Just here to surf around and have fun.

Both parties are not the same. #BlueWave

Conservatives say they don’t know why athletes are protesting. So here are over 40 athletes, coaches, sports commentators, and others explaining.

The GOP is afraid of all FBI investigations because the truth indicts their criminal politicians and kills their phoney narratives.

Where Millennials are buying the most & fewest homes.

It’s all due to housing and living costs. Also, the economy-blah blah blah yadda yadda

“This bill will be the vehicle that will ultimately provide change and provide the opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Iowa Republican state senator Rick Bertrand said of the legislation during floor debate. “There’s nothing hidden here about the agenda. You know, today the pro-life movement won a battle, but the war rages on.“’

And, for the record, whether or not a fetus is  baby isnt really the point. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

And, again, whether or not a fetus is autonomous isnt the point. Fully grown conscious AUTONOMOUS people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

Lol. k 

Human life cycle begins at conception. Check any science book.

Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

I dont particularly care how pro lifers view the issue- I care about the consequences of their legislation, which erodes bodily autonomy and reproductive control.

There is a difference between “pulling the plug” and forcible killing. You have no duty to give someone your blood to keep them alive, but you also have no justification for stabbing that person in the head and sucking their brains into a sink. Abortion is an active intervention into a natural system.

Now, we dont do this to people, especially not against their will, because its fucking EVIL.

It’s simple. Either you think it’s a human or not. If it’s human, you don’t kill it. If you don’t, well you’re stupid and tell me what species it is? Even in it’s earliest cellular form, if it isn’t human, with building blocks growing, what species off building blocks is it?

Again, whether or not a fetus is “human” isn’t being debated. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save a life.

Miscarriages happen, correct. A natural process without an external force killing the unborn human. Notice the external force part.

Your fight about spanking, income inequality, and etc makes you a hypocrite of the highest level.

Thanks

You’re defending killing of innocent life.

If you are just going to keep shouting the same fallacies and dodging the point, feel free to not reblog and find something better to do.

You are defending death of innocent humans for the purpose of “quality of life”, you have yet to define.

Access to family planning and reproductive control strongly correlates to increased quality of life in a society.

If the fetus is deemed a human it has is own body inside that of its mother. Being dependant on the mother doesn’t take away it’s rights to it’s own body.

2. Yes, it does. A fetus isn’t autonomous, so it doesn’t have bodily autonomy.  That’s…that’s how definitions work. 

They do have body autonomy. It’s a separate life. Indeed it’s inside a female but it’s still a separate body.

3. You can’t have bodily autonomy if you aren’t autonomous. Do you know what autonomy means? I don’t think you know what  autonomy means. 

3.There is no set definition when body autonomy begins. Because it’s just a theory, a concept, someone’s thought. Nice try.

3. Again, do you know what autonomous means? Do you know what autonomy means?  I don’t think you do.  I provided evidence that the two are linked.  Youre 

I do know Wednesday autonomy means. I also know body autonomy is a theory, an idea. One you try to use to solidify your point of view. You’re using theory, not fact.

3. Define autonomy for me, please. And explain how a fetus has autonomy. 

There is no definition when autonomy begins. The left’s way to replace the word life. It use to be when don’t know when life begins, and that was debunked, so the left switched to autonomy, which then can’t even be determined.

A fetus (as you try to desensitize people to it actually being an unborn child), is self governing. The DNA is instructing it to grow into a specific child.

The fact that you think children don’t have biological autonomy tells me that you don’t know what autonomy is.  Or viability, given how you said a living infant isn’t viable. Which, yeah it is. You just don’t understand those concepts. 

I’m not saying children don’t autonomy, I’m saying by liberal logic they might not.

Autonomy(referring to living things and not, like countries)  is the state of existing and functioning as an independent organism. A child is autonomous, a fetus is not. So a fetus doesn’t not have bodily autonomy.  Thanks for your time. 

Wow. 

But please, using YOUR definitions, explain how a fetus is a self-governing country. 

It’s only relevant to liberal pro-abortionists like yourself.

Boy, you really just do not understand. Maybe because understanding would weaken your position. But ignorance is a poor foundation to stand on, friend. 

Fact is this law will make it to the supreme court. And if Kennedy retires like rumors have it, then roe will be overturned.

