i know that a lot of perisex people love to appopriate and propagate intersexism to speak over people, but, to other intersex people: y'now you don't have to concede in your deshumanization? if your circumstances were the same mine, growing up, y'now you can actually try to unlearn the stigma infered on you by medical and psychiatric authorities? you know that you don't have to put up and let people instrumentalize your context to make it look like your identity is synthetic? what i mean here is that our existence isn't a transition into formality, if you identify to how you were initially assigned, that makes you cis as you didn't had to debate authorities on that, which is the distinction with being trans. transitioning into what has been determined for you just because of the medical process and ambiguity your condition may come with is transmedicalist theory, which is very ironic to see that kind of idea being promoted by people who actually pretend hating transmeds...it's the same idea. it comes from the same place. and the intention is the same: selling the impression that gender is synthetic and variation from the cis perisex model are disordered. it's exactly what people like john money, patricia jacobs, harry benjamin and ray blanchard tried to prove and every single of these people failed to do so, yet are still granted far too much authority and the repercussion of their work on culture have been nothing but a disaster. also, it's extremely western centric in application and rooted in white suppremacy, it's just fascist pseudo-science adjacent to phrenology in the end. it should be discarded instead of reclaimed as it's not the subversive flex a lot of people seems to think it is, stop it.









