Humanistic inquiries, Book reviews, Opinions
I'm moving to a new house where I will write more frequently :)Â
will byers stan first human second
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
wallacepolsom
Three Goblin Art
I'd rather be in outer space đž

Andulka

Love Begins
Monterey Bay Aquarium
đȘŒ
NASA

styofa doing anything
taylor price

titsay

izzy's playlists!
we're not kids anymore.

hello vonnie
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă

seen from Belgium

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States

seen from Pakistan

seen from Uruguay

seen from Brazil
seen from Gabon
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@historicalperspective-blog
Humanistic inquiries, Book reviews, Opinions
I'm moving to a new house where I will write more frequently :)Â

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Why history and the humanities are also a form of knowledge.
For extremists who argue that the humanities are pseudo-science that rests too much on generality.
John Thomson: Chinese Women, 1869-72.
John Thomson (1837-1921) was a pioneering Scottish photographer who, after traveling through various parts of Asia, settled in Hong Kong in 1868 and operated a studio there for the next four years. Using Hong Kong as his base, he traveled extensively throughout China and was the first known photographer to document the people and landscapes of China for publication in the western market. Returning to England, he published a four volume book entitled âIllustrations of China and its Peopleâ in London, 1873-1874.
Images courtesy of Yale University Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library.
LGBT Movements in the US: 1960s-1970s
This is a time-capsule project that I finished a year ago in memory of Harvey Milk, the first openly gay city council supervisor in the history of the US. It highlighted major achievements and progresses of the campaigns during a critical period of fighting for equality. In addition, it illuminates the magnitude of impact these movements exerted upon the global historical trajectory of the worldwide LGBT issues. Â
Prior to the 1960s, homosexuality was regarded by a majority of states in the US as a form of criminal activities and social decadence. Homosexual acts were condemned either in the public or in the private. The societal perception of same-sex relationships remained constricted. It became so highly political that the LGBT community was barred from the fundamental rights as citizens of the United States. The uphill battle for the assimilation of the LGBT population into the society saw its first signs of success in 1961 when Illinois became the first state ever to abolish the sodomy law from its criminal code. In 1965, the first incident that laid the foundation for future significant demonstration occurred at the Independence Hall in Philadelphia when conservatively dressed LGBT members demonstrated outside to protest against the suppression of the LGBT community. Â The year of 1966 marked a huge progression in the quest of asking for fundamental rights. Julius bar in New York was crowded with people in the âsip-inâ movement to challenge the authorityâs ban on serving alcohol to homosexual people. In the same year, NACHO (National Planning Conference of Homophile Organizations) was established as collective efforts between homophile groups. In 1967, the tense atmosphere of LGBT activism spread to college campuses and Columbia University established its first nationally recognized gay student group in America, marking the rising advocacy of LGBT movement among the most popular intellectual discourse in the community of students and scholars. 1969 saw the escalation of the movement with the occurrence of âStonewall Riotsâ as a monumental event in the LGBT history. If the 1960s was filled with social movements that demanded the social rights of the LGBT community within a homophobic society, the 1970s saw the advent of LGBT political figures that influenced the movement and redefined the American political arena at the same time. In 1971, Frank Kameny became the first openly gay candidate for the congress. Â In 1972, East Lansing and Ann Arbor in Michigan and San Francisco in California passed the first official law ever to endorse for homosexual rights. In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the list of recognized mental disorders under the research guidance of Evelyn Hooker. 1974 was the most successful year in the political movement of the LGBT community with figures such as Kathy Kozachenko, Fritz Klein, Elaine Noble and Robert Grants, whose achievements will be discussed in the âInfluential individualsâ part of the project. In 1975, California became the first state to legalize homosexuality with the Consenting Adult Sex Bill and also for the first time in history, Leonard Matlovich, an American serviceman in the United Stateâs air force to publicly come out and advocate the rights for gay to serve in public military service. In 1977, Harvey Milk became a highly significant figure of the LGBT movement when he was elected to the city council of California and his assassination is 1978 resulted in a period of public outrage that led up to the biggest event to mark the end of the 1970s: the first National Homosexual Rights March in Washington DC in 1979.
As a monumental event of the LGBT movement, the âStonewall Riotsâ was not only the first unprecedented violent resistance to the police suppression against the LGBT community but it was also the first event in the whole world to fight against the governmentâs systematic persecution of homosexuals as criminals. This movement also posed a challenge to the aggressive anti-homosexual spheres in the United States. The event occurred at the Stonewall Inn, at Greenwich Village, New York in 1979 when a group of police raiding on the bar at 1:20 morning arrested and bullied customers who they deemed to be homosexuals. About 150 people gathering outside the Inn contemplated the whole scene until the crowd became multiple and hundreds of other LGBT members arrived to occupy the inn. The police force was kept captive within the circle of people fighting against their mistreatments of the homosexuals. The riots escalated to an open public violent resistance against the police when other police force was sent in to free the captive polices from the crowd. Within the next few days, violent demonstration kept escalating as people occupied Christopher Street in the Stonewall area and exerted their power upon the police force and other so-called âhomophobic ladsâ. The outcome of the Stonewall Riots remained controversial because of the violent nature of the movement. However, the series of riots in Stonewall Inn gave rise to the societal recognition of homosexual subculture, set the foundation for the establishment of the gay liberation front and most importantly, gave birth to a new form of LGBT activism in 1970 in America and the world: the Gay Pride Parade that was hosted yearly in Los Angeles, San Francisco and New York.
In the historical timeline of the LGBT movement, significant figures emerged as very quintessential elements to the success of the LGBT advocacy and the position in which we stand today. Dr. Frank Kameny was an important political figure in this time period. As the first openly gay candidate for the United States Congress, Frank Kameny brought new flavor to American politics that challenged the conventional ideals of democracy, which posed important questions to the ongoing LGBT movements. Psychologist Evelyn Hooker contributed a great deal to the success of the movement by proving to the world that homosexuality was not a disease and removing homosexuality from the disease-categorized list with her extensive psychological research on the homosexual community. A long line of important LGBT-advocate historical figures emerged in 1974. Kathy Kozachenko was the first gay American to be elected to office as she wins a seat on council at Ann Arbor, Michigan. In the same year, Fritz Klein, a self-proclaimed bisexual psychiatrist and also a graduate of Yale University, created the Bisexual Forum- also known as the first open educational forum for LGBT discussion and social support. His establishment of the Bisexual Forum also created the foundation for bisexual studies in particular and sexology in general. Within the realm of religion, Robert Grant was the first Christian ever to fight for a cause for homosexuality, especially the acceptance of homosexuality in the Christian community. His founding of the American Christian Cause had become the cornerstone for the development of modern Christianity in America. In 1977, Harvey Milk, an important yet controversial political figure amidst the LGBT movement, was elected to be the city council supervisor of San Francisco despite waves of public opposition. The assassination of Harvey Milk in 1978 triggered enormous public outrage all over the world, which later led to the hugest event in the history of LGBT movement: the first National Homosexual Rights March at Washington DC in 1979.
Over the course of 20 years, the LGBT movement in the United States progressed from small-scale groups of activists fighting for fundamental rights to collective support groups of LGBT members from all over the country and from different disciplines fighting for political involvements and social recognition. The LGBT movement was not only meaningful as a period of dynamic activism in the United States but it also served as a model for worldwide human rights activism in the period of 1960s-1970s.Â
How Much of a Chimera is Comparability? Reflections on Comparative Studies in Sinology Whenever I tell someone in Chinese Studies that my doctoral dissertation is about the relationship between Zhu...
Highly thought-provoking dissection on the nature of sinology study and the politics of terminology- whether Chinese studies or sinology are apt name-calling.Â

