Legend of Korra and ATLA Blog
Safe space for queer people.

â
sheepfilms
almost home
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
ojovivo
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
we're not kids anymore.
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Janaina Medeiros
dirt enthusiast
art blog(derogatory)

JVL

Keni
Not today Justin
Show & Tell
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
wallacepolsom

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Austria

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
@linnorabeifong
Legend of Korra and ATLA Blog
Safe space for queer people.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
âAuthors should not be ALLOWED to write aboutââ you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative
âThis book should be taken off of shelves for featuringââ you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative
âSchools shouldnât teach this book in class becauseââ you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative
âNobody actually likes or wants to read classics because theyâreââ you are an anti-intellectual and an idiot
âI only read YA fantasy books because every classic novel or work of literary fiction is problematic and featuresââ you are an anti-intellectual and you are robbing yourself of the full richness of the human experience.
"you are functionally a conservative" is such a good and clarifying insult
Literally right after I saw this post, I saw another post in a discord chat for BOOK EDITORS in which an outspokenly liberal editor talked about how Nabokov should have never been published because he wrote about p*dophiles and described women's bodies in ways that made her uncomfortable. She described his writing as "objectively terrible" and said she wanted to burn his books. And other editors were bringing up classics they didn't like and talking about how they wanted to throw them in the trash. This wasn't like a light "unpopular opinion!" conversation. This was actual book editors talking about how books should be destroyed and censored.
There is something so scary and toxic in global culture right now. The revival of fascism is influencing everyone's mindset and approach to art, regardless of where they fall on the political spectrum.
I see far more books being censored today than when I was a kid. Librarians handed me The Catcher in the Rye, The Sexual Politics of Meat, and Animal Farm when I was literally 8-11. My mom would never have taken a book away from me. I read everything from the Tao Te Ching to the Qur'an to atheist texts under my desk at school. Teachers thought nothing of it or encouraged it. Books seemed universally acknowledged as sacrosanct to me.
Now I can't find any adults who don't hesitate or want to make exceptions when it comes to censorship. Even the most liberal social activist librarians I know go, "well except for book X..."
Functionally conservative. It's so important to have the language to express that.
Thank you for this addition!
I did a report on book banning once.
Actually, I did reports on book banning three separate times with three separate teachers, with three separate sets of parameters so I was able to write about the same topic in different ways, but this is specifically about the report I did in university. The actual specs for the report included that we were supposed to complete some kind of study or poll (this was not a science class). I put the questions out on a couple of forums I belonged to at the time and asked a few IRL friends as well. A lot of the questions were standard for this sort of thing, I think - were you ever assigned to read a banned book, did you ever read banned books on your own, did you read/were you assigned them BECAUSE they were banned or did you find out about them being banned later, what's your opinion on banning books, etc.
But there was one question I asked that ended up reshaping the entire thrust of my presentation: "Are there any books that you think SHOULD be banned, and if so, why?"
Here's the thing. Most of the forums I was posting on were fan spaces for a book series that, at the time, was one of the most banned/challenged books out there. It's a fandom that I have since entirely distanced myself from, that I one hundred percent do not recommend to anyone, that I will actively attempt to dissuade people from reading or talking about, and that I would like to not be popular anymore. I'm sure most of you reading this can guess which one I'm talking about (I won't name it or go into specifics because I don't want to trip any filters unnecessarily). But it was KNOWN that these books were banned in a lot of places. A lot of people wore the "I read banned books" badge with pride. I fully expected that the answer to that question would be a resounding "no" from the forums, and that I'd maybe get a few affirmative answers from one of the other spaces.
I was shocked. Not only did a lot of people come back with either "not exactly but I think we should keep [author] or [book] out of the hands of children" or "yes, [book]/anything by [author] should be banned because XYZPDQ", but not a single person who responded gave me the same answer. The only one I remember - keep in mind it's been almost twenty years - was that one person specifically said The Bone Collector, and for the "why do you think it should be banned" question, they only said, "No. I'm not explaining it. It's too horrible to even think about. Just believe me when I say nobody should ever be allowed to read this book."
I highlighted that last comment in my presentation, along with several other of my "favorite" official reasons for banning books - the Alabama school board that banned The Diary of Anne Frank in 1984 because it was "a real downer", the district that removed A Raisin in the Sun because it was "pornographic", the library that took Charlie and the Chocolate Factory out of circulation because it "might be hurtful to children without parents", and things of that nature - and pointed out that all of these were the same thing. This was somebody saying "I don't like this, therefore nobody should read it, and I shouldn't have to explain why." I also pointed out that if you can't give a good reason, the whole thing falls apart, and then I quoted "Smut" by Tom Lehrer:
