Released in 2023, I have heard labour by Paris Paloma all over my TikTok feed.
âAll day, every day, therapist, mother, maid
Nymph, then a virgin, nurse, then a servant
Just an appendage, live to attend him
So that he never lifts a finger
24/7 baby machine
So he can live out his picket-fence dreams
It's not an act of love if you make her
You make me do too much labourâ
I really love how this song challenges what we deem as labor, extending it to emotional labor and âwomanlyâ duties. The acts of therapist, mother, maid, sexual being, and servant are common ideals that women are expected to have in the home. Yet, this is also physical and emotional labor, even if it is not a commodity. I also love the âMadonna-whore complexâ nature of the ânymph, then a virginâ portion. Women's sexuality is so heavily policed, especially in heterosexuality. The expectation to be sexual for a man, but not to âflauntâ that sexuality, is so prominent. And this is deemed normal love and a common household practice, yet it is in favor of the âhimâ in this song. There are expectations for women that âheâ does not have to also comply to. And there is physical and emotional labor on the part of the woman just to benefit the man's dreams, yet we do not know if this is also the woman's dreams. She has to do labor (both physical and emotional) to let him obtain these dreams, though.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I watched "Dirty Girls" a couple months ago. As a 90s music and Riot Grrrl enthusiast, I love seeing teenage girls exploring feminism and hating the patriarchy. This group of Los Angeles young girls do exactly that and share zines and projects of their creativity on why they are feminists and how the patriarchy has hurt them.
There is so much hate toward these young girls (only about 13 or so years old) and it saddens me. Ideas about feminism have changed a lot in the past 30 years, and that is very noticable while watching this video. It was a lot more judged and questioned in the 90s, as it went against the cultural norms/hegemony. Now, bullying is still very much a thing, especially toward people who do not fit the norm. Or, it is hidden as appreciation, when it is mockery. Otherwise, videos like this and riot grrrl feminism make me question the norm/hegemony. Why is it "common sense"? Who does it help? Who does it hurt?
Does it hurt anyone to go against this cultural hegemony? Or does it only disvalue the system?
I read Persepolis in 2023 for my senior year English class in high school. Marjane Satrapi's depictions of her childhood in Iran really spoke to me. I grew up with my dad recounting stories from 1960s-90s Iraq. So, hearing and reading stories about Iran and Iraq before the Islamic revolution is especially eye-opening to me and makes me feel like a kid listening to stories from my dad.
Satrapi wears the veil, in compliance with Islamic modesty, at school. Throughout Persepolis, Satrapi shares her complicated feelings with the veil, as she has more and more complicated feelings about God. In Persepolis, the veil is worn out of choice before the Islamic regime takes over Iran. After the Shah is overthrown, the veil and modesty compliance become mandatory. Thus, with Satrapi being a rebellious and avant-garde kid, she faces backlash for her choice of clothing that does not comply with the regime.
Satrapi's complicated feelings with the veil remind me of my own. I wore a hijab for only a year before deciding it was not for me. And I think that choice is very important. In Persepolis, there was choice to comply with Islamic modesty rules before the regime. After an oppressive regime took place, there was no longer that choice. A lot of people will say that the veil itself and Islam are oppressive, but I also encourage them to look toward all religions. Do all religious rhetorics leave choice for practicers? Is it ârightâ or âwrongâ to have or not have that choice under religion? What deems that morality? Especially with the rhetoric surrounding Muslim women in hijabs, I think we should listen to women (both veiled and unveiled). We make a lot of assumptions on the âmoralityâ of Islam, without listening to those who practice the religion. We conflate Islam with oppression toward women, but do not look deeper into the histories of the patriarchy's influence in Arab countries. We do not listen to the women who are oppressed; we merely make assumptions about their oppression.
For a documentary review, I watched How to Lose Your Virginity (dir. Therese Shechter). As someone who is fairly educated in the world of comprehensive sexuality education, I reflected a lot on the role of sex education and communication surrounding sex and gender. In Nebraska, sex education is required to be abstinence-emphasized (SIECUS). This means sex education is required to mention, or be centered around, the idea of virginity and maintaining this virginity. It is true that no sex is the safest way to have sex, but we all know that people will have sex regardless. Abstinence-only/abstinence-emphasized sex education programs notoriously do not extensively educate students on diversity of gender and sexuality. When people are not educated on gender identity vs. sex and similar topics, there is simply a gap in knowledge. This gap can create hate and confusion toward the âunknownâ and be harmful toward non cishet people. Comprehensive sex education educates students on how communication creates gender and how this is impacted by biology (i.e., sex vs. gender), society, and psychology. When we use general education and comprehensive sexuality education to share concepts of communication in relation to gender and sexuality, students may question hate of the unknown and why we have the ideas we do. Why is sex âdirtyâ? Why is female virginity more emphasized than male virginity? Is virginity even real? These are questions we can answer when communication is not censored in education.
