Messages
Part Three: Doâs and Donâts of Motivation and Persuasion
A variety of methods can be used to improve the audienceâs reception of motivation and persuasion messages. First, serious health issues cannot be treated too lightly, but at the same time the consequence of not taking an action should not be exaggerated. Credibility can be lost if people are shown dying from a fairly minor or obscure illness but also the message must make a realistic connection between a problem and its consequence. What mismatches between the feel and content do you see in these messages (choose 2)?:
Now try these two:
Analyze the potential effectiveness of one of these smoking control ads;
and this child abuse prevention ad.
The âKill a Cigarette Save A life. Yoursâ Campaign is comparing smoking to using a gun to kill oneself. I am focusing more on the second one where a young male is smoking and the smoke is appearing the shape of gun pointed at this head. I am always weary about using this message like this. Now a day people know that smoking can kill them, but they continue to smoke anyways. There needs to be a stronger motivation in these types of ads, since fear is does not appear to be as effective.
While the NSPCC anti-child abuse ad, struck a code with me. More specifically the laugher in the back ground while the cartoon child was being abused. Then complete silence at the end when the child appears on the basement floor. This would motivate me to say something if I saw something. If this message is aimed at those who abuse, it might provide a different perspective then they normally see in their reality, but will really stop those who abuse children. Perhaps it was aimed at those of spouses who abuse children to speak up. But was fear is stronger the fear of a child being abuse or that abuser turning their anger to you. This commercial definitely planned to the peripheral channel and hit hard on emotions, but confused on the behavior is attempting to motivate.
I agree with you on your analysis of the âkill a cigarette save a lifeâ ad is not very convincing nor effective. In part because a gun will kill you intermediately, while a smoking might kill you at a slow (and maybe more painful) pace.Â


















