Alright, Cassi! Since you wanna avoid accountability so bad, letโs see what we can do!
So letโs debunk everything disgusting youโve just said in this image provided by the victim themself, Q.
1. โYou blocked and left first.โ
Okay. Even if thatโs true, that doesnโt magically erase the original issue people were upset about. Someone distancing themselves from you does not retroactively make your earlier actions acceptable, and it never will.
2. โI reflected and moved forward.โ
Reflection is good, sure, but it is not the same thing as apologizing to the people affected. Those are two separate things. Thatโs a pretty basic concept, Cassi.
3. โYou never communicated when there were chances.โ
This one feelsโฆstrange. Why are you saying this but then also arguing that you respected the distance and moved on? Which is it? Was the expectation that people should leave her alone, or that they should have continued pursuing the conversation? Like I have said, your views do not co-exist.
4. โI was willing if you wanted an apology.โ
This is probably the biggest issue in the entire message. Since when do apologies have to be asked for? If someone believes they genuinely hurt people, the apology usually comes because they recognize that harm occurred, not because someone asked for it. Thatโs justโฆ not how it works. โYou never asked for oneโ isnโt really a defense in this. Your points just keep getting weaker, Cassi.
โPressured that I was always supposed to know.โ
This part depends heavily on context, but generally speaking, people arenโt mind readers, thatโs true. At the same time, if multiple people are criticizing the exact same behavior, plus Dante being called out on it, that usually indicates there was enough information available to realize something was wrong. I donโt know why youโre saying that you were pressured when you were 16 at the time, you are fully capable of knowing that exposing NSFW to a minor is wrong. Stop victimizing yourself.
โYouโre obsessed, petty, bitching, making calloutsโฆโ
Whether someone is angry, petty, obsessed, or annoying has absolutely nothing to do with whether the original criticism was correct.
Even an angry person can be right.
For more info on the so called โraidโ, check out @/cottonbuns post. It was done purely to show people evidence of another personโs behavior. A โraidโ is an exaggeration of what ACTUALLY happened. As for the spam, the purpose was to prevent the messages containing evidence from being immediately deleted before people had a chance to see them.