When discussing gendered/sexed voices in class, I questioned my use of voice. As someone with a complicated relationship with femininity, who has not aligned with âtraditionalâ femininity since childhood, I have always questioned my tone of voice. I always felt/was taught by my socialization that a deeper voice was more âpowerfulâ and androgynous. Despite this, though, I often still use a softer/âfeminineâ tone of voice. I think that my lesbianism and discovery of this plays a role into this. As lesbianism, in my experience, exists outside the boundaries of the patriarchy, but still in a patriarchal society, I do not want to adhere to patriarchal standards. The standard that women must be feminine and âdelicateâ and that this can be shown through voice is one that I do not want to adhere to. Yet, I do. When in public speaking situations or at work, I find myself putting on a âfeminineâ, âniceâ tone of voice. In private, when I am excited, my voice goes higher in pitch. Yet, my natural speaking tone is much lower. It feels almost secret. I do not show my âactualâ voice for fear of discontent with not being as âfeminineâ as I am expected to. I use a âfeminineâ tone of voice for protection, as I am not supposed to use my natural âmasculineâ tone of voice.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I have been binging âHacksâ for a month or two now. It is (in brief) about a young writer (Ava) who ends up working for a groundbreaking older female comedian (Deborah) in a career slump. It is witty, heartwarming, and absolutely addicting.
I could talk for hours about Jean Smart and the differences in feminism and female experiences between generations, but I had a âlightbulbâ moment when watching this after a class discussion on work. Ava puts aside everything for her job; her relationships revolve around work, her living situation revolves around work, her and Deborah revolve around work. It is a very complicated relationship between Deborah and Ava, especially as they are the âsameâ toxic people.
The relationship between women and work in âHacksâ is complicated, too. As Deborah had to fight so hard to get where she is in the comedy world (no matter what it took), her life revolves around work in the same way. Her relationships with everyone can be toppled if it means a better career. Deborah is addicted to the fame and thrill. Ava is addicted to work. Ava is wholeheartedly emotionally involved with people surrounding work, conflating the two, rather than addicted to working.
Women in male-dominated fields are heavily discussed throughout this show. On a micro level, Ava and Deborah educate each other a lot on what life is like for women of different generations, especially in the workplace. While Deborah shares stories with Ava about sexual harassment faced in the workplace and having to play nice with men abusing power, Ava shares stories about feminism, sexual identities, and her career. On a meso level, patriarchal systems and sexism are often shown in the show, especially with Deborah either putting it aside or fighting against it with her comedy. There are institutional rituals that exclude women in comedy (hence Deborah being the first woman on âLate Nightâ being a big deal). Ageism and sexism also intersect for Deborah, as people undermine her due to societal ideas. On a macro level, wage gaps and gender discrimination in the workplace are part of Deborah's career history, and she shares these stories with Ava.
I first heard this poem (via this TikTok) in 2022. I love poetry and am an avid writer (when I am in the mood). So, hearing this poem and seeing the adoration and affirmation it got from millions of women on the Internet warmed my heart. To be connected through an oppressive system, yet stand together to talk about this art, is powerful to me. This is such a beautiful poem and illustrates the repetitiveness of sexualization of women and expectations to be more than mediocre in a society where anything above mediocrity of women is criticized. You are given two options (as a woman/fem) within a patriarchal sexist system: adhere or be shunned. It is repetitive and nonsensical, as is navigating the system successfully. Vanity is not allowed, yet you only have value if you are attractive. You must be more than just pretty, but not smarter than a man. Personality is not accepted, unless it is in favor of the patriarchy. Talent is shamed, beauty is shamed, knowledge is shamed. Nothing is good enough in a patriarchal sexist system.
(Images from Pinterest. I saved them to various boards from 2023-2025)
I want to be able to grow old. I want my wife to grow my hair out and braid it. I want to celebrate my love. I want to talk about it; just be able to talk about my experiences in life.
