Liquid Bird

Hello Guys! We are working on building an exciting tabletop game themed around rockets. The game is a fun 1 to 5 player card game where you build rockets, bid for payload contracts, and race to launch two payloads first. We are planning to make it public this year, probably around August.

The game will have around a 2.25-ish complexity weight. If you like what you see and would like to playtest the game, simply comment "Payload" and we will connect.

And if you would simply like to be notified when the game launches, comment "Launch" and we will connect for that too.

Hi everyone, I compiled the fundamentals of two big subjects, computers and electronics in two decks of playing cards. It took me ~9 months to study and design these.

The idea is to give a physical product to anyone curious in the field of computers and electronics that helps him/her to get the complete overview of the field in an organized, engaging and colorful manner.

Request for checking the complete project, joker cards and supporting it on Kickstarter here. Happy to have your feedback for improvement.

Telescopes are basically light collectors. The bigger the aperture—the part that gathers light—the more you can see. A larger aperture means brighter, sharper images of faraway stars and galaxies.

There are three main types of telescopes: refractors, reflectors, and catadioptrics. Refractors use lenses to bend light, reflectors use mirrors, and catadioptrics mix both. Most big research telescopes today are reflectors, because mirrors are lighter and easier to make large.

Lenses in refractors can get heavy and sag under their own weight, which ruins the image. Mirrors don’t have that problem and only need one surface shaped correctly. Plus, you can support them from the back, making them perfect for massive observatories.

A telescope’s job depends on the type of light it’s designed to catch. Some capture visible light like our eyes do, others detect invisible signals like infrared or ultraviolet. That’s why different telescopes have different shapes and instruments.

Hubble sees mostly in visible and ultraviolet light, so it has a long tube to keep light focused and protected. James Webb, on the other hand, looks at infrared light. Infrared needs a cold telescope, so Webb doesn’t use a tube—it uses a sunshield the size of a tennis court instead.

Ground-based telescopes fight with clouds, light pollution, and the atmosphere itself. Space telescopes like Hubble and Webb avoid all that, giving us clear views of the universe. That’s why putting them in orbit makes such a huge difference.

From Galileo’s tiny spyglass to today’s billion-dollar observatories, telescopes have completely changed how we see the cosmos. Let’s keep the curiosity alive—what’s your favorite space telescope and why? Drop your thoughts below, follow us for more, and check the link in bio for free ebooks on the space shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants.

Back in the early days, computers weren’t small or smart. They were massive machines filled with vacuum tubes, glowing like old TV sets and taking up entire rooms. These tubes controlled electricity but got hot, broke often, and used tons of power.

Then came the game-changer: the transistor. Invented in 1947, it replaced vacuum tubes with a tiny, solid-state switch. Computers became faster, more reliable, and way smaller—this was the real start of the digital age.

Before hard drives and flash memory, data lived on punch cards. Programs were written using holes in stacks of stiff paper. One wrong punch and the whole program could crash. It was precise, painful, and totally normal back then.

In the 1970s, things took a fun turn. The Altair 8800 came out—a tiny metal box with switches and blinking lights. It wasn’t pretty, but it got hobbyists excited and even inspired Bill Gates to write BASIC for it.

Then came the Apple II in 1977. It had color graphics, sound, and was actually easy to use. Suddenly, computers weren’t just lab toys—they became part of people’s homes.

Microprocessors made all of this possible. The Intel 4004 kicked it off in 1971, packing thousands of transistors into a chip the size of a fingernail. Today, chips have billions, running everything from watches to cars.

Unix also quietly changed the game. It introduced command lines, file systems, and multitasking—laying the foundation for macOS, Linux, and even Android.

Now, we’re entering the age of quantum computers. These machines don’t just crunch numbers—they play with probability and parallel worlds. The future of computing might not be just faster, but weirder and way more powerful.

What do you think the future of computers looks like? Let’s talk—drop your thoughts below and follow us for more daily learning. And don’t forget to check the link in bio for free ebooks on the space shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants.

