I have a question about your code of ethics you apply as binding to yourself and all the groups and functions you run, one where you're urged to answer in the form of a yes-or-no answer to as a natural guardrail against you being roundabout. Is every last one of the messages I link to here (referring to the ones which are connected to you are cited or identified in any of them, whether by name or not) canon to the code of ethics in question as prescriptions/advice/precepts/additions to the mindset or approach one is meant to take away from the school of thought the code was meant to convey to adherents (with at least one thing being canon to it but only when read from a certain language)?
Yes.
And if I were to ask the same question again along with another one (my final two questions about the code of ethics under this name, though I might continue to do this under my other name), to the same effect (in which you are urged to answer in the form of a single answer that's four words long, with only citations that are things which are directly being asked about)...
Do certain competing codes of ethics have a "millet system" relationship to yours?
Would your answers to questions I cite here as having asked recently be canon to the same self-applied code of ethics, as well as what all of the things I link to here imply or are conveying as a main or side detail, referring to your input when it's given or your ideas when you're referred to as the only one who's subtly referred to (or the discussion itself when it's not)?
