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Several lessons learned today as reference for future history major:
1. Liking history is not enough if you want to be a historian. You can always be a business major and watch history channel to fill that gap in your heart for history. Or you can be incredibly successful in another walk of life and spend a significant portion of your money on history books as a way of consuming knowledge. Being a historian means you care about past lives and you care about them enough that you imagined possibilities through intellectual, systematic critiques (arguments) to stimulate discourses and expand realms of knowledge leading to a deeper understanding of the human conditions.
2. As a historian, you devote your life to writing as your mode of communication, reading as mode of accumulation along with a lifelong commitment to research. The dynamics of these skills make you a historian, however, not guaranteed efficacious historian.
3. You do not take information just for the sake of information. You struggled with it, critically questioning the reason for its existence. You have a desire to trace origins and seek understandings whatever cultural, social or intellectual background of a particular artifact.
4. Passion is important but not enough. Patience, commitment, a critical mind, and certain level of readiness to dig hours and hours in archives for the discovery of knowledge remain essential.
hi, you posted a piece on anarcho-feminism, and you said to message you if we wanted a pdf of a translated versions of various essays by He Zhen. can i get a copy? my email address is maggotgurl6sic6 at yahoo
Hi ! Sorry for my late reply. It has been a really hectic week for me. I will forward you two copies of the most two famous essays by He Zhen. Have fun reading!
In line with recent uproars on North Korea's threats. Very interesting analysis on China's role.
Book Review: The Devil in the White City by Erik Larson
SPOILER ALERT: If you have not read the book, refrain from reading this review for a lot of key, sensational details were revealed and analyzed here.Â
Admittedly, this book was a fascinating read and it enlightened me in many ways given my position as a Non-Americanist with little expertise on the field. It is a well-blended story of murder, development, and society constructed on the backdrop of real historical events in late 19th century America. Erik Larson's writing was enticingly descriptive despite his meticulously laboring over a few minor details that I think did not contribute significantly to the development of the story. With that being said, this book is definitely not a conventional history book, but rather a combination of fictional writing with certain stylistic elements and real-world events. How much history the readers grasp from reading the book really depends on the vantage point from which ones approach the history matters in this thriller of murder and societal development. Here goes my elaborate review of the book. Â Â Â Â
The Gilded age in late 19th century was an era of rapid economic development and industrialization in America. Not only did this critical period vastly transformed America as an emerging nation but it also brought about tremendous social and political perplexity into the American society by the time. âThe Devil in the White Cityâ by Erik Larson, as a non-fiction, gave readers many historical insights into the economic and social development of America through the lens of Chicagoâs radical transformation into a rising metropolis that promised both prosperity and arising social diseases, and the story of the very first American serial killer during this so-called Gilded age. The book was excellent at providing the readers with substantial information on the history of America during post-civil war reconstruction in general and Chicago history in particular. It even did a more excellent job at exposing the dark, degrading and wretchedness that had always existed side by side with this glorious sight of upward development in America, and tactfully linking these two contradictory matters to display a big-picture history of Americaâs social turmoil, policy flaws, and economic instability as the imperfections of the rapidly industrialized era.
The novel revolved around two main stories that were narrated in a parallel fashion: the Columbian Worldâs Exposition held at Chicago in 1893 and the mass-murders of Chicagoan women and children committed by H.H. Holmes, also known as the Americaâs first serial killer during the time of the world fairâs occurrence. The book carefully depicted the tension faced Chicago in its battle for honorary status and recognition against New York and Washington D.C in their attempts to gain the right to host the World Fair. For Chicago itself, this opportunity meant optimism, a resurrection of its capability for a city whose reputation had always been associated with the status of being the âAmericaâs slaughter houseâ, and a brand-new era of Chicagoâs ever-changing image to the perception of Americans and to the world. Along with the exposition, the story featured two Americaâs greatest architects and their toils as well as various pressures imposed on them throughout the process: Daniel Burnham and John Root. Perfectly situated next to the story of the World Fair was the incredibly gruesome story of H.H. Holmes, who by taking advantage of the World Fair situations created his impeccable murder castle that mercilessly slaughtered several hundred innocent people. Written in a parallel fashion, the two stories intertwined to create a historical work of suspense that revealed the weakness of America in the industrialized period.
The juxtaposition of the Chicago World Fair and H.H. Holmes was the keystone that enabled us to understand American history from two different angles. Lying underneath the mere sight of wealth, prosperity, and grandeur, as indicators of skyrocketing economic growth and expansion were the inconvenient truths of crimes and murders. In order to truly grasp the theme of the book that Mr. Larson was trying to convey, understanding how these two stories worked together remained essential. Undeniably, the World Fair was a humongous work of marvelous architecture that represented Chicago as a world-class metropolitan. Chicago would earn its nationwide and worldwide reputation of being the center of innovation, where all the unprecedented were introduced into it. Moreover, the fair transcended its role of an architectural beauty by exposing to the world Americaâs powerful economic transformation and civilization. On the other hands, it was the World Fair that forever changed America as a wealthy, powerful industrialized state in various ways. First, the World Fair completely elevated American architectural development to a new level on the worldâs architectural arena by this time. Larson wrote as Burnham pondered upon the idea of Chicagoâs eligibility to host the fair âHe argued that Chicagoâs fair, unlike any other before it, would be primarily a monument to architect. It would awaken the nation to the power of architecture to conjure beauty from stone and steel (Larson, 80)â America now was not considered incompetent in terms of its architectural development compared to Paris or London. Larsonâs vivid description of the detailed architectural technicalities that spread through the chapters served a critical purpose: it did the American architectureâs rapid growth justice and showed that America was now able to cope with the even the toughest environment that might have hindered architects from making construction possible by its own innovations and ideas. Besides a boost in the development of architecture, the fair tremendously impacted American cultures of consumption and commercialization by introducing new things that had been unheard of. Larson described:Â
âThey saw the first moving pictures on Edisonâs Kinetoscope, and they watched, stunned, as lightning chattered from Nikola Teslaâs body. They saw even more ungodly things- the first zipper; the first-ever all-electric kitchen, which included an automatic diswasher; and a box purporting to contain everything a cook would need to make pancakes, under the brand name Aunt Jemimaâs, etc (Larson, 247)â
Obviously, the World Fair was not just about architecture but it was also about inventions that symbolized Americaâs Gilded age and forever changed the worldâs perception of the country and the city of Chicago itself: America was now civilized and innovative while Chicago received the honorary title of being home to the worldâs first inventions. The fairâs impact on America was undoubtedly enormous.