Rockets have come a long way from being just fire arrows. Around 9th century China, people packed gunpowder into tubes and strapped them to arrows—they had no clue, but they’d just invented the first rockets. These were used in battles, mostly to scare enemies with noise and flames.

In the 18th century, Indian Mysorean rockets shocked the British with their metal casings and deadly accuracy. Tipu Sultan’s army launched hundreds at once, inspiring the British to make their own. That led to the Congreve rockets in Europe—less accurate but made a loud statement in wars.

Fast forward to the early 1900s, and we meet Konstantin Tsiolkovsky—a Russian schoolteacher who dreamed of space travel. He laid the math behind how rockets could leave Earth, long before anyone had built one. Without him, modern rocketry wouldn’t exist.

Then came the V-2 rocket, built in Nazi Germany during World War II. It was the first man-made object to reach space, but it caused destruction on Earth. After the war, the US brought German scientists—including Wernher von Braun—under Operation Paperclip to work on American rockets.

That work eventually gave us the mighty Saturn V, which sent humans to the Moon. Later, the Space Shuttle changed things by partially reusing parts, cutting launch costs a bit. But true reusability was still a dream.

Today, companies like SpaceX are landing rockets back on Earth, aiming to fly them again and again. Fully reusable rockets could make space travel as common as flying planes. And all this is building up to one big goal—sending humans to Mars.

What do you think about the journey of rockets? Let’s talk in the comments. Follow for more space stories every day. Check the link in bio for free ebooks on the Space Shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket fuels.

Ever heard the term “human computer”? No, it’s not a sci-fi thing. Before digital computers took over, real people – mostly women – crunched numbers by hand for everything from engineering to astronomy.

They weren’t just solving basic math. These human computers tackled complex calculations like flight paths, ballistics, orbital mechanics, and rocket trajectories. All using pencils, slide rules, and graph paper. It was slow, repetitive, and super brain-heavy work.

In the 1700s and 1800s, European scientists built trig and log tables that shaped early science. But behind the scenes, it was often anonymous human computers who did the actual calculations. The published credit? That went to the lead mathematicians.

Fast forward to the World Wars, and women stepped into computing roles for military research. At places like Aberdeen Proving Ground, they calculated weapon trajectories for ballistics research. Their math made sure artillery hit its target.

Then came NASA. And women like Katherine Johnson became legends. She did the math for Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo missions—including the Apollo 11 Moon landing. Her numbers were so accurate that astronauts trusted her over early digital computers.

The first electronic computer, ENIAC, wasn’t programmed by some famous guy. It was six women human computers who made it work. They figured out how to input code before computer science was even a thing.

Their legacy is powerful—and often untold. They didn’t just calculate. They made exploration possible. Without their work, rockets wouldn’t fly, and humans wouldn’t have walked on the Moon.

Think AI might do to artists what computers did to them? Let’s talk about it.

Drop your thoughts below, follow for more daily curiosity bites, and hit the link in bio for free ebooks on the Space Shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants.

How do we detect life on other planets? It’s not like aliens wave at our telescopes. Instead, we look for something called biosignatures—clues that life might be present, or once was.

These could be certain gases like oxygen or methane in a planet’s atmosphere, or surface chemicals that only living organisms can create. Biosignatures are like fingerprints of life left behind for us to study from afar.

The main tool we use is spectroscopy. When a planet passes in front of its star, some of the starlight filters through its atmosphere. Different molecules absorb different wavelengths of light, so by studying these light patterns, we can tell what the planet’s atmosphere is made of.

If we spot gases like oxygen and methane together, that’s a big hint—because on Earth, those gases don’t hang around long without life constantly making more.

But life isn’t always soft and squishy. Some microorganisms on Earth—called extremophiles—have been found living in boiling hot springs, under ice sheets, and even inside rocks deep underground.

A few can survive radiation, vacuum, and freezing temperatures, just like the harsh conditions found on Mars or Europa. That gives us hope that life could survive in places we once thought impossible.

