I am working from my own memory and not all my figures may be accurate; but this, roughly, was my own early experience:
I was the only one from my ‘elementary’ school class who went, in 1930, to the local 1902-Act grammar school. I have been told that I failed to pass the qualifying examination (I remember a cold march day, a walk to a large strange school, and some strange and complicated Maths. papers). I was given a grammar school places, the story goes, because my Headmaster asked the local education office to look again at my English essay.
I remember others in that ‘elementary’ school class who were bright. But other forces - poo food, unhelpful homes, poor teaching - were presumably too much for them. Those who went on from that slum school were exceptionally intelligent, exceptionally tough, or exceptionally lucky.
In my grammar school form - drawn from a wide area - I was not usually top boy, except perhaps in English. I was usually among the first 5. After Matriculation (in which I gained a Distinction in Maths! - we had a good teacher), only about half-a-dozen of us stayed on into the Sixth form. First, the social climate did not greatly encourage staying on, except for the really outstanding [sic] boys; second, too many had parents who needed the money they could earn (parents who could see their way - imaginatively, financially - to keeping their child at school from 14-16, so he became a black-coated worker; but for whom a further stretch was only rarely conceivable). I stayed because of one sentence on my report at the end of the Matric. Year. My headmaster wrote at the bottom of the report: ‘Should think of professional life’. I was an orphan, being brought up by my grandmother on 7s 6d. A week Board of Guardians’ money. She did not know exactly what the sentence meant but asked the Board of Guardians' Visitor, a most helpful woman. She took the report to her Board who increased my weekly payment to 15s. A week. My grandmother, a first generation townswoman, had the old rural respect for learning; I stayed on.
After two years in the Sixth a handful of us took H.S.C. State scholarships were practically unheard of. I only remember Oxford or Cambridge being mentioned twice, each time in connection with rather special pupils who took a third year in the Sixth. [...] Of the rest of us one or two gained Senior City scholarships, of which 20 were given each year throughout the city’s grammar schools, and were told that our next move was to Leeds University. Some others reached university on R.S.T. grants. Ther rest went to Training Colleges.
So I joined others, who had been similarly selected each stage, at Leeds. My education properly began when I joined Bonamy Dobree’s School of English there. I give this personal history first, because it comes into my mind first whenever I hear people talk (and some talk easily) about ‘scraping the barrel’.
By comparison with us, even a moderately-endowed boy from a good school and a well-provided home had a simple run to the University in the ‘Thirties. If, on my 12 years rock-climbing progress there, only one other of my class-mates with similar abilities had been lost en route, then that - repeated in schools all over the country - meant a considerable drain of talent. I think it follows that we could stand a large expansion, in these more comfortable times, to cater for those intelligent children who would have been lost by the wayside in harder times. [175]
We are still losing mean (see, e.g. Early Leaving, Floud and Halsey’s work - or think of the shortage of places for girls at Oxbridge). But we are losing less. Better health, better schools, less worry about money and steady employment among parents … all these are creating a climate more congenial to the idea of continued education. I am struck by the number of my students who are first-generation undergraduates in their families. Some parents are thinking chiefly of investment, of ensuring a better-paid job for their children (though this is not a sin); but most, it seems to me, also respect education in itself - they say they are glad to think that their children are having ‘opportunities we could not have and regret missing - there’s nothing like education for broadening your mind’. It occurs to me that these parents include those who I left behind 30 years ago, in the ‘elementary school’.
[...] In making provision for an education democracy we are only now at the end of the beginning.
Memorandum submitted by Professor H. R. Hoggart, 28 August 1961, Committee on Higher Education, Evidence - Part One, Volume A: Written and Oral Evidence (London, 1963), pp. 174-175.