Pyrrhic Malin

Am I meant to believe this person originally writes, arranges, records, edits, mixes and masters this many songs, sometimes with several released in the same day, with the exact same thumbnail style and descriptions that read like this…

It’s chat-GPT speak. The “it’s not X, it’s X,” the exact same style, the talk of “diving” or “capturing” being awfully reminiscent of prompting a summary of a song. If you know how AI writes summaries, you can spot this pretty easily. Seriously, what person talks like this?

And a dead giveaway of this description being AI is the overusage of emojis. ChatGPT does this all the time.

My main problem with this isn’t even the slop, it’s that it’s not being labelled as being made by AI. This person is tricking people (somehow) into thinking these are actual, original songs, when they clearly are not. Also, what fucking theories and news and character analysis? They only post songs LMAO.

This video explains how to spot AI music better (relevant points start 3:00 minutes in. Point #4 is also probably irrelevant. I do not think this person is botting numbers though I wouldn’t be surprised tbh. Though after taking a peak at the comments, some of them are way too similar to each other or weirdly worded. What I can tell surely is that criticism is deleted/accusations. If it’s not AI, why not come out and say that?)

It’s really disappointing to see someone taking advantage of their listeners trust to deceive them. I have seen one video callout on this person, but it was either deleted or taken down, but other than that, this person’s music gets views that could’ve been better spent on honest actors. And yes, plausible deniability will always exist, on the off-chance this person just so happens to act exactly like an AI ‘artist’ who is lying about it would. In the same way finding someone at a crime scene holding a knife doesn’t mean they killed someone. Oh, and the knife has a weird red stain on it. Could be ketchup. Even if it smells weird. Who knows?

Disliking chatGPT is LITERALLY JUST LIKE THAT SCENE WHERE THE SENTIENT ROBOT IS GETTING BEAT UP.

You know, if we ignore how the androids in the game are heavily implied to experience some form of sentience and how chatGPT, uh, doesn’t.

UNLESS…

In all seriousness, this was coming from a video about a life sim competitor to the sims, with such great arguments like “but the sims already uses AI” (ignoring the difference between code written by a programmer and data-trained LLM’s or GAN’s). Granted I’ve heard EA is planning on implementing GenAI, and tbh they’ve already probably done it and haven’t said, but that’s not the point.

Now, I understand the argument that people can be reactionary. I have my own qualms with certain arguments myself. But these things are not equivalent. Is your bond with Claude so strong that you’re starting to believe he’s the exact same thing as an Android from the game? Not that Detroit’s writing is amazing in the first place, but the idea that these are equivalent is asinine.

Now, maybe there’s an argument to be said that if in some magical fairytale sci-fi universe there was sentient AI (something we don’t even know is possible) this could become an issue, because yes, I have seen comments about how the protestors were right from the game because of the discourse in recent years. However, I don’t take these to be serious comments especially since I frankly don’t believe we’ll reach sentient AI. I barely believe we’ll make it the next fifteen years. Like, even if AI was sentient, how would we know? It’s the hard problem of consciousness. But whatever. Point is that this comment is funny asf.

More comments from the ai bros of Neverland

BOO!!! And this was after already making changes today.

-

Change the title of prologue. It’s not a prologue. (Fair point. The whole bit was that it’s an epilogue.)

‘you’re not going to write one.’ (Not sure what this refers to. I know the line but not what I was telling myself here. Keep in mind I didn’t write this with sharing it in mind. I hardly did it with myself in mind sometimes, and I’d look at my own notes and be confused.)

In fact, maybe move it to the end? Probably not. (I didn’t end up moving it in the end. I felt it added more of a WTF factor, because the reader wants to know who these people are and what’s going on with them.)

Too. Many. Severals. (I think this is probably a word over-usage thing?)

Page 9: Ring should be region. (Because my book takes place in a loose parody of an inferno-like world, a concept that has been done a million times and I probably could’ve been more unique about, I wanted to give it a little bit of a unique and grounded edge.)

“She went through. The room engulfed” might flow better (don’t know what the original line was. I’m assuming ‘she went through, the room engulfing.’

“It’s tradition, though,” (I guess I forgot the commas.)

“Sophomore, either,” (same here)

Replace soul with life. Has more of an umph to it. (Self-explanatory. Plus from a meta perspective I don’t believe in souls so there’s probably some metaphysical explanation in-universe for the afterlife. Did I write it? No. That would’ve been boring for this project. But still.)