So next time we hear about a planet with “potential for life,” it’s not random. It’s the result of careful science, tracking gases and scanning light from worlds light-years away.

What do you think—will we find life soon? Let’s talk in the comments. Follow us for more space stories every day. And don’t forget to check the link in our bio for free ebooks on space shuttles, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket fuels!

People often say nuclear fusion is impossible on Earth. But that’s not true. We’ve done fusion many times in labs. The real challenge is making it give more energy than we put in—something called net energy gain.

Scientists use a number called Q to measure this. If Q is 1, it means the fusion reaction produced as much energy as it took to start it. If Q is more than 1, it’s a win. That’s called breakeven or even ignition if the fusion keeps going on its own for a bit.

The National Ignition Facility (NIF) in the US has been leading this dream. In December 2022, they crossed Q = 1 for the first time, producing more energy out than the lasers pumped in. That was a huge moment for fusion science. They’ve done it again a few more times since, showing it wasn’t just luck.

But here’s the catch. The lasers used tons of energy to run, way more than what reached the fuel capsule. So while fusion gave out more energy than it received directly, the full system still lost energy. Turning this into a working power plant is the next big step.

As of April 2025, fusion ignition is real, but power plants are still years away. Projects like ITER in France and private startups are trying to make fusion practical. Everyone’s aiming for a system where energy in is less than energy out—including the whole machine. That’s when fusion becomes a true energy source for Earth.

What do you think—will fusion change the world in our lifetime? Drop your thoughts below, let’s chat!

Follow us for more science explainers daily, and check the link in bio for FREE ebooks on space shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants!

E-ink displays are super cool screens that look like paper. They don’t shine light into your eyes like phone screens do.

Instead, they use tiny black and white particles that move around using electric signals to form words and images. That’s why they’re easy on the eyes and can be read even in bright sunlight.

The idea came from MIT in the 1990s and became real thanks to a company called E Ink Corporation. These screens became popular through e-readers like the Kindle, giving book lovers a paper-like reading feel without actual paper.

They only use power when changing pages, so battery life lasts for weeks. That’s a huge win for travelers and students.

Now we’ve got color e-ink too! It works by adding color filters on top of the regular e-ink particles. While the colors aren’t super bright like LCDs, they’re perfect for comics, charts, or textbooks. And they still keep the long battery and no-glare benefits.

The best part? E-ink screens are flexible, light, and can even bend. They’re used in smartwatches, price tags in shops, digital signs, and even laptops for eye-friendly reading. New tech is making e-ink displays faster and more colorful every year.

But they do have limits. They refresh slower than normal screens, so no videos or fast scrolling.

And color versions cost more and don’t pop as much. But if you care about battery, your eyes, and a calm screen experience, e-ink is gold.

Ever tried an e-ink gadget? Share your experience or thoughts below, we’d love to hear!

Follow me for more fun and educational tech explainers every day. Also, don’t forget to check the link in bio for free ebooks on space shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants!

Imagine sailing through space using sunlight instead of fuel. That’s the idea behind solar sails.

These sails don’t rely on solar wind, but on radiation pressure—light itself pushing against giant, reflective surfaces. Even though photons have no mass, they carry momentum, and when they hit a sail, they give it a tiny push.

Over time, these tiny pushes add up. A solar sail doesn’t provide quick bursts like rockets do, but it keeps accelerating as long as sunlight hits it.

That means, given enough time, a solar sail can go really fast—without using any propellant. It’s a clean, continuous way to travel through space.

Several missions have already tested this idea. Japan’s IKAROS was the first spacecraft to successfully demonstrate solar sailing in 2010. It used a thin, square sail to travel toward Venus.

The Planetary Society’s LightSail 2 also proved the tech in Earth orbit, raising its altitude using only sunlight.

Solar sails come with challenges too. They only work well near the Sun where light is strong, and they can be hard to control.

The sails must be super light and incredibly large to catch enough sunlight. Plus, once you’re far from the Sun, like in deep space, the push becomes very weak.