Behind this picture of innovations and glorious achievements emerged the imperfections of American weaknesses and unpreparedness at the forefront of the World Fair that forever changed America. H.H. Holmes came into place as the most notorious, yet though-provoking case to ponder upon the irony of development in the American Gilded age. Understanding Holmesâ motives and positioning them next to the World Fair brought us more complete perspectives on the situations in America during this period. Understanding how a person so merciless with no sense of repentance who ruthlessly said âI was born with the devil in me (Holmes)â took advantage of the opportunities to slaughter was key to the interpretation of âThe Devil in the White Cityâ and Larsonâs purpose of juxtaposing the World Fair with Holmesâ horror. Chicago on the eve of the fair was described as a chaotic and dangerous place. Larson commented â It was so easy to disappear, so easy to deny knowledge, so easy in the smoke and din to mask that something dark had taken root (Larson, 12)â The World Fair with an overflow of visitors flocking to contemplate the world-class architectural beauty served as the best opportunity for murderer like Holmes to enjoy himself. It could be inferred from the book two possible motives that actually encouraged Holmes to conduct the genocide: the psychological and economic motives. However, Larsonâs criticism lied in the fact that these motives would not have been made possible without the weakness of Americaâs social control and overrated security system that enabled Holmes to leak through the loopholes. The documentary âH.H. Holmes- Americaâs First Serial Killerâ along with the book provided the basis for Holmesâ inferences of motives. Its depiction of Holmesâ dysfunctional childhood gave insights into Holmesâ development as a psychopath who was educated and scarily rational in his killing albeit killing for pleasure was the major desire. A clever, well-educated and appealing young man, he utilized his medical skills and passion for anatomy as a way to gain pleasure from his victims. Thus, Holmes emerged within the American society also as an âinnovationâ and a completely new type of person. He created a new American society for himself that no American at this time would ever expect: a society of psychopaths. Larson was so clever at his intentional juxtaposition because while the World Fair introduced its inventions, Chicago and the American society experienced a brand-new type of mass killing, dangerous, brutal, uncontrolled and intelligent. America was unprepared to deal with this type of smart and rational serial killer in the reality. Holmesâ another motive lied in the facet of economic benefits. Performing anatomy on the victims and selling their corpses to medical schools were his purposes. Holmes regarded the World Fair as a wonderful moneymaking opportunity and at the same time perfect to fulfill his desire for killing. However, Erik Larson did not simply end there but he went further to suggest many of American weaknesses that created the ideal surrounding for this society of psychopath to flourish side by side with industrialization. First was Holmesâ construction of the murder castle, which he virtually paid everything on credits without ever intending to pay back. This revealed the underdevelopment in the banking system with a poor system of credit risk evaluation that led to an indiscriminate borrowing of credits allowing Holmesâ to bypass the system and make his massacre dream come true. The fact that many visitors vanished without a trace during the World Fair without ever being detected and the detectiveâs long enduring process to find the bodies of three Pitezelâs children exposed the weakness of the Chicago municipal police force in particular and Americaâs poor security system in general. Erik Larson nicely summed up these deficiencies in the following reflection:
âIt is humiliating to think that had it not been for the exertions of the insurance companies which Holmes swindled, or attempted to swindle, he might yet be at large, preying upon society, so well did he cover up the traces of his crime. Chicagoâs feeling of humiliation was not surprising, the New York Times said; anyone familiar with the saga âmust be amazed at the failure of the municipal police department and the local prosecuting officers not only to prevent those awful crimes, but even to procure any knowledge of them (Larson, 370)â
These loopholes combined, covered up in the glamour of the Chicago World Exposition thus reveal Americaâs vulnerability during the period of economic expansion with numerous opportunities. The juxtaposition of the World Fair with H.H. Holmes served its powerful function of uncloaking these layers of Americaâs development. It revealed a history, politics and the difficulties facing a rapidly transforming society.
Without a doubt, Larsonâs versatility of a great writer and his literary style contributed to the success of âThe Devil in the White Cityâ as a significant nonfiction and historical work that helped us to understand a critical period of American history. Although Larsonâs depiction of the architectural technical details throughout the book seemed lengthy and stagnant to the development of the narratives that put me under the impression that the story progressed too slowly, Larson was judicious enough to include these details in an organized manner to show the intensity and magnitude of the World Fair, and the herculean efforts to make it possible. He also did this task purposefully so as to bring into an extremity of contrast between the fair and the story of the murderer- also the contrast between the age of burgeoning economy and social evilness. The greatest thing that Larson was able to achieve was his excellent presentation of the people, the society and the politics that made the past come alive. Through vivid and realistic description of Chicago from a âBlack cityâ to becoming a âWhite cityâ, Larson brought the city to life: from a dangerous and obnoxious state to a city filled with opulence and opportunities. The politics came subtly to the surface of the narrative through this description but I could clearly feel the tension and turmoil enveloping the cityâs constant growth. By alternating the narrative between the progress of the World Fair and murder mystery, Larson pushed the story to the pinnacle of suspense and retained this curiosity-provoking element in his style to keep the readers going. Rarely do I find in a historical work such a well-balanced synchronization of suspense and history as in âthe Devil in the White Cityâ.
âThe Devil in the White Cityâ was an excellent book profuse with historical knowledge of America in the Gilded age, specifically the urban economic development of Chicago as a rising metropolis. On the other hands, it was a brilliant source of insights to conduct both historical and social analysis on Americaâs period of booming industrialization. Chicago appearing to the world in its utmost splendor, wealth and prosperity was now revealing Americaâs vulnerability through its inability to control the degradation and wretchedness reflected via H.H. Holmesâs series of mass killing. Larson has made an incredible amount of efforts to depict Chicago in the 1890s from a decayed and filthy city to the center of inventions floating to the top of the world, and the problems confronting the American society by the time. Overall, I highly recommend this book to avid readers who want to learn more about the Gilded age in America through a different optical lens: the World Columbian Exposition and an emerging society of psychopaths.Â
Sources:Â
Larson, Erik, âThe Devil in the White Cityâ, Vintage Books, New York, 2003
Spikol, Liz, âHolmes Sweet Holmes. On the Outside, H.H. Holmesâ, Philadelphia Weekly, Oct. 29, 2003Â
Basic Facts: Marxist Historiography
What distinguishes Marxist historiography from other schools of historiography (for example, civil society or the "great men" theory)? How do Marxist historians have contributed actively to the scholarships and pave a tradition for historical research from a Marxian vantage point? These questions are fundamentally answered in this link that I find very useful and concise.
http://ericdenby.hubpages.com/hub/Understanding-Marxist-Historiography-An-Overview
While I have extensively utilized Marxist framework on a majority of my research, coupled up with Lefebvre's philosophy of everyday life, I have a growing realization of both the danger and limitation of this school of historiography, which led me to the future exploration of other historiographical methodology. I feel the need to have a guiding research scheme, yet at the same time remain balanced among the applicability and impartial historicity of each pattern of analyses. It is true that history has long drifted away from the theory of the great men that impacted the global historical trajectories, and Marxist historians quickly built upon the size of scholarship tantamount to that of its counter-schools. Marxism in our understandings of the world, despite being of paramount significance, is irrevocably a useful dissector and prominent optical lens through which a bottom-up, commoner-emphasized, and class concepts were articulated and reified. Â Â Â