Although it is so heavily contested nowadays, representation truly matters. In multiple gender studies classes that I have taken, we have discussed the importance of representation and just acknowledging and celebrating identities, especially intersectional identities. Celebration of love, life, and queerness can be life changing for people. There is importance in using language and communication (whether verbal or nonverbal) to affirm and support the variety of human condition, sexuality, and gender. When histories and identities are hidden, people who share these identities may not feel safe to speak or show it. This is why community is so important, especially vocality in the queer community. I believe that intersectionality within queerness should be emphasized, especially. In my geographies and sexualities class, I have had the pleasure of researching lesbian bars/the lack of lesbian bars, and safe spaces. From this research, along with knowledge I have gained on communication, the importance of spaces for community and representation has become more obvious to me. Community can thrive anywhere, but to have physical spaces free of shame that celebrate and encourage communication is essential. It also acts as a tool of resistance against oppression that does not support representation of diversity. I believe that community and language through gathering can be language of resistance.
So, I want to be represented in my community. I want to encourage community gatherings and be able to embrace my queerness. I don't want my legacy and queer history to be unseen. I want to be able to be me, loudly.
I found this video while on my usual weekly binge of random YouTube videos. This struck me as relevant to communication, as the way that people conceptualize and monetize women affects how women may act. As a fem person, concepts like this make me analyze my behavior more and understand why (some) men behave a certain way toward me. Am I perpetuating this trope by playing into innocence for my own protection?
âInstead of blaming Abby for embodying a sexist trope, 30 Rock explores how women are often forced to conform to those roles as a form of social and professional survival.â
A portion of this video analyzes the use of the âsexy babyâ trope as a form of protection in the show â30 Rockâ. There is also analysis of the main character accusing the âsexy babyâ character of holding back feminism. So, I think this specific portion of the video ties well into the use of gendered tropes and the male gaze.
Women in media are often expected to be subservient, sexy, and like accessories to the male protagonists. I feel that the sexy baby trope plays into this, as these âsexy babyâ female characters are just used as funny, sexy eye-candy. They are too âinnocentâ or âimmatureâ to be able to provide substantial plot depth, so they are just used for viewing and comedic pleasure for (primarily) male audiences. So, the male gaze is fully realized through this trope. Although some women may use âsexy babyâ as a shield, it is because men will be looking nonetheless, so to appeal to them is âsaferâ.
I also think that this trope shows the broader societal hierarchies of the patriarchy that we see in media. Women are infantilized and have their agency and maturity stripped away in order to be appealing on the screen. This, to me, is about power and the fact that these âsexy babyâ women do not have the power of knowledge and maturity to speak up against men; they are there to serve men and their desires. Having an adult, mature, sexually liberated woman is not sexy under the male gaze; having a pawn is.
The creator makes a great statement regarding societal implications of this trope:
âThe trope's persistence in the media reflects broader societal discomfort with fully realized autonomous women, Instead favoring those women who remain young, naive, and easily controlled.â
Media and portrayal on screens that we see every day allow for gendered, sexist tropes to sneak into our minds every day. To be conscious of this and the meanings of these messages is important in order to think critically and combat these ideas.
I first heard Narcissus at 16 or 17. Alanis Morissette really hits the nail on the head with Narcissus. She talks about the expectations of men and lack of repercussions of men's actions. It seems to be the consequences of the patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity in Alanis' relationship with this man. Inadvertently, this song also perpetuated my perception of gender as a 17-year-old. With descriptions of a man who is egotistical and arrogant, I was able to connect this song to many men in my life. It made me want to further myself from men and the patriarchy more and more.
The first thing that stands out to me in this song is how mothers' treatment of sons affects their attitude. This socialization into hegemonic masculinity is also in part due to what women (and moms) are taught through the patriarchy.
Part of my gender experience, as a fem person, has been at the hands of ridiculing and demeaning men. Throughout my childhood and teenage years, I was directly or indirectly taught that I was smaller and not as intelligent, through the way boys and men talked to me and interacted with me. Listening Narcissus was part empowerment and part realizing, âOh. Men are also just going through the effects of the patriarchy, too. But do I have to forgive them?â. Alanis seems to âforgiveâ the man who she describes, still falling for him despite his ego. Do fem people owe cis men forgiveness, as they were also socialized a certain way? I, personally, do not think that forgiveness is owed, but I know of (and am curious about) other perspectives.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Note: This essay is long, so it is organized into three parts.
Trad Wives and Authoritarianism
We read this article for class, but I wanted to expand my thoughts on the rise of authoritarian in America and âtrad wivesâ.
