I read an article yesterday in which Mac Walters, a writer behind a popular video game franchise, discussed fans' reactions (expected & unexpected) to the characters he worked to bring to life. There were some the audience embraced wholeheartedly, but others who were largely ignored, or even caused outrage. The writer can't control how their creation will be received, regardless of how much effort & heart they put into it...but according to Walters, that's okay.
It made me think about how much fear there is within the fanfiction community when it comes to writing something that is deemed controversial. Some authors have been driven away from their communities entirely due to backlash over their work, but so often the reasons for the outrage that we see boils down to the fact that someone didn't like it, and therefore it was unacceptable.
"I don't like that" is not a reason to berate, abuse, or target a creator. Not at all. Never.
Too often, subjective criticism is confused with objective critique.
Thus, we have the saying, "Don't like, don't read." In this interview, Walters says the exact same thing, but in a way that I think empowers both authors and their readers...
...you want to write a character so someone will hopefully gravitate towards [them]. But if you try to write a character that everyone gravitates towards, you're going to fail. I mean, it's not that you're gonna fail, but how substantial is that character going to be? How meaningful can a character be if they appeal to everyone?
There needs to be something there that you have to work with, that challenges you. And if it challenges you so much that you're like, No, I don't want to deal with that, that's fine. That's your choice. It emphasizes choice, I think.
â Mac Walters, writer & director Mass Effect trilogy ("Mass Effect writer reflects on trilogy's grand ambition" via Polygon)
In terms of fanfiction writing (or any form of creative work, really), this can apply not just to characters, but to themes, tropes, scenes, or whole plots that present something which offers readers that "challenge." No one will ever write a story that every person who ever reads it will love. There will always be those who dislike it, are made uncomfortable, get bored, or don't wish to engage with what the story asks of them. That's based on personal preference, however, and it's up to the reader to make the choice to continue on despite their aversion or walk away.
Often, writers include a difficult element intentionally in order to present that challenge, both to the characters and their readers. It's meant to make people pause to think and reflect. Stories which truly intend to cause harm or promote something harmful are very, very rare (and in those cases, there are proper channels to bring them to the attention of the sites they're posted on, thankfully). That aside, however, we all ultimately own the responsibility to curate our own experience.
There is an audience for every work, and a work for every audience. With the wealth of creativity posted every day, there's never a scarcity of content to enjoy.
So, don't like, then don't read...and that's okay.