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
A Bit of History Today: Anarcho-Feminism
I'm an active member on the gradcafe, which is a popular forum for future and current graduate students across disciplines to discuss various issues within the humanities and social sciences. Today, I received a message from a fellow member who inquired more information on a form of radical feminism known officially in the field of gender study as anarcho-feminism (an unsounding combination of anarchism and feminism). Thus, I was inspired to follow up with this concept and prone to giving out some fundamental ideas on the history of anarcho-feminism, specifically as in how it worked and developed. Caveat: I'm not quite familiar with the concept in the contextualization of the Euro-American world. The only anarcho-feminist I know from that area of focus was Emma Goldman, so these information will very much likely to apply to East Asia. There is no guarantee that anarcho-feminism will remain consistent regardless of geographical differences.
The term itself suggests a combination: anarchism and feminism. This combination may strike many readers as strange and ideologically impossible. In fact, anarcho-feminism was among one of the popular schools of social theories with a good number of followers, emerging in China at the turn of the 20th century. A prominent leader of the movement was Hezhen- a newly discovered scholar whose significant works on anarchism and feminism revealed a tremendous amount of information on the state of women's status at a time of national chaos, and salvation-seeking Chinese nation-state. Anarcho-feminism exerted its influences on many women's movements of the time, one of which being the first wave feminism discourse consisting of a major, ultimate goal: fighting for women's suffrage. Lying at the core of anarcho-feminism were the distinctive notion of patriarchy being promoted by a hierarchical system existing in the society that resulted from a centralized political system and government, and the complete abandonment of the male's authoritative selves. Basically, anarcho-feminists deemed the collapse of a governing nation-state to be necessary in the liberation of women because state existence gave way to the deliberate construction of social hierarchy. Patriarchy, after all, is a byproduct of nation-state formation of social ladders. The root of all women's suppression must lie in nation-state and its destruction is principal to a fulfilling quest of class struggle.
Practically, anarcho-feminism was not successful. It is purely a theory of radicalism that was advocated by theorists/feminists such as He Zhen and Emma Goldman. While the former pointed out an inextricable link between state destruction, liberation and class struggle, the latter pushed the theory to extremity by advocating a futureless vision of the women's liberation, which emphasized that the shortcomings of the women's liberation discourse were made recurrent due to the fact that women first had to liberate themselves from the idea of being liberated. Second, any vision of a nation-state, or close to the formation of it will cause disruption to anarcho-feminist practice. The "no-future" attitude reinforced Goldman's ideals of disallowing the existence of hierarchy and moreover gave a full blow to the slightest possibility of nation-state reemergence, which was critical to any governing bodies.
This is an interesting field both in terms of history and social theory studies. For more complete discussion of anarcho-feminism, please refer to the following sources:Â
Emma Goldman, "Anarchism and Other Essays"
Various essays by He Zhen including "On the Revenge of Women" and "On Women's Liberation"Â
Peter Zarrow, "He Zhen and Anarcho-Feminism in China" on JSTOR
Rebecca Karl, "On Women's Labor: He Zhen, Anarcho-feminism and 20th Century China in the World" Link: http://www.tanianavarroswain.com.br/labrys/labrys15/china/rebecca.htm
Before I end here, I'm in possession of the translated versions of various essays by He Zhen. Contact me and I will be happy to email you the pdf. For some reason, I cannot find the links online. Hope this is helpful.
Absolutely powerful photosot by photographer Ahn Sehong of comfort women who were abandoned in China. Compositionally, some of the photos are more effective than others. Yet, there is a strange alienation to it that is eeriely appropriate considering the subject matter. Iâm posting the unabridged text.
Ahn Sehong Photography:
The processes of seeking the truth in a photograph would be difficult but enjoyable. A photographer is creating relations with the object that s/he takes in order to incorporate the inner truth, not the âseeingâ truth, into the photograph.
The relations with the surviving Korean Comfort Women, who were mostly in their 80s and 90s, were not formed accidentally. It took me a long time to get to know them. When I first encountered these women, they were very shy and treated me as a stranger. But we became closer to each other as we met many times. It was fortunate for me to have understood the deepest part of their hearts, listening to their stories and witnessing their hardships. I am privileged to make some contributions to them as a photographer.
I had been contacting the surviving Korean Comfort Women, who then were forced to live in China, and visited them since 2001. This made me understand their situations better: I saw the individual women selling things on a bus, or on a train, or on a ship for a living. Such a miserable way of living seemed to mirror their past lives as the displaced. In fact this harsh reality made me visit to China seven times to take pictures of them and to let the world know.
While staying with them, I captured the moments of their daily life into my camera, and this work required extreme tension. I was already thrown into their world and into their expressions of joy and sorrow. But when I looked into the viewfinder of my camera, I realized that it was not easy to cross freely the boundary and the object with freedom. But I tried to contain some truth about them, being tensely aware of the breathtaking boundaries between the object as the victims known as âComfort Womenâ and their human side.
