I try not to fall into the "I never liked their work anyway" ditch when an artist/creator reveals themself to be a terrible person
BUT
a feeling I do have and will stand by is "While I enjoyed their work overall I did have some gripes that I overlooked out of affection and whimsy, but now that my loyalty is gone and my affection tainted there is nothing holding me back from enumerating my many grievances, to which the revelations of the creator's shittiness may or may not provide a new and infuriating context."
#such a good summation of this actually#because yeah there’s usually things that were always present#but which were easy to overlook or give the benefit of the doubt#that suddenly become relevant after a revelation about the creator#and it’s really not the same thing as the self-defensive “’I never liked it anyway’
tags via chimaerakitten
I objectively liked Harry Potter when I was younger, this is a fact, I won’t deny it, even though sometimes I want to
But what is also a fact is that I thought books one and two were dumb because Harry faced Voldemort as an 11/12 year old and book 3 was the first good one because Voldemort wasn’t the main villain of that specific book
Another fact, I believed for a long time (yes even as a 10 year old) that people were more drawn to the world and escapism than they were to the actual plot
What is also a fact is that when I got older I realised some of the very stereotypical names of non-white characters, the lowkey terrible writing of female characters, and the antisemitic stereotypes/caricatures, and more, were almost problematically present throughout the whole series
And despite the fact that Harry Potter was objectively a big part of my childhood that I felt very attached to, when jk Rowling became or revealed herself to be or whatever, a massive transphobe (among other things), I was perfectly capable of letting the franchise go, and tbh I find the whole “but it was a big part of my childhood” argument a bit dumb, but I can’t control other people















