Hi, thank you for your very elaborate response to my post. The effort you took to writing this is something I appreciate, regardless of what the content states. But I canât help but feel like laughing reading this because I feel that you have misread or misinterpreted some information about me, but it is specifically funny because I donât recall even giving out any information of this sort to be misconstrued in the first place.
For example, first of all, you state that I âraged against women who shave their hair as conforming to a beauty normâ. Where did I rage against this? In the post where I write âin the end, weâre all the same?â about women who may see my posts and think that body hair is gross. How, exactly, if this example is the one you are referring to (as it is the only example I could possibly think of), does this make me rage against women who shave in order to conform to a beauty ideal? Surely, if you read this correctly, although I am not raging, you would see I am criticising the women who shave and who call other women with hair gross. That is a very small percentage of women. Women, who criticise other women, who donât shave, while they shave. Does that make sense? Iâm not raging at women who shave, I am raging at women who shave AND critisize women who do not. In fact if you read any of my posts that would concern this â or in fact my âprotestâ video which initially started anything of the sort - it emphasises that I have absolutely no problem with women who shave, and by not shaving I am not âstanding up for women to be naturalâ but I am standing up for âwomen to have the choice.â Direct quotes by the way. I followed this video up with a result video, in which at the end I shaved one armpit while left the other one hairy, and attached a picture of that at the end to emphasise the equality of my idea further. So not only you have taken one single post out of context and extracted a meaning which plainly does not exist, you clearly have done absolutely no research into something that you passionately wish to create an argument against.
Second of all, I think you have again misunderstood why I reacted firmly, saying âFuck offâ, at comments that I have received which have been sexual. Lol, I have not reacted that way because they are sexual, I have reacted that way because they have been personal. And anyone who has messaged me privately, to let me know that they masturbate to my pictures, and if âthatâs okayâ, if I have already been having a conversation with them, I have told them that I donât mind if they masturbate to my photos because anyone can interpret my photos in any way that they like, anyone can find them sexual, sexy, or inspiring, interesting, and even simply âoh alrightâ - whatever, that does not concern me. But I have told them that I would rather they did not bring it up in conversation because it is not why I make the posts that I do and I have no interest to have a conversation of that kind.
So. It is not the sexual nature that I have reacted to - it is to the offensive personal directness which shows lack of respect to me as a person. Just because I make photos which can be seen as sexual - again something which I do not deny - does not mean I am here for sexual purposes. What I deny is the reason WHY I make them. I do not make them FOR people to masturbate to, they are sexual yes, but I do not make them for the purpose for people to get off. That is why I am fine with prospect that someone might enjoy themselves to my photos in their private time, but why I am not fine with them conversing with me about it or disrespecting me with crude messages. Sexy images, sexy intent does not mean I am here so everyone can fuck me and because I am horny. In plain English. And just because something can be construed as sexy, does not mean that that person has a right to directly message me asking if they can suck on my armpits or any part of my body. Are we clear on that?
You say that I play coy, and am somehow trying to create a sexual image of women with body hair. Bingo. The one thing which you did NOT misconstrue. That IS the reason why I make the media I do. I donât see media of people like myself, professionally, glamourised, or of good quality, sexual or not sexual. And I wanted to change that. Since I canât see that media, and I donât see that media, I do it myself. So although you did get the whole reason and idea behind it wrong, you did at least get that right. Except rather than âmaking it sexualâ, I am simply embracing the beauty in it which I myself already see and which I donât see expressed. In other words, I am not creating something that I donât think is already there. I do think that women with hair can be sexy. Though my reasons have nothing to do with me being against people shaving or people being sexual about hairy women. None at all! Lol, and thus that is why I laugh.
Just because I am making pretty, professional, sexy or whatever have you photos of hairy women, does not mean I am against shaved women. There is a place for all, and every kind. I am simply filling the lack that is my kind.
And by the way, saying âsuper cuteâ, etc, â you think too much into it. I like to call myself things like that. I do find hair super cute, and I can find it both cute and sexy. They donât cancel out each other. If they do for you, then that is your opinion, but it does not necessarily mean that is what I believe or any one else believes, so I think it is a bit rushed to assume such things. When I called my ass hair super cute, donât think for a second that I expected people to be like âaw cute like a little small bunny rabbitâ and did not expect people to find it sexy. But at the same time, is it also super cute to me in a non sexual way? Yeah it is. It can be both. And just because I state that I find it cute does not mean I am trying to sway people into thinking the picture shouldnât be sexy. That is the most ridiculous idea. Of course I canât blame you though, you spoke on two posts which you took completely out of context, without thinking this through yourself.
Although I donât think you really care for a response or will even understand a reply such as this, I wanted to write it anyway because it was so elaborate and funny at how deeply you tried to extract things that were not there. It might also be nice for others to read and understand, though I doubt many others will have come to the same conclusion as you. If you were the anon who asked me that one question which I replied âFuck offâ to though, I do not take it back. I say Fuck off again, and will say it again. If not, then have a great day and a Happy New Year. :)