“This bill will be the vehicle that will ultimately provide change and provide the opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Iowa Republican state senator Rick Bertrand said of the legislation during floor debate. “There’s nothing hidden here about the agenda. You know, today the pro-life movement won a battle, but the war rages on.“’

And, for the record, whether or not a fetus is  baby isnt really the point. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

And, again, whether or not a fetus is autonomous isnt the point. Fully grown conscious AUTONOMOUS people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

Lol. k 

Human life cycle begins at conception. Check any science book.

Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

I dont particularly care how pro lifers view the issue- I care about the consequences of their legislation, which erodes bodily autonomy and reproductive control.

There is a difference between “pulling the plug” and forcible killing. You have no duty to give someone your blood to keep them alive, but you also have no justification for stabbing that person in the head and sucking their brains into a sink. Abortion is an active intervention into a natural system.

Now, we dont do this to people, especially not against their will, because its fucking EVIL.

It’s simple. Either you think it’s a human or not. If it’s human, you don’t kill it. If you don’t, well you’re stupid and tell me what species it is? Even in it’s earliest cellular form, if it isn’t human, with building blocks growing, what species off building blocks is it?

Again, whether or not a fetus is “human” isn’t being debated. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save a life.

Miscarriages happen, correct. A natural process without an external force killing the unborn human. Notice the external force part.

Your fight about spanking, income inequality, and etc makes you a hypocrite of the highest level.

Thanks

You’re defending killing of innocent life.

If you are just going to keep shouting the same fallacies and dodging the point, feel free to not reblog and find something better to do.

You are defending death of innocent humans for the purpose of “quality of life”, you have yet to define.

Access to family planning and reproductive control strongly correlates to increased quality of life in a society.

If the fetus is deemed a human it has is own body inside that of its mother. Being dependant on the mother doesn’t take away it’s rights to it’s own body.

2. Yes, it does. A fetus isn’t autonomous, so it doesn’t have bodily autonomy.  That’s…that’s how definitions work. 

They do have body autonomy. It’s a separate life. Indeed it’s inside a female but it’s still a separate body.

3. You can’t have bodily autonomy if you aren’t autonomous. Do you know what autonomy means? I don’t think you know what  autonomy means. 

3.There is no set definition when body autonomy begins. Because it’s just a theory, a concept, someone’s thought. Nice try.

3. Again, do you know what autonomous means? Do you know what autonomy means?  I don’t think you do.  I provided evidence that the two are linked.  Youre 

I do know Wednesday autonomy means. I also know body autonomy is a theory, an idea. One you try to use to solidify your point of view. You’re using theory, not fact.

3. Define autonomy for me, please. And explain how a fetus has autonomy. 

There is no definition when autonomy begins. The left’s way to replace the word life. It use to be when don’t know when life begins, and that was debunked, so the left switched to autonomy, which then can’t even be determined.

A fetus (as you try to desensitize people to it actually being an unborn child), is self governing. The DNA is instructing it to grow into a specific child.

The fact that you think children don’t have biological autonomy tells me that you don’t know what autonomy is.  Or viability, given how you said a living infant isn’t viable. Which, yeah it is. You just don’t understand those concepts. 

I’m not saying children don’t autonomy, I’m saying by liberal logic they might not.

Autonomy(referring to living things and not, like countries)  is the state of existing and functioning as an independent organism. A child is autonomous, a fetus is not. So a fetus doesn’t not have bodily autonomy.  Thanks for your time. 

Wow. 

But please, using YOUR definitions, explain how a fetus is a self-governing country. 

It's only relevant to liberal pro-abortionists like yourself.

“This bill will be the vehicle that will ultimately provide change and provide the opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Iowa Republican state senator Rick Bertrand said of the legislation during floor debate. “There’s nothing hidden here about the agenda. You know, today the pro-life movement won a battle, but the war rages on.“’

And, for the record, whether or not a fetus is  baby isnt really the point. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

And, again, whether or not a fetus is autonomous isnt the point. Fully grown conscious AUTONOMOUS people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

Lol. k 

Human life cycle begins at conception. Check any science book.

Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

I dont particularly care how pro lifers view the issue- I care about the consequences of their legislation, which erodes bodily autonomy and reproductive control.