The woman that was incorporated into my viewfinder was a human being. The photo revealed her grudging heart expressed in her tearful eyes, the deep furrow of her wrinkles and her stained belongings. This certainly reflected both the present and past life of the particular woman.
More than 70 years have passed since the surviving Comfort Women settled down in the barren land and lived alone. These women had only resentful vitality that overcame the given environment in a harsh reality of a foreign country.
Would they be forced to move to other place again? Or would they be blown away with a cold wind and dispersed and vanished to the back stage of history?
For more research on comfort women, refer to the bibliography at the George Washington University:Â http://www.gwu.edu/~memory/research/bibliography/comfortwomen.html
Engraved Lighters of The Vietnam War (via)
âWho ever may rend this will see that there is no other but one girl for me and her lovely name is Beverly Dennington. I love her very much.â
Some remnants of the Vietnam War (or from my perspective, the American War). It is interesting to look at these engraved lighters- very much similar to viewing long lost historical artifacts that deliver certain messages about a historical period.Â
Currently Reading
"Staging the World: Chinese Nationalism at the Turn of the 20th Century"Â
Rebecca Karl, NYU Â
This is among the most innovative books out there on the humongous sea of analytical history that requestioned the formation of nationalist discourse since early 20th century China. Rebecca Karl's take on Chinese nationalism was transnational and tactful- embroiling various concepts of race, ethnocentrism, class, globalism in historical analysis to argue for the emergence of the nationalist discourse as a totality, rather than an independent, asiacentric process that reinforced thirdworldism. Carefully crafted to illuminate the interwoven global events that made history a linkage- Europe, East and South East Asia, Africa and the Pacific, "Staging the World" is innovative in the sense that it is among the first few books to approach the topic of nationalism in this way.
With my reading progress so far, I have to say that the ideas are refreshing and the questions are carefully tackled with detailed archival supports. It is albeit not an easy read so I'm reading it at a slow pace to get the most out of the arguments. I will try to sit down and do a complete book review for "Staging the World" as my finals are over. Various book reviews are currently on JSTOR, most prominently from Madeleine Yue Dong (University of Washington) and Peter Zarrow (Academia Sinica Taiwan). If you have read the book and want to have a nice recap, make sure to check those reviews out.Â
Fun Fact: Rebecca Karl is my advisor's mentor at NYU in her graduate school years so I can make a lot of connections from her teaching style and ideological influences.Â
Preview from the Asia-Pacific A series edited by Rey Chow, H.D. Harootunian, and Masao Miyoshi:Â
"In Staging the World Rebecca E. Karl rethinks the production of nationalist discourse in China during the late Qing period, between Chinaâs defeat in the Sino-Japanese War in 1895 and the proclamation of the Republic in 1911. She argues that at this historical moment a growing Chinese identification with what we now call the Third World first made the modern world visible as a totality and that the key components of Chinese nationalist discourse developed in reference to this worldview.
The emergence of Chinese nationalism during this period is often portrayed as following from Chinaâs position vis-Ă -vis Japan and the West. Karl has mined the archives of the late Qing period to discern the foci of Chinese intellectuals from 1895 to 1911 to assert that even though the China/Japan/West triangle was crucial, it alone is an incompleteâand therefore flawedâmodel of the development of nationalism in China. Although the perceptions and concerns of these thinkers form the basis of Staging the World, Karl begins by examining a 1904 Shanghai production of an opera about a fictional partition of Poland and its modern reincarnation as an ethno-nation. By focusing on the type of dialogue this opera generated in China, Karl elucidates concepts such as race, colonization, globalization, and history. From there, she discusses how Chinese conceptions of nationalism were affected by the âdiscoveryâ of Hawaiâi as a center of the Pacific, the Philippine revolution against the United States, and the relationship between nationality and ethnicity made apparent by the Boer War in South Africa.
Staging the World will appeal to students and scholars of modern Chinese history, theories and processes of nationalism, world history, and colonialism."Â
Sugihara Chiune, is one of the lesser known heroes during World War II and the Holocaust. Although Japan was technically Germanyâs ally during the War, Sugihara used his status and unique position to help refugees and those of Jewish descent escape from behind enemy lines. He also represents a fairly different image of a Japanese person during this time in terms of his deeds and personal convictions. Even today the Empire of Japan is usually portrayed as a monolithic body of fervent and usually brutal zealots working for the glory of Japan. While itâs very common to hear about Europeans helping the Jews escape, rarely does one hear about the Japanese or Chinese contribution to helping the Jews. It is estimated that Sugihara saved between 6,000 and 10,000+ Jews from the Holocaust. He was honored by the state of Israel for his deeds as Righteous Among the Nations.
