The story repeats itself.

Andulka
we're not kids anymore.
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Misplaced Lens Cap

Discoholic 🪩
official daine visual archive

ellievsbear

trying on a metaphor
macklin celebrini has autism
Keni
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
taylor price
YOU ARE THE REASON

if i look back, i am lost
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

pixel skylines
seen from Iraq

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Jordan
seen from Nepal

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from South Korea

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia

seen from Paraguay

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Jamaica
seen from Pakistan
seen from Thailand
seen from United States
@haknamindustries
The story repeats itself.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Another easter egg hidden in "Patlabor - The New Files: Episode 8 - The Seven Days of Fire".
I found a neat little easter egg in "Patlabor - The New Files: Episode 8 - The Seven Days of Fire".
The Network Is Still There. The People Aren’t.
There was a time when typing a message into a terminal actually meant something.
You hit enter, and it went somewhere real. Not into a queue. Not into a model. Not into a monetisation funnel dressed up as a timeline. It went to people. Actual people. In a room. Watching the same stream of text, in real time, with no gatekeeper standing between your signal and their eyes.
That wasn’t magic. That was just how the internet worked.
Or how it was supposed to work.
Back When the Network Was the Interface
Once upon a time, the stack was clean.
user → client → protocol → network → other users
No middlemen. No “boost this post.” No “unlock reach.” No opaque ranking system deciding whether your words were worth anyone’s time.
You joined a channel. You spoke. Everyone saw it.
If you were boring, you got ignored. If you were interesting, people replied. That was the algorithm. Brutal, human, immediate.
IRC didn’t care who you were. It didn’t care how much money you had. It didn’t care about your engagement metrics, your posting schedule, your brand voice, or your follower count.
It just delivered the message.
Thirty years ago, a kid with a dodgy connection and a half-broken client had the same broadcasting power as anyone else in the room.
That wasn’t a limitation.
That was the point.
The Great Trade: Convenience for Control
Then came the carrot.
Convenience.
No more remembering servers. No more weird clients. No more figuring out where your people were hanging out. Just sign up, log in, and we’ll handle the rest. We’ll show your content to people. We’ll connect you. We’ll grow your audience.
It worked.
People moved.
The old infrastructure didn’t break — it just got abandoned. Like a perfectly good city left to rot because someone built a shinier one down the road with better lighting and easier parking.
And once everyone moved in?
The terms changed.
What was once:
type → delivered → seen
became:
type → platform → algorithm → maybe seen
That “maybe” is doing a lot of heavy lifting.
The Illusion of Reach
Modern social media sells reach the way casinos sell luck.
The promise is scale. Massive, global, instant visibility. You’re not limited to a channel of a few hundred people anymore. You’ve got the whole world.
In theory.
In practice, most users are shouting into a void that looks busy from the outside and silent from within.
The timeline is full, but your post isn’t in it.
Not unless the system decides it should be.
Not unless you play the game.
Not unless you pay.
So now you’ve got the worst of both worlds:
No guaranteed delivery like IRC
No guaranteed reach like the marketing copy suggests
Just a probabilistic system where visibility is rationed, nudged, and increasingly sold back to you.
Managing Ten Platforms Instead of One Network
We were told this was simpler.
That we wouldn’t have to coordinate presence anymore. That we wouldn’t need to maintain identities across fragmented systems.
Absolute nonsense.
What we actually got was:
IRC: 1 protocol → many networks → 1 client Now: many platforms → many identities → no shared layer
Instead of managing a nick and a handful of channels, you’re now:
maintaining multiple accounts
adapting to multiple formats
chasing multiple algorithms
posting into multiple systems
All of which refuse to talk to each other.
Congratulations. You’re now manually federating closed systems like some kind of human middleware.
The Backbone Is Open. The World Isn’t There.
Here’s the part that stings.
The internet itself didn’t close.
The protocols are still there. HTTP still works. RSS still works. Email still works. You can still stand on the open backbone and broadcast your signal into the void.
The problem is:
No one’s there.
The settlements moved.
What used to be shared space is now empty infrastructure — perfectly functional, completely uninhabited. Meanwhile, the crowds live inside bright, sealed environments orbiting overhead, each one charging rent in money, data, or attention.
You can still build a website.
You can still publish a feed.
You can still speak.
But unless you plug yourself into one of the gated systems, your signal doesn’t land anywhere meaningful.
Not because the network is broken.
Because the people left.
Pay to Speak, Pay to Be Heard
Let’s not dance around it.
Distribution is no longer neutral.
Money doesn’t guarantee success, but it absolutely increases your odds of being seen. The system is tilted, and it’s tilted on purpose.
What used to be a flat plane is now a gradient.
At the top: those who can pay, optimise, and game the system.
At the bottom: everyone else, posting into a probabilistic void and hoping for a flicker of visibility.
The lie wasn’t that the system would be free forever.
The lie was that convenience wouldn’t come with a long-term cost.
What We Actually Lost
This isn’t just about APIs or interoperability.
What we lost is simpler, and more fundamental:
a shared space where messages were reliably seen
Not scaled. Not boosted. Not optimised.
Seen.
That certainty is gone.
In its place, we got:
massive scale with no guarantees
frictionless posting with conditional visibility
global networks with localised silence
Conclusion: The Signal Still Exists
Here’s the part nobody likes to say out loud.
You can still broadcast.
You just can’t assume anyone will hear you.
That’s the real shift.
The network didn’t die. It got hollowed out, then wrapped in layers designed to extract value from the act of speaking and being heard.
What used to be a basic function is now a product.
What used to be a right of participation is now a managed experience.
And yeah, it’s bitter.
Because once you’ve seen the old model — once you’ve lived in a system where typing a message meant guaranteed delivery to real people — everything that came after feels like a downgrade wrapped in better UX.
The stack didn’t evolve.
It got enclosed.
And somewhere underneath all of it, still humming quietly, is the version of the internet that actually worked.
First build of the year, Kotobukiya Nacchin Scopedog. I love cats and mechs and Armored Trooper Votoms so this little dude (barely 10 cm tall) is the perfect combination of all of these. He even got a little cat tail but you can't see it in the picture. Also, first time applying water slides. Who would have thought that applying tiny stickers is so relaxing? Next step is a top coat to seal everything in (and hide the the nub marks 😂).

