Why do EU countries, the USA and Canada allow migrants from third world countries to visit them?
I will answer this question, which is being asked by more and more people every day. I will answer it clearly and quite specifically, but first, a short preface.
In January of this year, I had a meeting with a businessman and one of the former officials from one of the EU countries. He asked me not to mention his real name if I wanted to share the information he told me, so we'll call him Matteo.
We met to discuss my startup to create the MEIS processor architecture, Matteo contacted me himself, and we agreed that I would personally tell him all the details.
During our conversation, we somehow imperceptibly turned to personal topics, and I asked about migrants out of interest. I asked Matteo why the prosperous countries of Europe let in a large number of frankly marginal people from third world countries who regularly commit serious crimes.
I expressed my point of view that allowing a large number of extremely marginalized people from third world countries to enter the prosperous countries of Europe is fraught with big problems for the local population and for tourists. Rising crime, rising government spending on benefits, security, medicine, and additional strain on infrastructure are just some of the problems that migrants from third world countries are bringing.
Matteo listened to me carefully and gave me a detailed answer that sheds light on why all this is happening.
So, there are only three reasons why the EU countries, as well as the USA and Canada, allow migrants from third world countries to visit them, and they are interconnected with each other. I will name these reasons and reveal each of them in detail.:
1. Political reasons. The education of managerial personnel and the imposition of Western culture on ordinary people.
It is no secret that Western countries are actively developing trade and social relations with third world countries. There are huge amounts of minerals being mined in third world countries, and due to the population growth of these countries, there is a potentially large market for goods and services produced in Western countries.
In order to more effectively influence these countries in all spheres of their lives, control their policies and have access to their resources, it was decided to gradually socialize the population of these countries and instill in them Western values and culture of behavior. To do this, elites from third world countries are lured away and integrated into Western elites, money from elites from third world countries is stored in banks in Europe and the United States, and children of elites from third world countries study at the best universities in Europe, the United States and Canada. Also, to expand their influence on third world countries, European countries, the USA and Canada actively accept migrants from these countries.
Many of these migrants, enriched by Western culture, will return to their homeland and pass on elements of Western culture to everyone else. Language, some everyday habits, preferences in music, cinema, and much more flesh out some elements of democracy and human rights. Not all migrants stay in developed countries forever, many of them return to their homeland and there they are already trying to build their lives by passing on those elements of Western culture that they have absorbed into themselves.
But even more importantly, the elites of the third world countries are also gradually democratizing those societies in which they have a privileged position under the influence of Western culture. This process is gradual, but extremely effective.
European countries, the United States and Canada benefit politically from accepting migrants from third world countries, as they extend their influence to these countries by promoting Western values there and using the resources of these countries.
Despite the harsh criticism of nationalists from Western countries, not all migrants live on benefits and engage in criminal activities. Many people work in extremely low-paying jobs where the local population refuses to work. A lot of migrants end up in labor slavery in the European Union and the United States, working for pennies for 14 hours a day, without any rights. Anyone who says that migrants only spend their budget by receiving benefits has probably never thought about who works in the lowest-paying jobs. Practice and statistics show that migrants are economically beneficial to businesses, allowing many sectors of the Western economy to be competitive. Yes, of course, there are costs that representatives of far-right parties regularly talk about, but none of them talk about the benefits that low-paid labor brings, which is also a consumer of goods and services, creating additional GDP growth.
Most EU countries have been experiencing demographic decline for many years and even decades. Demographic growth is necessary to maintain a high standard of living and a competitive economy, and migrants have become one of the options for solving the demographic problem. The indigenous population of the EU countries has recently become so interested in the subject of consumption and living for themselves that they have stopped creating large families. The indigenous youth of the EU countries want to earn more money, live for their own pleasure, and are not eager to create families and take responsibility for their children. For this reason, it is necessary to resort to importing migrants from other countries, not necessarily from third world countries, the countries of Eastern Europe also participate in this process.
I listened to Matteo for a long time, during our conversation we exchanged opinions, and Matteo brought two or more of his arguments to each of my arguments. At some point, I realized that I had no arguments left and it looked like he was right in what he was saying. At least there is truth in his words.
He was interested in my startup MEIS and the very idea of creating a new processor architecture, and he promised to help me attract donations and finance the project itself, as well as solve some technical issues within his competence.
Our conversation with Matteo ended with a firm handshake and friendly hugs, and I was pleased to talk to him. Matteo explained to me what I couldn't understand for a long time, and now I understand the deep logic and consistent actions of the European leadership.