Sugihara Chiune was born in 1900, his parents were fairly high up - his mother being upper-middle class which is equal to the samurai class. His father wanted him to be a doctor but he purposefully failed the exam. He became involved in diplomacy, working for Japanâs government in the time leading up to the Second World War. He was eventually given a position in Harbin, China to deal with Russian diplomacy. He studied Russian and German and became an expert in Russian affairs. Mostly, that involved trying to keep the peace between Russia and Japan as they squabbled over Manchuria.
He later worked trying to keep the peace between the Soviet Union and Japan as Japan inched into China and worked on the Chinese Far East Railway, which linked Russia to Siberia to China to Manchuria and into Korea. Because the railway linked to various ports and harbors (the ones not coated in deep ice), Japan and Russia fought over who would have control of the line. Eventually it bounced back and forth and today the Railway is the property of China proper.
While Sugihara was in Harbin, China he converted to Eastern Orthodox, a denomination of Christianity which came about when the Roman Catholic Church split from Byzantium (present-day Istanbul). As an aside, Eastern Orthodox is what gives rise to Greek Orthodox and Russian Orthodox and so while many of the Western European nations tend to be more Catholic, many Eastern European nations like Russia, Belarus, the Czech Republic, Lithuania, Hungary etc. tend to be more Orthodox. Sugiharaâs conversion is seen as strange for the Japanese who have no official religion.
While attempting to keep the peace between China, the Soviet Union and Japan, Sugihara resigns as the Deputy Foreign Minister of Manchuria because the Japanese treat the Chinese so poorly - saying they treated them like animals. This is seen as a bit strange because in the Japanese hierarchy, especially the government, youâre told to follow your orders without complaint. This is all leading up to the Second Sino-Japanese War over Manchuria. If you want to read more about the Japanese Empire and Manchuria during WWII, my other post on that is HERE.
He marries twice, his first marriage to a Russian woman which ends in divorce, his second to a Japanese woman named Sugihara Yukiko. When Sugihara converts to Orthodox Christianity, he takes on the Baptismal name of âPavel Sergeyevichâ which is sometimes written as Pavel Sergeivich or Paul Sergius. Yukikoâs Baptismal name becomes âMaryâ sometimes written as âMariaâ. She is said to have been attracted to him because he treated her as an equal, whereas Japanese society was very sexist and didnât afford Japanese women the same privileges as men.
He is appointed the vice-consul of Kaunas, the second largest city in Lithuania. His job was to handle the embassy to Japan in Lithuania and also he worked to monitor Soviet and German forces. The reason for that is Japan was allied to Germany in name only and Japan was said to have been working with Poland for a contingency plan against the Germans.Â
As many Lithuanian people and Polish people ended up displaced in the Second World War began, many citizens wanted visas to get to Japan and be out of the crossfires. Many of the refugees were from Poland (which fell to Nazi Germany) as well as many Lithuanians who feared Nazi Germany would move into their land. The process of obtaining a Japanese visa required proper immigration procedures and funds to cover the fees. This was difficult for most of the refugees since they hadnât had time to file all their paperwork and many were poor either from the economy or from having to go on the run.
Sugihara now faced a dilemma because he could turn his back on the refugees as Japanese policy demanded or he could skirt the law. He knew that if he left them behind, many of them would fall victim to the Germans, either being caught in the crossfire between German and Soviet forces or because many of them were Jewish or had Jewish ancestry and so they would be sent to the concentration camps. He had a crisis of faith where his duty as a Japanese diplomat was to ignore them but the Christian doctrine tells you that if someone is in danger and you can help them, you help them. He consulted with his family and his wife told him he should help them so they began issuing visas because they knew it was the right thing to do.
Keep in mind, these are the days before computers, so he had to write the visas by hand. Many of them were travel visas, which is just a fancy way of saying that they could be used for multiple people (typically families) instead of individual visas. This was smart because it not only cut down on how much he had to write, but it also left many children undeclared, so in the event that one family unit should happen be stopped by officials for whatever reason, some of the family could then pretend to be from someone elseâs family and slip by. It wasnât entirely uncommon for parents who were detained to give their children to trusted people to look after them.
He brokered passage with the Soviets for the Jewish families. Keep in mind that European society in general didnât care for the Jews and they hadnât for many centuries; in Medieval times when the Black Plague was blamed on Jews poisoning the water. In short, the Soviets had no more love for Jews than the Nazis; the only difference was the Soviets just oppressed the Jews, they didnât round them up and send them off to death camps. Also keep in mind that the Japanese and the Soviets were technically enemies and that Sugihara was a vice-consul which is very low on the hierarchical totem pole which limited his ability to make things happen by himself. The Soviets agreed to let the Jews pass for five times the normal train fare.
He and his wife spent 18-20 hour days writing travel visas by hand for the refugees. This went on from about July 18th to August 28th, 1940. The embassy was about to be closed down so he continued to work until he was forced to leave the embassy. He continued writing visas until September 4th, when he had to leave by train. It is said as the train was leaving he threw multiple written visas out of the window for the people seeing him off. Finally when he could write no more, he threw blank sheets of paper out of the window with his signature and the seal from the consulate for them to write in their own visas, apologizing for not being able to write anymore.
