See what pastebin.com/qFv8Yc8C brings to light for more

just remember.. I have records if you come after me again.

The haters shutting their stuff down proves my damn point, they didn't let me defend myself and now they look Guilty for reporting me even. I now probably can post here with out it being looked at because I know Kiwi also is deleting stuff.

This drama has gone too far to the point I am age restricting my Youtube account as well, no I am not drawing NSFW over there cause it is not allowed, I just don't wanna deal with a kid in my supporters.

Thank you to everyone who stood up for me, and accepted me as a friend. Ilia reached out and understood what I was trying to do, now I am not speaking for her, how ever I did apologize and people can read that.

Artists aware, I know you read these posts , pleaase take my name off your site. people are going to bother you , I know running a BASHING SITE is stressful and you have the wrong person on here.

I am not trying to harm Artists Aware, Abyss, or any one who helped defend me or any one in general.

I just want people to leave me the fuck alone.

they don't even live in my state how the hell can they see my dang thread as legit?

Thank You for giving me a voice, Abyss.

One crowd of people (which, like the rest of the crowds, have found their way on DA) even dissed them for casting a blind actor as Toph. Oh the horror! The character IS blind, you fandom fakers!

Perhaps they were hoping Brad Pitt would play Toph.

I now know what it feels like to hate your generation, the hater generation (if the misfortunes of everyone here are anything to go by).

Imagine people being so full of themselves that after excusing the leak on the basis that it was the company's fault, now they're defending the bad actor (as shown in the comments of the videos on the topic, whose commenters won't do so much as look up why the leaker got such a hefty punishment), almost as if to imply it's acceptable to have it normalized to grasp at straws if it provides a defense for tyranny of the masses, which also hold it would be wrong to request people be courteous enough to do so much as donate to the studios.

I often am surprised how often I have to tell people that, if anyone was wondering, more than just peoples' boundaries (which already should be respected) are at stake when people violate IP laws, it's also creative planning that gets ruined in the process.

This whole thing has really shown the true unrestrained extent of the recklessness of audience, corporation, and media alike; corporations for enshittification, audience for empissification (toxicity, especially them), and the media for turning it into a story worth hearing.

Everything being alright again doesn't make them all less evil or unworthy of what you declared, though I scold the media for making us go on this journey.

Good for him. Imagine teaming up with Triagonal, who dismisses documented evidence, including archived webpages of their own behavior toward minors as mere "rumors", and acts as if evidence somehow expires once it's been cited.

He did his homework, saw through Triagonal's rambling and gaslighting, and wanted no association with a 26-year-old self-described machiavellian who spends all day of every day feeling sorry for themselves and talking to themselves on alts, impersonated one of their own siblings, stalks and lusts after minors, and is estranged from their own siblings for good reason. What Triagonal still refuses to learn is that actions have consequences.

Meanwhile, most of Triagonal's supposed "slanderers" (read: people who call out Triagonal's misconduct and slander) are living far happier, more productive lives than Triagonal ever will.

Because of how relentless you, your friends, and possibly everyone observing this conversation thinking your side is the side to take are, let me burst that bubble with an analogy, which I will use to explain it like you're five.

This is tank man. You may have heard of him.

This happened in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese equivalent to Times Square. This was from June 3rd and June 4th of 1989.

To this day, the Chinese government frowns upon people talking in depth about it. There are memes too about it. You might find people repeating "nothing happened in Tiananmen Square" as a joke, but also you might find people in China using workarounds to portray the massacre, such as drawing giant inflatable ducks walking down the road it's on.

You see that? That is censorship.

Is planning out a drawing of the event with giant inflatable ducks worth a felony charge? No. Do people do it? Yes, ones who feel so compelled it's like a hole in their heart. But does that make it a priority? No. Which is why, deep down, most people like you wouldn't. And here is where I say "exactly".

Does China ban people from other countries who do this? Yes. Even in the way I'm doing right now. If you go there, and they find out, you are either deported or imprisoned. They can even do it based on incomplete proof, which means now anyone falsely accused of being any of us are now at risk if we went there. But is it someone's right to point fingers? Exactly.

Is it gaslighting to say nothing happened? Yes. But was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that those responsible changed? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that there was more context involved in that, and that the tank drivers weren't going out of their way to commit an atrocity? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that not every participant in the events were participants in the atrocities and that people exaggerate the guilt of the tank drivers in their minds? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that the gang of four was responsible for permeating Mao's decisions? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that the video has misleading elements that makes it unusable as proof that this happened as was portrayed? Would you judge someone who, in their youth, was a part of the cultural revolution, but who, in their later years, became your next door neighbor?

All of these questions and their complex answers are a feature and not a bug of history, and it would be more alien to be avoidant of that kind of respect for all events.

