The Bright Sessions

Discoholic 🪩
official daine visual archive
EXPECTATIONS

Cosimo Galluzzi
KIROKAZE

@theartofmadeline
occasionally subtle

ellievsbear
Color Me Curious
Sade Olutola
h
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

oozey mess
todays bird

shark vs the universe
𓃗
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
sheepfilms

seen from Malaysia
seen from Philippines
seen from China

seen from Japan

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Nepal

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Canada
@erik-even-wordier

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
honestly as much as i can think about it there really is no other explanation for sauron's actions on numenor other than an extremely elaborate suicide-by-cop plot that didn't work as intended
Not only are all his actions entirely counterintuitive to any previously perceived goal, his choices to willingly and unnecessarily put himself in a situation (whatever the reader may imagine that situation to fully entail) which is innately humiliating and self-destructive, and generally against his nature already set him up as a deeply unwell individual.
He clearly hates the ocean, hates Valinor, and although he considers them a preferrable people to the elves, holds nothing but disdain and disgust for the men of Numenor.
If his goal was simply to conquer Numenor and thus neutralize what threatened his dominion of Middle Earth, 50 years of allowing his kingdom on Middle Earth to disintegrate while playing mistress to a king he could easily kill or replace and building up a religion based on Melkor he fully knew held no truth is utterly batshit insane.
If his idea was to prove his loyalty to Melkor, or genuinely attempt to use Numenoreans to break the door of night and release Melkor, why intentionally lead them astray with misinformation that will have them flounder, and continuously undermine his own possible force and trustworthiness by putting thousands to meaningless human sacrifice? Additionally, Sauron is not stupid enough to believe Valinor could ever be conquered by mortals. That said, he didn't exactly have any elves at his disposal post the Celebrimbor debacle, but he would very well know a plan like that was doomed from the start.
If his intention was purely to ruin a good thing out of spite, boredom, and pride, wanting it entirely destroyed from the beginning, he would have constructed proper routes that would have given him an easy way to flee Numenor, preserving his fair form and dignity, (and of course the ring) and demonstrate his point. And even if he had not forseen another rising of the sea (which he probably would, considering how impactful the first one was to him), there would be some indication of a plan for an empty or near-empty island-- he would likely have held back a portion of the King's Men or even a single empty boat to have literally any indication of intent to survive beyond its failure.
However, I don't think that he really wanted any of those things. He might not even have known fully what he did want, as I'll make a claim to say after the creation of the ring he shows barely any that vain sense of self which he prides himself on in the first age. Playing out this charade on Numenor, however, successfully serves one aim-- rashly provoking the attention of all the Valar and Iluvatar himself, who he knows even with the ring he stands not a sliver of a chance against, and who will likely not hesitate if they can to capture him, destroy him, or throw him out past the Door of Night like they did his predecessor.
He has refused trial once before, because even if according to Tolkien he might have felt some repentance, the idea of intentional surrender has been to him for ten millennia the most repugnant of sins.
This is a charade presenting himself as fighting with all his strength, while all actions examined demonstrate a profound draw towards grievous and catastrophic personal harm, bringing down as much of the world the Valar and Ilivatar love as possible with him. If this Numenor thing tears the immortal world into enough chaos, the Valar would surely not deign to offer him trial, and would as per Melkor skip straight to sentencing, to obliteration, something which Sauron would and could not, after the creation of the ring, possibly do for himself.
And this succeeds. Entirely so. As the attack of the Numenoreans on Valinor clearly begins to lead all forces to mass slaughter and the seas rise, Sauron does not flee when the jig is up, but stands atop Melkor's temple, continuing to theatrically throw himself upon the Valar, painting a massive target on his own head. However, it does not work as he was hoping it might. Quite possibly because of the Ring, Iluvatar and the Valar won't, or cannot send him beyond the Door of Night, where he might be with Melkor or even simply be free of a campaign of terror far too long underway to take back. They painfully and humiliatingly refuse to sever his spirit from Arda, and destroy everything he holds within the circles of the world, which he remains still powerless to leave.
It's, if interpreting Iluvatar as a humanoid-enough thinking being, an incredibly idiotic move-- forever removing the last remnant of options for Sauron to decide to quit. He cannot impeccably change forms and live unhunted as a beast or new being. He cannot discorporate and leave the circles of Arda on his own. He has no purpose other than to serve Melkor, and in his absence, becomes Melkor, a wound on the earth continuously bleeding black oil onto everything he touches. And in at least a halfhearted attempt to halt the envelopment of the old world, he instead made it drastically worse.
Well yeah, so. He is a creature of pride and war-manners believing that surrender comes only when you have demonstrated the full extent of your ability-- that choosing surrender was worse than a loss. So he must manufacture one, and instead only dooms himself far more deeply.
The problem with a lot of "progressive" ideas for Utopia is that if you scratch the surface just a little, you find that there are entire classes of people their utopia has no room for, just like the Right.
And neither of their futures has any room for the Jews.
Either you are building a future for EVERYONE, or you are just peddling the same old divide and conquer and apocalyptic war shit as every tyrant for millennia, and "WE'RE actually the good guys and will totally win and end all suffering forever once we destroy the Others who totally deserve it" sounds no more convincing than every other time we've heard it.
If you regret a permanent body alteration you got and your immediate thought is "raise the legal age for everybody who can do this" instead of "Maybe I, specifically, was a dipshit" you need to get Gotten by a mountain lion
The LENGTHS that some people will go to in order to avoid acknowledging that they're a dipshit are truly astonishing
Honestly if we just normalize laughing at yourself that would probably do a number on this kind of fascist bullshit