There is a difference between “pulling the plug” and forcible killing. You have no duty to give someone your blood to keep them alive, but you also have no justification for stabbing that person in the head and sucking their brains into a sink. Abortion is an active intervention into a natural system.

Now, we dont do this to people, especially not against their will, because its fucking EVIL.

It’s simple. Either you think it’s a human or not. If it’s human, you don’t kill it. If you don’t, well you’re stupid and tell me what species it is? Even in it’s earliest cellular form, if it isn’t human, with building blocks growing, what species off building blocks is it?

Again, whether or not a fetus is “human” isn’t being debated. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save a life.

Miscarriages happen, correct. A natural process without an external force killing the unborn human. Notice the external force part.

Your fight about spanking, income inequality, and etc makes you a hypocrite of the highest level.

Thanks

You’re defending killing of innocent life.

If you are just going to keep shouting the same fallacies and dodging the point, feel free to not reblog and find something better to do.

You are defending death of innocent humans for the purpose of “quality of life”, you have yet to define.

Access to family planning and reproductive control strongly correlates to increased quality of life in a society.

If the fetus is deemed a human it has is own body inside that of its mother. Being dependant on the mother doesn’t take away it’s rights to it’s own body.

2. Yes, it does. A fetus isn’t autonomous, so it doesn’t have bodily autonomy.  That’s…that’s how definitions work. 

They do have body autonomy. It’s a separate life. Indeed it’s inside a female but it’s still a separate body.

3. You can’t have bodily autonomy if you aren’t autonomous. Do you know what autonomy means? I don’t think you know what  autonomy means. 

3.There is no set definition when body autonomy begins. Because it’s just a theory, a concept, someone’s thought. Nice try.

3. Again, do you know what autonomous means? Do you know what autonomy means?  I don’t think you do.  I provided evidence that the two are linked.  Youre 

I do know Wednesday autonomy means. I also know body autonomy is a theory, an idea. One you try to use to solidify your point of view. You’re using theory, not fact.

3. Define autonomy for me, please. And explain how a fetus has autonomy. 

There is no definition when autonomy begins. The left’s way to replace the word life. It use to be when don’t know when life begins, and that was debunked, so the left switched to autonomy, which then can’t even be determined.

A fetus (as you try to desensitize people to it actually being an unborn child), is self governing. The DNA is instructing it to grow into a specific child.

The fact that you think children don’t have biological autonomy tells me that you don’t know what autonomy is.  Or viability, given how you said a living infant isn’t viable. Which, yeah it is. You just don’t understand those concepts. 

I’m not saying children don’t autonomy, I’m saying by liberal logic they might not.

Autonomy(referring to living things and not, like countries)  is the state of existing and functioning as an independent organism. A child is autonomous, a fetus is not. So a fetus doesn’t not have bodily autonomy.  Thanks for your time. 

Wow. 

But please, using YOUR definitions, explain how a fetus is a self-governing country. 

“This bill will be the vehicle that will ultimately provide change and provide the opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Iowa Republican state senator Rick Bertrand said of the legislation during floor debate. “There’s nothing hidden here about the agenda. You know, today the pro-life movement won a battle, but the war rages on.“’

And, for the record, whether or not a fetus is  baby isnt really the point. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

And, again, whether or not a fetus is autonomous isnt the point. Fully grown conscious AUTONOMOUS people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

Lol. k 

Human life cycle begins at conception. Check any science book.

Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

I dont particularly care how pro lifers view the issue- I care about the consequences of their legislation, which erodes bodily autonomy and reproductive control.

There is a difference between “pulling the plug” and forcible killing. You have no duty to give someone your blood to keep them alive, but you also have no justification for stabbing that person in the head and sucking their brains into a sink. Abortion is an active intervention into a natural system.

Now, we dont do this to people, especially not against their will, because its fucking EVIL.

It’s simple. Either you think it’s a human or not. If it’s human, you don’t kill it. If you don’t, well you’re stupid and tell me what species it is? Even in it’s earliest cellular form, if it isn’t human, with building blocks growing, what species off building blocks is it?

Again, whether or not a fetus is “human” isn’t being debated. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save a life.

Miscarriages happen, correct. A natural process without an external force killing the unborn human. Notice the external force part.