âAs men are elevated, women must be disempowered. There are correlations between the appeal of strongmen and moments when men feel their status is threatened due to changes in gender roles and distributions of economic and social power.â â Ruth Ben-Ghiat
Tradwives (and the hatred of them) are all over my TikTok feed. That, along with modest fashion being on the rise, hate of âBBL cultureâ, and dismissal of influencers being Trump supporters, seems to correlate with a rise in Gen-Z conservatism. As Gen-Z further supports the gendered ideas of âalpha maleâ and âgirly girlâ and âI'm just a girlâ, we will fall further and further into the clenches of conservatism and authoritarianism.
Trad ideology doesn't just extend to 1950s housewife videos. It also has sinister connections with right-wing extremism, experts say.
Ben-Ghiat utilizes the Vice article listed above when discussing tradwives. When reading this article, what stuck out to me was:
âShe herself admits that sheâs romanticising the 1950s aesthetic, but says âthereâs both positive and negative things about the 50s housewife idea,â saying that she recognises some could absolutely identify issues with the way women were treated back then.â
It is hard for me to put so many thoughts into words, but I will try.
I think that it is perfectly understandable for people to be stay-at-home parents. Parental labor is equal labor to office labor. Yet, what concerns me is this being watered down into âwoman's workâ and â1950s aestheticâ, without the acknowledgement of how Black women were treated during this time or how second-wave Feminism was put into place due to âThe Feminine Mystiqueâ being published. And maybe this lack of education correlates to this rise in White woman conservatism. With people my age (and older) not reading outside of school, not being able to afford education, and being sucked into the wormhole of doom-scrolling, we only see what we want to see. We are not as educated on Feminism and what women in the 1950s endured, or what literature they published. So, when our Instagram and TikTok feeds show us that the 1950s housewife aesthetic is desirable, and then further feeds alt-right content due to the algorithm associating them, we can't look away. That communication of association is ingrained in us. So, conservatism's support of the âmanlinessâ and âgirlinessâ that is so aesthetic on our feeds is something that we want to do and show to the world. It is all for aesthetics and looks (like hegemonic masculinity). Authoritarian governments thrive off the uneducated and disempowered, and tradwives are feeding that to them. When it is communicated that this form of gender expression is the ideal form, that gender expression is created. When the lack of individuality and need for everything to be marketable is communicated, those ideas are put into effect.
I started doing research about The Lesbian Bar Project in January of this year. Lesbian bars have gone from 200 to roughly 35 in the United States, with an all time low of 15 in 2019. The Lesbian Bar Project highlights the remaining (and emerging) lesbian bars in the United States.
Lesbianism is diverse and historical. That is why I like that these lesbian bars are inclusive toward all. Inclusivity and listening to the stories of others, especially of other queer people, is so important. Even if someone passes as cisgender or heterosexual, you do not know their whole story, and it is a wonderful thing to be able to listen to another person's story, no matte their background. Lesbian bars create space for this.
"When thinking about why we need to preserve lesbian spaces it really is about recognizing that a lesbian exists and there's the really great pride in lesbian identity"
With the younger lesbian community being mostly forced to connect via The Internet and social media, lesbian and queer spaces are disappearing more. (This is also caused by gentrification, gay bars being inclusive to all and not just lesbian-centered, and COVID-19).
Inclusivity is essential, and that can exist within the lesbian communities and lesbian bars. Both lesbian history and culture and inclusivity can coexist and thrive off of one another, especially as lesbian gender identity often exists outside of the gender binary. Without gender being rooted in patriarchal ideals, gender exists outside of these boundaries. That is, at least, how I experience my gender: outside of the boundaries of the patriarchy.
The queer community as a whole is inclusive, so to show and celebrate that inclusivity can make people within the community feel desired, loved, and seen. The lesbian community is often overshadowed, questioned, and hidden within the queer community. Lesbian bars create spaces for lesbianism to be celebrated. The purpose of these spaces are not to exclude other queer people, straight people, or men; it is to celebrate lesbianism and put the focus toward women/AFAB people and lesbians. That is why I think that exclusivity should not be tolerated at these bars, especially as transness is so important to lesbian history and dismantling of the patriarchy. Celebration and joy and loudness and queerness should be expressed for and with one another. Inclusive lesbian bars create a space within a space for this joy.
