Alright, Cassi! Since you wanna avoid accountability so bad, let’s see what we can do!
So let’s debunk everything disgusting you’ve just said in this image provided by the victim themself, Q.
1. “You blocked and left first.”
Okay. Even if that’s true, that doesn’t magically erase the original issue people were upset about. Someone distancing themselves from you does not retroactively make your earlier actions acceptable, and it never will.
2. “I reflected and moved forward.”
Reflection is good, sure, but it is not the same thing as apologizing to the people affected. Those are two separate things. That’s a pretty basic concept, Cassi.
3. “You never communicated when there were chances.”
This one feels…strange. Why are you saying this but then also arguing that you respected the distance and moved on? Which is it? Was the expectation that people should leave her alone, or that they should have continued pursuing the conversation? Like I have said, your views do not co-exist.
4. “I was willing if you wanted an apology.”
This is probably the biggest issue in the entire message. Since when do apologies have to be asked for? If someone believes they genuinely hurt people, the apology usually comes because they recognize that harm occurred, not because someone asked for it. That’s just… not how it works. “You never asked for one” isn’t really a defense in this. Your points just keep getting weaker, Cassi.
“Pressured that I was always supposed to know.”
This part depends heavily on context, but generally speaking, people aren’t mind readers, that’s true. At the same time, if multiple people are criticizing the exact same behavior, plus Dante being called out on it, that usually indicates there was enough information available to realize something was wrong. I don’t know why you’re saying that you were pressured when you were 16 at the time, you are fully capable of knowing that exposing NSFW to a minor is wrong. Stop victimizing yourself.
“You’re obsessed, petty, bitching, making callouts…”
Whether someone is angry, petty, obsessed, or annoying has absolutely nothing to do with whether the original criticism was correct.
Even an angry person can be right.
For more info on the so called “raid”, check out @/cottonbuns post. It was done purely to show people evidence of another person’s behavior. A “raid” is an exaggeration of what ACTUALLY happened. As for the spam, the purpose was to prevent the messages containing evidence from being immediately deleted before people had a chance to see them.
theartofmadeline
ellievsbear
dailybridgerton
tangentwithtanner
jacobvanloon
areudirty