Your fight about spanking, income inequality, and etc makes you a hypocrite of the highest level.

Thanks

You’re defending killing of innocent life.

If you are just going to keep shouting the same fallacies and dodging the point, feel free to not reblog and find something better to do.

You are defending death of innocent humans for the purpose of “quality of life”, you have yet to define.

Access to family planning and reproductive control strongly correlates to increased quality of life in a society.

If the fetus is deemed a human it has is own body inside that of its mother. Being dependant on the mother doesn’t take away it’s rights to it’s own body.

2. Yes, it does. A fetus isn’t autonomous, so it doesn’t have bodily autonomy.  That’s…that’s how definitions work. 

They do have body autonomy. It’s a separate life. Indeed it’s inside a female but it’s still a separate body.

3. You can’t have bodily autonomy if you aren’t autonomous. Do you know what autonomy means? I don’t think you know what  autonomy means. 

3.There is no set definition when body autonomy begins. Because it’s just a theory, a concept, someone’s thought. Nice try.

3. Again, do you know what autonomous means? Do you know what autonomy means?  I don’t think you do.  I provided evidence that the two are linked.  Youre 

I do know Wednesday autonomy means. I also know body autonomy is a theory, an idea. One you try to use to solidify your point of view. You’re using theory, not fact.

3. Define autonomy for me, please. And explain how a fetus has autonomy. 

There is no definition when autonomy begins. The left’s way to replace the word life. It use to be when don’t know when life begins, and that was debunked, so the left switched to autonomy, which then can’t even be determined.

A fetus (as you try to desensitize people to it actually being an unborn child), is self governing. The DNA is instructing it to grow into a specific child.

The fact that you think children don’t have biological autonomy tells me that you don’t know what autonomy is.  Or viability, given how you said a living infant isn’t viable. Which, yeah it is. You just don’t understand those concepts. 

I’m not saying children don’t autonomy, I’m saying by liberal logic they might not.

Autonomy(referring to living things and not, like countries)  is the state of existing and functioning as an independent organism. A child is autonomous, a fetus is not. So a fetus doesn’t not have bodily autonomy.  Thanks for your time. 

# of avoidable deaths of mothers and infants in a world without abortions > # of avoidable deaths of mothers and infants in the same world with abortions

“This bill will be the vehicle that will ultimately provide change and provide the opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Iowa Republican state senator Rick Bertrand said of the legislation during floor debate. “There’s nothing hidden here about the agenda. You know, today the pro-life movement won a battle, but the war rages on.“’

And, for the record, whether or not a fetus is  baby isnt really the point. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

And, again, whether or not a fetus is autonomous isnt the point. Fully grown conscious AUTONOMOUS people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

Lol. k 

Human life cycle begins at conception. Check any science book.

Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

I dont particularly care how pro lifers view the issue- I care about the consequences of their legislation, which erodes bodily autonomy and reproductive control.

There is a difference between “pulling the plug” and forcible killing. You have no duty to give someone your blood to keep them alive, but you also have no justification for stabbing that person in the head and sucking their brains into a sink. Abortion is an active intervention into a natural system.

Now, we dont do this to people, especially not against their will, because its fucking EVIL.

It’s simple. Either you think it’s a human or not. If it’s human, you don’t kill it. If you don’t, well you’re stupid and tell me what species it is? Even in it’s earliest cellular form, if it isn’t human, with building blocks growing, what species off building blocks is it?

Again, whether or not a fetus is “human” isn’t being debated. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save a life.

Miscarriages happen, correct. A natural process without an external force killing the unborn human. Notice the external force part.

Your fight about spanking, income inequality, and etc makes you a hypocrite of the highest level.

Thanks

You’re defending killing of innocent life.

If you are just going to keep shouting the same fallacies and dodging the point, feel free to not reblog and find something better to do.

You are defending death of innocent humans for the purpose of “quality of life”, you have yet to define.

Access to family planning and reproductive control strongly correlates to increased quality of life in a society.

If the fetus is deemed a human it has is own body inside that of its mother. Being dependant on the mother doesn’t take away it’s rights to it’s own body.

