Ex-Muslim Lesbian

You are being rude. Yes, even if you are neurodivergent. You can be both autistic and rude.

this is the core of why some women defend beauty standards - if they’re deconstructed even a little they have to face how much money/time they’ve sunk into them. it also exposes how untrue “i did it for myself” really is - if that was true, you wouldn’t be upset that other bodies are being uplifted

OK bisexual (czech)

I hate them more every single day. how does someone even think this way???? and 2. this poor woman oh my god. how does it get to the point where you make yourself so useless your poor wife feels like she has to bribe you this way? this is so beyond disgusting for so many reasons it’s insane. AND TO CALL HER A NARCISSIST?

To whomever the poor woman is who felt obligated to pen this travesty may the goddesses give her the strength to leave this human shit stain right where she fucking found him.

What if I said that neither of these things are normal, and both benefit the patriarchy only?

And yeah, I can ignore all the times it's trying to get me to cut out any semblance of my own voice, or shove things into the wrong tense, or make the most random suggestions on comma usage. But if it's getting all that WRONG, what is it just straight up missing that I SHOULD be correcting? What real spelling and grammar errors are still lurking in there?

Industry standards are industry standards FOR A REASON. Having everyone on the same workflow can be crucial to getting things done effectively and correctly without creating a lot of extra work. And those things are not going to change overnight, as much as we might want them to.

Yeah, Word, let me just leave this whole chunk of dialogue without the closing quotation marks. That's the thing to do. How dare I have two punctuation marks in a row. It's not like that's how closing quotation marks fucking work.

I am going to light something on fire.

When you hear something about men being predatory, you should always think about how that affects Black men or you will inevitably say something racist.

a black woman, along with any race of woman, has every right to say, “i hate all men” because men are dangerous. you should not seek to control the speech of women when they discuss misogyny, as women are a marginalized group based on sex and subject to sex-specific violence, a universal force that keeps women at the global level under the control of men. when men stop targeting women for sex-based violence, then we can speak on the issue of whether or not saying “all men are ___” leads to racialized thinking. until then, telling women to not disparage men is simply another manifestation of silencing victims and survivors. the fact that you felt this was at all appropriate to write is the perfect demonstration of how misogyny warps thinking to minimize harm to women as mere collateral damage in the rhetoric of political activism.

You people think that everyone lives around white people and that the home is a space place for women and girls

how can you see homosexuals being punished by death or genital mutilation and think it’s somehow a progressive policy due to it being “affirming”

“well technically they’re not being forced to”