Still, solar sails offer a glimpse of the future—where spacecraft might glide between planets or even stars using nothing but light. It’s a quiet revolution in space travel, powered by physics and patience.

Science isn’t magic—it follows a system. And at the heart of that system are four big ideas that help scientists explore the world in a smart and reliable way.

These ideas are what make science trustworthy, and they’re called the foundational principles of the scientific method.

First comes empiricism. That’s just a fancy word for this: don’t just believe something because someone says it. Real knowledge must come from things you can see, measure, or test in the real world. If it can’t be observed or recorded, it’s not science yet.

Next is repeatability. Let’s say you do an experiment and get cool results. That’s great—but if someone else tries the same thing and doesn’t get the same results, then something’s off. Science needs to work the same way every time, no matter who’s doing it.

Then we have falsifiability. This means your idea or hypothesis must be testable—and not just to prove it right, but to check if it could be wrong too. If you can’t ever prove it false, it doesn’t belong in science.

Last comes predictability. A strong scientific theory doesn’t just explain what happened—it helps guess what will happen next. If we know the conditions, we should be able to forecast the outcome. That’s how science powers inventions and discoveries.

These four—empiricism, repeatability, falsifiability, and predictability—are what keep science honest, useful, and always improving.

What do you think about these principles? Which one do you find the most interesting? Share your thoughts, join the discussion, and follow for more cool and educational content every day.

Check the link in bio to grab your free ebooks on the space shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants!

The Sun doesn’t just shine light—it also blows a constant stream of particles across the solar system.

This stream is called the solar wind. It comes from the Sun’s outer layer, the corona, where the heat is so intense that particles break free and escape into space. These particles mostly include electrons and protons moving at crazy high speeds.

There are two main types of solar wind: fast and slow. The fast one comes from holes in the corona and can zip along at over 700 km per second.

The slow wind moves at about half that speed and tends to come from around the Sun’s equator. Both kinds carry magnetic fields along with them, shaping the space weather around Earth and beyond.

When the solar wind hits Earth’s magnetic field, it can create big changes in our upper atmosphere. Sometimes it messes with satellites, GPS signals, and even power grids.

On the fun side, it’s also what causes the aurora—the beautiful northern and southern lights. The charged particles from the Sun crash into Earth’s atmosphere and light up the sky near the poles.

We’ve been studying the solar wind for decades. In the 1950s, scientists first guessed its existence, and spacecraft like NASA’s Parker Solar Probe are now flying super close to the Sun to study it up close.

The more we learn, the better we can protect our technology and understand the space around us.

Have you ever seen an aurora or read about space weather? Share your thoughts and let’s chat. Follow for more space facts and cool science content daily. Don’t forget to check the link in bio for free ebooks on the space shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants.

Rockets need powerful propellants to escape Earth’s gravity. There are three main types: solid, liquid, and hybrid. Each works differently, has its own advantages, and is used in different missions.

Solid propellants are the simplest. Fuel and oxidizer are mixed into a solid block that burns once ignited. They are reliable, easy to store, and can sit for years without losing efficiency. But once lit, they can’t be stopped or controlled. The Space Shuttle’s boosters and ICBMs use solid propellants.

Liquid propellants are more complex but offer better control. Fuel and oxidizer are stored separately and pumped into a combustion chamber. This allows precise control, making them ideal for deep-space missions and crewed flights. Liquid hydrogen with liquid oxygen, used in the Space Shuttle, is highly efficient. RP-1 with liquid oxygen, used in Falcon 9, is denser and easier to handle. Hypergolic fuels ignite on contact, making them perfect for spacecraft thrusters like those on the Apollo Lunar Module.

Hybrid propellants combine features of both. They use a solid fuel and a liquid or gas oxidizer, offering some control while keeping things simpler than full liquid engines. These are safer and more flexible but not as powerful as pure liquid or solid systems. Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo uses a hybrid engine.

Each type has its place in rocketry, from small satellites to deep-space exploration. What’s your favorite rocket engine? Let’s discuss in the comments. Follow for more space content, and check the link in bio for free ebooks on the Space Shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants.