2. Yes, it does. A fetus isn’t autonomous, so it doesn’t have bodily autonomy.  That’s…that’s how definitions work. 

They do have body autonomy. It’s a separate life. Indeed it’s inside a female but it’s still a separate body.

3. You can’t have bodily autonomy if you aren’t autonomous. Do you know what autonomy means? I don’t think you know what  autonomy means. 

3.There is no set definition when body autonomy begins. Because it’s just a theory, a concept, someone’s thought. Nice try.

3. Again, do you know what autonomous means? Do you know what autonomy means?  I don’t think you do.  I provided evidence that the two are linked.  Youre 

I do know Wednesday autonomy means. I also know body autonomy is a theory, an idea. One you try to use to solidify your point of view. You’re using theory, not fact.

3. Define autonomy for me, please. And explain how a fetus has autonomy. 

There is no definition when autonomy begins. The left’s way to replace the word life. It use to be when don’t know when life begins, and that was debunked, so the left switched to autonomy, which then can’t even be determined.

A fetus (as you try to desensitize people to it actually being an unborn child), is self governing. The DNA is instructing it to grow into a specific child.

The fact that you think children don’t have biological autonomy tells me that you don’t know what autonomy is.  Or viability, given how you said a living infant isn’t viable. Which, yeah it is. You just don’t understand those concepts. 

I’m not saying children don’t autonomy, I’m saying by liberal logic they might not.

Autonomy(referring to living things and not, like countries)  is the state of existing and functioning as an independent organism. A child is autonomous, a fetus is not. So a fetus doesn’t not have bodily autonomy.  Thanks for your time. 

Wow. 

“This bill will be the vehicle that will ultimately provide change and provide the opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Iowa Republican state senator Rick Bertrand said of the legislation during floor debate. “There’s nothing hidden here about the agenda. You know, today the pro-life movement won a battle, but the war rages on.“’

And, for the record, whether or not a fetus is  baby isnt really the point. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

And, again, whether or not a fetus is autonomous isnt the point. Fully grown conscious AUTONOMOUS people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

Lol. k 

Human life cycle begins at conception. Check any science book.

Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

I dont particularly care how pro lifers view the issue- I care about the consequences of their legislation, which erodes bodily autonomy and reproductive control.

There is a difference between “pulling the plug” and forcible killing. You have no duty to give someone your blood to keep them alive, but you also have no justification for stabbing that person in the head and sucking their brains into a sink. Abortion is an active intervention into a natural system.

Now, we dont do this to people, especially not against their will, because its fucking EVIL.

It’s simple. Either you think it’s a human or not. If it’s human, you don’t kill it. If you don’t, well you’re stupid and tell me what species it is? Even in it’s earliest cellular form, if it isn’t human, with building blocks growing, what species off building blocks is it?

Again, whether or not a fetus is “human” isn’t being debated. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save a life.

Miscarriages happen, correct. A natural process without an external force killing the unborn human. Notice the external force part.

Your fight about spanking, income inequality, and etc makes you a hypocrite of the highest level.

Thanks

You’re defending killing of innocent life.

If you are just going to keep shouting the same fallacies and dodging the point, feel free to not reblog and find something better to do.

You are defending death of innocent humans for the purpose of “quality of life”, you have yet to define.

Access to family planning and reproductive control strongly correlates to increased quality of life in a society.

If the fetus is deemed a human it has is own body inside that of its mother. Being dependant on the mother doesn’t take away it’s rights to it’s own body.

2. Yes, it does. A fetus isn’t autonomous, so it doesn’t have bodily autonomy.  That’s…that’s how definitions work. 

They do have body autonomy. It’s a separate life. Indeed it’s inside a female but it’s still a separate body.

3. You can’t have bodily autonomy if you aren’t autonomous. Do you know what autonomy means? I don’t think you know what  autonomy means. 

3.There is no set definition when body autonomy begins. Because it’s just a theory, a concept, someone’s thought. Nice try.

3. Again, do you know what autonomous means? Do you know what autonomy means?  I don’t think you do.  I provided evidence that the two are linked.  Youre 

I do know Wednesday autonomy means. I also know body autonomy is a theory, an idea. One you try to use to solidify your point of view. You’re using theory, not fact.

