is a poet, journalist, and critic who used to teach poetry at Oxford and appears to be a pretty darn acclaimed English writer. He’s also still alive. I’m just going to sit here and sigh at the thought that it might still be possible for someone to hunt him down and wring whatever is left of his LM work out of him (assuming that Les Miz The Musical Sensation hasn’t somehow sworn him to silence).
I’m also going to order that Behr book that Marianne mentions ASAP. For anyone who’s interested, you can currently snag a copy for around $4 incl. shipping on Amazon.
peter was probably the most brilliant marauder tbh, as awful as he was
not only does he fool hogwarts’ staff by letting them believe he was a “stupid and foolish boy”, but he dupes his three closest friends into believing it as well, to a varied degree (cue them patronizing him, underestimating him, trusting him to a fault because it was easy to believe he wasn’t capable of treachery, etc)
successfully became an animagus within the span of three years (an unheard of feat only managed by few others)
willingly ran around with a werewolf once a month
was included in the making of the marauders map
hints of his more reprehensible nature were visible as early as his school days:
“Wormtail was looking from Sirius and James to Snape with a look of avid anticipation on his face.” Wormtail was on his feet now, watching hungrily, edging around Lupin to get a clearer view.“ "Several people watching laughed; Snape was clearly unpopular. Wormtail sniggered shrilly.”
-swm, ootp
as well as other moments in the chapter where wormtail derives sadistic pleasure at snape’s (a victim’s) expense
switched sides during the war without a single person catching whiff of his treachery (including dumbledore, moody, kingsley, the marauders, and all order members including those who were official auror and ministry personnel)
supplied information to voldemort about the order and the potters whilst remaining smoothly undercover and playing the perfect part of loyal, trustworthy friend (and even inciting affection and pity from them while doing it ie lily’s letter; pet nickname “wormy” sympathy and concern “i thought he seemed down” etc)
shifted the blame for the potters’ deaths on sirius black in front of a crowd of muggle witnesses before he 1) single-handedly murdered twelve people with a single powerful blast of magic, 2) cut off his finger and 3) transformed into his animagus form - all in a clever ruse to frame sirius
(sirius laughed maniacally when the aurors arrived to apprehend him because he realized the extent of peter’s cunning)
lived in disguise as a rat for twelve years unbeknownst to the wizarding family who adopted him as a pet
was the one who found voldemort’s spirit in albania within a relatively short span of time, and manipulated and overpowered ministry personnel bertha jorkins (who he recognized as a valuable source of information for voldemort)
he was rather adept with dark arts (blasting curse, unforgivable curses), duelling (confrontation with sirius, overpowering bertha jorkins, capturing mad-eye moody), charms (marauders map), potions (he produced the rudimentary body potion and regeneration potion for voldemort, brewed the polyjuice potion to help barty crouch jr disguise himself as moody), transfiguration (was an animagus, could perform conjuration - an advanced type of transfiguration), displayed wand versatility (was able to cast unforgivables, conjuration, levitation and many other spells with his masters wand despite not having won the wands allegiance), non-verbal magic (stunning both ron and crookshanks in poa, locking and unlocking the cell door at malfoy manor, lighting a fire and conjuring ropes and levitating harry in gof - all done wordlessly).
despite his obvious weaknesses and character flaws, he’s competent, skilled, self-preserving, intelligent, displays deductive reasoning and strategic-thinking, is capable of affection and mercy, and is an opportunist.
tl;dr peter pettigrew is as much underestimated by fandom as he was by the marauders/everyone who knew him, and it’s a damn shame.
i ~loathe~ fandom's attitude to Peter Pettigrew
that boy is like the single most fascinating thing about all the Marauders in their entirety. he was their best friend, they loved him, he became an Animagus with them, they trusted him to join the Order, and then he betrayed them because he didn’t see the war as worth it anymore, he knew everyone was going to die so he tried to live
he was literally the only Gryffindor to come to the realisation that this Gryffindor glory in war was all a hoax, a lie, just this big “dolce et decorum est pro patria morti“ bullshit that they’d been fed their entire lives. he’s fascinating.
why would you cut him out and pretend he’s worthless and he’s got no talent and is no use to the group. he’s the most interesting one.
but, honestly, fandom isn’t actually interested in the First War and the Marauders as a dynamic, it just wants adorable anachronistic CW fluff fanfic. and the short shy fat kid doesn’t fit into that imaginary landscape you want to live in. despite the fact he’s the single most fascinating Marauder.