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Autumn Hill left a Prairieland ICE facility protest before it turned violent. She was still sentenced to 50 years as part of Trump's war on
They're sending a trans woman to prison for life over the fact that she attended an anti-ICE protest where a cop died (she had already left the protest when the 'violence' started)
MAGA boomers SHOCKED by 20y/o commie speaking fluent hog
Hog 201 for anyone interested in trying this:
Bodily autonomy (like abortion, anti draft, etc) -> “The government shouldn’t be able to force anything on my body I don’t want.”
Anti surveillance -> “I don’t trust big government/big tech (big brother if you’re feeling frisky) with the ability to spy on me and my family.”
Immigration -> “Next to all of us immigrated at some point, I don’t see why the elites get to decide who’s allowed to be where. What’s to stop them coming for me?”
Climate Change -> “Big oil shouldn’t get to determine whether or not I get to go places. I don’t want to be dependent on some big business to survive.”
State Violence -> “I don’t want the goddamn secret police breathing down my neck! I trust my community a whole hell of a lot more to help me than I do the state!”
The vast majority of conservatives think of themselves as underdogs being repressed by the government/the elite, and they value personal freedom (specifically their personal freedom, they don’t care about other people). The will almost always agree with leftist points if you can find a way to blame the problem on their vague enemies (useful, since rich people are the root of most problems), and tie it back to their ability to say fuck everyone else. NEVER appeal to science, theory, logic, or human goodness. Make it seem as if you are a paranoid lunatic who trusts no one. They love it.
This needs to be brought up from the tags:
#careful with the ''elitists'' though #you know you're talking about billionaires #but a lot of conspiracy theorists will assume you mean jews
The average person literally has no idea what is going on. Trump’s news avalanche of the past decade has made normal people who are not news junkies wary of paying attention to any of this shit, so they are completely ignorant to almost all of it.
I am a single issue voter: punish the villains.
When Did Everything Become ‘K-Shaped’?
What started as a term to describe the pandemic recovery has become a catchall in these anxious economic times. By Lora Kelley Dec. 19, 2025
Holiday spending this year is expected to surpass $1 trillion for the first time, according to the National Retail Federation. But it’s the very wealthy, making expensive purchases, who will be driving much of that spending while many lower-income Americans will buy discounted versions of items or finance them with credit cards. Call it the “K-shaped” economy, holiday edition.
“When people talk about the K-shaped economy, they’re talking about an economy that is being experienced very differently across the population,” said Joanne Hsu, the director of the Surveys of Consumers at the University of Michigan. The wealthy, represented by the line of the K that is angled up, are spending confidently. The less wealthy, the line trending down, are scrambling to make ends meet. This “bifurcation,” Dr. Hsu said, is visible in surveys about consumer sentiment.
“K-shaped” entered the popular parlance in 2020 and is now ubiquitous, used for divergent consumer outlooks, unsteady spending at stores and restaurants, and even corporate stumbles, as some companies, especially tech-focused ones, thrive while the prospects of others decline. Moody’s Analytics recently estimated that the top 10 percent of households were responsible for nearly half of all spending.
Peter Atwater, a lecturer in economics at the College of William & Mary, is credited with popularizing the term. He saw an account on X (then Twitter) using “K-shaped” to describe the uneven ways different people were recovering from the pandemic and thought the framing sounded apt. “I hoped it would be short-lived,” he added.