3. Define autonomy for me, please. And explain how a fetus has autonomy. 

There is no definition when autonomy begins. The left’s way to replace the word life. It use to be when don’t know when life begins, and that was debunked, so the left switched to autonomy, which then can’t even be determined.

A fetus (as you try to desensitize people to it actually being an unborn child), is self governing. The DNA is instructing it to grow into a specific child.

The fact that you think children don’t have biological autonomy tells me that you don’t know what autonomy is.  Or viability, given how you said a living infant isn’t viable. Which, yeah it is. You just don’t understand those concepts. 

I’m not saying children don’t autonomy, I’m saying by liberal logic they might not.

Autonomy(referring to living things and not, like countries)  is the state of existing and functioning as an independent organism. A child is autonomous, a fetus is not. So a fetus doesn’t not have bodily autonomy.  Thanks for your time. 

Wow. 

“This bill will be the vehicle that will ultimately provide change and provide the opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Iowa Republican state senator Rick Bertrand said of the legislation during floor debate. “There’s nothing hidden here about the agenda. You know, today the pro-life movement won a battle, but the war rages on.“’

And, for the record, whether or not a fetus is  baby isnt really the point. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

And, again, whether or not a fetus is autonomous isnt the point. Fully grown conscious AUTONOMOUS people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

Lol. k 

Human life cycle begins at conception. Check any science book.

Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

I dont particularly care how pro lifers view the issue- I care about the consequences of their legislation, which erodes bodily autonomy and reproductive control.

There is a difference between “pulling the plug” and forcible killing. You have no duty to give someone your blood to keep them alive, but you also have no justification for stabbing that person in the head and sucking their brains into a sink. Abortion is an active intervention into a natural system.

Now, we dont do this to people, especially not against their will, because its fucking EVIL.

It’s simple. Either you think it’s a human or not. If it’s human, you don’t kill it. If you don’t, well you’re stupid and tell me what species it is? Even in it’s earliest cellular form, if it isn’t human, with building blocks growing, what species off building blocks is it?

Again, whether or not a fetus is “human” isn’t being debated. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save a life.

Miscarriages happen, correct. A natural process without an external force killing the unborn human. Notice the external force part.

Your fight about spanking, income inequality, and etc makes you a hypocrite of the highest level.

Thanks

You’re defending killing of innocent life.

If you are just going to keep shouting the same fallacies and dodging the point, feel free to not reblog and find something better to do.

You are defending death of innocent humans for the purpose of “quality of life”, you have yet to define.

Access to family planning and reproductive control strongly correlates to increased quality of life in a society.

If the fetus is deemed a human it has is own body inside that of its mother. Being dependant on the mother doesn’t take away it’s rights to it’s own body.

2. Yes, it does. A fetus isn’t autonomous, so it doesn’t have bodily autonomy.  That’s…that’s how definitions work. 

They do have body autonomy. It’s a separate life. Indeed it’s inside a female but it’s still a separate body.

3. You can’t have bodily autonomy if you aren’t autonomous. Do you know what autonomy means? I don’t think you know what  autonomy means. 

3.There is no set definition when body autonomy begins. Because it’s just a theory, a concept, someone’s thought. Nice try.

3. Again, do you know what autonomous means? Do you know what autonomy means?  I don’t think you do.  I provided evidence that the two are linked.  Youre 

I do know Wednesday autonomy means. I also know body autonomy is a theory, an idea. One you try to use to solidify your point of view. You’re using theory, not fact.

3. Define autonomy for me, please. And explain how a fetus has autonomy. 

There is no definition when autonomy begins. The left’s way to replace the word life. It use to be when don’t know when life begins, and that was debunked, so the left switched to autonomy, which then can’t even be determined.

A fetus (as you try to desensitize people to it actually being an unborn child), is self governing. The DNA is instructing it to grow into a specific child.

The fact that you think children don’t have biological autonomy tells me that you don’t know what autonomy is.  Or viability, given how you said a living infant isn’t viable. Which, yeah it is. You just don’t understand those concepts. 

I’m not saying children don’t autonomy, I’m saying by liberal logic they might not.

Autonomy(referring to living things and not, like countries)  is the state of existing and functioning as an independent organism. A child is autonomous, a fetus is not. So a fetus doesn’t not have bodily autonomy.  Thanks for your time. 

Wow.