NEWSFLASH: Kids in a war in the 1970s will not be living some adorable CW teen drama narrative where everyone’s white and gorgeous and straight. Why is fandom obsessed with this? Why don’t you talk about something interesting, like Peter, instead of obsessing over shit like, Blackinnon, and how clearly the love of Sirius Black’s life was this one line woman who wasn’t even a character, just this name Marlene McKinnon who everyone latched onto and turned into a self-insert cute white blonde girl who was in love with Sirius Black and a cool official Marauderette yadda yadda yadda.
like you go in for this heteronormative bullshit instead of, say, actual war stuff.
ugh this is why I quit this fandom.
type prevs url with your eyes closed in the tags

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Why did James Potter choose to confront Voldemort unarmed rather than trying to escape or hide when he knew they were discovered?
James was trying to buy time for Lily and Harry, which is fair enough.
Why did he not think to pick up/Accio his wand? He was flustered and taken by surprise, since the Fidelius was meant to be so secure. But it does confirm that he was used to fighting people who couldn’t fight back. Compare with how Snape went for his wand as soon as he heard James’s voice, because he knew he might be attacked.
That also tends to confirm that his battles with Snape in seventh year were, if not still actual bullying, at least pre-arranged by James, so James never had to learn to be on the alert for an attack. That fits with the fact that he was able to hide their duels from Lily and from the school - he used the Map to choose times and places where there were no witnesses, other than his friends, so it was a case of “We’ll be duelling in ten minutes - do I have everything I need?”
Why did he not change into Prongs? Even if he correctly assumed Peter had betrayed them and would have warned Voldemort that he was an Animagus, losing the element of surprise, still having a small horse covered in spikes fall on him would have put a serious crimp in Voldemort’s day. The Doylist answer is that Rowling didn’t think of it, but it’s more evidence that James had not actually thought out a “What would I do if?” plan. Brave he may well have been, but he was nothing like the thinking-on-his-feet fighter his son would be.
A much bigger question is why the hell did Lily - apparently also wandless, what the hell is it with these two? - take Harry *upstairs* and then try to barricade the nursery door with boxes, instead of going out of a back door or downstairs window with him and ducking behind the hedge, or simply Apparating away with him?
Again, the Doylist reason was that Rowling needed James and Lily to die, and is such a bad strategist herself that she didn’t bother to make their end credible. But there is a possible Watsonian explanation.
James told Lily to “take Harry and go” and her response was to go upstairs. So maybe they weren’t as unprepared as they seemed, and they had a Portkey or a Floo ready upstairs, but Voldemort - although we don’t see him do it - had set up not only anti Apparition but also anti-Portkey/Floo wards. That would *slightly* reduce the blame on Dumbledore for not covering all bases, if they had had an escape-route prepared but Voldemort had blocked it because Peter had warned him about it in advance.
Barricading herself in with boxes was still ridiculous - standing behind the door with something heavy would have made a lot more sense. But we know she’s good at wandless magic, so perhaps she had sent a Patronus and was trying to buy time until reinforcements arrived. That would explain how the Order even knew that the Potters had been attacked.