All books can be indecent books, Though recent books are bolder, For filth, I'm glad to say, Is in the mind of the beholder. When correctly viewed, Everything is lewd. I can tell you things about Peter Pan And the Wizard of Oz - THERE'S a dirty old man...
Go back to that paragraph I mentioned earlier, about those books that I no longer recommend to anyone. Notice how I phrased that. I don't recommend them. I will tell you all the reasons why I don't think you should buy them. I will tell you all the problems with the author, with the franchise, with the writing. I wish they were out of print, I wish they were deeply unpopular, I wish nobody would ever read them again.
But I still won't advocate for banning them.
It's so easy to twist a justification. Look at what I quoted up there! A Raisin in the Sun was banned for being "pornographic". One of the websites I used as a source responded to that accusation with "Did they read the same play I did?" At the time, I thought the comment was funny. Now, twenty years later, I realize: It was a buzzword. It was a convenient label. At the time of the challenge, just saying "it's pornographic" was enough. Obviously you're not some kind of sicko who wants to hear about all the pornographic details, are you? Freak! That's pornography! And they're teaching it in schools! We should get rid of it!
A Raisin in the Sun, for anyone who didn't study it at any point or read it (or watch the movie, which was very good), is a play/movie about a black family in Chicago in the 1960s. The family matriarch has been in domestic service for years, but she's just received a very large insurance payment from her husband's death and is retiring. Wanting to give her family, especially her young grandson, a better life, she goes out and buys a house...in an otherwise exclusively white neighborhood. The head of the homeowner's association (essentially) comes to visit them and offers to pay them a substantial amount of money to not move into the neighborhood, because segregation isn't officially a thing and they can't legally stop them from moving in, but they don't want them there. There's a lot more that goes on in the play, and I highly recommend you go and read it, but the point is that there is nothing sexual or titillating in the entire thing. The closest we get is a scene where the daughter (Beneatha, a college student) is gifted a traditional African dress from her boyfriend, who's Nigerian, and he shows her how to put it on over the clothes she's already wearing, and maybe the scene where the daughter-in-law (Ruth, a laundress) accidentally reveals that, having found out she's pregnant, she's planning to have an abortion rather than bring another child into the world/have another mouth to feed.
It's not pornographic. But someone didn't want it taught in schools, so they called it that to get it banned.
It's so easy to twist labels. If you, a liberal, agree that books with X trait are okay to ban, the people who don't want books to exist will find a way to say they have X trait, and then what are you going to do, admit that you like that sort of thing? Sicko! Freak! Pervert!
You don't have to like the book, or the author, or the topic. But if you're advocating for banning them entirely, you're functionally a conservative.
having being anti death penalty as one of my core beliefs is fun because it really makes me realize how even progressive people want soooooo badly for there to be a category of people they can kill. I'm sorry but "group of people okay to kill" does not exist.
does every activity a disabled person does have to be therapy? A perpetual schooling and treatment in pursuit of seemingly nothing- a pursuit of normalcy, I suppose, that we've long since realized is impossible, so why are we still here???
people liked these tags so I'm adding them to the post
i had a dream last night that the entire world used a currency (?) called angrypennies which as the name implies are obtained by experiencing anger. the stronger and more intense your anger was, the more angrypennies you'd gain. an all-consuming rage would earn you more than a slight irritation, etc. so people were always searching for ways to fuel their anger and purposefully keeping themselves angry all the time because they wanted to earn angrypennies. unclear if angrypennies could be exchanged for goods and services, or if they were just a collectible.
anyway, as if this wasn't heavy-handed enough, at one point british comedian greg davies appeared and explained that angrypennies couldn't be worth feeling angry all the time. this was a real revelation to dream-me and i was finally able to break free of the angrypenny grind and allow myself to experience emotions other than anger.
it goes without saying that i will be using the word angrypenny as if it was part of the common vernacular instead of a term that my dreaming brain conjured up i.e. "he's all about the angrypennies" (derogatory way to refer to a guy who searches for reasons to be angry and possibly lacks introspection)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
everyone's career advice is like "you should do what you love" and "there's no better feeling in the world than fulfilling employment" until you start digging graves for yourself instead of your boss and then suddenly you're doing it wrong and need to stop whistling merrily and wipe that smile off your face
this isn't a hypothetical btw a bird hit my mom's window and died and she refused to let me bury it because i was "too enthusiastic"
Saw this license plate today and I'm still ugly laughing about it
"you can jack off you can eat grapes all else banned" is kind of the post of the summer because literally wtf else are you supposed to do once itâs 30°C outside
D-2 | "Trust" for @yangvikweek
Yangchen really lost half her soul and didn't even get the time to properly mourn him...

