i followed a sewing pattern that didn't have any irl finished pics of it, and the whole time i was like 'yknow this doesn't seem like it'll work very well, but i'm the novice so i guess i should follow the pattern' and well.
this is fucked
What are you talking about it's perfect
I KNOW THIS PATTERN, I KNOW THIS EXACT PATTERN!
SO IT’S NOT JUST ME, THE PATTERN IS JUST FUCKED! THANK YOU!
I suspect? the problem is the fabrics that the examples above use--polyester fleece and polyester felt, neither of which are the most stable fabrics, so will stretch in ways the pattern doesn't account for
The pattern is noted in the replies as coming from here
Free vintage patterns including sewing, embroidery, cross stitch, knitting and crochet; 1930s reproduction quilt fabric, quilting and crafti
and it's intended to look like this
Those illustrations--and the 1940s/50s time frame of when the pattern was published--say to me that these were meant to be made from woven cotton calico
My own pertinent experience is in the other direction:
I used this pattern
to make this plush, using fake fur--which is on a knit base--as the pattern directs
Then I made it again using a woven fabric
and that's when I realized that the original pattern depended on the stretch of the knit to help round out the shape
So! While the vintage kitten pattern probably still won't look quite like the illustration when made from calico, it might look less like a creeper. Maybe.
no blame because the linked pattern source doesn't say what kind of fabric to use, and most people aren't going to think about how so many fabrics available today were not available/didn't exist 70 years ago
...or.......it just is, indeed, a bad pattern
I'm kind of wondering if whatever was readily available as filling back then might behave differently from modern polyfil, too, maybe? Because I can't imagine putting enough polyfil inside these to make them that round while also allowing them to fold the way the illustrations show
OK, this will be my last addition to this post
First, lots of people are saying that sawdust would have been the most likely filling, and they're probably right. Loosely packed sawdust, though, but the idea of packing one of these with enough sawdust to make a pincushion is oddly tempting...
I don't think the shape shown in the illustrations can be achieved from this pattern, though. There need to be more seams and or darts for this to be round where it's supposed to be round.
However, I did try a few easy little changes to try to make it stop being quite so much...that
here it is compared to the first one I made
I'll put what I did under a cut, because I have already managed to make this a very long post
I'm so glad you did this, it was driving me insane. The person who did the illustrations obviously made up the whole thing haha. I feel kinda bad for all the people who bought this on Etsy expecting cute lil beanbags and got ... those. 🦒
Able to resist the temptation to edit the pattern myself now that you did it, but not resisting the temptation to study other vintage patterns and how they shaped heads. I do like the big ol forehead gusset style.
Edit: To be clear I'm sure it was that illustrator's job 70yrs ago to romanticize the plain reality and give people a creative push to buy the thing but this is well into bait n switch territory lol
















