(Disclaimer: I am not a sociologist, criminologist, activist, or professional anything. I am capable of being wrong ā as capable as any of the aformentioned. Probably more. I am capable of overstepping or poorly stating my feelings and thoughts or simply misreading. I must nevertheless TRY to formulate my thoughts and feelings. I must always trust those who do know better. I must always learn and grow.)
What Whiteness does when Whites commit crimes: theoreticizes an actual event, promotes an objective, wait-and-see viewpoint that "eliminates the possibility for Race to be a factor", argues always a consideration for each event's nuances, calls for more investigation into "details of the case." Details. Details. Never enough Details.
There has never been a single crime in the history of the world where each detail was objectively provable as true or false, a fact made even more true when there are only two sides and one of those versions has been silenced by the other. Yet consistently, Whiteness gives the benefit of the doubt to white criminals.
The "Benefits of Doubt" are: stripping the dead of their death to make the murdered culpable or responsible, refusing to make a judgement until "all the facts" are revealed (as if it's possible to do so) and to then argue any failure or inability to do this as reason enough for exoneration, dismissing anyone who chooses to pass judgement based on their eyes (you know, like the video clearly shows it) as rash or biased or irrational or militant or (as I recently found out) a race traitor.
I don't think I need to argue how these same people handle crime (or just the mundane acts of walking, standing, driving, attending a pool party, sleeping on your couch in your own home) when done by Black America.
As a white guy, I have to confront when I do this first. Details are great, nuance is great...except when it creates a framework that benefits the powerful (read: living) and degrades the weak (read: dead/murdered).
Instead of scouring for more and more and more details, take your theoreticized objectivity and look at the situation from a perspective that presents its simple blind truths. For example:
adult with a gun, mace, a nightstick,
a taser, training, a responsibility to
uphold an oath to protect, and
easy access to a radio for more
with similar or even greater utilities
VS
the unarmed untrained sometimes
adolescent sometimes minding
their own damn business citizen
who is supposed to be protected
by oath-sworn official of the government.
You can hunt for details until your white face turns blue, but nothing will change the fact that āPerson with Gun & Oathā has a higher standard to be held to than the āUnarmed Citizenā and āUnarmed Citizenā deserves The Benefits of Doubt.
Especially when Race is a factor. Especially now. Especially when you consider all weāve seen made national just since Trayvon Martin was murdered, or when you consider our national history, or how progress is always met by those who seek to undo it.
Like a 21-year-old man who wants to start a Race War. How is he given āThe Benefits of Doubtā when he so clearly doesnāt want any doubt.
If we see ourselves in Darren Wilson and George Zimmerman and Dylann Roof because they share our whiteness, how are we not disgusted by what we see?
How do we strangulate the big simple facts with our hunger for the potential uncovering of tiny details that donāt ever really nullify the big truth? How do we assert that āAll Lives Matterā when Black lives are targeted and subjected postmortem to our so-called objectivity?
How do we sleep at night?
As Neil Young said in the song āSouthern Manā released 45 years ago, āhow long now?ā
How long?