The Golden and Silver Pavilions: Monuments to Power
The Golden Pavilion (Kinkaku-ji) and the Silver Pavilion (Ginkaku-ji) are two large Zen Buddhist temples in Kyoto, with lush gardens surrounding the temples.
Picture of the Golden Pavilion
Picture of the Silver Pavilion
The Golden Pavilion was built by Ashikaga Yoshimitsu and is an emblem of âKitayama cultureâ (119). It is three stories high and covered in gold leaf, with both shinden and shoin architectural styles. The Silver Pavilion was built by Yoshimitsuâs grandson, Ashikaga Yoshimasa, and resembles the Golden Pavilion, except that it lacks silver. Â Although it was supposed to have silver-foil on the exterior, it was never added/completed because resources were going to war. The unfinished look of the Silver Pavilion is an example of Wabi-sabi, which is a Japanese aesthetic centered on the acceptance of imperfection. In a way, it also pays respects to Yoshimasa since the structure remained incomplete when he died.
Both these structures are betsugyĹs, which are side businesses. They were used by capital elites who âretired from formal imperial posts to exercise greater power from behind the scenesâ (99), and represent the exploitation of the hierarchy in order to accumulate private wealth and power. Structures like the Golden and Silver Pavilions were built to âmaintain a high level of political engagementâ (97) and were âdesigned to facilitate substantial political and economic engagementâ (98) after retirement. In particular, control was held over marriage politics and management of land wealth.
The most successful Kyoto elite, including imperial princes, civil aristocrats, and warrior leaders had residences inside and outside the capital, for different purposes. The residences within the capital were emblems of their public profiles, but their residences outside the capital were âmonuments to their extra-public lives, private influence, and spiritual inclinationsâ (96). Â Oftentimes, the people who built and owned these structures would garner more power after retirement than they had while working.
The structures serve to remind us of the magnitude of power and influence aristocrats had, and also show that power was manipulated through large institutions, and temples. Although the grandness of Kyoto declined as power became privatized, these structure show that privatization might have been caused by the people within government, who built these large temples and residences to accumulate power outside of their government posts. These structures facilitated the shift of power to outside the capital, and initiated the fall of the strong mononuclear capital of Kyoto.
SindhuÂ
Stavros, Matthew. Kyoto: An Urban History of Japanâs Pre-Modern Capital. Honolulu: Univeristy of Hawaiâi Press, 2014. Print.
You made a good point highlighting how privatization actually occurred because of the government elites moving out and shifting powers away from the centralized Imperial influence, and how some religious temples arose indirectly due to the state. The quotes you chose also did a good job pointing out just how much power those elites gained (and lost in other respects) just because they built a residence outside of Daidairi. -Carolyn L.















