on censorship and sensitivity
Thereâs a certain attitude that scares the shit out of me â letâs call it destructive sensitivity. Â Itâs the philosophy that, if an idea is uncomfortable, it needs to go away. Â If an image upsets you, or reminds you of a bad experience you had, then not only should you not have to look at it, no one should be allowed to look at it. Â And if you canât eradicate it completely, it should at least be buried so deep that a casual viewer would never stumble upon it. Â This kind of censorship is nothing new, but I feel like itâs becoming more and more common. Â So, why do I think itâs a problem?
An important question we need to ask ourselves first is, what is the purpose of media, and particularly of fiction? Â Why do we read, why do we look at artwork, why do we watch movies? Â To only see happy things? Â As escapism? Â Thatâs certainly a valid interpretation, but itâs not the only one.
For the artist or creator, fiction can be a way to communicate the inner self to the outer world, through the use of symbols. Â Itâs a means of expression. Â What they express might be deep, might be simple, might be beautiful or disgusting, might be for a niche audience or the whole world, but in the end, it is the artist taking pieces of their own experience and creating something new. Â
For the viewer, fiction is a way to understand things that are outside their experience, and a way to expand their experience safely. Â Fiction allows us to go places and do things that we canât or wouldnât in our own lives, without risk, without physical harm, and without causing harm to others. Â Fiction can teach us what we fear, what we love, what weâre missing. Â It can show us how others live, how others see us, how we see ourselves, and weâre free to engage with it as shallowly or as deeply as we want.
But fiction is not equal to reality. Watching Friday the 13th doesnât make you a murderer, and it doesnât kill you. Â Reading Lolita doesnât make you a pedophile. Â Writing a story where a character is raped is not the same as committing rape, and reading that story is not the same as being raped. Â Thought is not crime.
Censorship is a way to force your interpretation of material on others, to reduce or destroy anotherâs experience by prejudging it as harmful to them. Â But part of becoming a well-rounded human being is accepting that not everyone has the same sensibilities, and not every experience needs to be positive. Â
What you find offensive, some might find enjoyable. Â What you find traumatic, some might see as an exercise in empathy, or a means of catharsis. Â Sad songs can be beautiful. Â Horror stories can be fun. Â When you decide to silence the things you donât like, youâre cutting off others from that same experience. Youâre making decisions for others, and youâre essentially saying that your feelings (and the feelings of people who agree with you) are more valid than anyone elseâs. Â I find this darkly ironic, because the audience that holds these particular sensitivities also tends to be the first to champion acceptance and non-traditional viewpoints, while organizing witch hunts for those they feel disrespect them.
So, why is this important to me? Â Why does it scare me? Â Well, as an artist, the complaint of one sensitive viewer can erase my work in an instant. Â When complaints are made, content is removed first and questions are asked later. Â Artists are guilty by default, and viewers are treated as victims. Â No content host wants to be the one to stand up for freedom of expression at the risk of being seen as supporting offensive material. Â Most alarming of all, this is all seen as totally acceptable, or even justified. Â When an artistâs work is taken down, I see comments like, âWell, thatâs the risk you take when you post stuff like that. Â Canât be helped.â Â Even the people who disagree with censorship just shrug their shoulders.
To those who are sensitive, Iâm not trying to say, âjust get over itâ. Â Emotional hurt is real, traumatic experiences are real. Â I would never belittle someone elseâs pain. Â But you have to realize as well that your experience is not the be-all, end-all of the world. Â Not all content is made with you in mind. Â It is inevitable, if we want to exist in a world with other people in it, that weâll be exposed to things we donât enjoy. Â The answer is not to destroy or degrade those things, but to try to understand them â and if that fails, at the very least, we can allow them to exist on equal terms. Â It is that frightening desire to homogenize the world, to eliminate that which we fail to understand or which causes us emotional distress, that can lead as to real prejudice, to real violence and real crime. Â Please understand that allowing content you dislike to exist is not the same as advocating it. Â
What I would love to see is a perspective shift. Â I want to see a world where responsibility is on the viewer, not the creator or the content host. Â If you have a problem with something, itâs up to you to not see it, not for the artist to hide it for you, or add unavoidable warnings that prejudge a work. Â I want a world where, rather than censorship by default, censorship is a conscious choice for those who want it. Â No work is hidden until a user hides it themselves. Â Artists are not punished for merely posting content that some find offensive, only for not tagging it correctly. Â Freedom of expression and variety of content is seen as more important than protecting viewers from fiction, from discomfort, from viewpoints that donât mesh with their own.
Accept others. Â Take responsibility for yourself (and only yourself). Â Understand that not all content is meant for you. Â Understand that fiction is not crime, and fiction does not equate to real-world harm. Â Thatâs all Iâm asking.
(please donât let this become a shitstorm⌠TT _ TT)