not at all interested in entering the debate over who can write what rn, not the point of this post. but it has been a source of alienation to me for a while that a lot of discussions re: how women relate to sexual offences in fiction assume a default position for the group as one of stastically potential victims that however have, in the majority, probably not experienced sexual offenses firsthand. i have met many women that haven't been raped, true, but i have never met a single one (i am not exaggerating, though i can grant my experience is not universal. this is why i am saying this is alienating to me, in my social context) that, when the topic was raised, couldn't dig up not one but multiple stories of sexual harassment of some kind: groping, threats of rape, being followed home with that intent, people masturbating on them in public, people exposing themselves to them, unsolicited requests to remove clothes, send naked pictures, exchange sexual services for professional favours etc etc etc. having one experience doesn't mean you can "claim ownership" over adjacent ones: if you haven't been raped you haven't been raped and if you have been raped any other rape will in any case be different from yours. it's important to track this, especially as, unless you are writing an autobiography, you are always in some way contending with a subjective experience that doesn't precisely trace yours. but unless you think the problems of so called "rape culture" as a gendered issue - their source, the identification of harm, their consequences - begin and end with rape considered as an isolated act i don't know how to justify framing these women as not actual victims of that culture, as people who have exclusively experienced its probabilistic risk. this is not how i live