Instead, the term and the conditions underpinning it have persisted. In the years since the pandemic, financial markets have hit record highs, and the wealthiest Americans have been on “an escalator” going up, Mr. Atwater said. But lower-income families have been struggling. Wages are rising most slowly for the lowest-paid workers, data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta shows; the unemployment rate has ticked up to 4.6 percent, the highest in four years; and tariffs, inflation and the job-market risks of artificial intelligence have only added to economic stress. In Bank of America’s 2025 Holiday Survey, 62 percent reported feeling financial strain, and 87 percent of those respondents said they planned to shop at discount stores.
On earnings calls, some executives are talking about people seeking value and trading down, while companies offering luxury products are seeing sales flourish. Delta Air Lines, for example, said in October that premium tickets were set to outpace coach sales.
The Federal Reserve chair, Jerome H. Powell, has acknowledged this gap. “If you listen to the earnings calls or the reports of big, public, consumer-facing companies,” he said at a news conference last month, “many, many of them are saying that there’s a bifurcated economy there and that consumers at the lower end are struggling and buying less and shifting to lower-cost products,” though wealthier people are still spending.
Americans are currently living in two different worlds, said Mr. Atwater, who popularized K-shaped. “Those at the bottom can’t help but notice the overabundance above them.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/business/k-shaped-economy.html
A "K-shaped economy" means different groups are experiencing the economy differently, with top income earners doing better than those making
Every time I see someone being like "we need to ally ourselves with the Democrat party because we need a larger more structured organization to fight properly" I remember a story my social studies teacher told us once (I forget a lot of the specific but remember the gist).
Back in 18eleventy2, the people's liberation army of Slavislavia joined forces with Count Murder von OnlyNobleBloodMatters to have the numbers to overthrow the royal family. They're now chiefly remembered for assassinating the entire royal family and then dying mysteriously after handing the country over to Count Murder von OnlyNobleBloodMatters, who instituted the beginning of the 'Hundred years of Oppression and Murderslavery'. The lesson behind their downfall is 'the powerful only offer a hand when it's to benefit themselves' and anyone who forgets this ends up losing everything for a gain of nothing.
And this has happened with revolutionary forces countless times thru history.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
There's really this strong temptation that everyone has which basically says "to have interiority is to be like me; ordinary people are surface everywhere." And this manifests in different ways in different spaces, and becomes really pronounced when you cluster together with similar people. So tumblr users often act like straight people don't have any interiority because it helps you feel the deepening of social bonds with other gay people. This happens professionally too. I think it was Summer or Sharks who was saying that programming people think that intelligence is just being really good at writing code. Not surprising but very strange to me! I am (equally ridiculously) used to thinking that intelligence is being really good at philosophy, having command of a lot of sources that you can use creatively, etc. This reflects a kind of dynamic on tumblr and reddit. On reddit to have interiority is to be a science guy and on tumblr to have interiority is to be a humanities girl (and the dynamic is gendered in exactly this way). And I think there is something dangerous about habitually regarding other people as automatons. It's good to have people outside of your niche to remind you that other people from different walks of life are quite deep and complicated. They are full of love and fine grained attention to things you never thought to care about. And I think a lot of people go through life thinking of themselves as perpetually victimized by basically empty people rather than having genuine confrontations with full, genuine people who are committed to subtle, complex and real values, who have detailed and intricate histories, and who have a bond to you that you might never quite fully understand. But we rarely even try at understanding these things. We just decide that they're stupid and ridiculous and unreasonable.