Page 16: “what? What is this?” (Don’t know the context.)

Page 23: About four times should be changed to eight times (This is because I’m very particular about the way I use specific numbers in my work symbolically. I might’ve gone overboard with it at some parts in retrospect, though.)

Page 24: change “fuck this” to “enough of this?” (I guess I found it too swear-y, which is funny, because some neutral feedback I’ve received on this work thus far is that there’s a lot of swearing. My bad. I’m naturally a swear-y person and both protagonists aren’t exactly polite company but I guess a character I thought this was OOC for said this.)

Page 24: change ten to five (This is because I’m very particular about the way I use specific numbers in my work symbolically.)

You know I’m suddenly 50/50 on giving her an accent. Probably not. (There was a character I considered giving an accent but decided against; the MMC’s best friend.h

Page 29: Change it to them having access to portals, not teleporting freely. (I’m assuming this was to resolve a logic error, like if they could teleport freely why wouldn’t they just teleport everywhere)

Page 33: Change the fire sword metaphor (I don’t remember this, but it was probably a bad one.)

Page 35: Remove ‘anyway’ (Filler word, I’m assuming.)

Page 36: lower case (I deliberately lowercased the ‘names’ of two locations in this work because they’re not names, they’re directions.)

Page 36: Yep, change last one to level 9 (I guess I figured the FMC was progressing too fast)

Page 41: Trying to solve level 15, 16 and 17. Also, three weeks to two. (See above. Also, two weeks may have been a number symbol thing but I’m unsure. Probably.)

43: Five chances. (Number symbol)

Page 45: Two months (Adds credence to what I said two points ago.)

Page 57: “I’d say watching a human try and fail at beating me is moderately fun to watch.” (I think I changed it to moderately to fit the character better and used a more extreme word.)

Page 108: Dagger. Also, search for book for knife and replace with dagger. (Yeah, no memory on why I changed a character owning a knife to a dagger. Actually might’ve been symbolic)

Page 121: add a line showing MMC’s discomfort (btw, obviously I’m using the actual character names in my notes I’m just doing it for context sake here. I think this was probably some unwanted comment and as this character is aroace I wanted to make it clearer?)

Page 136: Would he swear? Also add detail about how there had been white roses prior. (White roses were symbolism for something and background storytelling for something that comes later. It’s a detail I think most people would miss but I felt it was an interesting Easter egg anyway. And no, this character wouldn’t have so openly so I changed it.)

Page 145: Five second intervals. Also reframe his knowledge of the trials to make it clear MMC’s father was lying. (I don’t remember the context, sorry. I’m six or seven months separated from this work.)

Page 158: Really? ‘Knocked heavily on the door?’ (yeah, that was poor prose.)

Page 166: Realistially, she would figure out pretty quickly what the code was. (There’s a code that’s pretty obvious, so I think I changed the wording.)

Page 176: That teleportation line is silly (Don’t remember)

Page 189: not what a truism is (I misused a word)

Page 287: “Just adding being getting.” Speech 100 lel. (LOL)

Change showering line (related to a trauma, I think? Don’t remember.)

Change changeling to who are you (For some reason, I used comparing people to changelings like three times in this book so I changed it.)

-

No seriously let’s say witchcraft is real. There have probably been hundreds of thousands of people to have practiced it in all of history. If that were the case, surely some butterfly effect bullshit would happen and stir up some shit when Sally Downtown is using carnelian to help with inspiration for her risotto while Sam Uptown is summoning a demon while John Averageguy is taking a shower and somehow, all of these events come together to cause an Earthquake in the middle of Singapore or a fire in Italy or a flood in Monaco.

1. <VERRRRRY GOOOOD!>

2. THEREFORE, MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE, HE WANTED A LOT OF MONEY RIGHT NOW…!

3. "......People are born with sin... and live life to obtain forgiveness from someone. Or perhaps they are born with riddles... and live life searching for someone to solve them. Here, all of her riddles had been solved, ......with no lingering regrets. People are riddles. They want someone else to solve their riddle. They live life wanting someone to solve the riddle that they are, the most difficult riddle in the world. They want someone to look at the riddle they are. And they want that person to solve it. For her, that wish had been granted.”

But y’know that last one’s more of a footnote.