I first heard this piece from Audre Lorde in my Intro to Gender Studies class my first semester of college (Fall of 2023). Through this piece and my wonderful professor, I learned about intersectionality. Now, I recognize intersectionality everywhere. When one person (or group) is affected, we are all affected and connected. So, for Audre Lorde, she experiences life as a person who has membership with various identities. I, too, have membership with various identities. Our identities make us whole, they do not battle another. Under an oppressive system, we may be told that one identity must be more prominent than another, but our experiences and these portions of ourselves make us whole. To me, they bounce off each other and weave a large web. Oppression comes from the same source: the patriarchy/kyriarchy. Someone may embrace one identity more vocally than another, but under an oppressive system, these identities are equal. Thus, people who share these identities with us are equal, we are seen as one and the same under the patriarchy/kyriarchy (and, to me, under humanity). Patriarchal hegemonic control places all oppressed peoples under a shared struggle. Through the lens of resistance of oppression, I think that intersectionality is very prevalent. We are all in this fight together.
I would also like to give acknowledgement to KimberlĂŠ Crenshaw for coining the term âintersectionalityâ.
I have just recently started my reading journey of bell hooks' All About Love, yet the feminist analysis on how gender plays a role on our perception of love (especially for women) has already stood out to me.
âMen theorize about love, but women are more often love's practitioners. Most men feel that they receive love and therefore know what it feels like to be loved; women often feel we are in a constant state of yearning, wanting love but not receiving it.â
hooks delves more into the reasons behind this. It is complicated, as hegemonic masculinity does not support emotional men, and hooks mentions this, talking about how love is often not talked about by non-emotional "real men". Although women are the "emotional" ones on this gender binary, men still dominate in the field of love. According to hooks, fantastical romance novels and poems by men are the most revered, while women who speak of fantastical love are seen as writing it for "pure escape."
So, from my very brief reading of All About Love, I thought about the communication of love. Love communicated by men is valid, yet it stems from a perspective that they are deserving of love. Love communicated by women stems from a perspective of yearning for love. In a patriarchial society where men are favored, they are also favored in the realm of love.
âOverlapâ is an exhibition at Petshop in the heart of Benson, in Omaha. I include the artist's (Mx. Jae) description of their work, but this exhibit made me think about the confusion of gender (especially for AFAB people) and the intersection of gender and religion. One piece, titled âGenderâ (image on the right) portrays this well. From my interpretation, the pink and blue strings, overlapping and intertwining, represent the overlap of masculinity and femininity. The woman clasping her head seems overwhelmed, presumably, by the gender barriers of masculinity and femininity. This exhibit, from my perspective, rejects the gender binary, but represents its importance in 1960s-1980s culture and religion.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
âGod, sometimes you donât come through.
Do you need a woman to look after you?â
Tori Amos' God rings as a feminist anthem, to me. While it uses the trope that women are expected to cater toward men and âlook afterâ them, I interpret the sentiment as sarcastic. This lyric combined with: âA few witches burning, gets a little toasty hereâ rang the bell that this is feminist. The line on witches reminded me of the feminist saying, âWe are the granddaughters of the witches you couldn't burn.â I have my own issues with this saying, but I am looking at Amos' song through a 90's feminist lens. I think that the line on witches in God alludes toward rebellious women being likened to witches. If you are not conforming with gendered expectations (performing emotional labor for men), you must be a witch. So, sarcastically, Amos must be a toasty, burning witch, as she does not desire to look after a man.
âCause I'm just a girl, oh, little old me
Well, don't let me out of your sight
Oh, I'm just a girl, all pretty and petite
So don't let me have any rightsâ
No Doubt's Just A Girl is a commentary on perception of women of being âjust a girlâ and belittling/diminishing women to being just that: women. This song caught my attention during the âI'm just a girlâ excuse trend on TikTok, where girls would excuse their actions (either big or small) with the caption âI'm just a girlâ. Commentary on how we are doing unnecessary tasks every day instead of enjoying our lives became interlaced with gender (i.e., âI don't want to do taxes, I want to go out with friends because I'm just a girl.â). This, along with âgirl dinnerâ and âgirl mathâ were understandable to me, but went in the wrong direction toward putting diminishing stereotypes on girls. âGirl mathâ is just budgeting, and âgirl dinnerâ is having portions that don't align with the portion plates we were taught. They, to me, are doing what is best for one's self and fulfilling ones needs. But, instead of calling it that, these trends support the idea that women are incompetent and just women. It is not fighting against stereotypes against women, it is supporting them, whether intentionally or not.