i’m not going to talk about this too much hopefully but in the literacy meltdown we are experiencing as a nation (as a world, and only worsening with the rapid propagation of machines designed to do our thinking for us), it feels insidious and dystopian to watch the most prominent figure in book publishing go on a podcast (one of the largest in the world) and lament about how literature is boring, intellectualism is out, and bend over backwards to convince the audience that she’s actually a cool-girl (i have a labubu! me and margot (robbie, but we’re on a first name basis) are sooo similar, hand me a spicy marg!), while also answering as few direct questions as possible about her literature.
there were opportunities to address controversy within her books and she skirted them all with half answers (why make feyre’s pregnancy so horrific and strip her of all her bodily autonomy? sjm talked about her own pregnancy for 10+ mins, but never closed the loop on this. yes, it was the author’s own experience. WHY write it this way? to not shrink back from reality, to hold up a mirror so other women might feel represented? both good reasons. if the doctor who brutalized sarah is an asshole, why did his fictional counterpart face no repercussions? — why do the women routinely lose their powers and the men do not? sacrifice is important. okay, agreed! why are only the women making these sacrifices time and time again?)
i know it’s foolish to look to someone like sjm of alllll people for a scrap of intellectualism in this bleak landscape, but i will never stop believing that power begets responsibility. if she’s going to be the face of publishing (which is a pedestal she has earned through massive sales and engagement, because her writing resonates with her devoted readers), can she at the very least show some semblance of respect for the institution? i’m so tired of the booktok girlypop anti-intellectual feminism i can’t take it anymore