Itâs unclear how many people were saved because of the sheer number of travel visas he wrote and the nature of the travel visa to include multiple people. Itâs also said that Sugihara left behind his seal so that even after the embassy had closed, people could forge visas under his name. 5,580 visas were made officially which means at least 6,000 people were saved but due to forgeries and the nature of the visas, itâs probable the number is much higher. The enigmatic nature of the travel visa also makes it hard to give Sugihara the credit he deserves for having saved so many people, but Sugiharaâs methods helped save more people than wouldâve been possible otherwise.
After leaving Lithuania, Sugihara continued to work in consulates in Prague (Czechoslovakia), Bucharest (Romania) and in Prussia but when the Soviets occupied Romania in 1944, he was placed under arrest until 1946 because he was a Japanese official.
Many of the people he helped took the Far East Railway to Vladivostok, Russia where they then caught boats or ferries to Japan. The Russian embassies and consulates in Japan then helped many of the Jews relocate to places that were willing to take the Jews with asylum visas - specifically Canada, Australia, Shanghai and other places. Many of the refugee Jews from Europe found places to stay in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Shanghai, China and so they were typically called the Argentinean Ghetto and the Shanghai Ghetto. Ghetto is an old Italian word originating in Venice, the Venetian Ghetto was the part of the city the Jews and the Gypsies/Roma lived.
After Sugihara was released, he was let go by the Japanese government - officially because the management and logistics of Japanâs infrastructure was altered after the war but Sugiharaâs wife claimed it was because of his insubordination in Lithuania. After that, Sugihara worked multiple menial jobs for very little money, at one point selling light bulbs. He then moved back to the Soviet Union, living a very low-key life until the 60s and 70s. He received the honor of Righteous Among the Nations by Israel in the 80s but was too ill to go himself - being in his eighties - so his wife received the award on his behalf.
Most of Japan had no idea of the impact of Sugiharaâs efforts until his death in 1986 when various Jewish delegates and the Israeli ambassador arrived at the funeral - strange for an average joe to get so much attention. Once that story broke, Sugiharaâs name was spread through the media.
As for the Japanese reaction to the Jews during WWII, it was a bit ambivalent. Although Nazi Germany had demanded that the Japanese (who had so many refugee Jews in their control, especially in the Shanghai Ghetto which was under Japanese control) the Japanese never handed them over. Some have speculated that it was because the Japanese didnât care about Germany which makes a bit of sense because Japan only allied with Germany for the sake of its own Empire. Others say that Japan wanted the Jews there because they could be used against the Germans as allies if they ever had to come to blows. Still others say that theyâd heard the stereotypes that the Jews were all wealthy and were skilled bankers so having a bunch of grateful citizens in the Empire of Japan with money would enrich the Empire.
But the explanation that holds the most water is that the Japanese just didnât care about Germany. The Jews were hated by the Aryan supremacists because they were said to be of a lesser race - short and dark-skinned - which is how the Aryans viewed Asians too. The white supremacist policies of Nazi Germany probably made it so that the Japanese werenât really that cooperative in general with the Nazis because, like the Jews, Asians and Japanese thought of as were a âlesser raceâ. Added to that, Japan and Germany were allies in name only and had very little contact during the war itself; Germanyâs goals were of no importance to the Japanese Empireâs goals. All that mattered was that Germany played its part.
Sugiharaâs legacy is much less known than most of those who helped the Jews or resisted the Nazis, likely because it never really came to light until the 80s but itâs the subject of many stories and movies including the biography written by Sugiharaâs wife Yukiko called âVisas for Lifeâ.
In the Eastern Orthodox tradition of Christianity, Sugihara is portrayed as a saint. Pictured above is the typical icon of Sugihara who is sometimes known as Sempo - the Chinese translation of the characters of his name. Although he was never canonized - which is the way someone gets declared a saint - itâs popular opinion that heâs a saint, sort of like Mother Teresa.Â
For more information on Sugihara Chiune you can check out this biography, which is where I got the icon. It has a much more personal biography of Suighara than I could do including things like notes on his first marriage and why there was a divorce etc. And that is HERE.
The wikipeda article of Sugihara Chiune is HERE which is a bit of an overview like I did.
The Russian Orthodox Church has an article on him HERE.
There was a movie based on Sugihara Chiune called âVisas for Virtueâ with Chris Tashima and Susan Fukuda, if you want to watch a movie.
The book that Sugihara Yukiko wrote is called Visas for Life. There are other stories about Sugihara Chiune like Passage to Freedom: The Sugihara Story by Ken Mochizuki and there are also books on the Japanese and the Jews, the most well-known would beThe Fugu Plan by Marvin Tokayer.
I really like the book Sugihara Yukiko wrote, partly because itâs a good read and partly because she was there so itâs a bit more credible and personal than a normal biography or history book.
-Beyondsilkroads
Rebloggeg from Asianhistory at:Â http://asianhistory.tumblr.com/post/43344320512/sugihara-chiune-is-one-of-the-lesser-known-heroes

