This Is Barely A Studyblr

The ONE statement that Amber won was when Depps former lawyer said she and her friends messed the apartment up to make it look like Johnny went on a rampage. That was found to be a lie. The rest of the claims, thst Amber was lying and the Johnny did not abuse her, we’re found to be truthful.

The other case in the UK was against the Sun. They did not find depp or heard guilty of abuse. They just found that the sun did not defame Johnny. The judge was not finding if Johnny abused Amber or if Amber abused Johnny. It was just about if the sun was purposefully lying about depp. That’s it.

This case does not set a precedent. That precedent already existed. You cannot make false statements with intention of malice, whether you name the person or not, and especially if it’s been implied and later confirmed by yourself that it’s written abt a certain person. That’s defamation.