Displays are everywhere—phones, TVs, laptops, even smartwatches. But not all screens are the same. Let’s break them down and see what makes each type special.

LCD, or Liquid Crystal Display, is the most common. It uses a backlight to shine through liquid crystals that control colors. It’s affordable and works well, but blacks look more like dark gray because the backlight is always on. LED displays are just an advanced version of LCDs. They still use liquid crystals but replace traditional backlights with LEDs, making them brighter and more power-efficient.

OLED, or Organic Light Emitting Diode, is a big upgrade. Instead of a backlight, each pixel lights up on its own. This means perfect blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors. AMOLED, or Active Matrix OLED, takes this further by adding a special layer that controls each pixel faster, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate screens. POLED is just OLED made on plastic instead of glass, making it thinner and more flexible.

Then we have MicroLED, which works like OLED but uses tiny LEDs for each pixel. It lasts longer, gets super bright, and doesn’t suffer from burn-in like OLEDs. But it’s expensive, so it’s mostly in premium devices. E Ink, used in e-readers, is different—it doesn’t emit light at all. Instead, it rearranges tiny black and white particles to form text and images. It’s great for reading but slow for anything else.

Now, displays aren’t just flat anymore. Foldable screens, like those in flip phones, use flexible OLEDs. Rollable displays can extend and retract like a scroll. Some futuristic ones are stretchable, bending in all directions. These are still improving, but they’re changing how we interact with screens.

Which type do you use daily? Got a favorite? Let’s discuss in the comments.

Follow for more deep dives into tech, and check the link in bio for FREE ebooks on space tech like the Space Shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants.

Science terms often get mixed up, but each has a clear role. A hypothesis is a testable guess, like “Plants grow taller with more sunlight.” If repeated experiments support it, it may contribute to a theory, a well-tested explanation, such as evolution. A law, like gravity, describes a consistent natural pattern but doesn’t explain why it happens. Theories explain, laws describe.

A fact is a repeatedly confirmed observation—water boils at 100°C at sea level. A principle is a broad rule forming the foundation of science, like conservation of energy. A postulate is an assumption used to develop theories, while a conjecture is a statement believed to be true but not yet proven, like the Goldbach Conjecture in math.

In mathematics, proof is absolute, like Pythagoras’ theorem, while verification checks if results match evidence, such as vaccine trials confirming effectiveness. An axiom is a fundamental truth accepted without proof, like “a straight line can be drawn between two points.” A lemma is a smaller result that helps prove a theorem, while a corollary is a direct consequence of a proven statement.

Science grows by testing, questioning, and refining ideas. Which of these terms was new to you? Let’s discuss in the comments!

Follow for daily educational content and check the link in bio for free ebooks on the space shuttle, ISS, Falcon 9, and rocket propellants.

The black box isn’t actually black—it’s bright orange! This flight data recorder (FDR) is built to survive extreme crashes, fire, and deep-sea pressure, holding vital clues about flight incidents.

FDRs have evolved from magnetic tapes to solid-state memory, recording thousands of parameters like altitude, airspeed, and engine performance. They work alongside the cockpit voice recorder to give investigators a complete picture of what happened before a crash.

Housed in impact-resistant stainless steel or titanium, these devices can withstand 3,400 g-force impacts and temperatures up to 1,100°C. Located in the aircraft’s tail, they have a better chance of surviving accidents.

Each black box has an underwater locator beacon (ULB) that emits a ping for up to 30 days, helping recovery teams find it even in deep waters. But what if we didn’t have to recover it at all?

Future advancements aim for real-time data transmission to ground stations, AI-powered analysis for predictive maintenance, and even deployable FDRs that eject on impact, making recovery easier.

Black boxes have revolutionized aviation safety, helping us learn from past accidents to prevent future ones. As technology evolves, we move closer to a system where flight data is always accessible, making air travel even safer.

What are your thoughts on real-time flight data transmission? Let’s discuss!