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Early Interactions of the Chinese Central Plain With the Southern Yue (770 B.C-220 A.D)
 Picture Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nam-Viet_200bc.jpg
To kick off this tumblr blog, the first entry will reveal to us an interesting albeit limited perspective on the Han people in the early ancient time in China and their interactions with the Southern people, generically referred to by the time as Yue (Viá»t). This Han-Yue study has been at the center of cross-ethnic and cultural studies in the context of Sino-Viet relationship for  a long time. This branch of research is highly appealing because it revealed a great deal about the long-standing dynamism occurring across the border of two neighbored nations, Vietnam and China and consequently held important genealogical implications if the studies produce fruitful outcomes. In addition, it contributes positively to the studies of the emergence of nationalism, nation-state conceptualization, interregional conflicts and opens up a wide ranges of opportunities for genealogical studies in this contemporary era. However, the reality is that Han-Yue study remained a highly complex discourse, in which a plethora of historical resources no longer existed, and the insufficiency of information due to lack of historical records prevented scholars from acquiring a full-fledged picture of this history. The study posted here today is an attempt to recapture a brief period of Han-Yue interaction, investigate the notion of Yue ( as a culture or ethnographic term?), and challenge the argument in favor of the submissive nature of Yue Guo (è¶ćœïŒwhen faced its more civilized Northern counterpart.
Some terminologies: è¶ćœïŒViá»t Quá»c), ćè¶ïŒNam Viá»t), è¶äœïŒTriá»u ÄĂ ), 秊ć§çïŒTáș§n Thá»§y HoĂ ng)Â
For my full research, click on this link: http://db.tt/que14yoT
More published research on this topic, see: Â
 Brindley, Erica, âBarbarians or Not? Ethnicity and Changing Conceptions of the Ancient Yue (Viet) Peoples, ca. 400- 50 BCâ,Article Link: http://www.ihp.sinica.edu.tw/~asiamajor/pdf/2003a/03%20brindley.pdf
 Brindley, Erica, âPresentations and Uses of Yue Identity Along The Southern Frontier of the Han, CA. 200-111 B.C.E.â, Annual Journal of the Society for the Study of Early China, Volume 33-34, 2010-2011, University of California Press, Berkeley, California
 Falkenhausen, Von Lothar, âThe Waning of the Bronze Age: Material Culture and Social Developments, 770-481 B.Câ in Loewe and Shaughnessy, Cambridge History, p. 526
 Lary, Diana, âThe tomb of the King of Nanyue- the Contemporary Agenda of History: Scholarship and Identityâ, Modern China, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Jan., 1996), pp. 3-27
Have fun reading !Â