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Yangvik Week 2026
Day 2 - Healing an injury
(Reference - Ashes to Crown)
@yangvikweek
saw this ref by @/narugrm on google images and i immediately thought of themâŚ..
@yangvikweek may i humbly present an old art i didâŚ
Jealous kavik
@yangvikweek
Also I sat down and wrote 3.5k words in one sitting so new yangvik fic coming your wayyyyy
The Green-eyed Monster
Written for Yangvik Week 2026. Prompt: Jealousy
Word Count: 3,911
Summary: As Yangchen and Kavik's relationship grows closer, her lemur Pak is struggling to adjust with sharing his Airbending master with another person -- especially with one who once threw him out of a window. Will he be able to show this upstart Waterbender who Yangchen's real best friend is?
CW: implied/referenced sex, emetophobia warning
Read on Ao3
----
There is some kind of conspiracy going on here; Pak is sure of it. Yangchen has kicked them out of her sleeping-room again.Â
Pak scratches at the wood of the closed door, but to no avail. It remains closed, an impenetrable barrier between him and his master.Â
Itâs the fault of that boy again. Every time Yangchen removes her lemurs and locks them out, that waterbender boy gets to stay inside with her.Â
Pak just doesnât understand it. What does the boy have that he and Pik donât? He canât fly, he isnât very good at bringing back bugs, and that single measly patch of fur on the top of his head certainly canât be more comfortable to pet. It makes no sense.
And yet, here they are. This has been happening more and more frequently, to the point that itâs nearly a daily occurrence. Something is going on, and Pak is positive it has to do with that boy.Â
Clearly, heâs trying to steal their master away. That just wonât do. Whatever secret power he has that makes Yangchen prefer him over them⌠Pak is determined to get to the bottom of it.
⌠As soon as the door opens, of course.Â
~~~~

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
YANGVIK WEEK DAY 1 - DANCE
They're doing a traditional Tibetan Dance called Gorshey/Gorshie.
"Gorshey is a social dance deeply embedded in Tibetan culture, performed at various celebrations, such as festivals, weddings, and religious gatherings. It fosters community spirit, joy, and shared experience, transcending individual differences and uniting participants in a common rhythm, a lively dance, a romp. "
Houseal, J. (2024, March 11). Writing Dance in Stone, Part 2: The case of the Tibetan Gorshey - BuddhistDoor Global. Buddhistdoor Global. https://www.buddhistdoor.net/features/writing-dance-on-stone-part-2-the-tibetan-gorshey-folk-dance/
@yangvikweek
Prompt: What are you doing here?
Ship: Linzolt
Random Cats of Kindness
Thank you, @wingchunwaterbender for this suggestion! I was able to work on it some while waiting for various things to happen, and despite my excruciatingly aggravating networking issues.
I hope this works well for you!
Zolt debated whether to eat the last two dumplings in his bag or carry them all they way home to sit in his icebox. Where theyâd probably go bad and need throwing out before Yu Jin got hungry some afternoon.
Since it was such a nice day, he decided to divert through the park and walk past the hydrangeas that had burst into full bloom over the past couple of days.
Spring had been pleasant for once. There had been two straight years with no major catastrophe. The rebuilding after Kuviraâs devastation was nearly complete.