During this lecture, we were now exploring what had come after the utopian idealism of modernism.
We first looked at symbols of the end of modernism, acting as metaphors to its failures. One design which had shown this, was the modernist buildings designed by Minoru Yamasaki in 1956, and demolished in 1972. Its extinction was ultimately due to its failures in responding to the social needs of the families who lived within them. This showing a lack of keeping up with a rapidly evolving society.
Another metaphor of the modernist ideals falling, includes the Twin Towers which was also designed by Yamasaki. Something that I found quite interesting was what Karen said about the skyscrapers, literally reaching for the future with its height. As a symbol of capitalism, it was a target of terrorist attacks. Again, this was an indicator of the end of the modernist ideals.
Andy ultimately explained that, while modernism committed to the idea of working hard to achieve capitalism promises and leisure time, post modernism embodied skepticism towards those ideals. Therefore, post modernism was chaotic and unstructured.
In abandoning the modernist ideals, there came the Punk Movement. The Punk movement was counter-cultural, disturbing and disrupting the happy complacency of the wider society. Ultimately, it was characterised by its anti-establishment views and its promotion of individual freedom.
The example of the Sex Pistols poster from the Europunk Visual Punk Culture, directly attacks the idea of established order. With a portrait of the queen, collaged over with type over her eyes and mouth, she is ultimately muted.
A similar destructive and rebellious behavior is demonstrated in the album cover for Sex Pistols by Jamie Reid. Showing the lack of respect in harmony with no grid, and no balance in type. This being a total disregard, of the Bauhaus and modernist design.
Ultimately, many of the works within the Punk Movement, immediately disregarded modernist ideals. Reacting to the culture of society, they gave identities to people in smaller communities where many faced unemployment. Moving on, a similar movement which also opted out on Bauhaus ideology, involved the Memphis Group.
The Memphis Group had intense disregard of the aesthetic and minimalist aspects of design, and would rather collage physical things together. They were playful and bizarre, experimental with pattern, material and form. Unlike modernism, where material was highly involved, the Memphis collection made it difficult to tell what materials as an emphasis was put on surface and pattern with lamination.Â
Overall, it was fascinating to understand what happened during the post modernism era. Where it was found to be adventurous and unstructured. I personally love the playfulness and the ways these movements broke out of the simplistic and minimalist ideals.Â