By way of clarifying contrast: a force with low morale might melt away from desertion even when there’s not fighting going on, because no one is invested in the cause. A force with low cohesion (but high morale) might panic and disperse in a battle but reform later to fight again: they remain committed to the cause, but unable to handle the terror of battle collectively. A force with bad morale but high cohesion is very dangerous to a general, because that is the raw material for mutinies: the men will hold together against you as quickly as for you.
Sadly America's sailors today lack the cohesion of their fellows on the Potemkin
somehow Russia regularly fields all of these variations simultaneously
it takes time to build up societal antibodies to information overload and over the past thirty years we've seen shocks from the web, search engines, social media (text, photos, then short-form video), and now AI, all compounded by the transition from desktop computers accessing the internet through modems to being connected by phones in our hands 24/7.
what future future shocks can we anticipate from this point? seems a bit trite to imagine the next take on VR, a bit rash to jump to human uploads, there are probably at least a few more iterations of social media we haven't yet envisaged.
I feel like I hate AI slightly less than the average Tumblr user, but it still scares the shit out of me to see how many people now engage in internet arguments by submitting their opponent’s argument to an AI bot and saying “explain why this is wrong and I am right.” It is concerning first because most AI models are sycophants that will tell you exactly what you want to hear, which makes then extremely potent delusion-confirmers. But it’s even more concerning because learning how to argue for yourself— how to evaluate claims, to assess an argument, to find and check sources, to spot flaws in someone’s case— is one of the most important skills you can have in life. If you don’t have that, you are unable to evaluate what is true for yourself. You will walk right into the arms of the first crackpot or cult that talks to you when you don’t have Claude available. Extremely grim portent that many people seem to find this acceptable
fwiw, here's what opus 5 said when I asked it to argue with this:
^ superpersuasion
Acknowledging the post's validity despite it coming from Brett
Pros And Cons Of Flock Cameras
Surveillance company Flock’s automatic license plate readers, which are used by over 5,000 law enforcement agencies across 49 states, are generating controversy. The Onion examines the pros and cons of the technology.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
there are so many movies about a dystopian future in which fascism takes hold in America (or Britain) and it usually comes down to adapting the aesthetic of the 1930s and '40s to modern times, which feels pretty fake, or sometimes basing it on something more authentic to America like exaggerated militia culture, and it's interesting to compare that with the current MAGA moment in America, especially as it starts to look more vulnerable rather than ascendant.
(there's also the contrast with past movements in America like the Confederacy or the KKK or uh simply regular America tbh, but I think the key to a fascist regime is that it's self consciously positioning itself as such).
Revolting little machine I hope someone guy fawkeses you too.
(Context: was trying to find the text of a version of the Guy Fawkes poem which ends 'are we glad that they stopped him or not?' Was not expecting this thing to run defence for the UK parliament 400 years ago)
Btw, if you ever wanted an indicator of the ideological censorship that now exists, and how pervasive it has become? The poem I was looking for, with its implication that maybe it might not have been a bad thing to blow up parliament way back when, was published in a children's book two decades ago. Without incident. Now I can't even SEARCH for that poem without receiving a telling off for its contents.