What I'm getting at is every single bit of logic spoken by Triagonal to you is something you treat as alien to anyone you think of as having a good sense of judgement, and yet the opposite approach is codified in their mindset popularly known dilemmas. You normally would not do one. Why do the other?

I am curious about your take (and the take of certain kiwifarms members who are watching) on whether the Tiananmen Square events happened, are deserving of being the inspiration for a crusade on Chinese officials, and were handled properly by the Chinese; please do tell me without telling me (in what many would call litmus test style).

I just may be ready to make sure all of you get the sought-after reaction from China.

Just replace "joke" with "good analogy that was badly articulated that doubled as an approach to attain @casualxlfanatic and his KiwiFarms friends a ban from China and all things that come out of China".

This is actually kind of amusing to find played out, to be honest.

I was browsing one of Triagonal's Xitter alts and came across a recent post. Compare it to the photo of Triagonal on Buzzlyart, the one they didn't realize could be brightened. Once the enhanced version came out, they quickly went into damage control and deleted the original from their profile. But sure, that supposedly wasn't you, even though your reaction says otherwise.

Whose selfie have you stolen, Tynan? She looks like a teenager and is in a school uniform. Does that girl know that a 26 year old is stealing her selfies and claiming to be her? The photo even looks like you might've intentionally cropped it so that it'd be harder for people to reverse image search it.

There have been other occasions where you've shared staged or edited other people's selfies, like this one that appeared on your DeviantArt account. It was even pointed out by someone on Discuit.

Note the badly photoshopped/edited hands. This doesn't look like a "selfie", this looks more like a frame from a vlog.

Triagonal gaslighting the people putting 2 and 2 together, which is nothing new for them.

Also Casualxlfanatic: Goes to preach that their target, who isn't even the one doing the thing Casualxlfanatic is concerned about (but is said to be because Casualxlfanatic has concluded without waiting for proof that the person doing it must be Triagonal), is disregarding the rules of photo privacy/ethics and photography physics in simply pointing out a phone reflection in the photo uploaded by their friend and the fact it suggests who is MT, also claiming it's not her.

I especially think that HyperionBlueGT person gives away what's going on here. Nobody in their right mind is going to mind if you flag him accordingly.

I was browsing one of Triagonal's Xitter alts and came across a recent post. Compare it to the photo of Triagonal on Buzzlyart, the one they didn't realize could be brightened. Once the enhanced version came out, they quickly went into damage control and deleted the original from their profile. But sure, that supposedly wasn't you, even though your reaction says otherwise.

Whose selfie have you stolen, Tynan? She looks like a teenager and is in a school uniform. Does that girl know that a 26 year old is stealing her selfies and claiming to be her? The photo even looks like you might've intentionally cropped it so that it'd be harder for people to reverse image search it.

There have been other occasions where you've shared staged or edited other people's selfies, like this one that appeared on your DeviantArt account. It was even pointed out by someone on Discuit.

Note the badly photoshopped/edited hands. This doesn't look like a "selfie", this looks more like a frame from a vlog.

Triagonal gaslighting the people putting 2 and 2 together, which is nothing new for them.

Also Casualxlfanatic: Goes to preach that their target, who isn't even the one doing the thing Casualxlfanatic is concerned about (but is said to be because Casualxlfanatic has concluded without waiting for proof that the person doing it must be Triagonal), is disregarding the rules of photo privacy/ethics and photography physics in simply pointing out a phone reflection in the photo uploaded by their friend and the fact it suggests who is MT, also claiming it's not her.

Good for him. Imagine teaming up with Triagonal, who dismisses documented evidence, including archived webpages of their own behavior toward minors as mere "rumors", and acts as if evidence somehow expires once it's been cited.

He did his homework, saw through Triagonal's rambling and gaslighting, and wanted no association with a 26-year-old self-described machiavellian who spends all day of every day feeling sorry for themselves and talking to themselves on alts, impersonated one of their own siblings, stalks and lusts after minors, and is estranged from their own siblings for good reason. What Triagonal still refuses to learn is that actions have consequences.

Meanwhile, most of Triagonal's supposed "slanderers" (read: people who call out Triagonal's misconduct and slander) are living far happier, more productive lives than Triagonal ever will.

Because of how relentless you, your friends, and possibly everyone observing this conversation thinking your side is the side to take are, let me burst that bubble with an analogy, which I will use to explain it like you're five.

This is tank man. You may have heard of him.

This happened in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese equivalent to Times Square. This was from June 3rd and June 4th of 1989.

To this day, the Chinese government frowns upon people talking in depth about it. There are memes too about it. You might find people repeating "nothing happened in Tiananmen Square" as a joke, but also you might find people in China using workarounds to portray the massacre, such as drawing giant inflatable ducks walking down the road it's on.

