The Expressiveness of the Body and the Divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine, Shigehisa Kuriyama (1999)
âphysicians of the empiricist school insisted on the distance separating the anatomical definition of the pulse and the actual experience of the fingers.âÂ
âHow do pulse and palpitation differ?â
âBasic to this divorce was the new perception of the body defined by dissection.â
âtransformâŚfrom a vague occasional oddity into a vital signâ
âsystematic anatomyâ
âThe earliest evidence of systematic anatomy appears in the animal dissections of Aristotleâ
âPhlebes, moreover, stretched the length of the body in routes that cannot be directly matched with anatomical blood vessels.â
âPraxagoras also took an interest in both dissection and pulsation.â
âphysicians of the empiricist school insisted on the distance separating the anatomical definition of the pulse and the actual experience of the fingers. What our fingers feel, the empiricists contended, is merely the sensation of being struck.â
âno necessity dictates the pulsetakerâs approach. There are other ways to cradle meaning at the wrist.â
âroughly mirrored the spatial organization of the bodyâ
âAll approaches took for granted that the meaning of what the fingers felt, depended on where they felt.â
âits grammar was topologicalâ
âGreek diagnosticians evinced little interest in, or even awareness of, the differing feel of the pulse in distant parts.â [in different parts, different places]
âone inspects the wrist because the pulse there can be felt clearlyâ
âhe conjures of the image of their frantic pantingâ
âNo major blood vessel matches these meanderings from ankle to eye.â
âhow and why treating one site on the body solved [involved] suffering in other, distant partsâ