Internal evidence suggests that Hagrid didn’t find Harry in the ruins until about 5am. But if the Order received a Patronus saying “Under attack!” their first move would probably be to check wherever they were meant to Portkey to to see if they were there, then send a Patronus back to see what was happening, and if it found the cottage partially collapsed and James dead by the front door, with no further word from Lily, it would assume they were *all* dead and Hagrid’s task was simply to establish what had happened before the Muggles contaminated the evidence. And that wouldn’t happen till daylight because the house was the last one in the lane - meaning no-one would walk *past* it unless they were on their way out to a farm - and it was only a few days before 5th November, so the bang would be assumed to be fireworks until a milkman or postman tried to deliver to the cottage
They would have no reason, until Hagrid heard him yell from under the rubble, to think that Harry was still alive, nor did they initially have any reason to think that Voldemort had been disembodied and wasn’t still somewhere in the offing, waiting to curse them. Hence the delay of several hours in retrieving Harry, and perhaps why it was Hagrid who was sent. They didn’t send Sirius because they thought he had been the Secret Keeper and must be the traitor, they didn’t send Peter because they couldn’t find him, that presumably left a very limited number of people who were in on the secret (*not* including Remus since Sirius didn’t trust him), and Hagrid, as a half-giant, is almost immune to magic so even Voldemort would find it difficult to take him down.
Then, during the day, while Hagrid was lying low with Harry, people with Death Eater relatives started to say “I think He-Who has disappeared, they’re all panicking!” and perhaps Snape’s Mark also changed, so Dumbledore was able to piece together what must have happened. But surely, if they didn’t initially realise Harry had survived - and how could they? - Dumbledore must have been in touch with Hagrid to learn that Harry was alive, then tell him to take him to Surrey. Does Hagrid have a Patronus, and if so what is it? Or maybe he had a two-way mirror like the one Sirius gave to Harry.
Claire Jordan's answer: James was trying to buy time for Lily and Harry, which is fair enough. Why did he not think to pick up/Accio his wa
[please note that the photo depicts the June Days Uprising of 1848, not the June Rebellion of 1832. Silver iodine photography was not invented until 1833.]
Do you hear the people sing?
Lost in the valley of the night
It is the music of a people
Who are climbing to the light
For the wretched of the earth
There is a flame that never dies
Even the darkest night will end
And the sun will rise

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
SUPERNATURAL: 2x21 // 9x23
SUPERNATURAL ⤷ 1x01 Pilot // 15x20 Carry On
some old stuffs
🎨: @alessiajontrunfio
(probably (shut up pinterest is confusing and google does not help))
Barricade Day in Real Time: June 6, 11am
Death of Gavroche. Marius and Combeferre retrieve him and his basket of ammunition. Courfeyrac bandages Marius’s head wound with his cravat. Jean Valjean refuses his allotment of 15 cartridges. Combeferre tends the wounded. Bossuet and Feuilly prepare more cartridges with Gavroche’s gunpowder. Courfeyrac arranges his weapons. Joly checks his tongue in a mirror.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
link / archive
I’m going to say something that might sound crazy. Suicide and suicide attempts are sort of a societal alarm bell that says “something is very wrong with the environment this individual was in.” A living being choosing to take themselves out of existence is the most extreme act of distress there is. The state stepping in to silence this alarm bell by funneling suicidal people into a state sanctioned euthanasia program, normalizing this act through a socially accepted bureaucratic system, is not a good thing. It goes hand in hand with the state’s interest in maintaining the status quo at the expense of the population and the psychiatric industry’s interest in individualizing societal problems to extract profit and aid the existing system. It’s saying “there are no complaints here, just people with sick brains, carry on.”
Like why do i have to share a planet with these ‘people’?
This is why the 'feminist propaganda made women hate men' is such bullshit.
Men did this. Feminists don't even have to say anything , I mean just look at this fucking shite.
You look in the comment section of any manosphere video and there will be white men, brown men, asian men, black men, old men, young men, alt men, gay men, nerdy men, religious men, atheist men, arty men, blue collar men, white collar men, sporty men, men with wives and kids, and even young boys casually talking about the fact that they believe women are subhuman. Some of them acknowledge that they just outright hate women but a lot will say it's just how women are and thus it's not hate because it's just a fact.
I just don't get how some women are still in denial because this shite is EVERYWHERE now.