You see that? That is censorship.

Is planning out a drawing of the event with giant inflatable ducks worth a felony charge? No. Do people do it? Yes, ones who feel so compelled it's like a hole in their heart. But does that make it a priority? No. Which is why, deep down, most people like you wouldn't. And here is where I say "exactly".

Does China ban people from other countries who do this? Yes. Even in the way I'm doing right now. If you go there, and they find out, you are either deported or imprisoned. They can even do it based on incomplete proof, which means now anyone falsely accused of being any of us are now at risk if we went there. But is it someone's right to point fingers? Exactly.

Is it gaslighting to say nothing happened? Yes. But was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that those responsible changed? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that there was more context involved in that, and that the tank drivers weren't going out of their way to commit an atrocity? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that not every participant in the events were participants in the atrocities and that people exaggerate the guilt of the tank drivers in their minds? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that the gang of four was responsible for permeating Mao's decisions? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that the video has misleading elements that makes it unusable as proof that this happened as was portrayed? Would you judge someone who, in their youth, was a part of the cultural revolution, but who, in their later years, became your next door neighbor?

All of these questions and their complex answers are a feature and not a bug of history, and it would be more alien to be avoidant of that kind of respect for all events.

What I'm getting at is every single bit of logic spoken by Triagonal to you is something you treat as alien to anyone you think of as having a good sense of judgement, and yet the opposite approach is codified in their mindset popularly known dilemmas. You normally would not do one. Why do the other?

I am curious about your take (and the take of certain kiwifarms members who are watching) on whether the Tiananmen Square events happened, are deserving of being the inspiration for a crusade on Chinese officials, and were handled properly by the Chinese; please do tell me without telling me (in what many would call litmus test style).

I just may be ready to make sure all of you get the sought-after reaction from China.

Some who read this blog might be interested in how I'm getting on cause it's been like half a year!! E gads where does the time go? Fuck LMAO

Things in my life are on an upward spiral right now! I've been mad busy. I went on a first date with my boyfriend yesterday! It lasted 7 hours. The film was 2 and a half haha. He's so fuckin adorable I could eat him up. Seriously though, we kissed and cuddled in the cinema so much it's not even funny haha. He paid for the tickets and food we got at the arcade cafe even though I begged him to let me pay for the food he got me. Guy's a proper old fashioned good lad who you know has been raised right and knows how to treat a girl. We went shopping together and got some fresh drip toward the end. The feelings are mutual and we're now working out what we wanna do for a second date!

We got a new cat too! 3 days ago actually! My family adopted her and she's so loving it's nuts. We're looking to find a person to take care of her when we go on holiday which might be sometime in late summer. We haven't decided where we're gonna go yet, but we've got plenty of time! I've also been making a lot of pin/sticker designs in the last few months and showing them around to people. I've gotten such good feedback on them I'm thinking about starting a pin/sticker shop as a side thing I just need to get a brother scan and cut machine and some other sticker making stuff. Little nervous since I've never done this shop stuff before and it's all new to me LMAO but it's worth a shot!

It's great to see you in my inbox. We messaged a bit back when I first started this blog to expose Triagonal's misconduct, and I want to say a huge congratulations to you. You deserve all of this happiness, the great date, the cat, and the sticker shop. Definitely go get that ScanNCut machine. You're an excellent artist.

One small thought while I'm at it since it comes to mind. These photos are meant to demonstrate a good time is being spent, and yet the description of some of the photos say selfies of the two people in the relationship won't be shown because they'd be too "special", all the while everyone gets up and arms and meticulous, saying body parts like the legs aren't off-limits and neither is being the reflection's interpreter as being the very person you wouldn't want to share selfies of? That's a classic beginner's sign of deception. It's like that one joke they often show in movies where the woman will do bedroom activities with the man but only when the lights are turned off, or where Houdini will escape the milk vessel but only when the curtains are blocking the view of said vessel. It shows it's fake and that there is fabrication afoot, all from a new photographer I'd actually otherwise not consider bad at all (the only other issue being she takes pictures of people without their consent who aren't memes, doing cosplay, celebrities, etc. which would imply they were ready to have their picture taken; even "the-abyss-watcher" doesn't do that). I'm inclined to side with the people who aren't banned from Tumblr for slander and harassment, slander which they can't help but repeat after even mentioning the ban.

By your logic, there are a number of people who are on your side who would fit your bill, but then again, I am respectful of others' voices and am not one to go by the logic you're going by.

All that said, I'm into the same art medium. I wouldn't misunderstand any of it at this point (when normal expectations are applied), be it the physics of it or the ethics, with "GrandDreamPaper" including key expectations about the ethics even if nuance could've been added.