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Photography in sci-fi media: Armored Trooper Votoms - Brilliantly Shining Heresy (1994), Episode 3: „Pilgrimage“
The most powerful Gundam
crazy_whiteZero | ねんもあウィーゴをリペイントしました(✿´ ꒳ ` )♡ DIY風にしてデカーリングを少し。 バラすの大変だったけど、いい感じに仕上がったかな。
Latest obsession: Hasegawa Mechatro WeGo. I love these little potato mechs.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Research: cameras and photography in sci-fi media. Camera store (probably Yodobashi Camera) in Patlabor 2: The Movie (1993).
Research: cameras and photography in sci-fi media. Printed photos in Mobile Police Patlabor: The TV Series - Episode 13: „Gently, Your Highness“, (2003).
In feels a bit weird to file Patlabor under "sci-fi" but I'd argue it is. At the point of it's creation it was set in the future and the technologies presented feel reasonable and grounded. I guess it doesn't feel very futuristic because the aspects that are technological fiction are kept to the bare minimum, that is, the labors.
"All things change in a dynamic environment. Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
Mamoru Oshii being a fanboy about Blade Runner is simply adorable. This is an excerpt from the excellent lecture series Anime & Film Directing by Mamoru Oshii by Naro TV. The channel no longer exists but the show got preserved on archive.org.
Ghost in the Shell - Featurette: Landscapes & Dreamscapes

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A Cypherpunk's Manifesto by Eric Hughes
Posting this in full length because it is still relevant 32 years after it was first published. No, there is no TLDR. Read the fucking thing, it's important.
"Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy. A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world.
If two parties have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of their interaction. Each party can speak about their own memory of this; how could anyone prevent it? One could pass laws against it, but the freedom of speech, even more than privacy, is fundamental to an open society; we seek not to restrict any speech at all. If many parties speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other parties. The power of electronic communications has enabled such group speech, and it will not go away merely because we might want it to.
Since we desire privacy, we must ensure that each party to a transaction have knowledge only of that which is directly necessary for that transaction. Since any information can be spoken of, we must ensure that we reveal as little as possible. In most cases personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am. When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages, my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying or what others are saying to me; my provider only need know how to get the message there and how much I owe them in fees. When my identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction, I have no privacy. I cannot here selectively reveal myself; I must always reveal myself.
Therefore, privacy in an open society requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. An anonymous transaction system is not a secret transaction system. An anonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when desired and only when desired; this is the essence of privacy.
Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography. If I say something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no privacy. To encrypt is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to encrypt with weak cryptography is to indicate not too much desire for privacy. Furthermore, to reveal one's identity with assurance when the default is anonymity requires the cryptographic signature.
We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless organizations to grant us privacy out of their beneficence. It is to their advantage to speak of us, and we should expect that they will speak. To try to prevent their speech is to fight against the realities of information. Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor.
We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any. We must come together and create systems which allow anonymous transactions to take place. People have been defending their own privacy for centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow for strong privacy, but electronic technologies do.
We the Cypherpunks are dedicated to building anonymous systems. We are defending our privacy with cryptography, with anonymous mail forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic money.
Cypherpunks write code. We know that someone has to write software to defend privacy, and since we can't get privacy unless we all do, we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow Cypherpunks may practice and play with it. Our code is free for all to use, worldwide. We don't much care if you don't approve of the software we write. We know that software can't be destroyed and that a widely dispersed system can't be shut down.
Cypherpunks deplore regulations on cryptography, for encryption is fundamentally a private act. The act of encryption, in fact, removes information from the public realm. Even laws against cryptography reach only so far as a nation's border and the arm of its violence. Cryptography will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with it the anonymous transactions systems that it makes possible.
For privacy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract. People must come and together deploy these systems for the common good. Privacy only extends so far as the cooperation of one's fellows in society. We the Cypherpunks seek your questions and your concerns and hope we may engage you so that we do not deceive ourselves. We will not, however, be moved out of our course because some may disagree with our goals.
The Cypherpunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for privacy. Let us proceed together apace.
Onward.
Eric Hughes [email protected]
9 March 1993"
Resarch: cameras & photography in sci-fi media. Star Wars Andor Season 1 - Episode 5: "The Axe Forgets", (2022). This one is presented as a navigation device in the show but the base is the Polaroid SX 70 Land Camera. The unique folding mechanism makes it easily recognisable. More important though is the dialogue about reliance on tech and freedom in this scene.
"That's an old one." "Old and true. And sturdy. One of the best navigational tools ever built. Can't be jammed or intercepted. Something breaks, you can fix it yourself." "Hard to learn." "Yes, but once you've mastered it, you're free. We've grown reliant on Imperial tech, and we've made ourselves vulnerable. There's a growing list of things we've known and forgotten, things they've pushed us to forget. Things like freedom."
Replace "Imperial" with your evil mega corp of choice and you've got a neat little manifesto for d.i.y. and open source technology.